[{"data":1,"prerenderedAt":-1},["ShallowReactive",2],{"skill:01M6AF8RHPRFTS60B46QCECZ2J":3,"skill-same:01M6AF8RHPRFTS60B46QCECZ2J":71},{"skillNo":4,"name":5,"nameZh":6,"description":7,"descriptionZh":6,"repositoryFullName":8,"ownerLogin":9,"ownerAvatarUrl":10,"ownerAccountNo":11,"ownerDisplayName":12,"repositoryNo":13,"starsCount":14,"licenseSpdxId":15,"licenseFileUrl":6,"sourceHtmlUrl":16,"categories":17,"keywords":28,"publishedAt":42,"linkOnly":43,"markdownContent":44,"markdownBody":45,"frontMatter":46,"refName":47,"commitSha":48,"skillDirectory":49,"forksCount":50,"repositoryHtmlUrl":51,"repositoryHomepageUrl":52,"ownerHtmlUrl":53,"ownerBlogUrl":54,"ownerDescription":55,"updatedAt":56,"install":57,"resources":70},"01M6AF8RHPRFTS60B46QCECZ2J","writing-plans",null,"Use when you have a spec or requirements for a multi-step task, before touching code","davila7\u002Fclaude-code-templates","davila7","https:\u002F\u002Favatars.githubusercontent.com\u002Fu\u002F6216945?v=4","01M6ADEWWFPS191NFM0Y1EX1JH","Daniel Avila","01M6ADJHGM78PHQRD3XZTFDVKK",33286,"MIT","https:\u002F\u002Fgithub.com\u002Fdavila7\u002Fclaude-code-templates\u002Fblob\u002Fmain\u002Fcli-tool\u002Fcomponents\u002Fskills\u002Fproductivity\u002Fwriting-plans\u002FSKILL.md",[18,23],{"categoryNo":19,"categoryName":20,"taxonomyType":21,"taxonomyTypeDesc":22},"01JBSEEDCAT000000000000018","写作与文案","SCENARIO","使用场景",{"categoryNo":24,"categoryName":25,"taxonomyType":26,"taxonomyTypeDesc":27},"01JBSEEDCAT000000000000036","内容创作者","PROFESSION","适用职业",[29,30,31,32,33,34,35,36,37,38,39,40,41],"writing","writing plans","plans","spec","code","use","task","requirements","multi","multi-step task","you","for","when","2026-11-10 10:12:30",false,"---\nname: writing-plans\ndescription: Use when you have a spec or requirements for a multi-step task, before touching code\n---\n\n# Writing Plans\n\n## Overview\n\nWrite comprehensive implementation plans assuming the engineer has zero context for our codebase and questionable taste. Document everything they need to know: which files to touch for each task, code, testing, docs they might need to check, how to test it. Give them the whole plan as bite-sized tasks. DRY. YAGNI. TDD. Frequent commits.\n\nAssume they are a skilled developer, but know almost nothing about our toolset or problem domain. Assume they don't know good test design very well.\n\n**Announce at start:** \"I'm using the writing-plans skill to create the implementation plan.\"\n\n**Context:** This should be run in a dedicated worktree (created by brainstorming skill).\n\n**Save plans to:** `docs\u002Fplans\u002FYYYY-MM-DD-\u003Cfeature-name>.md`\n\n## Bite-Sized Task Granularity\n\n**Each step is one action (2-5 minutes):**\n- \"Write the failing test\" - step\n- \"Run it to make sure it fails\" - step\n- \"Implement the minimal code to make the test pass\" - step\n- \"Run the tests and make sure they pass\" - step\n- \"Commit\" - step\n\n## Plan Document Header\n\n**Every plan MUST start with this header:**\n\n```markdown\n# [Feature Name] Implementation Plan\n\n> **For Claude:** REQUIRED SUB-SKILL: Use superpowers:executing-plans to implement this plan task-by-task.\n\n**Goal:** [One sentence describing what this builds]\n\n**Architecture:** [2-3 sentences about approach]\n\n**Tech Stack:** [Key technologies\u002Flibraries]\n\n---\n```\n\n## Task Structure\n\n```markdown\n### Task N: [Component Name]\n\n**Files:**\n- Create: `exact\u002Fpath\u002Fto\u002Ffile.py`\n- Modify: `exact\u002Fpath\u002Fto\u002Fexisting.py:123-145`\n- Test: `tests\u002Fexact\u002Fpath\u002Fto\u002Ftest.py`\n\n**Step 1: Write the failing test**\n\n```python\ndef test_specific_behavior():\n    result = function(input)\n    assert result == expected\n```\n\n**Step 2: Run test to verify it fails**\n\nRun: `pytest tests\u002Fpath\u002Ftest.py::test_name -v`\nExpected: FAIL with \"function not defined\"\n\n**Step 3: Write minimal implementation**\n\n```python\ndef function(input):\n    return expected\n```\n\n**Step 4: Run test to verify it passes**\n\nRun: `pytest tests\u002Fpath\u002Ftest.py::test_name -v`\nExpected: PASS\n\n**Step 5: Commit**\n\n```bash\ngit add tests\u002Fpath\u002Ftest.py src\u002Fpath\u002Ffile.py\ngit commit -m \"feat: add specific feature\"\n```\n```\n\n## Remember\n- Exact file paths always\n- Complete code in plan (not \"add validation\")\n- Exact commands with expected output\n- Reference relevant skills with @ syntax\n- DRY, YAGNI, TDD, frequent commits\n\n## Execution Handoff\n\nAfter saving the plan, offer execution choice:\n\n**\"Plan complete and saved to `docs\u002Fplans\u002F\u003Cfilename>.md`. Two execution options:**\n\n**1. Subagent-Driven (this session)** - I dispatch fresh subagent per task, review between tasks, fast iteration\n\n**2. Parallel Session (separate)** - Open new session with executing-plans, batch execution with checkpoints\n\n**Which approach?\"**\n\n**If Subagent-Driven chosen:**\n- **REQUIRED SUB-SKILL:** Use superpowers:subagent-driven-development\n- Stay in this session\n- Fresh subagent per task + code review\n\n**If Parallel Session chosen:**\n- Guide them to open new session in worktree\n- **REQUIRED SUB-SKILL:** New session uses superpowers:executing-plans\n","# Writing Plans\n\n## Overview\n\nWrite comprehensive implementation plans assuming the engineer has zero context for our codebase and questionable taste. Document everything they need to know: which files to touch for each task, code, testing, docs they might need to check, how to test it. Give them the whole plan as bite-sized tasks. DRY. YAGNI. TDD. Frequent commits.\n\nAssume they are a skilled developer, but know almost nothing about our toolset or problem domain. Assume they don't know good test design very well.\n\n**Announce at start:** \"I'm using the writing-plans skill to create the implementation plan.\"\n\n**Context:** This should be run in a dedicated worktree (created by brainstorming skill).\n\n**Save plans to:** `docs\u002Fplans\u002FYYYY-MM-DD-\u003Cfeature-name>.md`\n\n## Bite-Sized Task Granularity\n\n**Each step is one action (2-5 minutes):**\n- \"Write the failing test\" - step\n- \"Run it to make sure it fails\" - step\n- \"Implement the minimal code to make the test pass\" - step\n- \"Run the tests and make sure they pass\" - step\n- \"Commit\" - step\n\n## Plan Document Header\n\n**Every plan MUST start with this header:**\n\n```markdown\n# [Feature Name] Implementation Plan\n\n> **For Claude:** REQUIRED SUB-SKILL: Use superpowers:executing-plans to implement this plan task-by-task.\n\n**Goal:** [One sentence describing what this builds]\n\n**Architecture:** [2-3 sentences about approach]\n\n**Tech Stack:** [Key technologies\u002Flibraries]\n\n---\n```\n\n## Task Structure\n\n```markdown\n### Task N: [Component Name]\n\n**Files:**\n- Create: `exact\u002Fpath\u002Fto\u002Ffile.py`\n- Modify: `exact\u002Fpath\u002Fto\u002Fexisting.py:123-145`\n- Test: `tests\u002Fexact\u002Fpath\u002Fto\u002Ftest.py`\n\n**Step 1: Write the failing test**\n\n```python\ndef test_specific_behavior():\n    result = function(input)\n    assert result == expected\n```\n\n**Step 2: Run test to verify it fails**\n\nRun: `pytest tests\u002Fpath\u002Ftest.py::test_name -v`\nExpected: FAIL with \"function not defined\"\n\n**Step 3: Write minimal implementation**\n\n```python\ndef function(input):\n    return expected\n```\n\n**Step 4: Run test to verify it passes**\n\nRun: `pytest tests\u002Fpath\u002Ftest.py::test_name -v`\nExpected: PASS\n\n**Step 5: Commit**\n\n```bash\ngit add tests\u002Fpath\u002Ftest.py src\u002Fpath\u002Ffile.py\ngit commit -m \"feat: add specific feature\"\n```\n```\n\n## Remember\n- Exact file paths always\n- Complete code in plan (not \"add validation\")\n- Exact commands with expected output\n- Reference relevant skills with @ syntax\n- DRY, YAGNI, TDD, frequent commits\n\n## Execution Handoff\n\nAfter saving the plan, offer execution choice:\n\n**\"Plan complete and saved to `docs\u002Fplans\u002F\u003Cfilename>.md`. Two execution options:**\n\n**1. Subagent-Driven (this session)** - I dispatch fresh subagent per task, review between tasks, fast iteration\n\n**2. Parallel Session (separate)** - Open new session with executing-plans, batch execution with checkpoints\n\n**Which approach?\"**\n\n**If Subagent-Driven chosen:**\n- **REQUIRED SUB-SKILL:** Use superpowers:subagent-driven-development\n- Stay in this session\n- Fresh subagent per task + code review\n\n**If Parallel Session chosen:**\n- Guide them to open new session in worktree\n- **REQUIRED SUB-SKILL:** New session uses superpowers:executing-plans\n",{"name":5,"description":7},"main","2b749c82b5d11fac39d9a6e021ce3f5b8a541bd1","cli-tool\u002Fcomponents\u002Fskills\u002Fproductivity\u002Fwriting-plans",3909,"https:\u002F\u002Fgithub.com\u002Fdavila7\u002Fclaude-code-templates","https:\u002F\u002Faitmpl.com","https:\u002F\u002Fgithub.com\u002Fdavila7","https:\u002F\u002Fdanielavila.me","Building AI dev tools with LLMs","2026-11-11 11:53:30",{"source":8,"skillName":5,"commands":58,"prompt":68,"zipAvailable":69},[59,62,65],{"tool":60,"command":61},"npx","npx skills add davila7\u002Fclaude-code-templates --skill writing-plans",{"tool":63,"command":64},"bunx","bunx skills add davila7\u002Fclaude-code-templates --skill writing-plans",{"tool":66,"command":67},"pnpm","pnpm dlx skills add davila7\u002Fclaude-code-templates --skill writing-plans","安装技能，技能地址：https:\u002F\u002Fgithub.com\u002Fdavila7\u002Fclaude-code-templates\u002Fblob\u002Fmain\u002Fcli-tool\u002Fcomponents\u002Fskills\u002Fproductivity\u002Fwriting-plans\u002FSKILL.md",true,[],[72,99,125,156,191,215],{"skillNo":73,"name":74,"nameZh":6,"description":75,"descriptionZh":6,"repositoryFullName":8,"ownerLogin":9,"ownerAvatarUrl":10,"ownerAccountNo":11,"ownerDisplayName":12,"repositoryNo":13,"starsCount":14,"licenseSpdxId":15,"licenseFileUrl":6,"sourceHtmlUrl":76,"categories":77,"keywords":81,"publishedAt":42},"01M70NHBTQ8BV0A2SCAZXEPHCX","wealthville-pool-scoring","Score DeFi liquidity pools before providing liquidity. Returns a 0-100 pool score and an Enter\u002FHold\u002FExit\u002FReduce\u002FAvoid verdict with calibrated confidence for ~68,800 Solana pools and 575 EVM pools, plus a public miss-inclusive track record. Use when asked whether a pool is worth LPing into, which pools look best right now, or how accurate the scores have actually been.","https:\u002F\u002Fgithub.com\u002Fdavila7\u002Fclaude-code-templates\u002Fblob\u002Fmain\u002Fcli-tool\u002Fcomponents\u002Fskills\u002Fweb-data\u002Fwealthville-pool-scoring\u002FSKILL.md",[78],{"categoryNo":79,"categoryName":80,"taxonomyType":21,"taxonomyTypeDesc":22},"01JBSEEDCAT000000000000023","Skill与智能体开发",[82,83,84,85,86,40,87,88,34,41,89,90,91,92,93,94,95,96,97,98],"scoring","pool","wealthville pool scoring","liquidity","which","exit","now","reduce","with","record","track","verdict","evm","solana","how","public","look",{"skillNo":100,"name":101,"nameZh":6,"description":102,"descriptionZh":6,"repositoryFullName":8,"ownerLogin":9,"ownerAvatarUrl":10,"ownerAccountNo":11,"ownerDisplayName":12,"repositoryNo":13,"starsCount":14,"licenseSpdxId":15,"licenseFileUrl":6,"sourceHtmlUrl":103,"categories":104,"keywords":106,"publishedAt":42},"01M70MB6VR8ERJ4EM8D5KHBMEV","technical-debt-auditor","Scans a codebase and produces a quantified technical debt report with a prioritized remediation plan. Analyzes dead code, TODO\u002FFIXME\u002FHACK markers, dependency staleness, complexity hotspots, code duplication signals, test coverage gaps, unused exports, and outdated patterns. Use this skill when the user asks to audit their codebase for tech debt, wants a health check of their code quality, says things like \"where should I focus refactoring\", \"find code smells\", \"audit my codebase\", \"what technical debt do we have\", \"prioritize cleanup work\", or asks about code quality metrics. Also trigger when the user mentions \"code rot\", \"legacy cleanup\", \"refactoring priorities\", or wants to understand the overall health of a project before a major effort. Trigger even if the user doesn't say \"technical debt\" explicitly — any request to systematically assess code quality and identify improvement priorities belongs here.","https:\u002F\u002Fgithub.com\u002Fdavila7\u002Fclaude-code-templates\u002Fblob\u002Fmain\u002Fcli-tool\u002Fcomponents\u002Fskills\u002Fdevelopment\u002Ftechnical-debt-auditor\u002FSKILL.md",[105],{"categoryNo":79,"categoryName":80,"taxonomyType":21,"taxonomyTypeDesc":22},[107,108,109,110,111,112,113,114,115,116,117,41,33,118,119,120,121,122,123,124],"technical debt","debt","technical","technical debt auditor","auditor","coverage","complexity","markers","project","cleanup","unused","todo","work","plan","focus","signals","audit","dependency",{"skillNo":126,"name":127,"nameZh":6,"description":128,"descriptionZh":6,"repositoryFullName":8,"ownerLogin":9,"ownerAvatarUrl":10,"ownerAccountNo":11,"ownerDisplayName":12,"repositoryNo":13,"starsCount":14,"licenseSpdxId":15,"licenseFileUrl":6,"sourceHtmlUrl":129,"categories":130,"keywords":138,"publishedAt":42},"01M70KPYH9QNHCNME5GJQGE22K","readonly-sql-guard","Make an agent's database access provably read-only. Use when an agent runs caller-supplied SQL against a production\u002FERP\u002Fanalytics database (a \"query\" MCP tool, text-to-SQL, an admin console), or when reviewing DB-access code for write\u002FDDL\u002Fside-effect\u002Ftransaction-escape risks. Checks what a statement CALLS, not just its shape.","https:\u002F\u002Fgithub.com\u002Fdavila7\u002Fclaude-code-templates\u002Fblob\u002Fmain\u002Fcli-tool\u002Fcomponents\u002Fskills\u002Fdatabase\u002Freadonly-sql-guard\u002FSKILL.md",[131,134,135],{"categoryNo":132,"categoryName":133,"taxonomyType":21,"taxonomyTypeDesc":22},"01JBSEEDCAT000000000000010","后端与接口",{"categoryNo":79,"categoryName":80,"taxonomyType":21,"taxonomyTypeDesc":22},{"categoryNo":136,"categoryName":137,"taxonomyType":26,"taxonomyTypeDesc":27},"01JBSEEDCAT000000000000033","数据分析师",[139,140,141,142,143,144,145,40,146,147,148,149,150,151,152,34,153,154,41,155],"readonly","guard","sql guard","sql","readonly sql guard","erp","effect","read-only","db","just","tool","calls","only","MCP","access","database","query",{"skillNo":157,"name":158,"nameZh":6,"description":159,"descriptionZh":6,"repositoryFullName":8,"ownerLogin":9,"ownerAvatarUrl":10,"ownerAccountNo":11,"ownerDisplayName":12,"repositoryNo":13,"starsCount":14,"licenseSpdxId":160,"licenseFileUrl":161,"sourceHtmlUrl":162,"categories":163,"keywords":167,"publishedAt":42},"01M6AFY6F7CC2BBZP1QD6VTNVC","web-artifacts-builder","Suite of tools for creating elaborate, multi-component claude.ai HTML artifacts using modern frontend web technologies (React, Tailwind CSS, shadcn\u002Fui). Use for complex artifacts requiring state management, routing, or shadcn\u002Fui components - not for simple single-file HTML\u002FJSX artifacts.","Apache-2.0","https:\u002F\u002Fgithub.com\u002Fdavila7\u002Fclaude-code-templates\u002Fblob\u002Fmain\u002Fcli-tool\u002Fcomponents\u002Fskills\u002Futilities\u002Fweb-artifacts-builder\u002FLICENSE.txt","https:\u002F\u002Fgithub.com\u002Fdavila7\u002Fclaude-code-templates\u002Fblob\u002Fmain\u002Fcli-tool\u002Fcomponents\u002Fskills\u002Futilities\u002Fweb-artifacts-builder\u002FSKILL.md",[164],{"categoryNo":165,"categoryName":166,"taxonomyType":21,"taxonomyTypeDesc":22},"01JBSEEDCAT000000000000009","前端开发",[168,169,170,171,172,173,174,175,176,177,178,179,180,181,182,183,184,185,186,187,188,189,40,190],"artifacts builder","web","web artifacts builder","artifacts","builder","state","routing","state management","component","css","frontend","ui","Tools","file","components","shadcn","react","Tailwind","suite","jsx","html","single-file","ui components",{"skillNo":192,"name":193,"nameZh":6,"description":194,"descriptionZh":6,"repositoryFullName":8,"ownerLogin":9,"ownerAvatarUrl":10,"ownerAccountNo":11,"ownerDisplayName":12,"repositoryNo":13,"starsCount":14,"licenseSpdxId":160,"licenseFileUrl":195,"sourceHtmlUrl":196,"categories":197,"keywords":202,"publishedAt":42},"01M6AFWF33SFV9Z3SF4PEEE4BF","webapp-testing","Toolkit for interacting with and testing local web applications using Playwright. Supports verifying frontend functionality, debugging UI behavior, capturing browser screenshots, and viewing browser logs.","https:\u002F\u002Fgithub.com\u002Fdavila7\u002Fclaude-code-templates\u002Fblob\u002Fmain\u002Fcli-tool\u002Fcomponents\u002Fskills\u002Fsecurity\u002Fwebapp-testing\u002FLICENSE.txt","https:\u002F\u002Fgithub.com\u002Fdavila7\u002Fclaude-code-templates\u002Fblob\u002Fmain\u002Fcli-tool\u002Fcomponents\u002Fskills\u002Fsecurity\u002Fwebapp-testing\u002FSKILL.md",[198,201],{"categoryNo":199,"categoryName":200,"taxonomyType":21,"taxonomyTypeDesc":22},"01JBSEEDCAT000000000000008","测试与质量",{"categoryNo":165,"categoryName":166,"taxonomyType":21,"taxonomyTypeDesc":22},[203,204,205,206,207,169,208,178,179,209,210,211,212,40,213,90,214],"webapp testing","testing","webapp","browser","playwright","applications","debugging","toolkit","logs","screenshots","local","behavior",{"skillNo":216,"name":217,"nameZh":6,"description":218,"descriptionZh":6,"repositoryFullName":8,"ownerLogin":9,"ownerAvatarUrl":10,"ownerAccountNo":11,"ownerDisplayName":12,"repositoryNo":13,"starsCount":14,"licenseSpdxId":160,"licenseFileUrl":219,"sourceHtmlUrl":220,"categories":221,"keywords":225,"publishedAt":42},"01M6AF67Q67JJJ5V51JR2P52KA","discernment-nudge","After you give a substantive answer or draft that the user may act on — advice or recommendations, drafted artifacts such as goals, plans, pitches, proposals, or emails, estimates or projections, analysis or interpretation of data, factual claims they may rely on, or a multi-step argument — invoke this skill BEFORE finalizing your reply and then, if it applies, append 2-3 short follow-up questions, each tied to something specific in what you just produced, that help the user check key facts, probe the reasoning or assumptions, and notice missing context. Do this at most once per conversation. Skip it when the user asked a trivial how-to or simple lookup, wants a purely educational explanation, asked you only to format, convert, or assemble a file from content they provided, is writing code they will run, is doing creative writing or casual chat, or already asked you to double-check, cite, or review — the skill file explains these boundaries and the exact output format.","https:\u002F\u002Fgithub.com\u002Fdavila7\u002Fclaude-code-templates\u002Fblob\u002Fmain\u002Fcli-tool\u002Fcomponents\u002Fskills\u002Fproductivity\u002Fdiscernment-nudge\u002FLICENSE.txt","https:\u002F\u002Fgithub.com\u002Fdavila7\u002Fclaude-code-templates\u002Fblob\u002Fmain\u002Fcli-tool\u002Fcomponents\u002Fskills\u002Fproductivity\u002Fdiscernment-nudge\u002FSKILL.md",[222,223,224],{"categoryNo":19,"categoryName":20,"taxonomyType":21,"taxonomyTypeDesc":22},{"categoryNo":79,"categoryName":80,"taxonomyType":21,"taxonomyTypeDesc":22},{"categoryNo":24,"categoryName":25,"taxonomyType":26,"taxonomyTypeDesc":27},[226,227,228,229,230,231,232,29,171,233,181,33,234,235,236,237,238,151,239,41,39,240,241,242,243,96,244],"discernment nudge","nudge","interpretation","help","run","reasoning","data","lookup","content","review","conversation","short","up","invoke","analysis","claims","argument","assemble","recommendations"]