AGENT SKILL

implementing-secret-scanning-with-gitleaks

This skill covers implementing Gitleaks for detecting and preventing hardcoded secrets in git repositories. It addresses configuring pre-commit hooks, CI/CD pipeline integration, custom rule authoring for organization-specific secrets, baseline management for existing repositories, and remediation workflows for exposed credentials.

License 许可
Apache-2.0
最近更新
2026-08-31
Stars
★ 3.6w
Forks
4.4k

01 前言 Front Matter

name
implementing-secret-scanning-with-gitleaks
tags
[ "devsecops", "cicd", "secret-scanning", "gitleaks", "pre-commit", "secure-sdlc" ]
author
mahipal
domain
cybersecurity
license
Apache-2.0
version
1.0.0
nist_csf
[ "PR.PS-01", "GV.SC-07", "ID.IM-04", "PR.PS-04" ]
subdomain
devsecops
description
This skill covers implementing Gitleaks for detecting and preventing hardcoded secrets in git repositories. It addresses configuring pre-commit hooks, CI/CD pipeline integration, custom rule authoring for organization-specific secrets, baseline management for existing repositories, and remediation workflows for exposed credentials.
mitre_attack
[ "T1195", "T1554", "T1059.004", "T1003", "T1110" ]

02 资源文件 7

03 SKILL.md 正文

Implementing Secret Scanning with Gitleaks

When to Use

  • When developers may accidentally commit API keys, passwords, tokens, or private keys to repositories
  • When establishing pre-commit gates that prevent secrets from entering the git history
  • When scanning existing repository history for previously committed secrets that need rotation
  • When compliance requirements mandate secret detection across all source code repositories
  • When migrating from manual secret audits to automated continuous scanning

Do not use for detecting secrets in running applications or memory (use runtime secret detection), for managing secrets after detection (use Vault or AWS Secrets Manager), or for scanning container images (use Trivy or Grype).

Prerequisites

  • Gitleaks v8.18+ installed via binary, Go install, or Docker
  • Pre-commit framework installed for local hook integration
  • Git repository with history to scan
  • CI/CD platform access (GitHub Actions, GitLab CI, or equivalent)

Workflow

Step 1: Install and Run Initial Repository Scan

Perform a baseline scan of the repository to identify all existing secrets in the git history.

# Install Gitleaks
brew install gitleaks  # macOS
# or download binary from https://github.com/gitleaks/gitleaks/releases

# Scan entire git history for secrets
gitleaks detect --source . --report-format json --report-path gitleaks-report.json -v

# Scan only staged changes (for pre-commit)
gitleaks protect --staged --report-format json --report-path gitleaks-staged.json

# Scan specific commit range
gitleaks detect --source . --log-opts="HEAD~10..HEAD" --report-format json

# Scan without git history (filesystem only)
gitleaks detect --source . --no-git --report-format json

Step 2: Configure Pre-Commit Hook

Set up Gitleaks as a pre-commit hook to prevent secrets from being committed.

# .pre-commit-config.yaml
repos:
  - repo: https://github.com/gitleaks/gitleaks
    rev: v8.21.2
    hooks:
      - id: gitleaks
        name: gitleaks
        description: Detect hardcoded secrets using Gitleaks
        entry: gitleaks protect --staged --verbose --redact
        language: golang
        pass_filenames: false
# Install pre-commit framework
pip install pre-commit

# Install hooks defined in .pre-commit-config.yaml
pre-commit install

# Run against all files (not just staged)
pre-commit run gitleaks --all-files

# Test the hook with a deliberate secret
echo 'AWS_SECRET_ACCESS_KEY="wJalrXUtnFEMI/K7MDENG/bPxRfiCYEXAMPLEKEY"' >> test.txt
git add test.txt
git commit -m "test"  # Should be blocked by gitleaks

Step 3: Integrate into GitHub Actions

# .github/workflows/secret-scanning.yml
name: Secret Scanning

on:
  push:
    branches: [main, develop]
  pull_request:
    branches: [main]

jobs:
  gitleaks:
    name: Gitleaks Secret Scan
    runs-on: ubuntu-latest
    steps:
      - uses: actions/checkout@v4
        with:
          fetch-depth: 0  # Full history for comprehensive scanning

      - name: Run Gitleaks
        uses: gitleaks/gitleaks-action@v2
        env:
          GITHUB_TOKEN: ${{ secrets.GITHUB_TOKEN }}
          GITLEAKS_LICENSE: ${{ secrets.GITLEAKS_LICENSE }}  # Required for gitleaks-action v2

      # Alternative: Run Gitleaks directly
      - name: Install Gitleaks
        run: |
          wget -q https://github.com/gitleaks/gitleaks/releases/download/v8.21.2/gitleaks_8.21.2_linux_x64.tar.gz
          tar -xzf gitleaks_8.21.2_linux_x64.tar.gz
          chmod +x gitleaks

      - name: Scan for secrets
        run: |
          if [ "${{ github.event_name }}" == "pull_request" ]; then
            ./gitleaks detect \
              --source . \
              --log-opts="${{ github.event.pull_request.base.sha }}..${{ github.event.pull_request.head.sha }}" \
              --report-format sarif \
              --report-path gitleaks.sarif \
              --exit-code 1
          else
            ./gitleaks detect \
              --source . \
              --report-format sarif \
              --report-path gitleaks.sarif \
              --exit-code 1 \
              --baseline-path .gitleaks-baseline.json
          fi

      - name: Upload SARIF
        if: always()
        uses: github/codeql-action/upload-sarif@v3
        with:
          sarif_file: gitleaks.sarif
          category: gitleaks

Step 4: Author Custom Detection Rules

Create organization-specific rules for internal secret patterns.

# .gitleaks.toml
title = "Organization Gitleaks Configuration"

[extend]
useDefault = true  # Include all default rules

# Custom rule for internal API tokens
[[rules]]
id = "internal-api-token"
description = "Internal API token for service-to-service auth"
regex = '''(?i)x-internal-token["\s:=]+["\']?([a-zA-Z0-9_\-]{40,})["\']?'''
entropy = 3.5
keywords = ["x-internal-token"]
tags = ["internal", "api"]

[[rules]]
id = "database-connection-string"
description = "Database connection string with embedded credentials"
regex = '''(?i)(postgres|mysql|mongodb|redis)://[^:]+:[^@]+@[^/]+/\w+'''
keywords = ["postgres://", "mysql://", "mongodb://", "redis://"]
tags = ["database", "credentials"]

[[rules]]
id = "jwt-secret"
description = "JWT signing secret"
regex = '''(?i)(jwt[_-]?secret|jwt[_-]?key)["\s:=]+["\']?([a-zA-Z0-9/+_\-]{32,})["\']?'''
entropy = 3.0
keywords = ["jwt_secret", "jwt-secret", "jwt_key", "jwt-key"]

# Allowlist for test files and known safe patterns
[allowlist]
description = "Global allowlist"
paths = [
  '''(^|/)test(s)?/''',
  '''(^|/)spec/''',
  '''\.test\.(js|ts|py)$''',
  '''\.spec\.(js|ts|py)$''',
  '''__mocks__/''',
  '''fixtures/''',
  '''(^|/)vendor/''',
  '''node_modules/'''
]
regexes = [
  '''EXAMPLE''',
  '''example\.com''',
  '''test[-_]?(key|secret|token|password)''',
  '''(?i)placeholder''',
  '''000000+'''
]

Step 5: Manage Baselines for Existing Repositories

Create a baseline of known findings to avoid blocking development while historical secrets are being rotated.

# Generate baseline from current state
gitleaks detect --source . --report-format json --report-path .gitleaks-baseline.json

# Subsequent scans compare against baseline (only new findings trigger failures)
gitleaks detect --source . --baseline-path .gitleaks-baseline.json --exit-code 1

# Review baseline periodically and remove entries as secrets are rotated
cat .gitleaks-baseline.json | python3 -m json.tool | head -50

Step 6: Remediate Exposed Secrets

When a secret is detected, follow the rotation and history cleanup procedure.

# 1. Immediately rotate the exposed credential
#    - Revoke the old API key/token in the service provider
#    - Generate a new credential
#    - Store the new credential in a secrets manager

# 2. Remove secret from git history using git-filter-repo
pip install git-filter-repo

# Create expressions file for secrets to remove
cat > /tmp/expressions.txt << 'EOF'
regex:AKIA[0-9A-Z]{16}==>REDACTED_AWS_KEY
regex:(?i)password\s*=\s*"[^"]*"==>password="REDACTED"
EOF

git filter-repo --replace-text /tmp/expressions.txt --force

# 3. Force-push the cleaned history (coordinate with team)
# git push --force --all  # WARNING: Requires team coordination

# 4. Add the secret pattern to .gitleaks.toml rules
# 5. Update the baseline file to remove the resolved finding

Key Concepts

Term Definition
Secret Any credential, token, key, or sensitive string that should not appear in source code
Pre-commit Hook Git hook that runs before a commit is created, blocking commits containing detected secrets
Entropy Measure of randomness in a string; high-entropy strings are more likely to be secrets
Baseline Snapshot of existing findings used to differentiate new secrets from pre-existing ones
Allowlist Configuration specifying paths, patterns, or commits to exclude from detection
SARIF Static Analysis Results Interchange Format for uploading findings to security dashboards
git-filter-repo Tool for rewriting git history to remove sensitive data from all commits

Tools & Systems

  • Gitleaks: Open-source secret detection tool supporting pre-commit hooks, CI/CD, and historical scanning
  • pre-commit: Framework for managing and maintaining multi-language pre-commit hooks
  • git-filter-repo: History rewriting tool for removing secrets from git history
  • TruffleHog: Alternative secret scanner with verified secret detection capabilities
  • GitHub Secret Scanning: Native GitHub feature that detects secrets matching partner patterns

Common Scenarios

Scenario: Onboarding Secret Scanning on a Legacy Repository

Context: A 5-year-old repository has never been scanned. The team needs to enable secret scanning without blocking all development while historical secrets are rotated.

Approach:

  1. Run gitleaks detect against full history and generate a baseline JSON file
  2. Triage each finding: classify as active (needs rotation), inactive (already rotated), or false positive
  3. Immediately rotate all active secrets and update consuming services
  4. Commit the baseline file (excluding active secrets that have been fixed)
  5. Enable pre-commit hooks for new development immediately
  6. Add CI/CD scanning with the baseline to catch only new secrets
  7. Progressively reduce the baseline as historical secrets are rotated

Pitfalls: Generating a baseline without triaging means accepting risk on unrotated secrets. Never assume a historical secret is inactive without verifying with the service provider. Running git-filter-repo on a shared repository without coordination will cause rebase conflicts for all team members.

Output Format

Gitleaks Secret Scanning Report
=================================
Repository: org/web-application
Scan Type: Full History
Commits Scanned: 4,523
Date: 2026-02-23

FINDINGS:
  Total: 12
  New (not in baseline): 3
  Baseline (pre-existing): 9

NEW FINDINGS (blocking):
  [1] AWS Access Key ID
      Rule: aws-access-key-id
      File: src/config/aws.py:23
      Commit: a1b2c3d (2026-02-22, dev@company.com)
      Secret: AKIA...REDACTED
      Entropy: 3.8

  [2] GitHub Personal Access Token
      Rule: github-pat
      File: scripts/deploy.sh:15
      Commit: d4e5f6g (2026-02-21, ops@company.com)
      Secret: ghp_...REDACTED
      Entropy: 4.2

  [3] Internal API Token
      Rule: internal-api-token
      File: src/services/auth.py:89
      Commit: h7i8j9k (2026-02-20, dev@company.com)

QUALITY GATE: FAILED (3 new findings)
Action: Rotate exposed credentials immediately.

04 同仓库更多 Skills

mukul975
mukul975/Anthropic-Cybersecurity-Skills

verifying-build-provenance-with-slsa-sigstore

Verifies artifact signatures and SLSA provenance using Sigstore's cosign (verify, verify-attestation, verify-blob-attestation) and slsa-verifier (verify-artifact), enforcing keyless OIDC builder identity and source repo against SLSA Build levels. Use in CI/CD before deploying artifacts, when consuming third-party attestations, establishing a SLSA Build L3 pipeline, or confirming provenance during incident response or admission control.

Skill与智能体开发
★ 3.6w
mukul975
mukul975/Anthropic-Cybersecurity-Skills

validating-tpm-measured-boot-attestation

Verifies TPM 2.0 measured-boot integrity and remote attestation with tpm2-tools -- reading PCRs (tpm2_pcrread), replaying the boot event log, generating and checking signed quotes (tpm2_quote/tpm2_checkquote), and sealing secrets to a PCR policy. Use to confirm a system booted trusted firmware/kernel for Zero Trust device posture, detect boot-chain tampering via PCR drift, or build a golden-value baseline for fleet attestation.

Skill与智能体开发
★ 3.6w
mukul975
mukul975/Anthropic-Cybersecurity-Skills

validating-backup-integrity-for-recovery

Validates backup integrity through cryptographic hash verification, automated restore testing, corruption detection, and recoverability checks to confirm backups are reliable for disaster recovery and ransomware response. Use before relying on backups for recovery, when building post-backup validation pipelines, auditing backup infrastructure for compliance, or checking immutable/air-gapped backups for silent corruption or tampering.

测试与质量Skill与智能体开发
★ 3.6w
mukul975
mukul975/Anthropic-Cybersecurity-Skills

triaging-windows-with-kape

Runs KAPE (Kroll Artifact Parser and Extractor) to collect targeted forensic artifacts (registry hives, $MFT, event logs, prefetch, browser data) via Targets and parse them with Modules wrapping Eric Zimmerman's EZ Tools (PECmd, MFTECmd, RECmd). Use during early incident containment/triage when full disk imaging is impractical but a defensible, parseable Windows artifact set is needed quickly, including at-scale remote collection.

Skill与智能体开发
★ 3.6w
mukul975
mukul975/Anthropic-Cybersecurity-Skills

triaging-vulnerabilities-with-ssvc-framework

Triages and prioritizes vulnerabilities with CISA's Stakeholder-Specific Vulnerability Categorization (SSVC) decision tree, weighing exploitation status (via the CISA KEV catalog and FIRST EPSS API), technical impact, automatability, and mission prevalence to output Track/Track*/Attend/Act decisions. Use when prioritizing vulnerability scan results (OpenVAS, Nessus, Qualys) for remediation planning beyond raw CVSS scores.

Skill与智能体开发
★ 3.6w
mukul975
mukul975/Anthropic-Cybersecurity-Skills

triaging-security-incident

Performs initial triage of security incidents using the NIST SP 800-61r3 and SANS PICERL frameworks, classifying incident type, assigning priority by business impact, and routing to the appropriate response team. Use when a SIEM/EDR alert needs human classification, concurrent alerts must be prioritized, or a user report or threat-intel IOC match requires initial incident categorization.

Skill与智能体开发
★ 3.6w