AGENT SKILL

implementing-supply-chain-security-with-in-toto

Implements supply chain integrity verification for container builds with the in-toto framework: generating signing keys, defining a supply chain layout, recording pipeline steps as signed link metadata, verifying before deployment, enforcing at Kubernetes admission, and integrating with SLSA. Use when attesting CI/CD pipeline steps, proving an image followed the approved build process, or enforcing provenance at admission. Keywords: in-toto, layout, link metadata, step, inspection, SLSA, provenance, admission. Do not use for signing and verifying images with Cosign - use implementing-image-provenance-verification-with-cosign.

使用场景运维与部署
License 许可
Apache-2.0
最近更新
2026-08-31
Stars
★ 3.6w
Forks
4.4k

01 前言 Front Matter

name
implementing-supply-chain-security-with-in-toto
tags
[ "in-toto", "supply-chain-security", "attestation", "slsa", "sigstore", "container-security", "cncf", "provenance", "sbom" ]
author
mahipal
domain
cybersecurity
license
Apache-2.0
version
1.0
nist_csf
[ "PR.PS-01", "PR.IR-01", "ID.AM-08", "DE.CM-01" ]
subdomain
container-security
description
Implements supply chain integrity verification for container builds with the in-toto framework: generating signing keys, defining a supply chain layout, recording pipeline steps as signed link metadata, verifying before deployment, enforcing at Kubernetes admission, and integrating with SLSA. Use when attesting CI/CD pipeline steps, proving an image followed the approved build process, or enforcing provenance at admission. Keywords: in-toto, layout, link metadata, step, inspection, SLSA, provenance, admission. Do not use for signing and verifying images with Cosign - use implementing-image-provenance-verification-with-cosign.
mitre_attack
[ "T1610", "T1611", "T1609", "T1525", "T1195" ]

02 资源文件 7

03 SKILL.md 正文

Implementing Supply Chain Security with in-toto

Overview

in-toto is a CNCF graduated project that ensures the integrity of software supply chains from initiation to end-user installation. It creates a verifiable record of the entire software development lifecycle by generating cryptographically signed attestations (called "link metadata") at each step, proving what happened, who performed it, and what artifacts were produced. For container environments, in-toto verifies that images deployed to Kubernetes followed approved build processes and have not been tampered with.

When to Use

  • When deploying or configuring implementing supply chain security with in toto capabilities in your environment
  • When establishing security controls aligned to compliance requirements
  • When building or improving security architecture for this domain
  • When conducting security assessments that require this implementation

Prerequisites

  • Python 3.8+ or Go runtime for in-toto client libraries
  • GPG or Ed25519 keys for signing attestations
  • Container build pipeline (Docker, Buildah, or Kaniko)
  • Container registry (Docker Hub, ECR, GCR, or Harbor)
  • Kubernetes cluster for deployment verification

Core Concepts

Supply Chain Layout

The layout is the central policy document that defines:

  • Steps: Ordered operations in the supply chain (clone, build, test, package, push)
  • Functionaries: Authorized entities (people or CI systems) that perform each step
  • Inspections: Client-side verification checks performed at verification time
  • Expected artifacts: Input/output relationships between steps
from in_toto.models.layout import Layout, Step, Inspection
from securesystemslib.interface import import_ed25519_privatekey_from_file

# Create the supply chain layout
layout = Layout()
layout.set_relative_expiration(months=3)

# Define the code clone step
step_clone = Step(name="clone")
step_clone.expected_materials = []
step_clone.expected_products = [["CREATE", "src/*"]]
step_clone.pubkeys = [clone_functionary_keyid]
step_clone.expected_command = ["git", "clone"]
step_clone.threshold = 1

# Define the build step
step_build = Step(name="build")
step_build.expected_materials = [["MATCH", "src/*", "WITH", "PRODUCTS", "FROM", "clone"]]
step_build.expected_products = [["CREATE", "image.tar"]]
step_build.pubkeys = [build_functionary_keyid]
step_build.expected_command = ["docker", "build"]
step_build.threshold = 1

# Define the scan step
step_scan = Step(name="scan")
step_scan.expected_materials = [["MATCH", "image.tar", "WITH", "PRODUCTS", "FROM", "build"]]
step_scan.expected_products = [["CREATE", "scan-report.json"]]
step_scan.pubkeys = [scan_functionary_keyid]
step_scan.threshold = 1

layout.steps = [step_clone, step_build, step_scan]

Link Metadata

Each step execution generates a link file containing:

  • Materials consumed (input artifacts with hashes)
  • Products created (output artifacts with hashes)
  • Command executed
  • Cryptographic signature of the functionary

Verification Process

At deployment time, the verifier checks:

  1. All required steps were performed
  2. Each step was signed by an authorized functionary
  3. Artifact hashes chain correctly between steps
  4. No unauthorized modifications occurred between steps

Implementation

Step 1: Generate Signing Keys

# Generate Ed25519 key pairs for each functionary
mkdir -p keys

# Project owner key (signs the layout)
in-toto-keygen --type ed25519 keys/owner

# CI builder key
in-toto-keygen --type ed25519 keys/builder

# Security scanner key
in-toto-keygen --type ed25519 keys/scanner

Step 2: Create the Supply Chain Layout

#!/usr/bin/env python3
"""Generate in-toto supply chain layout for container builds."""

from in_toto.models.layout import Layout, Step, Inspection
from in_toto.models.metadata import Envelope
from securesystemslib.signer import CryptoSigner
from securesystemslib.interface import import_ed25519_publickey_from_file

def create_container_build_layout():
    layout = Layout()
    layout.set_relative_expiration(months=6)

    # Load functionary public keys
    builder_key = import_ed25519_publickey_from_file("keys/builder.pub")
    scanner_key = import_ed25519_publickey_from_file("keys/scanner.pub")

    layout.keys = {
        builder_key["keyid"]: builder_key,
        scanner_key["keyid"]: scanner_key,
    }

    # Step 1: Source code checkout
    checkout = Step(name="checkout")
    checkout.expected_materials = []
    checkout.expected_products = [
        ["CREATE", "Dockerfile"],
        ["CREATE", "src/*"],
        ["CREATE", "requirements.txt"],
    ]
    checkout.pubkeys = [builder_key["keyid"]]
    checkout.threshold = 1

    # Step 2: Build container image
    build = Step(name="build")
    build.expected_materials = [
        ["MATCH", "Dockerfile", "WITH", "PRODUCTS", "FROM", "checkout"],
        ["MATCH", "src/*", "WITH", "PRODUCTS", "FROM", "checkout"],
    ]
    build.expected_products = [["CREATE", "image-digest.txt"]]
    build.pubkeys = [builder_key["keyid"]]
    build.threshold = 1

    # Step 3: Security scan
    scan = Step(name="scan")
    scan.expected_materials = [
        ["MATCH", "image-digest.txt", "WITH", "PRODUCTS", "FROM", "build"]
    ]
    scan.expected_products = [
        ["CREATE", "vulnerability-report.json"],
        ["CREATE", "sbom.json"],
    ]
    scan.pubkeys = [scanner_key["keyid"]]
    scan.threshold = 1

    # Inspection: Verify no critical vulnerabilities
    inspect_vulns = Inspection(name="verify-no-critical-vulns")
    inspect_vulns.expected_materials = [
        ["MATCH", "vulnerability-report.json", "WITH", "PRODUCTS", "FROM", "scan"]
    ]
    inspect_vulns.run = [
        "python", "-c",
        "import json,sys; r=json.load(open('vulnerability-report.json')); "
        "sys.exit(1) if any(v['severity']=='CRITICAL' for v in r.get('vulnerabilities',[])) else sys.exit(0)"
    ]

    layout.steps = [checkout, build, scan]
    layout.inspect = [inspect_vulns]

    return layout

if __name__ == "__main__":
    layout = create_container_build_layout()
    # Sign with owner key and save
    owner_signer = CryptoSigner.from_priv_key_uri("file:keys/owner")
    envelope = Envelope.from_signable(layout)
    envelope.create_signature(owner_signer)
    envelope.dump("root.layout")
    print("Layout created and signed: root.layout")

Step 3: Record Pipeline Steps

# In CI/CD pipeline - record each step

# Step 1: Checkout
in-toto-run --step-name checkout \
  --key keys/builder \
  --products Dockerfile src/* requirements.txt \
  -- git clone https://github.com/org/app.git .

# Step 2: Build
in-toto-run --step-name build \
  --key keys/builder \
  --materials Dockerfile src/* \
  --products image-digest.txt \
  -- bash -c "docker build -t app:latest . && docker inspect --format='{{.Id}}' app:latest > image-digest.txt"

# Step 3: Scan
in-toto-run --step-name scan \
  --key keys/scanner \
  --materials image-digest.txt \
  --products vulnerability-report.json sbom.json \
  -- bash -c "trivy image --format json app:latest > vulnerability-report.json && syft app:latest -o json > sbom.json"

Step 4: Verify Before Deployment

# Verify the entire supply chain
in-toto-verify --layout root.layout \
  --layout-key keys/owner.pub \
  --link-dir ./link-metadata/

# If verification passes, proceed with deployment
if [ $? -eq 0 ]; then
  kubectl apply -f deployment.yaml
  echo "Supply chain verification passed - deploying"
else
  echo "SUPPLY CHAIN VERIFICATION FAILED - blocking deployment"
  exit 1
fi

Step 5: Kubernetes Admission Control

Integrate with a policy engine to verify attestations at admission:

apiVersion: admissionregistration.k8s.io/v1
kind: ValidatingWebhookConfiguration
metadata:
  name: in-toto-verifier
webhooks:
  - name: verify.in-toto.io
    rules:
      - apiGroups: ["apps"]
        resources: ["deployments"]
        operations: ["CREATE", "UPDATE"]
    clientConfig:
      service:
        name: in-toto-webhook
        namespace: security
        path: /verify
    failurePolicy: Fail
    sideEffects: None
    admissionReviewVersions: ["v1"]

SLSA Integration

in-toto attestations map directly to SLSA (Supply chain Levels for Software Artifacts) requirements:

SLSA Level in-toto Requirement
Level 1 Build process documented (layout exists)
Level 2 Signed attestations from hosted build service
Level 3 Hardened build platform, non-falsifiable provenance
Level 4 Two-party review, hermetic builds

References

04 同仓库更多 Skills

mukul975
mukul975/Anthropic-Cybersecurity-Skills

verifying-build-provenance-with-slsa-sigstore

Verifies artifact signatures and SLSA provenance using Sigstore's cosign (verify, verify-attestation, verify-blob-attestation) and slsa-verifier (verify-artifact), enforcing keyless OIDC builder identity and source repo against SLSA Build levels. Use in CI/CD before deploying artifacts, when consuming third-party attestations, establishing a SLSA Build L3 pipeline, or confirming provenance during incident response or admission control.

Skill与智能体开发
★ 3.6w
mukul975
mukul975/Anthropic-Cybersecurity-Skills

validating-tpm-measured-boot-attestation

Verifies TPM 2.0 measured-boot integrity and remote attestation with tpm2-tools -- reading PCRs (tpm2_pcrread), replaying the boot event log, generating and checking signed quotes (tpm2_quote/tpm2_checkquote), and sealing secrets to a PCR policy. Use to confirm a system booted trusted firmware/kernel for Zero Trust device posture, detect boot-chain tampering via PCR drift, or build a golden-value baseline for fleet attestation.

Skill与智能体开发
★ 3.6w
mukul975
mukul975/Anthropic-Cybersecurity-Skills

validating-backup-integrity-for-recovery

Validates backup integrity through cryptographic hash verification, automated restore testing, corruption detection, and recoverability checks to confirm backups are reliable for disaster recovery and ransomware response. Use before relying on backups for recovery, when building post-backup validation pipelines, auditing backup infrastructure for compliance, or checking immutable/air-gapped backups for silent corruption or tampering.

测试与质量Skill与智能体开发
★ 3.6w
mukul975
mukul975/Anthropic-Cybersecurity-Skills

triaging-windows-with-kape

Runs KAPE (Kroll Artifact Parser and Extractor) to collect targeted forensic artifacts (registry hives, $MFT, event logs, prefetch, browser data) via Targets and parse them with Modules wrapping Eric Zimmerman's EZ Tools (PECmd, MFTECmd, RECmd). Use during early incident containment/triage when full disk imaging is impractical but a defensible, parseable Windows artifact set is needed quickly, including at-scale remote collection.

Skill与智能体开发
★ 3.6w
mukul975
mukul975/Anthropic-Cybersecurity-Skills

triaging-vulnerabilities-with-ssvc-framework

Triages and prioritizes vulnerabilities with CISA's Stakeholder-Specific Vulnerability Categorization (SSVC) decision tree, weighing exploitation status (via the CISA KEV catalog and FIRST EPSS API), technical impact, automatability, and mission prevalence to output Track/Track*/Attend/Act decisions. Use when prioritizing vulnerability scan results (OpenVAS, Nessus, Qualys) for remediation planning beyond raw CVSS scores.

Skill与智能体开发
★ 3.6w
mukul975
mukul975/Anthropic-Cybersecurity-Skills

triaging-security-incident

Performs initial triage of security incidents using the NIST SP 800-61r3 and SANS PICERL frameworks, classifying incident type, assigning priority by business impact, and routing to the appropriate response team. Use when a SIEM/EDR alert needs human classification, concurrent alerts must be prioritized, or a user report or threat-intel IOC match requires initial incident categorization.

Skill与智能体开发
★ 3.6w