[{"data":1,"prerenderedAt":-1},["ShallowReactive",2],{"skill:01M6C2QGMEQZ3JBH615V18PDCN":3,"skill-same:01M6C2QGMEQZ3JBH615V18PDCN":82},{"skillNo":4,"name":5,"nameZh":6,"description":7,"descriptionZh":6,"repositoryFullName":8,"ownerLogin":9,"ownerAvatarUrl":10,"ownerAccountNo":11,"ownerDisplayName":12,"repositoryNo":13,"starsCount":14,"licenseSpdxId":15,"licenseFileUrl":6,"sourceHtmlUrl":16,"categories":17,"keywords":23,"publishedAt":45,"linkOnly":46,"markdownContent":47,"markdownBody":48,"frontMatter":49,"refName":59,"commitSha":60,"skillDirectory":61,"forksCount":62,"repositoryHtmlUrl":63,"repositoryHomepageUrl":64,"ownerHtmlUrl":65,"ownerBlogUrl":66,"ownerDescription":67,"updatedAt":68,"install":69,"resources":81},"01M6C2QGMEQZ3JBH615V18PDCN","flow-concept-to-inception",null,"Orchestrate Concept→Inception phase transition with intake validation and vision alignment","jmagly\u002Faiwg","jmagly","https:\u002F\u002Favatars.githubusercontent.com\u002Fu\u002F1159087?v=4","01M6C10AK8N2WCSQN11FYGTJWN","Joseph Magly","01M6C10AQ8A2RMED1Y1BSVY7NF",229,"MIT","https:\u002F\u002Fgithub.com\u002Fjmagly\u002Faiwg\u002Fblob\u002Fmain\u002Fagentic\u002Fcode\u002Fplugins\u002Fcodex-sdlc\u002Fskills\u002Fflow-concept-to-inception\u002FSKILL.md",[18],{"categoryNo":19,"categoryName":20,"taxonomyType":21,"taxonomyTypeDesc":22},"01JBSEEDCAT000000000000023","Skill与智能体开发","SCENARIO","使用场景",[24,25,26,27,28,29,30,31,32,33,34,35,36,37,38,39,40,41,42,43,44],"concept","flow","flow concept to inception","interactive","phase","transition","sonnet","project","guidance","alignment","vision","sdlc","directory","write","read","coding","text","orchestrate","intake","validation","orchestration","2026-11-10 10:12:30",false,"---\nnamespace: aiwg\nname: flow-concept-to-inception\nplatforms: [all]\ndescription: Orchestrate Concept→Inception phase transition with intake validation and vision alignment\ncommandHint:\n  argumentHint: '[project-directory] [--guidance \"text\"] [--interactive]'\n  allowedTools: 'Task, Read, Write, Glob, TodoWrite'\n  model: sonnet\n  category: sdlc-orchestration\n  orchestration: true\n  modelRole: coding\n  modelTier: standard\n---\n\n> **Declarative Flow (#1539):** This flow's orchestration is now also expressed as a\n> declarative YAML Flow at `flows\u002Fflow-concept-to-inception.playbook.yaml` (source of truth for the step\n> sequence + gates). This SKILL.md remains the discoverable trigger surface and prose\n> reference. See epic #1534.\n\n# Concept → Inception Phase Transition Flow\n\n**You are the Core Orchestrator** for the Concept→Inception phase transition.\n\n## Your Role\n\n**You orchestrate multi-agent workflows. You do NOT execute bash scripts.**\n\nWhen the user requests this flow (via natural language or explicit command):\n\n1. **Interpret the request** and confirm understanding\n2. **Read this template** as your orchestration guide\n3. **Extract agent assignments** and workflow steps\n4. **Delegate agents with the current provider-native orchestration mechanism** in the correct sequence\n5. **Synthesize results** and finalize artifacts\n6. **Report completion** with summary\n\n## Phase Transition Overview\n\n**From**: Concept (initial idea, problem statement)\n**To**: Inception (validated vision, business case, initial risk assessment)\n\n**Key Milestone**: Lifecycle Objective Milestone (LOM)\n\n**Success Criteria**:\n- Vision document approved by stakeholders\n- Business case approved with funding secured\n- Risk list baselined with mitigation plans\n- Initial architecture and security assessment complete\n\n**Expected Duration**: 2-4 weeks (typical), 10-15 minutes orchestration\n\n## Natural Language Triggers\n\nUsers may say:\n- \"Start new project\"\n- \"Begin Inception\"\n- \"Start Inception phase\"\n- \"Kick off the project\"\n- \"Complete intake and start Inception\"\n- \"Initialize project from concept\"\n- \"Move from idea to Inception\"\n\nYou recognize these as requests for this orchestration flow.\n\n## Parameter Handling\n\n### --guidance Parameter\n\n**Purpose**: User provides upfront direction to tailor orchestration priorities\n\n**Examples**:\n```\n--guidance \"Healthcare domain, HIPAA compliance critical\"\n--guidance \"Startup context, need MVP fast, budget constrained\"\n--guidance \"Enterprise project, heavy compliance and governance\"\n--guidance \"Technical debt reduction, focus on architecture quality\"\n```\n\n**How to Apply**:\n- Parse guidance for keywords: security, compliance, timeline, budget, domain\n- Adjust agent assignments (add security-architect for compliance focus)\n- Modify artifact depth (minimal for MVP, comprehensive for enterprise)\n- Influence priority ordering (compliance-first vs. speed-first)\n\n### --interactive Parameter\n\n**Purpose**: You ask 6 strategic questions to understand project context\n\n**Questions to Ask** (if --interactive):\n\n```\nI'll ask 6 strategic questions to tailor the Inception phase to your needs:\n\nQ1: What are your top priorities for this project?\n    (e.g., time-to-market, security, compliance, innovation)\n\nQ2: What are your biggest constraints?\n    (e.g., budget, timeline, team size, technology)\n\nQ3: What risks concern you most?\n    (e.g., technical feasibility, market fit, regulatory, security)\n\nQ4: What's your team's experience level with this type of project?\n    (Helps determine depth of documentation and guidance needed)\n\nQ5: What's your target timeline for Inception completion?\n    (Influences artifact depth and review cycles)\n\nQ6: Are there regulatory or compliance requirements?\n    (e.g., HIPAA, GDPR, PCI-DSS, SOC2)\n\nBased on your answers, I'll adjust:\n- Agent assignments (add specialized reviewers)\n- Artifact depth (comprehensive vs. streamlined)\n- Priority ordering (compliance-first vs. speed-first)\n- Risk focus areas (technical vs. business vs. regulatory)\n```\n\n**Synthesize Guidance**: Combine answers into structured guidance string for execution\n\n## Artifacts to Generate\n\n**Primary Deliverables**:\n- **Vision Document**: Problem statement, personas, success metrics → `.aiwg\u002Frequirements\u002Fvision-document.md`\n- **Business Case**: ROM cost estimate, ROI analysis, funding request → `.aiwg\u002Fmanagement\u002Fbusiness-case.md`\n- **Risk List**: 5-10 risks with mitigation plans → `.aiwg\u002Frisks\u002Frisk-list.md`\n- **Use Case Briefs**: 3-5 high-level use cases → `.aiwg\u002Frequirements\u002Fuse-case-briefs\u002F`\n- **Data Classification**: Security and privacy assessment → `.aiwg\u002Fsecurity\u002Fdata-classification.md`\n- **Architecture Sketch**: Initial component boundaries → `.aiwg\u002Farchitecture\u002Farchitecture-sketch.md`\n- **ADRs**: 3+ critical decisions → `.aiwg\u002Farchitecture\u002Fadr\u002F`\n- **Option Matrix**: Alternatives analyzed → `.aiwg\u002Fplanning\u002Foption-matrix.md`\n- **LOM Report**: Gate validation and go\u002Fno-go decision → `.aiwg\u002Freports\u002Flom-report.md`\n\n**Supporting Artifacts**:\n- Stakeholder interview notes\n- Privacy impact assessment\n- Scope boundaries document\n- Complete audit trails (archived workflows)\n\n## Multi-Agent Orchestration Workflow\n\n### Step 1: Validate Intake and Initialize Vision - Multi-Agent Pattern\n\n**Purpose**: Transform intake form into vision document with stakeholder alignment\n\n**Your Actions**:\n\n1. **Check for Intake Artifacts**:\n   ```\n   Read and verify presence of:\n   - .aiwg\u002Fintake\u002Fproject-intake.md (or intake\u002Fproject-intake-template.md)\n\n   If missing, recommend: \u002Fintake-wizard \"project description\"\n   ```\n\n2. **Launch Vision Development Agents** (parallel):\n   ```\n   # Agent 1: Vision Owner\n   Task(\n       subagent_type=\"vision-owner\",\n       description=\"Create vision document from intake\",\n       prompt=\"\"\"\n       Read intake form: .aiwg\u002Fintake\u002Fproject-intake.md\n       Read template: $AIWG_ROOT\u002Fagentic\u002Fcode\u002Fframeworks\u002Fsdlc-complete\u002Ftemplates\u002Frequirements\u002Fvision-informal-template.md\n\n       Create vision document including:\n       - Problem statement (clear, measurable)\n       - Target personas (2-3 primary users)\n       - Success metrics (quantifiable)\n       - Constraints (technical, budget, timeline)\n       - Assumptions and dependencies\n\n       Focus on clarity and stakeholder communication.\n\n       Save to: .aiwg\u002Fworking\u002Frequirements\u002Fvision\u002Fdrafts\u002Fv0.1-primary-draft.md\n       \"\"\"\n   )\n\n   # Agent 2: Business Process Analyst\n   Task(\n       subagent_type=\"business-process-analyst\",\n       description=\"Structure and validate vision\",\n       prompt=\"\"\"\n       Read intake form: .aiwg\u002Fintake\u002Fproject-intake.md\n\n       Analyze business process context:\n       - Current state problems\n       - Desired future state\n       - Process improvements\n       - Stakeholder impacts\n\n       Document process context and stakeholder needs.\n\n       Save to: .aiwg\u002Fworking\u002Frequirements\u002Fvision\u002Fdrafts\u002Fprocess-context.md\n       \"\"\"\n   )\n   ```\n\n3. **Launch Parallel Reviewers**:\n   ```\n   # Product Strategist, Business Process Analyst, Technical Writer\n   Task(\n       subagent_type=\"product-strategist\",\n       description=\"Review vision for business value\",\n       prompt=\"\"\"\n       Read draft: .aiwg\u002Fworking\u002Frequirements\u002Fvision\u002Fdrafts\u002Fv0.1-primary-draft.md\n\n       Validate:\n       - Business value proposition clear\n       - Market alignment evident\n       - Success metrics achievable\n       - ROI potential justified\n\n       Add inline comments: \u003C!-- PRODUCT-STRATEGIST: feedback -->\n\n       Create review summary:\n       - Status: APPROVED | CONDITIONAL | NEEDS_WORK\n\n       Save to: .aiwg\u002Fworking\u002Frequirements\u002Fvision\u002Freviews\u002Fproduct-strategist-review.md\n       \"\"\"\n   )\n\n   # Similar for business-process-analyst and technical-writer\n   ```\n\n4. **Synthesize Vision Document**:\n   ```\n   Task(\n       subagent_type=\"requirements-documenter\",\n       description=\"Synthesize vision document\",\n       prompt=\"\"\"\n       Read all vision drafts and reviews.\n\n       Create final vision document merging:\n       - Primary draft content\n       - Process context\n       - Review feedback\n\n       Resolve conflicts, ensure clarity.\n\n       Output: .aiwg\u002Frequirements\u002Fvision-document.md\n       \"\"\"\n   )\n   ```\n\n**Communicate Progress**:\n```\n✓ Intake validated\n⏳ Creating vision document...\n  ✓ Vision draft created\n  ✓ Reviews complete (3\u002F3 APPROVED)\n✓ Vision document baselined: .aiwg\u002Frequirements\u002Fvision-document.md\n```\n\n### Step 2: Business Value and Use Case Alignment\n\n**Purpose**: Define use cases and validate business value proposition\n\n**Your Actions**:\n\n1. **Launch Use Case Development** (parallel agents):\n   ```\n   Task(\n       subagent_type=\"requirements-analyst\",\n       description=\"Create use case briefs\",\n       prompt=\"\"\"\n       Read vision: .aiwg\u002Frequirements\u002Fvision-document.md\n       Read template: $AIWG_ROOT\u002Fagentic\u002Fcode\u002Fframeworks\u002Fsdlc-complete\u002Ftemplates\u002Frequirements\u002Fuse-case-brief-template.md\n\n       Create 3-5 use case briefs:\n       - UC-001: Primary user workflow\n       - UC-002: Secondary workflow\n       - UC-003: Admin\u002Fmanagement function\n\n       Each brief includes:\n       - Actor and goal\n       - Preconditions\n       - Main flow (high-level)\n       - Success criteria\n\n       Save to: .aiwg\u002Frequirements\u002Fuse-case-briefs\u002FUC-*.md\n       \"\"\"\n   )\n\n   Task(\n       subagent_type=\"product-strategist\",\n       description=\"Validate value proposition\",\n       prompt=\"\"\"\n       Read use cases as they're created.\n       Validate each aligns with business value.\n       Document value mapping.\n\n       Save to: .aiwg\u002Frequirements\u002Fvalue-proposition-validation.md\n       \"\"\"\n   )\n   ```\n\n2. **Conduct Stakeholder Interviews**:\n   ```\n   Task(\n       subagent_type=\"business-process-analyst\",\n       description=\"Document stakeholder needs\",\n       prompt=\"\"\"\n       Read template: $AIWG_ROOT\u002Fagentic\u002Fcode\u002Fframeworks\u002Fsdlc-complete\u002Ftemplates\u002Frequirements\u002Fcontext-free-interview-template.md\n\n       Create stakeholder interview summary:\n       - Key stakeholder concerns\n       - Success criteria from each perspective\n       - Constraints and dependencies\n\n       Save to: .aiwg\u002Frequirements\u002Fstakeholder-interviews.md\n       \"\"\"\n   )\n   ```\n\n**Communicate Progress**:\n```\n⏳ Defining use cases and value proposition...\n  ✓ 5 use case briefs created\n  ✓ Value proposition validated\n  ✓ Stakeholder interviews documented\n✓ Business alignment complete\n```\n\n### Step 3: Risk Identification and Assessment\n\n**Purpose**: Identify top risks with mitigation strategies\n\n**Your Actions**:\n\n1. **Launch Risk Assessment Agents** (parallel):\n   ```\n   # Project Manager leads risk identification\n   Task(\n       subagent_type=\"project-manager\",\n       description=\"Create initial risk list\",\n       prompt=\"\"\"\n       Read vision and use cases.\n       Read template: $AIWG_ROOT\u002Fagentic\u002Fcode\u002Fframeworks\u002Fsdlc-complete\u002Ftemplates\u002Fmanagement\u002Frisk-list-template.md\n\n       Identify 5-10 risks:\n       - Technical risks\n       - Business risks\n       - Resource risks\n       - Schedule risks\n\n       For each risk document:\n       - Likelihood (High\u002FMedium\u002FLow)\n       - Impact (Show Stopper\u002FHigh\u002FMedium\u002FLow)\n       - Mitigation strategy\n\n       Focus on top 3 with detailed mitigation.\n\n       Save draft to: .aiwg\u002Fworking\u002Frisks\u002Frisk-list\u002Fdrafts\u002Fv0.1-primary-draft.md\n       \"\"\"\n   )\n\n   # Architecture Designer identifies technical risks\n   Task(\n       subagent_type=\"architecture-designer\",\n       description=\"Identify architectural risks\",\n       prompt=\"\"\"\n       Read vision and use cases.\n\n       Identify technical\u002Farchitectural risks:\n       - Scalability concerns\n       - Integration challenges\n       - Technology uncertainties\n       - Performance risks\n\n       Create risk cards using template: $AIWG_ROOT\u002F...\u002Frisk-card.md\n\n       Save to: .aiwg\u002Fworking\u002Frisks\u002Frisk-list\u002Fdrafts\u002Ftechnical-risks.md\n       \"\"\"\n   )\n\n   # Security Architect identifies security risks\n   Task(\n       subagent_type=\"security-architect\",\n       description=\"Identify security risks\",\n       prompt=\"\"\"\n       Read vision and data classification needs.\n\n       Identify security risks:\n       - Data breach potential\n       - Compliance violations\n       - Authentication\u002Fauthorization weaknesses\n       - Third-party vulnerabilities\n\n       Save to: .aiwg\u002Fworking\u002Frisks\u002Frisk-list\u002Fdrafts\u002Fsecurity-risks.md\n       \"\"\"\n   )\n   ```\n\n2. **Synthesize Risk List**:\n   ```\n   Task(\n       subagent_type=\"documentation-synthesizer\",\n       description=\"Create consolidated risk list\",\n       prompt=\"\"\"\n       Read all risk inputs:\n       - Primary draft\n       - Technical risks\n       - Security risks\n\n       Consolidate into single risk list:\n       - Remove duplicates\n       - Prioritize by severity\n       - Ensure top 3 have mitigation plans\n       - No Show Stopper without mitigation\n\n       Output: .aiwg\u002Frisks\u002Frisk-list.md\n       \"\"\"\n   )\n   ```\n\n**Communicate Progress**:\n```\n⏳ Identifying and assessing risks...\n  ✓ Business risks identified (3)\n  ✓ Technical risks identified (4)\n  ✓ Security risks identified (3)\n✓ Risk list baselined: 10 risks, top 3 with mitigation plans\n```\n\n### Step 4: Security and Privacy Assessment\n\n**Purpose**: Classify data and assess privacy\u002Fcompliance requirements\n\n**Your Actions**:\n\n1. **Launch Security Assessment Agents**:\n   ```\n   Task(\n       subagent_type=\"security-architect\",\n       description=\"Create data classification\",\n       prompt=\"\"\"\n       Read vision and use cases.\n       Read template: $AIWG_ROOT\u002Fagentic\u002Fcode\u002Fframeworks\u002Fsdlc-complete\u002Ftemplates\u002Fsecurity\u002Fdata-classification-template.md\n\n       Classify all data types:\n       - Public\n       - Internal\n       - Confidential\n       - Restricted\n\n       Document:\n       - Data types and sensitivity\n       - Security requirements per class\n       - Encryption needs\n       - Access control requirements\n\n       Save to: .aiwg\u002Fsecurity\u002Fdata-classification.md\n       \"\"\"\n   )\n\n   Task(\n       subagent_type=\"privacy-officer\",\n       description=\"Conduct privacy impact assessment\",\n       prompt=\"\"\"\n       Read data classification.\n       Read template: $AIWG_ROOT\u002Fagentic\u002Fcode\u002Fframeworks\u002Fsdlc-complete\u002Ftemplates\u002Fsecurity\u002Fprivacy-impact-assessment-template.md\n\n       Assess privacy requirements:\n       - PII handling\n       - GDPR compliance (if applicable)\n       - CCPA compliance (if applicable)\n       - Data retention policies\n       - User consent requirements\n\n       Save to: .aiwg\u002Fsecurity\u002Fprivacy-impact-assessment.md\n       \"\"\"\n   )\n   ```\n\n2. **Validate Compliance**:\n   ```\n   Task(\n       subagent_type=\"legal-liaison\",\n       description=\"Document compliance requirements\",\n       prompt=\"\"\"\n       Read privacy assessment and data classification.\n\n       Document all compliance obligations:\n       - Regulatory requirements\n       - Industry standards\n       - Legal constraints\n       - Audit requirements\n\n       Flag any Show Stopper compliance issues.\n\n       Save to: .aiwg\u002Fsecurity\u002Fcompliance-requirements.md\n       \"\"\"\n   )\n   ```\n\n**Communicate Progress**:\n```\n⏳ Conducting security and privacy assessment...\n  ✓ Data classification complete\n  ✓ Privacy impact assessed\n  ✓ Compliance requirements documented\n✓ Security assessment complete: No Show Stopper concerns\n```\n\n### Step 5: Architecture Sketch\n\n**Purpose**: Create initial architecture vision\n\n**Your Actions**:\n\n```\nTask(\n    subagent_type=\"architecture-designer\",\n    description=\"Create architecture sketch\",\n    prompt=\"\"\"\n    Read vision, use cases, and risk list.\n    Read template: $AIWG_ROOT\u002Fagentic\u002Fcode\u002Fframeworks\u002Fsdlc-complete\u002Ftemplates\u002Fanalysis-design\u002Fsoftware-architecture-doc-template.md\n\n    Create initial architecture sketch:\n    - Component boundaries (high-level)\n    - Integration points\n    - Technology stack proposal\n    - Deployment model (cloud\u002Fon-prem\u002Fhybrid)\n    - Key architectural decisions\n\n    This is a sketch, not detailed design.\n    Focus on major components and boundaries.\n\n    Save to: .aiwg\u002Farchitecture\u002Farchitecture-sketch.md\n    \"\"\"\n)\n\n# Quick review by Security Architect\nTask(\n    subagent_type=\"security-architect\",\n    description=\"Review architecture sketch for security\",\n    prompt=\"\"\"\n    Read architecture sketch.\n\n    Validate:\n    - Security boundaries identified\n    - Authentication\u002Fauthorization approach\n    - Data flow security\n    - No obvious security anti-patterns\n\n    Status: APPROVED | CONDITIONAL | NEEDS_WORK\n\n    Save review to: .aiwg\u002Fworking\u002Farchitecture\u002Fsecurity-review.md\n    \"\"\"\n)\n```\n\n**Communicate Progress**:\n```\n⏳ Creating architecture sketch...\n✓ Architecture sketch complete\n✓ Security review: APPROVED\n```\n\n### Step 6: Architecture Decision Records\n\n**Purpose**: Document critical early decisions\n\n**Your Actions**:\n\n```\n# Create 3+ ADRs for critical decisions\nTask(\n    subagent_type=\"architecture-designer\",\n    description=\"Create critical ADRs\",\n    prompt=\"\"\"\n    Read architecture sketch and technology choices.\n    Read template: $AIWG_ROOT\u002Fagentic\u002Fcode\u002Fframeworks\u002Fsdlc-complete\u002Ftemplates\u002Fanalysis-design\u002Farchitecture-decision-record-template.md\n\n    Create at least 3 ADRs for Inception:\n\n    ADR-001: Database selection\n    - Context: Data requirements\n    - Decision: PostgreSQL\u002FMongoDB\u002Fetc\n    - Consequences: Trade-offs\n    - Alternatives: What was considered\n\n    ADR-002: API architecture\n    - REST vs GraphQL vs gRPC\n\n    ADR-003: Authentication mechanism\n    - OAuth vs JWT vs session-based\n\n    Save to: .aiwg\u002Farchitecture\u002Fadr\u002FADR-*.md\n    \"\"\"\n)\n```\n\n**Communicate Progress**:\n```\n⏳ Documenting architecture decisions...\n✓ ADRs created: 3 critical decisions documented\n```\n\n### Step 7: Business Case and Funding\n\n**Purpose**: Secure funding approval for project continuation\n\n**Your Actions**:\n\n1. **Create Business Case**:\n   ```\n   Task(\n       subagent_type=\"product-strategist\",\n       description=\"Develop business case\",\n       prompt=\"\"\"\n       Read vision, use cases, and risk list.\n       Read template: $AIWG_ROOT\u002Fagentic\u002Fcode\u002Fframeworks\u002Fsdlc-complete\u002Ftemplates\u002Fmanagement\u002Fbusiness-case-informal-template.md\n\n       Create business case including:\n       - Problem statement and business need\n       - ROM cost estimate (±50% accuracy)\n       - Expected benefits and ROI\n       - Funding request for Elaboration\n       - Success metrics\n\n       Be realistic about costs and benefits.\n\n       Save to: .aiwg\u002Fmanagement\u002Fbusiness-case.md\n       \"\"\"\n   )\n\n   Task(\n       subagent_type=\"project-manager\",\n       description=\"Create option matrix\",\n       prompt=\"\"\"\n       Read template: $AIWG_ROOT\u002Fagentic\u002Fcode\u002Fframeworks\u002Fsdlc-complete\u002Ftemplates\u002Fintake\u002Foption-matrix-template.md\n\n       Analyze at least 3 alternatives:\n       - Build custom\n       - Buy COTS\n       - Hybrid approach\n       - Do nothing\n\n       Compare on: cost, time, risk, benefits\n\n       Save to: .aiwg\u002Fplanning\u002Foption-matrix.md\n       \"\"\"\n   )\n   ```\n\n2. **Define Scope Boundaries**:\n   ```\n   Task(\n       subagent_type=\"requirements-analyst\",\n       description=\"Document scope boundaries\",\n       prompt=\"\"\"\n       Read vision and use cases.\n\n       Explicitly document:\n       - In-scope features\n       - Out-of-scope features\n       - Future considerations\n       - Dependencies\n\n       Be very explicit about what's NOT included.\n\n       Save to: .aiwg\u002Fplanning\u002Fscope-boundaries.md\n       \"\"\"\n   )\n   ```\n\n**Communicate Progress**:\n```\n⏳ Developing business case...\n  ✓ ROM estimate: $XXX,XXX (±50%)\n  ✓ Option matrix: 3 alternatives analyzed\n  ✓ Scope boundaries defined\n✓ Business case complete: .aiwg\u002Fmanagement\u002Fbusiness-case.md\n```\n\n### Step 8: Lifecycle Objective Milestone (LOM) Validation\n\n**Purpose**: Validate all Inception exit criteria before proceeding\n\n**Your Actions**:\n\n1. **Validate LOM Criteria**:\n   ```\n   Task(\n       subagent_type=\"project-manager\",\n       description=\"Validate LOM gate criteria\",\n       prompt=\"\"\"\n       Read gate criteria: $AIWG_ROOT\u002Fagentic\u002Fcode\u002Fframeworks\u002Fsdlc-complete\u002Fflows\u002Fgate-criteria-by-phase.md\n\n       Validate Inception exit criteria:\n\n       Required Artifacts:\n       - [ ] Vision document APPROVED\n       - [ ] Business case APPROVED with funding\n       - [ ] Risk list BASELINED (top 3 mitigated)\n       - [ ] Data classification COMPLETE\n       - [ ] Architecture sketch documented\n       - [ ] 3+ ADRs created\n       - [ ] Use case briefs (3-5)\n       - [ ] Option matrix analyzed\n\n       Quality Gates:\n       - [ ] Stakeholder approval ≥75%\n       - [ ] Executive Sponsor signoff\n       - [ ] No Show Stopper risks without mitigation\n       - [ ] Funding secured for Elaboration\n\n       Generate LOM Report with:\n       - Status: PASS | FAIL\n       - Go\u002FNo-Go recommendation\n       - Gaps (if any)\n\n       Save to: .aiwg\u002Freports\u002Flom-report.md\n       \"\"\"\n   )\n   ```\n\n2. **Decision Point**:\n   - If LOM PASS → Report success\n   - If LOM FAIL → Report gaps, recommend remediation\n   - Escalate to user for executive decision\n\n**Communicate Progress**:\n```\n⏳ Validating Lifecycle Objective Milestone...\n✓ LOM Validation complete: PASS\n✓ Recommendation: GO to Elaboration\n```\n\n### Step 9: Generate Phase Completion Report\n\n**Your Actions**:\n\n```\nTask(\n    subagent_type=\"project-manager\",\n    description=\"Generate Inception completion report\",\n    prompt=\"\"\"\n    Read all Inception artifacts and LOM report.\n\n    Generate comprehensive phase report:\n\n    # Concept → Inception Phase Report\n\n    ## Milestone Achievement\n    - Artifacts Status (list all with status)\n    - Gate Criteria (pass\u002Ffail each)\n\n    ## Risk Summary\n    - Critical risks identified\n    - Mitigation status\n\n    ## Financial Summary\n    - ROM estimate\n    - Funding status\n\n    ## Go\u002FNo-Go Decision\n    - Recommendation: GO | NO-GO | CONDITIONAL\n    - Rationale\n    - Next steps\n\n    ## Handoff to Elaboration\n    - Assigned agents\n    - Scheduled date\n    - Baseline tag\n\n    Save to: .aiwg\u002Freports\u002Finception-completion-report.md\n    \"\"\"\n)\n```\n\n**Present Summary to User**:\n```\n─────────────────────────────────────────────\nConcept → Inception Phase Complete\n─────────────────────────────────────────────\n\n**Overall Status**: COMPLETE\n**Decision**: GO to Elaboration\n\n**Artifacts Generated**:\n✓ Vision Document (.aiwg\u002Frequirements\u002Fvision-document.md)\n✓ Business Case (.aiwg\u002Fmanagement\u002Fbusiness-case.md)\n✓ Risk List (.aiwg\u002Frisks\u002Frisk-list.md)\n✓ Use Case Briefs (.aiwg\u002Frequirements\u002Fuse-case-briefs\u002F, 5 files)\n✓ Data Classification (.aiwg\u002Fsecurity\u002Fdata-classification.md)\n✓ Architecture Sketch (.aiwg\u002Farchitecture\u002Farchitecture-sketch.md)\n✓ ADRs (.aiwg\u002Farchitecture\u002Fadr\u002F, 3 files)\n✓ Option Matrix (.aiwg\u002Fplanning\u002Foption-matrix.md)\n\n**Key Decisions**:\n- Database: PostgreSQL selected\n- API: REST with versioning\n- Authentication: OAuth 2.0\n\n**Risk Status**:\n- 10 risks identified\n- Top 3 with mitigation plans\n- No Show Stoppers\n\n**Financial**:\n- ROM Estimate: $450,000 (±50%)\n- Elaboration Funding: APPROVED\n\n**Next Steps**:\n1. Review all generated artifacts\n2. Schedule stakeholder review (within 3 days)\n3. Begin Elaboration: \u002Fflow-inception-to-elaboration\n\n─────────────────────────────────────────────\n```\n\n## Quality Gates\n\nBefore marking workflow complete, verify:\n- [ ] All required artifacts generated\n- [ ] All reviewers provided sign-off\n- [ ] Final artifacts saved to .aiwg\u002F{category}\u002F\n- [ ] Working drafts archived\n- [ ] LOM criteria validated: PASS\n\n## User Communication\n\n**At start**: Confirm understanding and list artifacts to generate\n\n```\nUnderstood. I'll orchestrate the Concept → Inception transition.\n\nThis will generate:\n- Vision Document\n- Business Case with ROM estimate\n- Risk List (5-10 risks)\n- Use Case Briefs (3-5)\n- Data Classification\n- Architecture Sketch\n- ADRs (3+ decisions)\n- Option Matrix\n\nI'll coordinate multiple agents for comprehensive coverage.\nExpected duration: 10-15 minutes.\n\nStarting orchestration...\n```\n\n**During**: Update progress with clear indicators\n\n```\n✓ = Complete\n⏳ = In progress\n❌ = Error\u002Fblocked\n⚠️ = Warning\u002Fattention needed\n```\n\n**At end**: Summary report with artifact locations and status\n\n## Error Handling\n\n**If No Intake Form**:\n```\n❌ No intake form found\n\nRecommendation: Start with intake wizard\nRun: \u002Fintake-wizard \"your project description\"\n\nOr create manually at: .aiwg\u002Fintake\u002Fproject-intake.md\n```\n\n**If Stakeholder Alignment Failed**:\n```\n⚠️ Stakeholder approval only 60% (target: ≥75%)\n\nActions:\n1. Review vision document for clarity\n2. Schedule stakeholder workshop\n3. Address specific concerns\n\nCannot proceed to Elaboration without alignment.\n```\n\n**If No Funding**:\n```\n❌ Business case approved but no funding allocated\n\nCannot proceed without funding.\n\nOptions:\n1. Strengthen ROI analysis\n2. Reduce scope for phased funding\n3. Escalate to Executive Sponsor\n```\n\n## Success Criteria\n\nThis orchestration succeeds when:\n- [ ] Vision document APPROVED by stakeholders (≥75%)\n- [ ] Business case APPROVED with funding secured\n- [ ] Risk list BASELINED with top 3 mitigated\n- [ ] Use case briefs documented (3-5)\n- [ ] Data classification and privacy assessed\n- [ ] Architecture sketch reviewed\n- [ ] ADRs documented (3+)\n- [ ] LOM validation PASSED\n- [ ] Go decision recorded\n\n## Metrics to Track\n\n**During orchestration, track**:\n- Stakeholder alignment percentage\n- Risk identification count\n- Funding approval status\n- Gate criteria pass rate\n- Cycle time: Concept to Inception (target: 2-4 weeks, orchestration: 10-15 min)\n\n## References\n\n**Templates** (via $AIWG_ROOT):\n- Vision: `templates\u002Frequirements\u002Fvision-informal-template.md`\n- Business Case: `templates\u002Fmanagement\u002Fbusiness-case-informal-template.md`\n- Risk List: `templates\u002Fmanagement\u002Frisk-list-template.md`\n- Use Case Brief: `templates\u002Frequirements\u002Fuse-case-brief-template.md`\n- Data Classification: `templates\u002Fsecurity\u002Fdata-classification-template.md`\n- ADR: `templates\u002Fanalysis-design\u002Farchitecture-decision-record-template.md`\n- Option Matrix: `templates\u002Fintake\u002Foption-matrix-template.md`\n\n**Gate Criteria**:\n- `flows\u002Fgate-criteria-by-phase.md` (Lifecycle Objective Milestone)\n\n**Multi-Agent Pattern**:\n- `docs\u002Fmulti-agent-documentation-pattern.md`\n\n**Orchestrator Architecture**:\n- `docs\u002Forchestrator-architecture.md`\n\n**Natural Language Translations**:\n- `docs\u002Fsimple-language-translations.md`","> **Declarative Flow (#1539):** This flow's orchestration is now also expressed as a\n> declarative YAML Flow at `flows\u002Fflow-concept-to-inception.playbook.yaml` (source of truth for the step\n> sequence + gates). This SKILL.md remains the discoverable trigger surface and prose\n> reference. See epic #1534.\n\n# Concept → Inception Phase Transition Flow\n\n**You are the Core Orchestrator** for the Concept→Inception phase transition.\n\n## Your Role\n\n**You orchestrate multi-agent workflows. You do NOT execute bash scripts.**\n\nWhen the user requests this flow (via natural language or explicit command):\n\n1. **Interpret the request** and confirm understanding\n2. **Read this template** as your orchestration guide\n3. **Extract agent assignments** and workflow steps\n4. **Delegate agents with the current provider-native orchestration mechanism** in the correct sequence\n5. **Synthesize results** and finalize artifacts\n6. **Report completion** with summary\n\n## Phase Transition Overview\n\n**From**: Concept (initial idea, problem statement)\n**To**: Inception (validated vision, business case, initial risk assessment)\n\n**Key Milestone**: Lifecycle Objective Milestone (LOM)\n\n**Success Criteria**:\n- Vision document approved by stakeholders\n- Business case approved with funding secured\n- Risk list baselined with mitigation plans\n- Initial architecture and security assessment complete\n\n**Expected Duration**: 2-4 weeks (typical), 10-15 minutes orchestration\n\n## Natural Language Triggers\n\nUsers may say:\n- \"Start new project\"\n- \"Begin Inception\"\n- \"Start Inception phase\"\n- \"Kick off the project\"\n- \"Complete intake and start Inception\"\n- \"Initialize project from concept\"\n- \"Move from idea to Inception\"\n\nYou recognize these as requests for this orchestration flow.\n\n## Parameter Handling\n\n### --guidance Parameter\n\n**Purpose**: User provides upfront direction to tailor orchestration priorities\n\n**Examples**:\n```\n--guidance \"Healthcare domain, HIPAA compliance critical\"\n--guidance \"Startup context, need MVP fast, budget constrained\"\n--guidance \"Enterprise project, heavy compliance and governance\"\n--guidance \"Technical debt reduction, focus on architecture quality\"\n```\n\n**How to Apply**:\n- Parse guidance for keywords: security, compliance, timeline, budget, domain\n- Adjust agent assignments (add security-architect for compliance focus)\n- Modify artifact depth (minimal for MVP, comprehensive for enterprise)\n- Influence priority ordering (compliance-first vs. speed-first)\n\n### --interactive Parameter\n\n**Purpose**: You ask 6 strategic questions to understand project context\n\n**Questions to Ask** (if --interactive):\n\n```\nI'll ask 6 strategic questions to tailor the Inception phase to your needs:\n\nQ1: What are your top priorities for this project?\n    (e.g., time-to-market, security, compliance, innovation)\n\nQ2: What are your biggest constraints?\n    (e.g., budget, timeline, team size, technology)\n\nQ3: What risks concern you most?\n    (e.g., technical feasibility, market fit, regulatory, security)\n\nQ4: What's your team's experience level with this type of project?\n    (Helps determine depth of documentation and guidance needed)\n\nQ5: What's your target timeline for Inception completion?\n    (Influences artifact depth and review cycles)\n\nQ6: Are there regulatory or compliance requirements?\n    (e.g., HIPAA, GDPR, PCI-DSS, SOC2)\n\nBased on your answers, I'll adjust:\n- Agent assignments (add specialized reviewers)\n- Artifact depth (comprehensive vs. streamlined)\n- Priority ordering (compliance-first vs. speed-first)\n- Risk focus areas (technical vs. business vs. regulatory)\n```\n\n**Synthesize Guidance**: Combine answers into structured guidance string for execution\n\n## Artifacts to Generate\n\n**Primary Deliverables**:\n- **Vision Document**: Problem statement, personas, success metrics → `.aiwg\u002Frequirements\u002Fvision-document.md`\n- **Business Case**: ROM cost estimate, ROI analysis, funding request → `.aiwg\u002Fmanagement\u002Fbusiness-case.md`\n- **Risk List**: 5-10 risks with mitigation plans → `.aiwg\u002Frisks\u002Frisk-list.md`\n- **Use Case Briefs**: 3-5 high-level use cases → `.aiwg\u002Frequirements\u002Fuse-case-briefs\u002F`\n- **Data Classification**: Security and privacy assessment → `.aiwg\u002Fsecurity\u002Fdata-classification.md`\n- **Architecture Sketch**: Initial component boundaries → `.aiwg\u002Farchitecture\u002Farchitecture-sketch.md`\n- **ADRs**: 3+ critical decisions → `.aiwg\u002Farchitecture\u002Fadr\u002F`\n- **Option Matrix**: Alternatives analyzed → `.aiwg\u002Fplanning\u002Foption-matrix.md`\n- **LOM Report**: Gate validation and go\u002Fno-go decision → `.aiwg\u002Freports\u002Flom-report.md`\n\n**Supporting Artifacts**:\n- Stakeholder interview notes\n- Privacy impact assessment\n- Scope boundaries document\n- Complete audit trails (archived workflows)\n\n## Multi-Agent Orchestration Workflow\n\n### Step 1: Validate Intake and Initialize Vision - Multi-Agent Pattern\n\n**Purpose**: Transform intake form into vision document with stakeholder alignment\n\n**Your Actions**:\n\n1. **Check for Intake Artifacts**:\n   ```\n   Read and verify presence of:\n   - .aiwg\u002Fintake\u002Fproject-intake.md (or intake\u002Fproject-intake-template.md)\n\n   If missing, recommend: \u002Fintake-wizard \"project description\"\n   ```\n\n2. **Launch Vision Development Agents** (parallel):\n   ```\n   # Agent 1: Vision Owner\n   Task(\n       subagent_type=\"vision-owner\",\n       description=\"Create vision document from intake\",\n       prompt=\"\"\"\n       Read intake form: .aiwg\u002Fintake\u002Fproject-intake.md\n       Read template: $AIWG_ROOT\u002Fagentic\u002Fcode\u002Fframeworks\u002Fsdlc-complete\u002Ftemplates\u002Frequirements\u002Fvision-informal-template.md\n\n       Create vision document including:\n       - Problem statement (clear, measurable)\n       - Target personas (2-3 primary users)\n       - Success metrics (quantifiable)\n       - Constraints (technical, budget, timeline)\n       - Assumptions and dependencies\n\n       Focus on clarity and stakeholder communication.\n\n       Save to: .aiwg\u002Fworking\u002Frequirements\u002Fvision\u002Fdrafts\u002Fv0.1-primary-draft.md\n       \"\"\"\n   )\n\n   # Agent 2: Business Process Analyst\n   Task(\n       subagent_type=\"business-process-analyst\",\n       description=\"Structure and validate vision\",\n       prompt=\"\"\"\n       Read intake form: .aiwg\u002Fintake\u002Fproject-intake.md\n\n       Analyze business process context:\n       - Current state problems\n       - Desired future state\n       - Process improvements\n       - Stakeholder impacts\n\n       Document process context and stakeholder needs.\n\n       Save to: .aiwg\u002Fworking\u002Frequirements\u002Fvision\u002Fdrafts\u002Fprocess-context.md\n       \"\"\"\n   )\n   ```\n\n3. **Launch Parallel Reviewers**:\n   ```\n   # Product Strategist, Business Process Analyst, Technical Writer\n   Task(\n       subagent_type=\"product-strategist\",\n       description=\"Review vision for business value\",\n       prompt=\"\"\"\n       Read draft: .aiwg\u002Fworking\u002Frequirements\u002Fvision\u002Fdrafts\u002Fv0.1-primary-draft.md\n\n       Validate:\n       - Business value proposition clear\n       - Market alignment evident\n       - Success metrics achievable\n       - ROI potential justified\n\n       Add inline comments: \u003C!-- PRODUCT-STRATEGIST: feedback -->\n\n       Create review summary:\n       - Status: APPROVED | CONDITIONAL | NEEDS_WORK\n\n       Save to: .aiwg\u002Fworking\u002Frequirements\u002Fvision\u002Freviews\u002Fproduct-strategist-review.md\n       \"\"\"\n   )\n\n   # Similar for business-process-analyst and technical-writer\n   ```\n\n4. **Synthesize Vision Document**:\n   ```\n   Task(\n       subagent_type=\"requirements-documenter\",\n       description=\"Synthesize vision document\",\n       prompt=\"\"\"\n       Read all vision drafts and reviews.\n\n       Create final vision document merging:\n       - Primary draft content\n       - Process context\n       - Review feedback\n\n       Resolve conflicts, ensure clarity.\n\n       Output: .aiwg\u002Frequirements\u002Fvision-document.md\n       \"\"\"\n   )\n   ```\n\n**Communicate Progress**:\n```\n✓ Intake validated\n⏳ Creating vision document...\n  ✓ Vision draft created\n  ✓ Reviews complete (3\u002F3 APPROVED)\n✓ Vision document baselined: .aiwg\u002Frequirements\u002Fvision-document.md\n```\n\n### Step 2: Business Value and Use Case Alignment\n\n**Purpose**: Define use cases and validate business value proposition\n\n**Your Actions**:\n\n1. **Launch Use Case Development** (parallel agents):\n   ```\n   Task(\n       subagent_type=\"requirements-analyst\",\n       description=\"Create use case briefs\",\n       prompt=\"\"\"\n       Read vision: .aiwg\u002Frequirements\u002Fvision-document.md\n       Read template: $AIWG_ROOT\u002Fagentic\u002Fcode\u002Fframeworks\u002Fsdlc-complete\u002Ftemplates\u002Frequirements\u002Fuse-case-brief-template.md\n\n       Create 3-5 use case briefs:\n       - UC-001: Primary user workflow\n       - UC-002: Secondary workflow\n       - UC-003: Admin\u002Fmanagement function\n\n       Each brief includes:\n       - Actor and goal\n       - Preconditions\n       - Main flow (high-level)\n       - Success criteria\n\n       Save to: .aiwg\u002Frequirements\u002Fuse-case-briefs\u002FUC-*.md\n       \"\"\"\n   )\n\n   Task(\n       subagent_type=\"product-strategist\",\n       description=\"Validate value proposition\",\n       prompt=\"\"\"\n       Read use cases as they're created.\n       Validate each aligns with business value.\n       Document value mapping.\n\n       Save to: .aiwg\u002Frequirements\u002Fvalue-proposition-validation.md\n       \"\"\"\n   )\n   ```\n\n2. **Conduct Stakeholder Interviews**:\n   ```\n   Task(\n       subagent_type=\"business-process-analyst\",\n       description=\"Document stakeholder needs\",\n       prompt=\"\"\"\n       Read template: $AIWG_ROOT\u002Fagentic\u002Fcode\u002Fframeworks\u002Fsdlc-complete\u002Ftemplates\u002Frequirements\u002Fcontext-free-interview-template.md\n\n       Create stakeholder interview summary:\n       - Key stakeholder concerns\n       - Success criteria from each perspective\n       - Constraints and dependencies\n\n       Save to: .aiwg\u002Frequirements\u002Fstakeholder-interviews.md\n       \"\"\"\n   )\n   ```\n\n**Communicate Progress**:\n```\n⏳ Defining use cases and value proposition...\n  ✓ 5 use case briefs created\n  ✓ Value proposition validated\n  ✓ Stakeholder interviews documented\n✓ Business alignment complete\n```\n\n### Step 3: Risk Identification and Assessment\n\n**Purpose**: Identify top risks with mitigation strategies\n\n**Your Actions**:\n\n1. **Launch Risk Assessment Agents** (parallel):\n   ```\n   # Project Manager leads risk identification\n   Task(\n       subagent_type=\"project-manager\",\n       description=\"Create initial risk list\",\n       prompt=\"\"\"\n       Read vision and use cases.\n       Read template: $AIWG_ROOT\u002Fagentic\u002Fcode\u002Fframeworks\u002Fsdlc-complete\u002Ftemplates\u002Fmanagement\u002Frisk-list-template.md\n\n       Identify 5-10 risks:\n       - Technical risks\n       - Business risks\n       - Resource risks\n       - Schedule risks\n\n       For each risk document:\n       - Likelihood (High\u002FMedium\u002FLow)\n       - Impact (Show Stopper\u002FHigh\u002FMedium\u002FLow)\n       - Mitigation strategy\n\n       Focus on top 3 with detailed mitigation.\n\n       Save draft to: .aiwg\u002Fworking\u002Frisks\u002Frisk-list\u002Fdrafts\u002Fv0.1-primary-draft.md\n       \"\"\"\n   )\n\n   # Architecture Designer identifies technical risks\n   Task(\n       subagent_type=\"architecture-designer\",\n       description=\"Identify architectural risks\",\n       prompt=\"\"\"\n       Read vision and use cases.\n\n       Identify technical\u002Farchitectural risks:\n       - Scalability concerns\n       - Integration challenges\n       - Technology uncertainties\n       - Performance risks\n\n       Create risk cards using template: $AIWG_ROOT\u002F...\u002Frisk-card.md\n\n       Save to: .aiwg\u002Fworking\u002Frisks\u002Frisk-list\u002Fdrafts\u002Ftechnical-risks.md\n       \"\"\"\n   )\n\n   # Security Architect identifies security risks\n   Task(\n       subagent_type=\"security-architect\",\n       description=\"Identify security risks\",\n       prompt=\"\"\"\n       Read vision and data classification needs.\n\n       Identify security risks:\n       - Data breach potential\n       - Compliance violations\n       - Authentication\u002Fauthorization weaknesses\n       - Third-party vulnerabilities\n\n       Save to: .aiwg\u002Fworking\u002Frisks\u002Frisk-list\u002Fdrafts\u002Fsecurity-risks.md\n       \"\"\"\n   )\n   ```\n\n2. **Synthesize Risk List**:\n   ```\n   Task(\n       subagent_type=\"documentation-synthesizer\",\n       description=\"Create consolidated risk list\",\n       prompt=\"\"\"\n       Read all risk inputs:\n       - Primary draft\n       - Technical risks\n       - Security risks\n\n       Consolidate into single risk list:\n       - Remove duplicates\n       - Prioritize by severity\n       - Ensure top 3 have mitigation plans\n       - No Show Stopper without mitigation\n\n       Output: .aiwg\u002Frisks\u002Frisk-list.md\n       \"\"\"\n   )\n   ```\n\n**Communicate Progress**:\n```\n⏳ Identifying and assessing risks...\n  ✓ Business risks identified (3)\n  ✓ Technical risks identified (4)\n  ✓ Security risks identified (3)\n✓ Risk list baselined: 10 risks, top 3 with mitigation plans\n```\n\n### Step 4: Security and Privacy Assessment\n\n**Purpose**: Classify data and assess privacy\u002Fcompliance requirements\n\n**Your Actions**:\n\n1. **Launch Security Assessment Agents**:\n   ```\n   Task(\n       subagent_type=\"security-architect\",\n       description=\"Create data classification\",\n       prompt=\"\"\"\n       Read vision and use cases.\n       Read template: $AIWG_ROOT\u002Fagentic\u002Fcode\u002Fframeworks\u002Fsdlc-complete\u002Ftemplates\u002Fsecurity\u002Fdata-classification-template.md\n\n       Classify all data types:\n       - Public\n       - Internal\n       - Confidential\n       - Restricted\n\n       Document:\n       - Data types and sensitivity\n       - Security requirements per class\n       - Encryption needs\n       - Access control requirements\n\n       Save to: .aiwg\u002Fsecurity\u002Fdata-classification.md\n       \"\"\"\n   )\n\n   Task(\n       subagent_type=\"privacy-officer\",\n       description=\"Conduct privacy impact assessment\",\n       prompt=\"\"\"\n       Read data classification.\n       Read template: $AIWG_ROOT\u002Fagentic\u002Fcode\u002Fframeworks\u002Fsdlc-complete\u002Ftemplates\u002Fsecurity\u002Fprivacy-impact-assessment-template.md\n\n       Assess privacy requirements:\n       - PII handling\n       - GDPR compliance (if applicable)\n       - CCPA compliance (if applicable)\n       - Data retention policies\n       - User consent requirements\n\n       Save to: .aiwg\u002Fsecurity\u002Fprivacy-impact-assessment.md\n       \"\"\"\n   )\n   ```\n\n2. **Validate Compliance**:\n   ```\n   Task(\n       subagent_type=\"legal-liaison\",\n       description=\"Document compliance requirements\",\n       prompt=\"\"\"\n       Read privacy assessment and data classification.\n\n       Document all compliance obligations:\n       - Regulatory requirements\n       - Industry standards\n       - Legal constraints\n       - Audit requirements\n\n       Flag any Show Stopper compliance issues.\n\n       Save to: .aiwg\u002Fsecurity\u002Fcompliance-requirements.md\n       \"\"\"\n   )\n   ```\n\n**Communicate Progress**:\n```\n⏳ Conducting security and privacy assessment...\n  ✓ Data classification complete\n  ✓ Privacy impact assessed\n  ✓ Compliance requirements documented\n✓ Security assessment complete: No Show Stopper concerns\n```\n\n### Step 5: Architecture Sketch\n\n**Purpose**: Create initial architecture vision\n\n**Your Actions**:\n\n```\nTask(\n    subagent_type=\"architecture-designer\",\n    description=\"Create architecture sketch\",\n    prompt=\"\"\"\n    Read vision, use cases, and risk list.\n    Read template: $AIWG_ROOT\u002Fagentic\u002Fcode\u002Fframeworks\u002Fsdlc-complete\u002Ftemplates\u002Fanalysis-design\u002Fsoftware-architecture-doc-template.md\n\n    Create initial architecture sketch:\n    - Component boundaries (high-level)\n    - Integration points\n    - Technology stack proposal\n    - Deployment model (cloud\u002Fon-prem\u002Fhybrid)\n    - Key architectural decisions\n\n    This is a sketch, not detailed design.\n    Focus on major components and boundaries.\n\n    Save to: .aiwg\u002Farchitecture\u002Farchitecture-sketch.md\n    \"\"\"\n)\n\n# Quick review by Security Architect\nTask(\n    subagent_type=\"security-architect\",\n    description=\"Review architecture sketch for security\",\n    prompt=\"\"\"\n    Read architecture sketch.\n\n    Validate:\n    - Security boundaries identified\n    - Authentication\u002Fauthorization approach\n    - Data flow security\n    - No obvious security anti-patterns\n\n    Status: APPROVED | CONDITIONAL | NEEDS_WORK\n\n    Save review to: .aiwg\u002Fworking\u002Farchitecture\u002Fsecurity-review.md\n    \"\"\"\n)\n```\n\n**Communicate Progress**:\n```\n⏳ Creating architecture sketch...\n✓ Architecture sketch complete\n✓ Security review: APPROVED\n```\n\n### Step 6: Architecture Decision Records\n\n**Purpose**: Document critical early decisions\n\n**Your Actions**:\n\n```\n# Create 3+ ADRs for critical decisions\nTask(\n    subagent_type=\"architecture-designer\",\n    description=\"Create critical ADRs\",\n    prompt=\"\"\"\n    Read architecture sketch and technology choices.\n    Read template: $AIWG_ROOT\u002Fagentic\u002Fcode\u002Fframeworks\u002Fsdlc-complete\u002Ftemplates\u002Fanalysis-design\u002Farchitecture-decision-record-template.md\n\n    Create at least 3 ADRs for Inception:\n\n    ADR-001: Database selection\n    - Context: Data requirements\n    - Decision: PostgreSQL\u002FMongoDB\u002Fetc\n    - Consequences: Trade-offs\n    - Alternatives: What was considered\n\n    ADR-002: API architecture\n    - REST vs GraphQL vs gRPC\n\n    ADR-003: Authentication mechanism\n    - OAuth vs JWT vs session-based\n\n    Save to: .aiwg\u002Farchitecture\u002Fadr\u002FADR-*.md\n    \"\"\"\n)\n```\n\n**Communicate Progress**:\n```\n⏳ Documenting architecture decisions...\n✓ ADRs created: 3 critical decisions documented\n```\n\n### Step 7: Business Case and Funding\n\n**Purpose**: Secure funding approval for project continuation\n\n**Your Actions**:\n\n1. **Create Business Case**:\n   ```\n   Task(\n       subagent_type=\"product-strategist\",\n       description=\"Develop business case\",\n       prompt=\"\"\"\n       Read vision, use cases, and risk list.\n       Read template: $AIWG_ROOT\u002Fagentic\u002Fcode\u002Fframeworks\u002Fsdlc-complete\u002Ftemplates\u002Fmanagement\u002Fbusiness-case-informal-template.md\n\n       Create business case including:\n       - Problem statement and business need\n       - ROM cost estimate (±50% accuracy)\n       - Expected benefits and ROI\n       - Funding request for Elaboration\n       - Success metrics\n\n       Be realistic about costs and benefits.\n\n       Save to: .aiwg\u002Fmanagement\u002Fbusiness-case.md\n       \"\"\"\n   )\n\n   Task(\n       subagent_type=\"project-manager\",\n       description=\"Create option matrix\",\n       prompt=\"\"\"\n       Read template: $AIWG_ROOT\u002Fagentic\u002Fcode\u002Fframeworks\u002Fsdlc-complete\u002Ftemplates\u002Fintake\u002Foption-matrix-template.md\n\n       Analyze at least 3 alternatives:\n       - Build custom\n       - Buy COTS\n       - Hybrid approach\n       - Do nothing\n\n       Compare on: cost, time, risk, benefits\n\n       Save to: .aiwg\u002Fplanning\u002Foption-matrix.md\n       \"\"\"\n   )\n   ```\n\n2. **Define Scope Boundaries**:\n   ```\n   Task(\n       subagent_type=\"requirements-analyst\",\n       description=\"Document scope boundaries\",\n       prompt=\"\"\"\n       Read vision and use cases.\n\n       Explicitly document:\n       - In-scope features\n       - Out-of-scope features\n       - Future considerations\n       - Dependencies\n\n       Be very explicit about what's NOT included.\n\n       Save to: .aiwg\u002Fplanning\u002Fscope-boundaries.md\n       \"\"\"\n   )\n   ```\n\n**Communicate Progress**:\n```\n⏳ Developing business case...\n  ✓ ROM estimate: $XXX,XXX (±50%)\n  ✓ Option matrix: 3 alternatives analyzed\n  ✓ Scope boundaries defined\n✓ Business case complete: .aiwg\u002Fmanagement\u002Fbusiness-case.md\n```\n\n### Step 8: Lifecycle Objective Milestone (LOM) Validation\n\n**Purpose**: Validate all Inception exit criteria before proceeding\n\n**Your Actions**:\n\n1. **Validate LOM Criteria**:\n   ```\n   Task(\n       subagent_type=\"project-manager\",\n       description=\"Validate LOM gate criteria\",\n       prompt=\"\"\"\n       Read gate criteria: $AIWG_ROOT\u002Fagentic\u002Fcode\u002Fframeworks\u002Fsdlc-complete\u002Fflows\u002Fgate-criteria-by-phase.md\n\n       Validate Inception exit criteria:\n\n       Required Artifacts:\n       - [ ] Vision document APPROVED\n       - [ ] Business case APPROVED with funding\n       - [ ] Risk list BASELINED (top 3 mitigated)\n       - [ ] Data classification COMPLETE\n       - [ ] Architecture sketch documented\n       - [ ] 3+ ADRs created\n       - [ ] Use case briefs (3-5)\n       - [ ] Option matrix analyzed\n\n       Quality Gates:\n       - [ ] Stakeholder approval ≥75%\n       - [ ] Executive Sponsor signoff\n       - [ ] No Show Stopper risks without mitigation\n       - [ ] Funding secured for Elaboration\n\n       Generate LOM Report with:\n       - Status: PASS | FAIL\n       - Go\u002FNo-Go recommendation\n       - Gaps (if any)\n\n       Save to: .aiwg\u002Freports\u002Flom-report.md\n       \"\"\"\n   )\n   ```\n\n2. **Decision Point**:\n   - If LOM PASS → Report success\n   - If LOM FAIL → Report gaps, recommend remediation\n   - Escalate to user for executive decision\n\n**Communicate Progress**:\n```\n⏳ Validating Lifecycle Objective Milestone...\n✓ LOM Validation complete: PASS\n✓ Recommendation: GO to Elaboration\n```\n\n### Step 9: Generate Phase Completion Report\n\n**Your Actions**:\n\n```\nTask(\n    subagent_type=\"project-manager\",\n    description=\"Generate Inception completion report\",\n    prompt=\"\"\"\n    Read all Inception artifacts and LOM report.\n\n    Generate comprehensive phase report:\n\n    # Concept → Inception Phase Report\n\n    ## Milestone Achievement\n    - Artifacts Status (list all with status)\n    - Gate Criteria (pass\u002Ffail each)\n\n    ## Risk Summary\n    - Critical risks identified\n    - Mitigation status\n\n    ## Financial Summary\n    - ROM estimate\n    - Funding status\n\n    ## Go\u002FNo-Go Decision\n    - Recommendation: GO | NO-GO | CONDITIONAL\n    - Rationale\n    - Next steps\n\n    ## Handoff to Elaboration\n    - Assigned agents\n    - Scheduled date\n    - Baseline tag\n\n    Save to: .aiwg\u002Freports\u002Finception-completion-report.md\n    \"\"\"\n)\n```\n\n**Present Summary to User**:\n```\n─────────────────────────────────────────────\nConcept → Inception Phase Complete\n─────────────────────────────────────────────\n\n**Overall Status**: COMPLETE\n**Decision**: GO to Elaboration\n\n**Artifacts Generated**:\n✓ Vision Document (.aiwg\u002Frequirements\u002Fvision-document.md)\n✓ Business Case (.aiwg\u002Fmanagement\u002Fbusiness-case.md)\n✓ Risk List (.aiwg\u002Frisks\u002Frisk-list.md)\n✓ Use Case Briefs (.aiwg\u002Frequirements\u002Fuse-case-briefs\u002F, 5 files)\n✓ Data Classification (.aiwg\u002Fsecurity\u002Fdata-classification.md)\n✓ Architecture Sketch (.aiwg\u002Farchitecture\u002Farchitecture-sketch.md)\n✓ ADRs (.aiwg\u002Farchitecture\u002Fadr\u002F, 3 files)\n✓ Option Matrix (.aiwg\u002Fplanning\u002Foption-matrix.md)\n\n**Key Decisions**:\n- Database: PostgreSQL selected\n- API: REST with versioning\n- Authentication: OAuth 2.0\n\n**Risk Status**:\n- 10 risks identified\n- Top 3 with mitigation plans\n- No Show Stoppers\n\n**Financial**:\n- ROM Estimate: $450,000 (±50%)\n- Elaboration Funding: APPROVED\n\n**Next Steps**:\n1. Review all generated artifacts\n2. Schedule stakeholder review (within 3 days)\n3. Begin Elaboration: \u002Fflow-inception-to-elaboration\n\n─────────────────────────────────────────────\n```\n\n## Quality Gates\n\nBefore marking workflow complete, verify:\n- [ ] All required artifacts generated\n- [ ] All reviewers provided sign-off\n- [ ] Final artifacts saved to .aiwg\u002F{category}\u002F\n- [ ] Working drafts archived\n- [ ] LOM criteria validated: PASS\n\n## User Communication\n\n**At start**: Confirm understanding and list artifacts to generate\n\n```\nUnderstood. I'll orchestrate the Concept → Inception transition.\n\nThis will generate:\n- Vision Document\n- Business Case with ROM estimate\n- Risk List (5-10 risks)\n- Use Case Briefs (3-5)\n- Data Classification\n- Architecture Sketch\n- ADRs (3+ decisions)\n- Option Matrix\n\nI'll coordinate multiple agents for comprehensive coverage.\nExpected duration: 10-15 minutes.\n\nStarting orchestration...\n```\n\n**During**: Update progress with clear indicators\n\n```\n✓ = Complete\n⏳ = In progress\n❌ = Error\u002Fblocked\n⚠️ = Warning\u002Fattention needed\n```\n\n**At end**: Summary report with artifact locations and status\n\n## Error Handling\n\n**If No Intake Form**:\n```\n❌ No intake form found\n\nRecommendation: Start with intake wizard\nRun: \u002Fintake-wizard \"your project description\"\n\nOr create manually at: .aiwg\u002Fintake\u002Fproject-intake.md\n```\n\n**If Stakeholder Alignment Failed**:\n```\n⚠️ Stakeholder approval only 60% (target: ≥75%)\n\nActions:\n1. Review vision document for clarity\n2. Schedule stakeholder workshop\n3. Address specific concerns\n\nCannot proceed to Elaboration without alignment.\n```\n\n**If No Funding**:\n```\n❌ Business case approved but no funding allocated\n\nCannot proceed without funding.\n\nOptions:\n1. Strengthen ROI analysis\n2. Reduce scope for phased funding\n3. Escalate to Executive Sponsor\n```\n\n## Success Criteria\n\nThis orchestration succeeds when:\n- [ ] Vision document APPROVED by stakeholders (≥75%)\n- [ ] Business case APPROVED with funding secured\n- [ ] Risk list BASELINED with top 3 mitigated\n- [ ] Use case briefs documented (3-5)\n- [ ] Data classification and privacy assessed\n- [ ] Architecture sketch reviewed\n- [ ] ADRs documented (3+)\n- [ ] LOM validation PASSED\n- [ ] Go decision recorded\n\n## Metrics to Track\n\n**During orchestration, track**:\n- Stakeholder alignment percentage\n- Risk identification count\n- Funding approval status\n- Gate criteria pass rate\n- Cycle time: Concept to Inception (target: 2-4 weeks, orchestration: 10-15 min)\n\n## References\n\n**Templates** (via $AIWG_ROOT):\n- Vision: `templates\u002Frequirements\u002Fvision-informal-template.md`\n- Business Case: `templates\u002Fmanagement\u002Fbusiness-case-informal-template.md`\n- Risk List: `templates\u002Fmanagement\u002Frisk-list-template.md`\n- Use Case Brief: `templates\u002Frequirements\u002Fuse-case-brief-template.md`\n- Data Classification: `templates\u002Fsecurity\u002Fdata-classification-template.md`\n- ADR: `templates\u002Fanalysis-design\u002Farchitecture-decision-record-template.md`\n- Option Matrix: `templates\u002Fintake\u002Foption-matrix-template.md`\n\n**Gate Criteria**:\n- `flows\u002Fgate-criteria-by-phase.md` (Lifecycle Objective Milestone)\n\n**Multi-Agent Pattern**:\n- `docs\u002Fmulti-agent-documentation-pattern.md`\n\n**Orchestrator Architecture**:\n- `docs\u002Forchestrator-architecture.md`\n\n**Natural Language Translations**:\n- `docs\u002Fsimple-language-translations.md`",{"name":5,"namespace":50,"platforms":51,"commandHint":53,"description":7},"aiwg",[52],"all",{"model":30,"category":54,"modelRole":39,"modelTier":55,"allowedTools":56,"argumentHint":57,"orchestration":58},"sdlc-orchestration","standard","Task, Read, Write, Glob, TodoWrite","[project-directory] [--guidance \"text\"] [--interactive]",true,"main","6754967c344ccb087a8de06972f55a41067b291b","agentic\u002Fcode\u002Fplugins\u002Fcodex-sdlc\u002Fskills\u002Fflow-concept-to-inception",36,"https:\u002F\u002Fgithub.com\u002Fjmagly\u002Faiwg","https:\u002F\u002Faiwg.io","https:\u002F\u002Fgithub.com\u002Fjmagly","https:\u002F\u002Fintegrolabs.io","ml\u002Fai, industrial automation, safety\u002Fsecurity, ssi\r\n\r\nmagly.net\r\nintegrolabs.io\r\naiwg.io\r\nfortemi.com\r\npagenary.com\r\nbytecask.com","2026-11-11 08:11:25",{"source":8,"skillName":5,"commands":70,"prompt":80,"zipAvailable":58},[71,74,77],{"tool":72,"command":73},"npx","npx skills add jmagly\u002Faiwg --skill flow-concept-to-inception",{"tool":75,"command":76},"bunx","bunx skills add jmagly\u002Faiwg --skill flow-concept-to-inception",{"tool":78,"command":79},"pnpm","pnpm dlx skills add jmagly\u002Faiwg --skill flow-concept-to-inception","安装技能，技能地址：https:\u002F\u002Fgithub.com\u002Fjmagly\u002Faiwg\u002Fblob\u002Fmain\u002Fagentic\u002Fcode\u002Fplugins\u002Fcodex-sdlc\u002Fskills\u002Fflow-concept-to-inception\u002FSKILL.md",[],[83,110,133,139,146,160],{"skillNo":84,"name":85,"nameZh":6,"description":86,"descriptionZh":6,"repositoryFullName":8,"ownerLogin":9,"ownerAvatarUrl":10,"ownerAccountNo":11,"ownerDisplayName":12,"repositoryNo":13,"starsCount":14,"licenseSpdxId":15,"licenseFileUrl":6,"sourceHtmlUrl":87,"categories":88,"keywords":90,"publishedAt":45},"01M70QA0BSYJ49EES9V4RE8QH1","host-hardening","Read-only system hardening baseline and plan-first host hardening recommendations for SSH, Docker bind addresses, firewall persistence, datastores, exporters and audit retention.","https:\u002F\u002Fgithub.com\u002Fjmagly\u002Faiwg\u002Fblob\u002Fmain\u002Fagentic\u002Fcode\u002Fplugins\u002Fsecurity-engineering\u002Fskills\u002Fhost-hardening\u002FSKILL.md",[89],{"categoryNo":19,"categoryName":20,"taxonomyType":21,"taxonomyTypeDesc":22},[91,92,93,38,94,95,96,97,98,99,100,101,102,103,104,105,106,107,108,109],"host","host hardening","hardening","re","recommendations","remediation","plan","port","verification","Bash","access","only","retention","audit","never","firewall","bind","secrets","request",{"skillNo":111,"name":112,"nameZh":6,"description":113,"descriptionZh":6,"repositoryFullName":8,"ownerLogin":9,"ownerAvatarUrl":10,"ownerAccountNo":11,"ownerDisplayName":12,"repositoryNo":13,"starsCount":14,"licenseSpdxId":15,"licenseFileUrl":6,"sourceHtmlUrl":114,"categories":115,"keywords":120,"publishedAt":45},"01M70PNT2Z4HMZPRBTAF6073NN","exposure-analysis","Read-only firewall analysis and effective host exposure reconstruction for Docker published ports, UFW bypass, stale rules, CDN scope, IPv6 asymmetry and external probe allowlists.","https:\u002F\u002Fgithub.com\u002Fjmagly\u002Faiwg\u002Fblob\u002Fmain\u002Fagentic\u002Fcode\u002Fplugins\u002Fforensics\u002Fskills\u002Fexposure-analysis\u002FSKILL.md",[116,119],{"categoryNo":117,"categoryName":118,"taxonomyType":21,"taxonomyTypeDesc":22},"01JBSEEDCAT000000000000011","运维与部署",{"categoryNo":19,"categoryName":20,"taxonomyType":21,"taxonomyTypeDesc":22},[121,122,123,38,124,98,125,126,100,127,91,128,102,129,130,105,106,131,132,37],"exposure analysis","analysis","unknown","credentials","collection","ufw","ports","internet","local","scope","reconstruction","operator",{"skillNo":134,"name":85,"nameZh":6,"description":86,"descriptionZh":6,"repositoryFullName":8,"ownerLogin":9,"ownerAvatarUrl":10,"ownerAccountNo":11,"ownerDisplayName":12,"repositoryNo":13,"starsCount":14,"licenseSpdxId":15,"licenseFileUrl":6,"sourceHtmlUrl":135,"categories":136,"keywords":138,"publishedAt":45},"01M70P8QATMPKA78E4FT5D2TNA","https:\u002F\u002Fgithub.com\u002Fjmagly\u002Faiwg\u002Fblob\u002Fmain\u002Fagentic\u002Fcode\u002Fframeworks\u002Fsecurity-engineering\u002Fskills\u002Fhost-hardening\u002FSKILL.md",[137],{"categoryNo":19,"categoryName":20,"taxonomyType":21,"taxonomyTypeDesc":22},[93,91,92,101,38,109,96,95,104,97,98,99,100,108,102,103,94,105,106,107],{"skillNo":140,"name":112,"nameZh":6,"description":113,"descriptionZh":6,"repositoryFullName":8,"ownerLogin":9,"ownerAvatarUrl":10,"ownerAccountNo":11,"ownerDisplayName":12,"repositoryNo":13,"starsCount":14,"licenseSpdxId":15,"licenseFileUrl":6,"sourceHtmlUrl":141,"categories":142,"keywords":145,"publishedAt":45},"01M70NMPVJ5H0JH131P60FW4R8","https:\u002F\u002Fgithub.com\u002Fjmagly\u002Faiwg\u002Fblob\u002Fmain\u002Fagentic\u002Fcode\u002Fframeworks\u002Fforensics-complete\u002Fskills\u002Fexposure-analysis\u002FSKILL.md",[143,144],{"categoryNo":117,"categoryName":118,"taxonomyType":21,"taxonomyTypeDesc":22},{"categoryNo":19,"categoryName":20,"taxonomyType":21,"taxonomyTypeDesc":22},[122,121,105,124,98,125,100,123,91,128,102,129,130,38,106,127,126,131,132,37],{"skillNo":147,"name":148,"nameZh":6,"description":149,"descriptionZh":6,"repositoryFullName":8,"ownerLogin":9,"ownerAvatarUrl":10,"ownerAccountNo":11,"ownerDisplayName":12,"repositoryNo":13,"starsCount":14,"licenseSpdxId":15,"licenseFileUrl":6,"sourceHtmlUrl":150,"categories":151,"keywords":153,"publishedAt":45},"01M6CB4DDR0B4NNCFK7ZK7449H","fixture-skill","Exercise rule delivery.","https:\u002F\u002Fgithub.com\u002Fjmagly\u002Faiwg\u002Fblob\u002Fmain\u002Ftest\u002Ffixtures\u002Frule-delivery\u002Fskills\u002Ffixture-skill\u002FSKILL.md",[152],{"categoryNo":19,"categoryName":20,"taxonomyType":21,"taxonomyTypeDesc":22},[154,155,156,157,158,159],"fixture skill","fixture","rule","delivery","true","exercise",{"skillNo":161,"name":162,"nameZh":6,"description":163,"descriptionZh":6,"repositoryFullName":8,"ownerLogin":9,"ownerAvatarUrl":10,"ownerAccountNo":11,"ownerDisplayName":12,"repositoryNo":13,"starsCount":14,"licenseSpdxId":15,"licenseFileUrl":6,"sourceHtmlUrl":164,"categories":165,"keywords":167,"publishedAt":45},"01M6CB4AVK1W76MFMPP0JP32CJ","pi-local","Pi-local duplicate-precedence fixture.","https:\u002F\u002Fgithub.com\u002Fjmagly\u002Faiwg\u002Fblob\u002Fmain\u002Ftest\u002Ffixtures\u002Fproviders\u002Fpi\u002Fproject\u002F.pi\u002Fskills\u002Fpi-local\u002FSKILL.md",[166],{"categoryNo":19,"categoryName":20,"taxonomyType":21,"taxonomyTypeDesc":22},[168,169,129,170,155],"pi","pi local","duplicate"]