[{"data":1,"prerenderedAt":-1},["ShallowReactive",2],{"skill:01M6C21NB2KP35AA3PB2TSG1M0":3,"skill-same:01M6C21NB2KP35AA3PB2TSG1M0":73},{"skillNo":4,"name":5,"nameZh":6,"description":7,"descriptionZh":6,"repositoryFullName":8,"ownerLogin":9,"ownerAvatarUrl":10,"ownerAccountNo":11,"ownerDisplayName":12,"repositoryNo":13,"starsCount":14,"licenseSpdxId":15,"licenseFileUrl":6,"sourceHtmlUrl":16,"categories":17,"keywords":26,"publishedAt":38,"linkOnly":39,"markdownContent":40,"markdownBody":41,"frontMatter":42,"refName":49,"commitSha":50,"skillDirectory":51,"forksCount":52,"repositoryHtmlUrl":53,"repositoryHomepageUrl":54,"ownerHtmlUrl":55,"ownerBlogUrl":56,"ownerDescription":57,"updatedAt":58,"install":59,"resources":72},"01M6C21NB2KP35AA3PB2TSG1M0","research-status",null,"Show research corpus health and statistics","jmagly\u002Faiwg","jmagly","https:\u002F\u002Favatars.githubusercontent.com\u002Fu\u002F1159087?v=4","01M6C10AK8N2WCSQN11FYGTJWN","Joseph Magly","01M6C10AQ8A2RMED1Y1BSVY7NF",229,"MIT","https:\u002F\u002Fgithub.com\u002Fjmagly\u002Faiwg\u002Fblob\u002Fmain\u002Fagentic\u002Fcode\u002Fframeworks\u002Fresearch-complete\u002Fskills\u002Fresearch-status\u002FSKILL.md",[18,23],{"categoryNo":19,"categoryName":20,"taxonomyType":21,"taxonomyTypeDesc":22},"01JBSEEDCAT000000000000021","资料检索与研究","SCENARIO","使用场景",{"categoryNo":24,"categoryName":25,"taxonomyType":21,"taxonomyTypeDesc":22},"01JBSEEDCAT000000000000023","Skill与智能体开发",[27,28,29,30,31,32,33,34,35,36,37],"research","status","research status","monitoring","health","json","export","corpus health","only","show","statistics","2026-11-10 10:12:30",false,"---\nnamespace: aiwg\nname: research-status\nplatforms: [all]\ndescription: Show research corpus health and statistics\ncommandHint:\n  argumentHint: \"[--detailed] [--problems-only] [--export json]\"\n  category: research-monitoring\n---\n\n# Research Status Command\n\nDisplay comprehensive health check and statistics for the research corpus.\n\n## Scope Boundary\n\n`corpus-health` \u002F `research-status` is **structural** — it checks whether the corpus is well-formed:\n- Are files present where expected? (orphans, missing artifacts)\n- Is frontmatter complete and valid? (schema violations)\n- Are references intact? (broken links, missing provenance)\n- Is the data well-organized? (checksums, naming, metadata)\n\nFor **intellectual** gap analysis — what topics lack coverage, what claims lack evidence, what contradictions are unresolved — use `research-gap` instead.\n\nFor **declarative rule checking** (automated, CI-ready), use `research-lint` which runs the `research` lint ruleset.\n\n## Instructions\n\nWhen invoked, analyze corpus health:\n\n1. **Scan Corpus**\n   - Count papers in `.aiwg\u002Fresearch\u002Fsources\u002F`\n   - Count finding documents\n   - Count quality assessments\n   - Count archival packages\n   - Identify orphaned or incomplete artifacts\n\n2. **Validate Integrity**\n   - Check fixity manifest integrity\n   - Verify all checksums\n   - Detect corrupted files\n   - Find missing provenance records\n\n3. **Assess Completeness**\n   - Papers missing finding documents\n   - Papers missing quality assessments\n   - Papers missing archival packages\n   - Incomplete frontmatter\n   - Missing metadata fields\n\n4. **Analyze Coverage**\n   - Topic distribution\n   - Publication year distribution\n   - Source type distribution (journal, conference, preprint)\n   - GRADE quality distribution\n\n5. **Check Policy Compliance**\n   - Citation policy violations\n   - GRADE hedging compliance\n   - Provenance completeness\n   - Metadata standards adherence\n\n6. **Generate Report**\n   - Summary statistics\n   - Health score\n   - Problem areas flagged\n   - Remediation suggestions\n\n## Arguments\n\n- `--detailed` - Show detailed statistics and breakdowns\n- `--problems-only` - Only show issues requiring attention\n- `--export [json|yaml|markdown]` - Export report to file\n- `--validate-all` - Perform deep validation (slower, thorough)\n- `--check-citations` - Include citation policy validation\n\n## Examples\n\n```bash\n# Basic status check\n\u002Fresearch-status\n\n# Detailed analysis\n\u002Fresearch-status --detailed\n\n# Show only problems\n\u002Fresearch-status --problems-only\n\n# Full validation with citation check\n\u002Fresearch-status --validate-all --check-citations\n\n# Export report\n\u002Fresearch-status --detailed --export markdown\n```\n\n## Expected Output\n\n### Standard Mode\n\n```\nResearch Corpus Health Check\n━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━\n\nCorpus Statistics:\n─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────\n  Papers:               47\n  Finding Documents:    47 (100%)\n  Quality Assessments:  45 (96%)\n  Archival Packages:    42 (89%)\n  Literature Notes:     38 (81%)\n\n  Total Size:           142.8 MB\n  Oldest Paper:         2018\n  Newest Paper:         2024\n\nHealth Score: 92\u002F100 (GOOD)\n─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────\n\nCompleteness:\n─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────\n  ✓ All papers have finding documents\n  ⚠ 2 papers missing quality assessments (REF-044, REF-045)\n  ⚠ 5 papers missing archival packages (REF-041-045)\n  ✓ Fixity manifest up to date\n  ✓ Provenance records complete\n\nQuality Distribution:\n─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────\n  HIGH:      12 papers (26%)  ████████░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░\n  MODERATE:  18 papers (38%)  ███████████████░░░░░░░░░░░\n  LOW:       14 papers (30%)  ████████████░░░░░░░░░░░░░░\n  VERY LOW:   3 papers (6%)   ██░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░\n\nSource Types:\n─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────\n  Peer-reviewed Journal:    15 (32%)\n  Peer-reviewed Conference: 22 (47%)\n  Preprint:                  8 (17%)\n  Technical Report:          2 (4%)\n\nTopics (Top 5):\n─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────\n  1. agentic-workflows         24 papers\n  2. llm-evaluation            18 papers\n  3. human-in-the-loop         14 papers\n  4. multi-agent-systems       12 papers\n  5. cognitive-scaffolding      9 papers\n\nIssues Requiring Attention:\n─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────\n  ⚠ 2 papers need quality assessment:\n      - REF-044 (acquired 7 days ago)\n      - REF-045 (acquired 5 days ago)\n\n  ⚠ 5 papers need archival:\n      - REF-041, REF-042, REF-043, REF-044, REF-045\n\n  ⚠ 9 papers need literature notes\n\nNext Steps:\n─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────\n  1. \u002Fresearch-quality REF-044 REF-045 - Complete quality assessments\n  2. \u002Fresearch-archive REF-041 REF-042 REF-043 REF-044 REF-045\n  3. \u002Fresearch-document REF-038 --depth comprehensive --include-notes\n\nLast Corpus Update: 2026-02-03T14:35:25Z (15 minutes ago)\n```\n\n### Detailed Mode\n\n```\n\u002Fresearch-status --detailed\n\nResearch Corpus Health Check (Detailed)\n━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━\n\nCorpus Statistics:\n━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━\n\nPapers by Year:\n  2024: ███████████ 18 (38%)\n  2023: ██████████  15 (32%)\n  2022: ████        6 (13%)\n  2021: ███         4 (9%)\n  2020: ██          3 (6%)\n  2019: ░           1 (2%)\n\nPapers by GRADE Level:\n  HIGH:      ████████  12 (26%)\n    - Systematic Reviews: 4\n    - Meta-analyses: 2\n    - High-quality RCTs: 6\n\n  MODERATE:  ███████████████  18 (38%)\n    - Conference Papers: 12\n    - Cohort Studies: 6\n\n  LOW:       ████████████  14 (30%)\n    - Case Series: 8\n    - Limited Evaluation: 6\n\n  VERY LOW:  ██  3 (6%)\n    - Preprints (not peer-reviewed): 2\n    - Blog Posts: 1\n\nPapers by Source:\n  ACM Digital Library:      12\n  IEEE Xplore:              8\n  arXiv:                    15\n  Nature\u002FScience:           5\n  Springer:                 4\n  Other:                    3\n\nAIWG Relevance:\n  HIGH:      32 papers (68%)  - Direct applicability\n  MEDIUM:    12 papers (26%)  - Tangential relevance\n  LOW:        3 papers (6%)   - Background\u002Fcontext only\n\nCitation Usage:\n  Total citations across corpus: 347\n  Average citations per paper:   7.4\n  Most cited: REF-001 (34 citations)\n  Least cited: REF-044 (0 citations, new)\n\nCompleteness Matrix:\n━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━\n\nArtifact Type               Count    %      Status\n────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────\nSource PDFs                 47\u002F47    100%   ✓ Complete\nFinding Documents           47\u002F47    100%   ✓ Complete\nQuality Assessments         45\u002F47    96%    ⚠ 2 missing\nArchival Packages           42\u002F47    89%    ⚠ 5 missing\nLiterature Notes            38\u002F47    81%    ⚠ 9 missing\nProvenance Records          47\u002F47    100%   ✓ Complete\n\nMetadata Completeness:\n────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────\nDOI:                        44\u002F47    94%    ⚠ 3 preprints lack DOI\nAuthors:                    47\u002F47    100%   ✓ Complete\nYear:                       47\u002F47    100%   ✓ Complete\nAbstract:                   46\u002F47    98%    ⚠ 1 missing\nKeywords:                   38\u002F47    81%    ⚠ 9 missing\nCitation Count:             45\u002F47    96%    ⚠ 2 missing\n\nIntegrity Checks:\n━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━\n\nFixity Validation:          47\u002F47    100%   ✓ All checksums verified\nProvenance Chains:          47\u002F47    100%   ✓ Complete\nBroken References:          0               ✓ None found\nOrphaned Files:             0               ✓ None found\n\nStorage Metrics:\n━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━\n\nTotal Size:                 142.8 MB\n  Source PDFs:              128.4 MB (90%)\n  Finding Documents:        2.1 MB (1%)\n  Literature Notes:         0.8 MB (1%)\n  Quality Assessments:      0.3 MB (\u003C1%)\n  Archival Packages:        11.2 MB (8%)\n\nAverage PDF Size:           2.7 MB\nLargest Paper:              REF-015 (12.4 MB, book chapter)\nSmallest Paper:             REF-031 (0.4 MB, short paper)\n\nTopic Coverage:\n━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━\n\nagentic-workflows           ████████████████  24\nllm-evaluation              ████████████      18\nhuman-in-the-loop           ██████████        14\nmulti-agent-systems         ████████          12\ncognitive-scaffolding       ██████            9\nprompt-engineering          ██████            8\ntool-use                    █████             7\nreproducibility             █████             6\nfair-principles             ████              5\ntest-generation             ████              4\n\nResearch Gaps Identified:\n━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━\n\n  ⚠ Limited coverage of:\n      - Agent security (2 papers, recommend 5+)\n      - Cost optimization (1 paper, recommend 5+)\n      - Real-world case studies (3 papers, recommend 10+)\n\n  ⚠ Date range gaps:\n      - 2019-2020: Only 4 papers (consider historical context)\n\n  ⚠ Source diversity:\n      - Heavy arXiv reliance (32% preprints)\n      - Recommend more journal articles for HIGH GRADE sources\n\nHealth Score Breakdown:\n━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━\n\nCompleteness:               18\u002F20 (90%)\nIntegrity:                  20\u002F20 (100%)\nQuality:                    18\u002F20 (90%)\nCoverage:                   16\u002F20 (80%)\nPolicy Compliance:          20\u002F20 (100%)\n────────────────────────────────────────────\nOverall Health Score:       92\u002F100 (GOOD)\n\nRecommendations:\n━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━\n\nHigh Priority:\n  1. Complete quality assessments for REF-044, REF-045\n  2. Archive recently acquired papers (REF-041-045)\n\nMedium Priority:\n  3. Add literature notes for 9 papers lacking synthesis\n  4. Enrich metadata (keywords for 9 papers, abstracts for 1)\n  5. Fill research gaps: agent security, cost optimization\n\nLow Priority:\n  6. Add more pre-2020 papers for historical context\n  7. Increase journal article proportion for HIGH GRADE sources\n\nMaintenance Schedule:\n━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━\n\n  Weekly:\n    - Run \u002Fresearch-status --validate-all\n    - Archive new acquisitions\n    - Update literature notes\n\n  Monthly:\n    - Citation policy audit\n    - GRADE reassessment for preprints (check for publication)\n    - Fixity verification\n    - Generate synthesis reports\n\n  Quarterly:\n    - Topic coverage review\n    - Research gap analysis\n    - Corpus pruning (remove obsolete sources)\n```\n\n### Problems Only Mode\n\n```\n\u002Fresearch-status --problems-only\n\nResearch Corpus Issues\n━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━\n\nCRITICAL Issues (0):\n  None found\n\nHIGH Priority Issues (2):\n━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━\n\n  ⚠ Missing Quality Assessments:\n      - REF-044 (acquired 7 days ago)\n        Action: \u002Fresearch-quality REF-044\n      - REF-045 (acquired 5 days ago)\n        Action: \u002Fresearch-quality REF-045\n\nMEDIUM Priority Issues (5):\n━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━\n\n  ⚠ Missing Archival Packages:\n      - REF-041, REF-042, REF-043, REF-044, REF-045\n        Action: \u002Fresearch-archive REF-041 REF-042 REF-043 REF-044 REF-045\n\nLOW Priority Issues (9):\n━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━\n\n  ⚠ Missing Literature Notes:\n      - REF-012, REF-015, REF-023, REF-028, REF-031, REF-038, REF-041, REF-044, REF-045\n        Action: \u002Fresearch-document [REF-XXX] --depth comprehensive\n\nINFO Issues (3):\n━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━\n\n  ℹ Missing Keywords:\n      - REF-012, REF-018, REF-023, REF-028, REF-031, REF-038, REF-041, REF-044, REF-045\n        Action: Update frontmatter manually or re-run metadata extraction\n\nSummary:\n  Total Issues: 19\n  Critical: 0\n  High: 2\n  Medium: 5\n  Low: 9\n  Info: 3\n\nSuggested Actions:\n  # Fix high priority issues\n  \u002Fresearch-quality REF-044 REF-045\n\n  # Fix medium priority issues\n  \u002Fresearch-archive REF-041 REF-042 REF-043 REF-044 REF-045\n\n  # Address low priority issues (optional)\n  \u002Fresearch-document REF-012 --depth comprehensive\n```\n\n## Health Score Calculation\n\n```\nHealth Score = weighted_sum(\n  completeness_score * 0.25,\n  integrity_score * 0.25,\n  quality_score * 0.20,\n  coverage_score * 0.15,\n  compliance_score * 0.15\n)\n\nCompleteness = % artifacts with all required elements\nIntegrity = % passing fixity\u002Fprovenance checks\nQuality = GRADE distribution (higher is better)\nCoverage = Topic diversity and gap analysis\nCompliance = Citation policy and standards adherence\n\nScore Ranges:\n  90-100: EXCELLENT\n  80-89:  GOOD\n  70-79:  FAIR\n  60-69:  NEEDS IMPROVEMENT\n  \u003C60:    CRITICAL\n```\n\n## Scheduled Reports\n\nGenerate scheduled reports:\n\n```bash\n# Daily summary\n\u002Fresearch-status --export json > .aiwg\u002Fresearch\u002Freports\u002Fdaily-$(date +%Y%m%d).json\n\n# Weekly detailed\n\u002Fresearch-status --detailed --export markdown > .aiwg\u002Fresearch\u002Freports\u002Fweekly-$(date +%Y%m%d).md\n\n# Monthly with citation audit\n\u002Fresearch-status --validate-all --check-citations --export yaml > .aiwg\u002Fresearch\u002Freports\u002Fmonthly-$(date +%Y%m%d).yaml\n```\n\n## References\n\n- @$AIWG_ROOT\u002Fagentic\u002Fcode\u002Fframeworks\u002Fresearch-complete\u002Fagents\u002Fworkflow-agent.md - Status monitoring\n- @$AIWG_ROOT\u002Fsrc\u002Fresearch\u002Fservices\u002Fstatus-service.ts - Health check implementation\n- @.aiwg\u002Fresearch\u002Ffixity-manifest.json - Integrity tracking\n- @.aiwg\u002Fresearch\u002FREADME.md - Corpus structure\n- @$AIWG_ROOT\u002Fagentic\u002Fcode\u002Fframeworks\u002Fsdlc-complete\u002Frules\u002Fcitation-policy.md - Policy compliance\n","# Research Status Command\n\nDisplay comprehensive health check and statistics for the research corpus.\n\n## Scope Boundary\n\n`corpus-health` \u002F `research-status` is **structural** — it checks whether the corpus is well-formed:\n- Are files present where expected? (orphans, missing artifacts)\n- Is frontmatter complete and valid? (schema violations)\n- Are references intact? (broken links, missing provenance)\n- Is the data well-organized? (checksums, naming, metadata)\n\nFor **intellectual** gap analysis — what topics lack coverage, what claims lack evidence, what contradictions are unresolved — use `research-gap` instead.\n\nFor **declarative rule checking** (automated, CI-ready), use `research-lint` which runs the `research` lint ruleset.\n\n## Instructions\n\nWhen invoked, analyze corpus health:\n\n1. **Scan Corpus**\n   - Count papers in `.aiwg\u002Fresearch\u002Fsources\u002F`\n   - Count finding documents\n   - Count quality assessments\n   - Count archival packages\n   - Identify orphaned or incomplete artifacts\n\n2. **Validate Integrity**\n   - Check fixity manifest integrity\n   - Verify all checksums\n   - Detect corrupted files\n   - Find missing provenance records\n\n3. **Assess Completeness**\n   - Papers missing finding documents\n   - Papers missing quality assessments\n   - Papers missing archival packages\n   - Incomplete frontmatter\n   - Missing metadata fields\n\n4. **Analyze Coverage**\n   - Topic distribution\n   - Publication year distribution\n   - Source type distribution (journal, conference, preprint)\n   - GRADE quality distribution\n\n5. **Check Policy Compliance**\n   - Citation policy violations\n   - GRADE hedging compliance\n   - Provenance completeness\n   - Metadata standards adherence\n\n6. **Generate Report**\n   - Summary statistics\n   - Health score\n   - Problem areas flagged\n   - Remediation suggestions\n\n## Arguments\n\n- `--detailed` - Show detailed statistics and breakdowns\n- `--problems-only` - Only show issues requiring attention\n- `--export [json|yaml|markdown]` - Export report to file\n- `--validate-all` - Perform deep validation (slower, thorough)\n- `--check-citations` - Include citation policy validation\n\n## Examples\n\n```bash\n# Basic status check\n\u002Fresearch-status\n\n# Detailed analysis\n\u002Fresearch-status --detailed\n\n# Show only problems\n\u002Fresearch-status --problems-only\n\n# Full validation with citation check\n\u002Fresearch-status --validate-all --check-citations\n\n# Export report\n\u002Fresearch-status --detailed --export markdown\n```\n\n## Expected Output\n\n### Standard Mode\n\n```\nResearch Corpus Health Check\n━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━\n\nCorpus Statistics:\n─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────\n  Papers:               47\n  Finding Documents:    47 (100%)\n  Quality Assessments:  45 (96%)\n  Archival Packages:    42 (89%)\n  Literature Notes:     38 (81%)\n\n  Total Size:           142.8 MB\n  Oldest Paper:         2018\n  Newest Paper:         2024\n\nHealth Score: 92\u002F100 (GOOD)\n─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────\n\nCompleteness:\n─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────\n  ✓ All papers have finding documents\n  ⚠ 2 papers missing quality assessments (REF-044, REF-045)\n  ⚠ 5 papers missing archival packages (REF-041-045)\n  ✓ Fixity manifest up to date\n  ✓ Provenance records complete\n\nQuality Distribution:\n─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────\n  HIGH:      12 papers (26%)  ████████░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░\n  MODERATE:  18 papers (38%)  ███████████████░░░░░░░░░░░\n  LOW:       14 papers (30%)  ████████████░░░░░░░░░░░░░░\n  VERY LOW:   3 papers (6%)   ██░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░\n\nSource Types:\n─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────\n  Peer-reviewed Journal:    15 (32%)\n  Peer-reviewed Conference: 22 (47%)\n  Preprint:                  8 (17%)\n  Technical Report:          2 (4%)\n\nTopics (Top 5):\n─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────\n  1. agentic-workflows         24 papers\n  2. llm-evaluation            18 papers\n  3. human-in-the-loop         14 papers\n  4. multi-agent-systems       12 papers\n  5. cognitive-scaffolding      9 papers\n\nIssues Requiring Attention:\n─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────\n  ⚠ 2 papers need quality assessment:\n      - REF-044 (acquired 7 days ago)\n      - REF-045 (acquired 5 days ago)\n\n  ⚠ 5 papers need archival:\n      - REF-041, REF-042, REF-043, REF-044, REF-045\n\n  ⚠ 9 papers need literature notes\n\nNext Steps:\n─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────\n  1. \u002Fresearch-quality REF-044 REF-045 - Complete quality assessments\n  2. \u002Fresearch-archive REF-041 REF-042 REF-043 REF-044 REF-045\n  3. \u002Fresearch-document REF-038 --depth comprehensive --include-notes\n\nLast Corpus Update: 2026-02-03T14:35:25Z (15 minutes ago)\n```\n\n### Detailed Mode\n\n```\n\u002Fresearch-status --detailed\n\nResearch Corpus Health Check (Detailed)\n━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━\n\nCorpus Statistics:\n━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━\n\nPapers by Year:\n  2024: ███████████ 18 (38%)\n  2023: ██████████  15 (32%)\n  2022: ████        6 (13%)\n  2021: ███         4 (9%)\n  2020: ██          3 (6%)\n  2019: ░           1 (2%)\n\nPapers by GRADE Level:\n  HIGH:      ████████  12 (26%)\n    - Systematic Reviews: 4\n    - Meta-analyses: 2\n    - High-quality RCTs: 6\n\n  MODERATE:  ███████████████  18 (38%)\n    - Conference Papers: 12\n    - Cohort Studies: 6\n\n  LOW:       ████████████  14 (30%)\n    - Case Series: 8\n    - Limited Evaluation: 6\n\n  VERY LOW:  ██  3 (6%)\n    - Preprints (not peer-reviewed): 2\n    - Blog Posts: 1\n\nPapers by Source:\n  ACM Digital Library:      12\n  IEEE Xplore:              8\n  arXiv:                    15\n  Nature\u002FScience:           5\n  Springer:                 4\n  Other:                    3\n\nAIWG Relevance:\n  HIGH:      32 papers (68%)  - Direct applicability\n  MEDIUM:    12 papers (26%)  - Tangential relevance\n  LOW:        3 papers (6%)   - Background\u002Fcontext only\n\nCitation Usage:\n  Total citations across corpus: 347\n  Average citations per paper:   7.4\n  Most cited: REF-001 (34 citations)\n  Least cited: REF-044 (0 citations, new)\n\nCompleteness Matrix:\n━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━\n\nArtifact Type               Count    %      Status\n────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────\nSource PDFs                 47\u002F47    100%   ✓ Complete\nFinding Documents           47\u002F47    100%   ✓ Complete\nQuality Assessments         45\u002F47    96%    ⚠ 2 missing\nArchival Packages           42\u002F47    89%    ⚠ 5 missing\nLiterature Notes            38\u002F47    81%    ⚠ 9 missing\nProvenance Records          47\u002F47    100%   ✓ Complete\n\nMetadata Completeness:\n────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────\nDOI:                        44\u002F47    94%    ⚠ 3 preprints lack DOI\nAuthors:                    47\u002F47    100%   ✓ Complete\nYear:                       47\u002F47    100%   ✓ Complete\nAbstract:                   46\u002F47    98%    ⚠ 1 missing\nKeywords:                   38\u002F47    81%    ⚠ 9 missing\nCitation Count:             45\u002F47    96%    ⚠ 2 missing\n\nIntegrity Checks:\n━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━\n\nFixity Validation:          47\u002F47    100%   ✓ All checksums verified\nProvenance Chains:          47\u002F47    100%   ✓ Complete\nBroken References:          0               ✓ None found\nOrphaned Files:             0               ✓ None found\n\nStorage Metrics:\n━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━\n\nTotal Size:                 142.8 MB\n  Source PDFs:              128.4 MB (90%)\n  Finding Documents:        2.1 MB (1%)\n  Literature Notes:         0.8 MB (1%)\n  Quality Assessments:      0.3 MB (\u003C1%)\n  Archival Packages:        11.2 MB (8%)\n\nAverage PDF Size:           2.7 MB\nLargest Paper:              REF-015 (12.4 MB, book chapter)\nSmallest Paper:             REF-031 (0.4 MB, short paper)\n\nTopic Coverage:\n━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━\n\nagentic-workflows           ████████████████  24\nllm-evaluation              ████████████      18\nhuman-in-the-loop           ██████████        14\nmulti-agent-systems         ████████          12\ncognitive-scaffolding       ██████            9\nprompt-engineering          ██████            8\ntool-use                    █████             7\nreproducibility             █████             6\nfair-principles             ████              5\ntest-generation             ████              4\n\nResearch Gaps Identified:\n━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━\n\n  ⚠ Limited coverage of:\n      - Agent security (2 papers, recommend 5+)\n      - Cost optimization (1 paper, recommend 5+)\n      - Real-world case studies (3 papers, recommend 10+)\n\n  ⚠ Date range gaps:\n      - 2019-2020: Only 4 papers (consider historical context)\n\n  ⚠ Source diversity:\n      - Heavy arXiv reliance (32% preprints)\n      - Recommend more journal articles for HIGH GRADE sources\n\nHealth Score Breakdown:\n━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━\n\nCompleteness:               18\u002F20 (90%)\nIntegrity:                  20\u002F20 (100%)\nQuality:                    18\u002F20 (90%)\nCoverage:                   16\u002F20 (80%)\nPolicy Compliance:          20\u002F20 (100%)\n────────────────────────────────────────────\nOverall Health Score:       92\u002F100 (GOOD)\n\nRecommendations:\n━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━\n\nHigh Priority:\n  1. Complete quality assessments for REF-044, REF-045\n  2. Archive recently acquired papers (REF-041-045)\n\nMedium Priority:\n  3. Add literature notes for 9 papers lacking synthesis\n  4. Enrich metadata (keywords for 9 papers, abstracts for 1)\n  5. Fill research gaps: agent security, cost optimization\n\nLow Priority:\n  6. Add more pre-2020 papers for historical context\n  7. Increase journal article proportion for HIGH GRADE sources\n\nMaintenance Schedule:\n━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━\n\n  Weekly:\n    - Run \u002Fresearch-status --validate-all\n    - Archive new acquisitions\n    - Update literature notes\n\n  Monthly:\n    - Citation policy audit\n    - GRADE reassessment for preprints (check for publication)\n    - Fixity verification\n    - Generate synthesis reports\n\n  Quarterly:\n    - Topic coverage review\n    - Research gap analysis\n    - Corpus pruning (remove obsolete sources)\n```\n\n### Problems Only Mode\n\n```\n\u002Fresearch-status --problems-only\n\nResearch Corpus Issues\n━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━\n\nCRITICAL Issues (0):\n  None found\n\nHIGH Priority Issues (2):\n━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━\n\n  ⚠ Missing Quality Assessments:\n      - REF-044 (acquired 7 days ago)\n        Action: \u002Fresearch-quality REF-044\n      - REF-045 (acquired 5 days ago)\n        Action: \u002Fresearch-quality REF-045\n\nMEDIUM Priority Issues (5):\n━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━\n\n  ⚠ Missing Archival Packages:\n      - REF-041, REF-042, REF-043, REF-044, REF-045\n        Action: \u002Fresearch-archive REF-041 REF-042 REF-043 REF-044 REF-045\n\nLOW Priority Issues (9):\n━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━\n\n  ⚠ Missing Literature Notes:\n      - REF-012, REF-015, REF-023, REF-028, REF-031, REF-038, REF-041, REF-044, REF-045\n        Action: \u002Fresearch-document [REF-XXX] --depth comprehensive\n\nINFO Issues (3):\n━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━\n\n  ℹ Missing Keywords:\n      - REF-012, REF-018, REF-023, REF-028, REF-031, REF-038, REF-041, REF-044, REF-045\n        Action: Update frontmatter manually or re-run metadata extraction\n\nSummary:\n  Total Issues: 19\n  Critical: 0\n  High: 2\n  Medium: 5\n  Low: 9\n  Info: 3\n\nSuggested Actions:\n  # Fix high priority issues\n  \u002Fresearch-quality REF-044 REF-045\n\n  # Fix medium priority issues\n  \u002Fresearch-archive REF-041 REF-042 REF-043 REF-044 REF-045\n\n  # Address low priority issues (optional)\n  \u002Fresearch-document REF-012 --depth comprehensive\n```\n\n## Health Score Calculation\n\n```\nHealth Score = weighted_sum(\n  completeness_score * 0.25,\n  integrity_score * 0.25,\n  quality_score * 0.20,\n  coverage_score * 0.15,\n  compliance_score * 0.15\n)\n\nCompleteness = % artifacts with all required elements\nIntegrity = % passing fixity\u002Fprovenance checks\nQuality = GRADE distribution (higher is better)\nCoverage = Topic diversity and gap analysis\nCompliance = Citation policy and standards adherence\n\nScore Ranges:\n  90-100: EXCELLENT\n  80-89:  GOOD\n  70-79:  FAIR\n  60-69:  NEEDS IMPROVEMENT\n  \u003C60:    CRITICAL\n```\n\n## Scheduled Reports\n\nGenerate scheduled reports:\n\n```bash\n# Daily summary\n\u002Fresearch-status --export json > .aiwg\u002Fresearch\u002Freports\u002Fdaily-$(date +%Y%m%d).json\n\n# Weekly detailed\n\u002Fresearch-status --detailed --export markdown > .aiwg\u002Fresearch\u002Freports\u002Fweekly-$(date +%Y%m%d).md\n\n# Monthly with citation audit\n\u002Fresearch-status --validate-all --check-citations --export yaml > .aiwg\u002Fresearch\u002Freports\u002Fmonthly-$(date +%Y%m%d).yaml\n```\n\n## References\n\n- @$AIWG_ROOT\u002Fagentic\u002Fcode\u002Fframeworks\u002Fresearch-complete\u002Fagents\u002Fworkflow-agent.md - Status monitoring\n- @$AIWG_ROOT\u002Fsrc\u002Fresearch\u002Fservices\u002Fstatus-service.ts - Health check implementation\n- @.aiwg\u002Fresearch\u002Ffixity-manifest.json - Integrity tracking\n- @.aiwg\u002Fresearch\u002FREADME.md - Corpus structure\n- @$AIWG_ROOT\u002Fagentic\u002Fcode\u002Fframeworks\u002Fsdlc-complete\u002Frules\u002Fcitation-policy.md - Policy compliance\n",{"name":5,"namespace":43,"platforms":44,"commandHint":46,"description":7},"aiwg",[45],"all",{"category":47,"argumentHint":48},"research-monitoring","[--detailed] [--problems-only] [--export json]","main","6754967c344ccb087a8de06972f55a41067b291b","agentic\u002Fcode\u002Fframeworks\u002Fresearch-complete\u002Fskills\u002Fresearch-status",36,"https:\u002F\u002Fgithub.com\u002Fjmagly\u002Faiwg","https:\u002F\u002Faiwg.io","https:\u002F\u002Fgithub.com\u002Fjmagly","https:\u002F\u002Fintegrolabs.io","ml\u002Fai, industrial automation, safety\u002Fsecurity, ssi\r\n\r\nmagly.net\r\nintegrolabs.io\r\naiwg.io\r\nfortemi.com\r\npagenary.com\r\nbytecask.com","2026-11-12 21:57:33",{"source":8,"skillName":5,"commands":60,"prompt":70,"zipAvailable":71},[61,64,67],{"tool":62,"command":63},"npx","npx skills add jmagly\u002Faiwg --skill research-status",{"tool":65,"command":66},"bunx","bunx skills add jmagly\u002Faiwg --skill research-status",{"tool":68,"command":69},"pnpm","pnpm dlx skills add jmagly\u002Faiwg --skill research-status","安装技能，技能地址：https:\u002F\u002Fgithub.com\u002Fjmagly\u002Faiwg\u002Fblob\u002Fmain\u002Fagentic\u002Fcode\u002Fframeworks\u002Fresearch-complete\u002Fskills\u002Fresearch-status\u002FSKILL.md",true,[],[74,101,125,131,138,152],{"skillNo":75,"name":76,"nameZh":6,"description":77,"descriptionZh":6,"repositoryFullName":8,"ownerLogin":9,"ownerAvatarUrl":10,"ownerAccountNo":11,"ownerDisplayName":12,"repositoryNo":13,"starsCount":14,"licenseSpdxId":15,"licenseFileUrl":6,"sourceHtmlUrl":78,"categories":79,"keywords":81,"publishedAt":38},"01M70QA0BSYJ49EES9V4RE8QH1","host-hardening","Read-only system hardening baseline and plan-first host hardening recommendations for SSH, Docker bind addresses, firewall persistence, datastores, exporters and audit retention.","https:\u002F\u002Fgithub.com\u002Fjmagly\u002Faiwg\u002Fblob\u002Fmain\u002Fagentic\u002Fcode\u002Fplugins\u002Fsecurity-engineering\u002Fskills\u002Fhost-hardening\u002FSKILL.md",[80],{"categoryNo":24,"categoryName":25,"taxonomyType":21,"taxonomyTypeDesc":22},[82,83,84,85,86,87,88,89,90,91,92,93,35,94,95,96,97,98,99,100],"host","host hardening","hardening","read","re","recommendations","remediation","plan","port","verification","Bash","access","retention","audit","never","firewall","bind","secrets","request",{"skillNo":102,"name":103,"nameZh":6,"description":104,"descriptionZh":6,"repositoryFullName":8,"ownerLogin":9,"ownerAvatarUrl":10,"ownerAccountNo":11,"ownerDisplayName":12,"repositoryNo":13,"starsCount":14,"licenseSpdxId":15,"licenseFileUrl":6,"sourceHtmlUrl":105,"categories":106,"keywords":111,"publishedAt":38},"01M70PNT2Z4HMZPRBTAF6073NN","exposure-analysis","Read-only firewall analysis and effective host exposure reconstruction for Docker published ports, UFW bypass, stale rules, CDN scope, IPv6 asymmetry and external probe allowlists.","https:\u002F\u002Fgithub.com\u002Fjmagly\u002Faiwg\u002Fblob\u002Fmain\u002Fagentic\u002Fcode\u002Fplugins\u002Fforensics\u002Fskills\u002Fexposure-analysis\u002FSKILL.md",[107,110],{"categoryNo":108,"categoryName":109,"taxonomyType":21,"taxonomyTypeDesc":22},"01JBSEEDCAT000000000000011","运维与部署",{"categoryNo":24,"categoryName":25,"taxonomyType":21,"taxonomyTypeDesc":22},[112,113,114,85,115,90,116,117,92,118,82,119,35,120,121,96,97,122,123,124],"exposure analysis","analysis","unknown","credentials","collection","ufw","ports","internet","local","scope","reconstruction","operator","write",{"skillNo":126,"name":76,"nameZh":6,"description":77,"descriptionZh":6,"repositoryFullName":8,"ownerLogin":9,"ownerAvatarUrl":10,"ownerAccountNo":11,"ownerDisplayName":12,"repositoryNo":13,"starsCount":14,"licenseSpdxId":15,"licenseFileUrl":6,"sourceHtmlUrl":127,"categories":128,"keywords":130,"publishedAt":38},"01M70P8QATMPKA78E4FT5D2TNA","https:\u002F\u002Fgithub.com\u002Fjmagly\u002Faiwg\u002Fblob\u002Fmain\u002Fagentic\u002Fcode\u002Fframeworks\u002Fsecurity-engineering\u002Fskills\u002Fhost-hardening\u002FSKILL.md",[129],{"categoryNo":24,"categoryName":25,"taxonomyType":21,"taxonomyTypeDesc":22},[84,82,83,93,85,100,88,87,95,89,90,91,92,99,35,94,86,96,97,98],{"skillNo":132,"name":103,"nameZh":6,"description":104,"descriptionZh":6,"repositoryFullName":8,"ownerLogin":9,"ownerAvatarUrl":10,"ownerAccountNo":11,"ownerDisplayName":12,"repositoryNo":13,"starsCount":14,"licenseSpdxId":15,"licenseFileUrl":6,"sourceHtmlUrl":133,"categories":134,"keywords":137,"publishedAt":38},"01M70NMPVJ5H0JH131P60FW4R8","https:\u002F\u002Fgithub.com\u002Fjmagly\u002Faiwg\u002Fblob\u002Fmain\u002Fagentic\u002Fcode\u002Fframeworks\u002Fforensics-complete\u002Fskills\u002Fexposure-analysis\u002FSKILL.md",[135,136],{"categoryNo":108,"categoryName":109,"taxonomyType":21,"taxonomyTypeDesc":22},{"categoryNo":24,"categoryName":25,"taxonomyType":21,"taxonomyTypeDesc":22},[113,112,96,115,90,116,92,114,82,119,35,120,121,85,97,118,117,122,123,124],{"skillNo":139,"name":140,"nameZh":6,"description":141,"descriptionZh":6,"repositoryFullName":8,"ownerLogin":9,"ownerAvatarUrl":10,"ownerAccountNo":11,"ownerDisplayName":12,"repositoryNo":13,"starsCount":14,"licenseSpdxId":15,"licenseFileUrl":6,"sourceHtmlUrl":142,"categories":143,"keywords":145,"publishedAt":38},"01M6CB4DDR0B4NNCFK7ZK7449H","fixture-skill","Exercise rule delivery.","https:\u002F\u002Fgithub.com\u002Fjmagly\u002Faiwg\u002Fblob\u002Fmain\u002Ftest\u002Ffixtures\u002Frule-delivery\u002Fskills\u002Ffixture-skill\u002FSKILL.md",[144],{"categoryNo":24,"categoryName":25,"taxonomyType":21,"taxonomyTypeDesc":22},[146,147,148,149,150,151],"fixture skill","fixture","rule","delivery","true","exercise",{"skillNo":153,"name":154,"nameZh":6,"description":155,"descriptionZh":6,"repositoryFullName":8,"ownerLogin":9,"ownerAvatarUrl":10,"ownerAccountNo":11,"ownerDisplayName":12,"repositoryNo":13,"starsCount":14,"licenseSpdxId":15,"licenseFileUrl":6,"sourceHtmlUrl":156,"categories":157,"keywords":159,"publishedAt":38},"01M6CB4AVK1W76MFMPP0JP32CJ","pi-local","Pi-local duplicate-precedence fixture.","https:\u002F\u002Fgithub.com\u002Fjmagly\u002Faiwg\u002Fblob\u002Fmain\u002Ftest\u002Ffixtures\u002Fproviders\u002Fpi\u002Fproject\u002F.pi\u002Fskills\u002Fpi-local\u002FSKILL.md",[158],{"categoryNo":24,"categoryName":25,"taxonomyType":21,"taxonomyTypeDesc":22},[160,161,120,162,147],"pi","pi local","duplicate"]