AGENT SKILL

scikit-survival

Comprehensive toolkit for survival analysis and time-to-event modeling in Python using scikit-survival. Use this skill when working with censored survival data, performing time-to-event analysis, fitting Cox models, Random Survival Forests, Gradient Boosting models, or Survival SVMs, evaluating survival predictions with concordance index or Brier score, handling competing risks, or implementing any survival analysis workflow with the scikit-survival library.

License 许可
MIT
最近更新
2026-11-14
Stars
★ 3.3w
Forks
3.9k

01 前言 Front Matter

name
scikit-survival
description
Comprehensive toolkit for survival analysis and time-to-event modeling in Python using scikit-survival. Use this skill when working with censored survival data, performing time-to-event analysis, fitting Cox models, Random Survival Forests, Gradient Boosting models, or Survival SVMs, evaluating survival predictions with concordance index or Brier score, handling competing risks, or implementing any survival analysis workflow with the scikit-survival library.

02 资源文件 6

03 SKILL.md 正文

scikit-survival: Survival Analysis in Python

Overview

scikit-survival is a Python library for survival analysis built on top of scikit-learn. It provides specialized tools for time-to-event analysis, handling the unique challenge of censored data where some observations are only partially known.

Survival analysis aims to establish connections between covariates and the time of an event, accounting for censored records (particularly right-censored data from studies where participants don't experience events during observation periods).

When to Use This Skill

Use this skill when:

  • Performing survival analysis or time-to-event modeling
  • Working with censored data (right-censored, left-censored, or interval-censored)
  • Fitting Cox proportional hazards models (standard or penalized)
  • Building ensemble survival models (Random Survival Forests, Gradient Boosting)
  • Training Survival Support Vector Machines
  • Evaluating survival model performance (concordance index, Brier score, time-dependent AUC)
  • Estimating Kaplan-Meier or Nelson-Aalen curves
  • Analyzing competing risks
  • Preprocessing survival data or handling missing values in survival datasets
  • Conducting any analysis using the scikit-survival library

Core Capabilities

1. Model Types and Selection

scikit-survival provides multiple model families, each suited for different scenarios:

Cox Proportional Hazards Models

Use for: Standard survival analysis with interpretable coefficients

  • CoxPHSurvivalAnalysis: Basic Cox model
  • CoxnetSurvivalAnalysis: Penalized Cox with elastic net for high-dimensional data
  • IPCRidge: Ridge regression for accelerated failure time models

See: references/cox-models.md for detailed guidance on Cox models, regularization, and interpretation

Ensemble Methods

Use for: High predictive performance with complex non-linear relationships

  • RandomSurvivalForest: Robust, non-parametric ensemble method
  • GradientBoostingSurvivalAnalysis: Tree-based boosting for maximum performance
  • ComponentwiseGradientBoostingSurvivalAnalysis: Linear boosting with feature selection
  • ExtraSurvivalTrees: Extremely randomized trees for additional regularization

See: references/ensemble-models.md for comprehensive guidance on ensemble methods, hyperparameter tuning, and when to use each model

Survival Support Vector Machines

Use for: Medium-sized datasets with margin-based learning

  • FastSurvivalSVM: Linear SVM optimized for speed
  • FastKernelSurvivalSVM: Kernel SVM for non-linear relationships
  • HingeLossSurvivalSVM: SVM with hinge loss
  • ClinicalKernelTransform: Specialized kernel for clinical + molecular data

See: references/svm-models.md for detailed SVM guidance, kernel selection, and hyperparameter tuning

Model Selection Decision Tree

Start
├─ High-dimensional data (p > n)?
│  ├─ Yes → CoxnetSurvivalAnalysis (elastic net)
│  └─ No → Continue
│
├─ Need interpretable coefficients?
│  ├─ Yes → CoxPHSurvivalAnalysis or ComponentwiseGradientBoostingSurvivalAnalysis
│  └─ No → Continue
│
├─ Complex non-linear relationships expected?
│  ├─ Yes
│  │  ├─ Large dataset (n > 1000) → GradientBoostingSurvivalAnalysis
│  │  ├─ Medium dataset → RandomSurvivalForest or FastKernelSurvivalSVM
│  │  └─ Small dataset → RandomSurvivalForest
│  └─ No → CoxPHSurvivalAnalysis or FastSurvivalSVM
│
└─ For maximum performance → Try multiple models and compare

2. Data Preparation and Preprocessing

Before modeling, properly prepare survival data:

Creating Survival Outcomes

from sksurv.util import Surv

# From separate arrays
y = Surv.from_arrays(event=event_array, time=time_array)

# From DataFrame
y = Surv.from_dataframe('event', 'time', df)

Essential Preprocessing Steps

  1. Handle missing values: Imputation strategies for features
  2. Encode categorical variables: One-hot encoding or label encoding
  3. Standardize features: Critical for SVMs and regularized Cox models
  4. Validate data quality: Check for negative times, sufficient events per feature
  5. Train-test split: Maintain similar censoring rates across splits

See: references/data-handling.md for complete preprocessing workflows, data validation, and best practices

3. Model Evaluation

Proper evaluation is critical for survival models. Use appropriate metrics that account for censoring:

Concordance Index (C-index)

Primary metric for ranking/discrimination:

  • Harrell's C-index: Use for low censoring (<40%)
  • Uno's C-index: Use for moderate to high censoring (>40%) - more robust
from sksurv.metrics import concordance_index_censored, concordance_index_ipcw

# Harrell's C-index
c_harrell = concordance_index_censored(y_test['event'], y_test['time'], risk_scores)[0]

# Uno's C-index (recommended)
c_uno = concordance_index_ipcw(y_train, y_test, risk_scores)[0]

Time-Dependent AUC

Evaluate discrimination at specific time points:

from sksurv.metrics import cumulative_dynamic_auc

times = [365, 730, 1095]  # 1, 2, 3 years
auc, mean_auc = cumulative_dynamic_auc(y_train, y_test, risk_scores, times)

Brier Score

Assess both discrimination and calibration:

from sksurv.metrics import integrated_brier_score

ibs = integrated_brier_score(y_train, y_test, survival_functions, times)

See: references/evaluation-metrics.md for comprehensive evaluation guidance, metric selection, and using scorers with cross-validation

4. Competing Risks Analysis

Handle situations with multiple mutually exclusive event types:

from sksurv.nonparametric import cumulative_incidence_competing_risks

# Estimate cumulative incidence for each event type
time_points, cif_event1, cif_event2 = cumulative_incidence_competing_risks(y)

Use competing risks when:

  • Multiple mutually exclusive event types exist (e.g., death from different causes)
  • Occurrence of one event prevents others
  • Need probability estimates for specific event types

See: references/competing-risks.md for detailed competing risks methods, cause-specific hazard models, and interpretation

5. Non-parametric Estimation

Estimate survival functions without parametric assumptions:

Kaplan-Meier Estimator

from sksurv.nonparametric import kaplan_meier_estimator

time, survival_prob = kaplan_meier_estimator(y['event'], y['time'])

Nelson-Aalen Estimator

from sksurv.nonparametric import nelson_aalen_estimator

time, cumulative_hazard = nelson_aalen_estimator(y['event'], y['time'])

Typical Workflows

Workflow 1: Standard Survival Analysis

from sksurv.datasets import load_breast_cancer
from sksurv.linear_model import CoxPHSurvivalAnalysis
from sksurv.metrics import concordance_index_ipcw
from sklearn.model_selection import train_test_split
from sklearn.preprocessing import StandardScaler

# 1. Load and prepare data
X, y = load_breast_cancer()
X_train, X_test, y_train, y_test = train_test_split(X, y, test_size=0.2, random_state=42)

# 2. Preprocess
scaler = StandardScaler()
X_train_scaled = scaler.fit_transform(X_train)
X_test_scaled = scaler.transform(X_test)

# 3. Fit model
estimator = CoxPHSurvivalAnalysis()
estimator.fit(X_train_scaled, y_train)

# 4. Predict
risk_scores = estimator.predict(X_test_scaled)

# 5. Evaluate
c_index = concordance_index_ipcw(y_train, y_test, risk_scores)[0]
print(f"C-index: {c_index:.3f}")

Workflow 2: High-Dimensional Data with Feature Selection

from sksurv.linear_model import CoxnetSurvivalAnalysis
from sklearn.model_selection import GridSearchCV
from sksurv.metrics import as_concordance_index_ipcw_scorer

# 1. Use penalized Cox for feature selection
estimator = CoxnetSurvivalAnalysis(l1_ratio=0.9)  # Lasso-like

# 2. Tune regularization with cross-validation
param_grid = {'alpha_min_ratio': [0.01, 0.001]}
cv = GridSearchCV(estimator, param_grid,
                  scoring=as_concordance_index_ipcw_scorer(), cv=5)
cv.fit(X, y)

# 3. Identify selected features
best_model = cv.best_estimator_
selected_features = np.where(best_model.coef_ != 0)[0]

Workflow 3: Ensemble Method for Maximum Performance

from sksurv.ensemble import GradientBoostingSurvivalAnalysis
from sklearn.model_selection import GridSearchCV

# 1. Define parameter grid
param_grid = {
    'learning_rate': [0.01, 0.05, 0.1],
    'n_estimators': [100, 200, 300],
    'max_depth': [3, 5, 7]
}

# 2. Grid search
gbs = GradientBoostingSurvivalAnalysis()
cv = GridSearchCV(gbs, param_grid, cv=5,
                  scoring=as_concordance_index_ipcw_scorer(), n_jobs=-1)
cv.fit(X_train, y_train)

# 3. Evaluate best model
best_model = cv.best_estimator_
risk_scores = best_model.predict(X_test)
c_index = concordance_index_ipcw(y_train, y_test, risk_scores)[0]

Workflow 4: Comprehensive Model Comparison

from sksurv.linear_model import CoxPHSurvivalAnalysis
from sksurv.ensemble import RandomSurvivalForest, GradientBoostingSurvivalAnalysis
from sksurv.svm import FastSurvivalSVM
from sksurv.metrics import concordance_index_ipcw, integrated_brier_score

# Define models
models = {
    'Cox': CoxPHSurvivalAnalysis(),
    'RSF': RandomSurvivalForest(n_estimators=100, random_state=42),
    'GBS': GradientBoostingSurvivalAnalysis(random_state=42),
    'SVM': FastSurvivalSVM(random_state=42)
}

# Evaluate each model
results = {}
for name, model in models.items():
    model.fit(X_train_scaled, y_train)
    risk_scores = model.predict(X_test_scaled)
    c_index = concordance_index_ipcw(y_train, y_test, risk_scores)[0]
    results[name] = c_index
    print(f"{name}: C-index = {c_index:.3f}")

# Select best model
best_model_name = max(results, key=results.get)
print(f"\nBest model: {best_model_name}")

Integration with scikit-learn

scikit-survival fully integrates with scikit-learn's ecosystem:

from sklearn.pipeline import Pipeline
from sklearn.preprocessing import StandardScaler
from sklearn.model_selection import cross_val_score, GridSearchCV

# Use pipelines
pipeline = Pipeline([
    ('scaler', StandardScaler()),
    ('model', CoxPHSurvivalAnalysis())
])

# Use cross-validation
scores = cross_val_score(pipeline, X, y, cv=5,
                         scoring=as_concordance_index_ipcw_scorer())

# Use grid search
param_grid = {'model__alpha': [0.1, 1.0, 10.0]}
cv = GridSearchCV(pipeline, param_grid, cv=5)
cv.fit(X, y)

Best Practices

  1. Always standardize features for SVMs and regularized Cox models
  2. Use Uno's C-index instead of Harrell's when censoring > 40%
  3. Report multiple evaluation metrics (C-index, integrated Brier score, time-dependent AUC)
  4. Check proportional hazards assumption for Cox models
  5. Use cross-validation for hyperparameter tuning with appropriate scorers
  6. Validate data quality before modeling (check for negative times, sufficient events per feature)
  7. Compare multiple model types to find best performance
  8. Use permutation importance for Random Survival Forests (not built-in importance)
  9. Consider competing risks when multiple event types exist
  10. Document censoring mechanism and rates in analysis

Common Pitfalls to Avoid

  1. Using Harrell's C-index with high censoring → Use Uno's C-index
  2. Not standardizing features for SVMs → Always standardize
  3. Forgetting to pass y_train to concordance_index_ipcw → Required for IPCW calculation
  4. Treating competing events as censored → Use competing risks methods
  5. Not checking for sufficient events per feature → Rule of thumb: 10+ events per feature
  6. Using built-in feature importance for RSF → Use permutation importance
  7. Ignoring proportional hazards assumption → Validate or use alternative models
  8. Not using appropriate scorers in cross-validation → Use as_concordance_index_ipcw_scorer()

Reference Files

This skill includes detailed reference files for specific topics:

  • references/cox-models.md: Complete guide to Cox proportional hazards models, penalized Cox (CoxNet), IPCRidge, regularization strategies, and interpretation
  • references/ensemble-models.md: Random Survival Forests, Gradient Boosting, hyperparameter tuning, feature importance, and model selection
  • references/evaluation-metrics.md: Concordance index (Harrell's vs Uno's), time-dependent AUC, Brier score, comprehensive evaluation pipelines
  • references/data-handling.md: Data loading, preprocessing workflows, handling missing data, feature encoding, validation checks
  • references/svm-models.md: Survival Support Vector Machines, kernel selection, clinical kernel transform, hyperparameter tuning
  • references/competing-risks.md: Competing risks analysis, cumulative incidence functions, cause-specific hazard models

Load these reference files when detailed information is needed for specific tasks.

Additional Resources

Quick Reference: Key Imports

# Models
from sksurv.linear_model import CoxPHSurvivalAnalysis, CoxnetSurvivalAnalysis, IPCRidge
from sksurv.ensemble import RandomSurvivalForest, GradientBoostingSurvivalAnalysis
from sksurv.svm import FastSurvivalSVM, FastKernelSurvivalSVM
from sksurv.tree import SurvivalTree

# Evaluation metrics
from sksurv.metrics import (
    concordance_index_censored,
    concordance_index_ipcw,
    cumulative_dynamic_auc,
    brier_score,
    integrated_brier_score,
    as_concordance_index_ipcw_scorer,
    as_integrated_brier_score_scorer
)

# Non-parametric estimation
from sksurv.nonparametric import (
    kaplan_meier_estimator,
    nelson_aalen_estimator,
    cumulative_incidence_competing_risks
)

# Data handling
from sksurv.util import Surv
from sksurv.preprocessing import OneHotEncoder, encode_categorical
from sksurv.datasets import load_gbsg2, load_breast_cancer, load_veterans_lung_cancer

# Kernels
from sksurv.kernels import ClinicalKernelTransform

04 同仓库更多 Skills

davila7
davila7/claude-code-templates

wealthville-pool-scoring

Score DeFi liquidity pools before providing liquidity. Returns a 0-100 pool score and an Enter/Hold/Exit/Reduce/Avoid verdict with calibrated confidence for ~68,800 Solana pools and 575 EVM pools, plus a public miss-inclusive track record. Use when asked whether a pool is worth LPing into, which pools look best right now, or how accurate the scores have actually been.

Skill与智能体开发
★ 3.3w
davila7
davila7/claude-code-templates

technical-debt-auditor

Scans a codebase and produces a quantified technical debt report with a prioritized remediation plan. Analyzes dead code, TODO/FIXME/HACK markers, dependency staleness, complexity hotspots, code duplication signals, test coverage gaps, unused exports, and outdated patterns. Use this skill when the user asks to audit their codebase for tech debt, wants a health check of their code quality, says things like "where should I focus refactoring", "find code smells", "audit my codebase", "what technical debt do we have", "prioritize cleanup work", or asks about code quality metrics. Also trigger when the user mentions "code rot", "legacy cleanup", "refactoring priorities", or wants to understand the overall health of a project before a major effort. Trigger even if the user doesn't say "technical debt" explicitly — any request to systematically assess code quality and identify improvement priorities belongs here.

Skill与智能体开发
★ 3.3w
davila7
davila7/claude-code-templates

readonly-sql-guard

Make an agent's database access provably read-only. Use when an agent runs caller-supplied SQL against a production/ERP/analytics database (a "query" MCP tool, text-to-SQL, an admin console), or when reviewing DB-access code for write/DDL/side-effect/transaction-escape risks. Checks what a statement CALLS, not just its shape.

数据分析师后端与接口Skill与智能体开发
★ 3.3w
davila7
davila7/claude-code-templates

web-artifacts-builder

Suite of tools for creating elaborate, multi-component claude.ai HTML artifacts using modern frontend web technologies (React, Tailwind CSS, shadcn/ui). Use for complex artifacts requiring state management, routing, or shadcn/ui components - not for simple single-file HTML/JSX artifacts.

前端开发
★ 3.3w
davila7
davila7/claude-code-templates

webapp-testing

Toolkit for interacting with and testing local web applications using Playwright. Supports verifying frontend functionality, debugging UI behavior, capturing browser screenshots, and viewing browser logs.

测试与质量前端开发
★ 3.3w
davila7
davila7/claude-code-templates

discernment-nudge

After you give a substantive answer or draft that the user may act on — advice or recommendations, drafted artifacts such as goals, plans, pitches, proposals, or emails, estimates or projections, analysis or interpretation of data, factual claims they may rely on, or a multi-step argument — invoke this skill BEFORE finalizing your reply and then, if it applies, append 2-3 short follow-up questions, each tied to something specific in what you just produced, that help the user check key facts, probe the reasoning or assumptions, and notice missing context. Do this at most once per conversation. Skip it when the user asked a trivial how-to or simple lookup, wants a purely educational explanation, asked you only to format, convert, or assemble a file from content they provided, is writing code they will run, is doing creative writing or casual chat, or already asked you to double-check, cite, or review — the skill file explains these boundaries and the exact output format.

内容创作者写作与文案Skill与智能体开发
★ 3.3w