AGENT SKILL

testing-ransomware-recovery-procedures

Tests and validates ransomware recovery procedures - backup restore operations (e.g. with Restic), RTO/RPO target verification, recovery sequencing, and clean-restore validation - to confirm organizational resilience against destructive ransomware attacks. Use when validating that recovery plans work under realistic conditions, measuring RTO/RPO against business requirements, or testing restore integrity after simulated encryption.

License 许可
Apache-2.0
最近更新
2026-08-31
Stars
★ 3.6w
Forks
4.4k

01 前言 Front Matter

name
testing-ransomware-recovery-procedures
tags
[ "incident-response", "ransomware", "disaster-recovery", "backup", "rto", "rpo", "resilience" ]
author
mahipal
domain
cybersecurity
license
Apache-2.0
version
1.0
mitre_f3
{ "tactics": [ "positioning", "monetization" ], "version": "1.1", "techniques": [ { "id": "T1531", "name": "Account Access Removal", "source": "attack", "tactic": "positioning" }, { "id": "F1018", "name": "Convert to Cryptocurrency", "source": "f3", "tactic": "monetization" }, { "id": "F1047", "name": "Transfer of funds", "source": "f3", "tactic": "monetization" }, { "id": "F1017.001", "name": "Conversion to Physical Monetary Instruments: Cash", "source": "f3", "tactic": "monetization" } ] }
nist_csf
[ "RS.MA-01", "RS.MA-02", "RS.AN-03", "RC.RP-01" ]
subdomain
incident-response
description
Tests and validates ransomware recovery procedures - backup restore operations (e.g. with Restic), RTO/RPO target verification, recovery sequencing, and clean-restore validation - to confirm organizational resilience against destructive ransomware attacks. Use when validating that recovery plans work under realistic conditions, measuring RTO/RPO against business requirements, or testing restore integrity after simulated encryption.
mitre_attack
[ "T1486", "T1490", "T1070", "T1078", "T1489" ]

02 资源文件 7

03 SKILL.md 正文

Testing Ransomware Recovery Procedures

When to Use

Use this skill when:

  • Validating that ransomware recovery plans actually work under realistic conditions
  • Measuring RTO (Recovery Time Objective) and RPO (Recovery Point Objective) against business requirements
  • Testing backup restore operations to confirm data integrity and completeness after simulated encryption
  • Conducting tabletop exercises or live recovery drills for ransomware scenarios
  • Auditing disaster recovery readiness as part of compliance or cyber insurance requirements

Do not use for active incident response during a live ransomware attack. Use dedicated IR playbooks instead.

Prerequisites

  • Isolated recovery test environment (air-gapped or network-segmented lab)
  • Access to backup infrastructure (Veeam, Commvault, Rubrik, AWS Backup, Azure Backup)
  • Documented RTO/RPO targets per application tier from business impact analysis
  • Backup copies available for restore testing (production replicas or test snapshots)
  • Recovery runbooks with step-by-step procedures for each critical system

Workflow

Step 1: Define Recovery Test Scope

Identify critical systems and their tiered recovery targets:

Tier System Type RTO Target RPO Target Example
Tier 1 Mission-critical < 1 hour < 15 min Active Directory, core database
Tier 2 Business-critical < 4 hours < 1 hour ERP, email, CRM
Tier 3 Business-operational < 24 hours < 4 hours File shares, internal apps
Tier 4 Non-critical < 72 hours < 24 hours Dev/test, analytics

Step 2: Prepare Test Environment

# Verify isolated recovery network is segmented
# No routes to production should exist
ip route show | grep -v "192.168.100.0/24"  # recovery VLAN only

# Verify backup catalog is accessible
restic snapshots --repo s3:s3.amazonaws.com/backup-bucket --password-file /etc/restic/pw
# Or for Veeam:
# Get-VBRBackup | Where-Object {$_.JobType -eq "Backup"} | Select Name, LastPointCreationTime

Step 3: Execute Restore and Measure RTO

For each tiered system, measure the full recovery timeline:

  1. Detection to Decision - Time from simulated alert to restore decision
  2. Backup Locate - Time to identify and select the correct clean restore point
  3. Restore Execution - Time to restore data/VM/application from backup
  4. Validation - Time to verify data integrity and application functionality
  5. Service Restoration - Time until the system is fully operational
Recovery Timeline Measurement:
  T0: Incident declared (simulated ransomware detection)
  T1: Recovery team assembled and backup identified
  T2: Restore initiated from clean backup
  T3: Restore completed, integrity checks passed
  T4: Application validated and service restored

  Actual RTO = T4 - T0
  Actual RPO = T0 - backup_timestamp

Step 4: Validate Data Integrity Post-Restore

# Compare file counts between backup manifest and restored data
find /restored/data -type f | wc -l
# Compare against pre-backup manifest

# Verify database consistency after restore
pg_isready -h localhost -p 5432
psql -c "SELECT count(*) FROM critical_table;" -d restored_db

# Hash verification of critical files
sha256sum /restored/data/critical_config.xml
# Compare against known-good hash from backup manifest

Step 5: Test Credential Rotation and Security Hardening

After restore, validate that security controls are re-established:

  1. Rotate all service account passwords and API keys
  2. Verify MFA is enabled on all administrative accounts
  3. Confirm EDR/AV agents are running and reporting to management console
  4. Validate firewall rules block known C2 indicators
  5. Check that restored systems have latest security patches

Step 6: Document Results and Calculate Gap

Recovery Test Report:
  System: [Name]
  Tier: [1-4]
  RTO Target: [target]    Actual RTO: [measured]    Gap: [delta]
  RPO Target: [target]    Actual RPO: [measured]    Gap: [delta]
  Data Integrity: [PASS/FAIL]
  Application Validation: [PASS/FAIL]
  Security Controls Restored: [PASS/FAIL]

  Status: [MEETS TARGET / EXCEEDS TARGET / FAILS TARGET]
  Remediation Required: [description if FAILS]

Key Concepts

Term Definition
RTO Recovery Time Objective: maximum acceptable downtime for a system after a disaster
RPO Recovery Point Objective: maximum acceptable data loss measured in time
WRT Work Recovery Time: time to verify system integrity after restore completes
MTD Maximum Tolerable Downtime: absolute limit before unacceptable business impact
Clean Restore Point A backup verified to be free of ransomware artifacts or encryption
Recovery Sequencing The order in which interdependent systems must be restored
Air-Gapped Backup Backup stored on media physically disconnected from the network

Tools & Systems

Tool Purpose
Veeam Backup & Replication VM and physical server backup and restore
Commvault Enterprise data protection and recovery orchestration
Rubrik Cloud-native backup with ransomware recovery SLA
AWS Backup Centralized backup for AWS services
Azure Backup Microsoft cloud backup with immutable vault
Restic Open-source encrypted backup tool
Velero Kubernetes cluster backup and restore

Common Pitfalls

  • Not testing restores regularly: Backups that are never tested often fail when needed. Test quarterly at minimum.
  • Ignoring recovery sequencing: Restoring an application before its database dependency causes cascading failures.
  • Skipping credential rotation: Restored systems may contain compromised credentials that allow re-infection.
  • Using production network for testing: Recovery tests on production networks risk spreading simulated or real infections.
  • Measuring RTO without WRT: Restore completion is not recovery completion. Include validation and hardening time.
  • No immutable backups: If ransomware can encrypt or delete backups, recovery is impossible. Use air-gapped or immutable storage.

References

04 同仓库更多 Skills

mukul975
mukul975/Anthropic-Cybersecurity-Skills

verifying-build-provenance-with-slsa-sigstore

Verifies artifact signatures and SLSA provenance using Sigstore's cosign (verify, verify-attestation, verify-blob-attestation) and slsa-verifier (verify-artifact), enforcing keyless OIDC builder identity and source repo against SLSA Build levels. Use in CI/CD before deploying artifacts, when consuming third-party attestations, establishing a SLSA Build L3 pipeline, or confirming provenance during incident response or admission control.

Skill与智能体开发
★ 3.6w
mukul975
mukul975/Anthropic-Cybersecurity-Skills

validating-tpm-measured-boot-attestation

Verifies TPM 2.0 measured-boot integrity and remote attestation with tpm2-tools -- reading PCRs (tpm2_pcrread), replaying the boot event log, generating and checking signed quotes (tpm2_quote/tpm2_checkquote), and sealing secrets to a PCR policy. Use to confirm a system booted trusted firmware/kernel for Zero Trust device posture, detect boot-chain tampering via PCR drift, or build a golden-value baseline for fleet attestation.

Skill与智能体开发
★ 3.6w
mukul975
mukul975/Anthropic-Cybersecurity-Skills

validating-backup-integrity-for-recovery

Validates backup integrity through cryptographic hash verification, automated restore testing, corruption detection, and recoverability checks to confirm backups are reliable for disaster recovery and ransomware response. Use before relying on backups for recovery, when building post-backup validation pipelines, auditing backup infrastructure for compliance, or checking immutable/air-gapped backups for silent corruption or tampering.

测试与质量Skill与智能体开发
★ 3.6w
mukul975
mukul975/Anthropic-Cybersecurity-Skills

triaging-windows-with-kape

Runs KAPE (Kroll Artifact Parser and Extractor) to collect targeted forensic artifacts (registry hives, $MFT, event logs, prefetch, browser data) via Targets and parse them with Modules wrapping Eric Zimmerman's EZ Tools (PECmd, MFTECmd, RECmd). Use during early incident containment/triage when full disk imaging is impractical but a defensible, parseable Windows artifact set is needed quickly, including at-scale remote collection.

Skill与智能体开发
★ 3.6w
mukul975
mukul975/Anthropic-Cybersecurity-Skills

triaging-vulnerabilities-with-ssvc-framework

Triages and prioritizes vulnerabilities with CISA's Stakeholder-Specific Vulnerability Categorization (SSVC) decision tree, weighing exploitation status (via the CISA KEV catalog and FIRST EPSS API), technical impact, automatability, and mission prevalence to output Track/Track*/Attend/Act decisions. Use when prioritizing vulnerability scan results (OpenVAS, Nessus, Qualys) for remediation planning beyond raw CVSS scores.

Skill与智能体开发
★ 3.6w
mukul975
mukul975/Anthropic-Cybersecurity-Skills

triaging-security-incident

Performs initial triage of security incidents using the NIST SP 800-61r3 and SANS PICERL frameworks, classifying incident type, assigning priority by business impact, and routing to the appropriate response team. Use when a SIEM/EDR alert needs human classification, concurrent alerts must be prioritized, or a user report or threat-intel IOC match requires initial incident categorization.

Skill与智能体开发
★ 3.6w