AGENT SKILL

public-technology-review

Build a vendor-neutral, source-linked public-technology procurement evidence and risk review without autonomous scoring or award recommendations.

License 许可
MIT
所属仓库
jmagly/aiwg
最近更新
2026-11-11
Stars
★ 229
Forks
36

01 前言 Front Matter

name
public-technology-review
triggers
[ "review a public technology procurement", "compare civic technology contract evidence", "assess public sector vendor lock in and lifecycle risk" ]
namespace
aiwg
platforms
[ "all" ]
description
Build a vendor-neutral, source-linked public-technology procurement evidence and risk review without autonomous scoring or award recommendations.

03 SKILL.md 正文

Public Technology Review

Process

  1. Select and cite the governing procurement profile; FAR/NIST are reference models unless adopted by that jurisdiction.
  2. Inventory need, planning, market research, solicitation, selection, award, administration, oversight, and public-release records.
  3. Separate protected proposals/source-selection material from public releases.
  4. Record claims and evidence without sentiment scores. Risk ratings require a human-defined scale, rationale, uncertainty, owner, and verification method.
  5. Do not infer corruption, rank vendors, or recommend an award autonomously.
  6. Record explicit handoff states for missing records, meeting/vote analysis, and any publication packet; protected material never enters a public handoff.

Output

A schema-valid evidence/risk review and human decision questions.

References

  • schemas/public-technology-review.schema.json
  • templates/public-technology-review.md
  • docs/research/civic-workflow-standards.md
  • docs/research/control-source-matrix.md

04 同仓库更多 Skills