code-comments
Write code comments that comment the non-obvious and delete the rest. Use when writing or editing comments in source code, adding explanatory comments to a change, or when the user asks to add, trim, or review comments. Steers toward brief, intent-focused comments and away from backstory, justification, or restating the code.
- License 许可
- MIT
- 最近更新
- 2026-10-26
- Stars
- ★ 2
- Forks
- 1
01 前言 Front Matter
- name
- code-comments
- description
- Write code comments that comment the non-obvious and delete the rest. Use when writing or editing comments in source code, adding explanatory comments to a change, or when the user asks to add, trim, or review comments. Steers toward brief, intent-focused comments and away from backstory, justification, or restating the code.
03 SKILL.md 正文
Code comments
Comment the non-obvious; delete the rest. A comment is a cost (it rots, it adds noise); it has to buy more than it costs.
A comment earns its place only if it says something the code can't
- Intent that isn't visible in the code itself
- A non-obvious decision or trade-off: why here, why this way, not the obvious alternative
- A constraint, invariant, or gotcha that will bite a later editor
- A pointer to context the reader needs (spec, ticket) as a link, not a retelling
Never
- Restate what the code plainly does (
// increment i) or echo the function/variable name - Narrate the backstory or justify the change: what was broken, what you investigated, why it matters. That's PR / commit / ticket territory, not source.
- Leave a comment the next edit will quietly make false
The test
Before keeping a comment, ask: does this describe what the code does or why it's here, or is it justifying the change / telling a story? A story or a justification gets cut, or moved to the commit or PR.
Style
- Usually one line. Say the thing and stop.
- Match the file's existing comment density and idiom; don't import a different house style.
- Prefer why over what. The what is in the code and rots fast; the why rots slowly.
- Rich context (root cause, the investigation, environment-specific findings) belongs in the PR, ticket, or commit message, not the source.
Worked example: trim to the one non-obvious fact
A collectDefaultMetrics() call added to a shared metrics module:
v1 (7 lines): full backstory — idle process serves empty /metrics, looks
identical to a broken endpoint, makes the partner metric a
clean signal… → an essay
v2 (2 lines): "…so an idle process still exposes a non-empty /metrics;
every other metric here is labelled…" → still justifying the change
v3 (1 line): "Here, not per-app, so every app importing these metrics
also gets the process_*/nodejs_* baseline." → the one non-obvious fact: placement
Each trim drops a layer of justification until only the thing a reader can't infer from the code remains: why the call lives in this shared module.
04 同仓库更多 Skills
zoom-out
Tell the agent to zoom out and give broader context or a higher-level perspective. Use when you're unfamiliar with a section of code or need to understand how it fits into the bigger picture.
tdd
Test-driven development. Use when the user wants to build features or fix bugs test-first, mentions "red-green-refactor", or wants integration tests.
improve-codebase-architecture
Scan a codebase for deepening opportunities, present them as a visual HTML report, then grill through whichever one you pick.
handoff
Compact the current conversation into a handoff document for another agent to pick up.
grilling
Grill the user relentlessly about a plan, decision, or idea. Use when the user wants to stress-test their thinking, or uses any 'grill' trigger phrases.
grill-with-docs
A relentless interview to sharpen a plan or design, which also creates docs (ADR's and glossary) as we go.