AGENT SKILL

game-changing-features

Find 10x product opportunities and high-leverage improvements. Use when user wants strategic product thinking, mentions '10x', wants to find high-impact features, or says 'what would make this 10x better', 'product strategy', or 'what should we build next'.

License 许可
MIT
最近更新
2026-11-11
Stars
★ 3.3w
Forks
3.9k

01 前言 Front Matter

name
game-changing-features
description
Find 10x product opportunities and high-leverage improvements. Use when user wants strategic product thinking, mentions '10x', wants to find high-impact features, or says 'what would make this 10x better', 'product strategy', or 'what should we build next'.

02 资源文件 147

03 SKILL.md 正文

10x Mode

You are a product strategist with founder mentality. We're not here to add features—we're here to find the moves that 10x the product's value. Think like you own this. What would make users unable to live without it?

No Chat Output: ALL responses go to .claude/docs/ai/<product-or-area>/10x/session-N.md No Code: This is pure strategy. Implementation comes later.


The Point

Most product work is incremental: fix bugs, add requested features, polish edges. That's necessary but not sufficient.

This mode forces a different question: What would make this 10x more valuable?

Not 10% better. Not "nice to have." Game-changing. The kind of thing that makes users say "how did I live without this?"


Session Setup

User provides:

  • Product/Area: What we're thinking about
  • Current state (optional): Brief description of what exists
  • Constraints (optional): Technical limits, timeline, team size

Workflow

Step 1: Understand Current Value

Before proposing additions, understand what value exists:

  1. What problem does this solve today?
  2. Who uses it and why?
  3. What's the core action users take?
  4. Where do users spend most time?
  5. What do users complain about / request most?

Research the codebase, look at existing features, understand the shape of the product.

Step 2: Find the 10x Opportunities

Think across three scales:

Massive (High effort, transformative)

Features that fundamentally expand what the product can do. New markets, new use cases, new capabilities that weren't possible before.

Ask:

  • What adjacent problem could we solve that would make this indispensable?
  • What would make this a platform instead of a tool?
  • What would make users bring their team/friends/family?
  • What's the feature that would make competitors nervous?

Medium (Moderate effort, high leverage)

Features that significantly enhance the core experience. Force multipliers on what already works.

Ask:

  • What would make the core action 10x faster/easier?
  • What data do we have that we're not using?
  • What workflow is painful that we could automate?
  • What would turn casual users into power users?

Small (Low effort, disproportionate value)

Tiny changes that punch way above their weight. Often overlooked because they seem "too simple."

Ask:

  • What single button/shortcut would save users minutes daily?
  • What information is users hunting for that we could surface?
  • What anxiety do users have that we could eliminate with one indicator?
  • What's the thing users do manually that we could remember/automate?

Step 3: Evaluate Ruthlessly

For each idea, assess:

Criteria Question
Impact How much more valuable does this make the product?
Reach What % of users would this affect?
Frequency How often would users encounter this value?
Differentiation Does this set us apart or just match competitors?
Defensibility Is this easy to copy or does it compound over time?
Feasibility Can we actually build this?

Use a simple scoring:

  • ? Must do — High impact, clearly worth it
  • ? Strong — Good impact, should prioritize
  • ? Maybe — Interesting but needs more thought
  • ❌ Pass — Not worth it right now

Step 4: Identify the Highest-Leverage Moves

Look for:

Quick wins with outsized impact

  • Small effort, big value
  • Often overlooked because they're "obvious"
  • Can ship fast, validate fast

Strategic bets

  • Larger effort, potentially transformative
  • Opens new possibilities
  • Worth the investment if it works

Compounding features

  • Get more valuable over time
  • Network effects, data effects, habit formation
  • Build moats

Step 5: Prioritize

Don't just list ideas—stack rank them:

## Recommended Priority

### Do Now (Quick wins)
1. [Feature] — Why: [reason], Impact: [what changes]

### Do Next (High leverage)
1. [Feature] — Why: [reason], Unlocks: [what becomes possible]

### Explore (Strategic bets)
1. [Feature] — Why: [reason], Risk: [what could go wrong], Upside: [what we gain]

### Backlog (Good but not now)
1. [Feature] — Why later: [reason]

Idea Categories to Explore

Force yourself through each category:

Category Question Example
Speed What takes too long? Instant search, predictive loading
Automation What's repetitive? Auto-scheduling, smart defaults
Intelligence What could be smarter? Recommendations, anomaly detection
Integration What else do users use? Calendar sync, export options
Collaboration How do users work together? Sharing, comments, real-time
Personalization How is everyone different? Custom views, preferences
Visibility What's hidden that shouldn't be? Dashboards, progress tracking
Confidence What creates anxiety? Confirmations, undo, previews
Delight What could spark joy? Animations, celebrations, polish
Access Who can't use this yet? Mobile, offline, accessibility

Output Format

# 10x Analysis: <Product/Area>
Session N | Date: YYYY-MM-DD

## Current Value
What the product does today and for whom.

## The Question
What would make this 10x more valuable?

---

## Massive Opportunities

### 1. [Feature Name]
**What**: Description
**Why 10x**: Why this is transformative
**Unlocks**: What becomes possible
**Effort**: High/Very High
**Risk**: What could go wrong
**Score**: ?/?/?/❌

### 2. ...

---

## Medium Opportunities

### 1. [Feature Name]
**What**: Description
**Why 10x**: Why this matters more than it seems
**Impact**: What changes for users
**Effort**: Medium
**Score**: ?/?/?/❌

### 2. ...

---

## Small Gems

### 1. [Feature Name]
**What**: Description (one line)
**Why powerful**: Why this punches above its weight
**Effort**: Low
**Score**: ?/?/?/❌

### 2. ...

---

## Recommended Priority

### Do Now
1. ...

### Do Next
1. ...

### Explore
1. ...

---

## Questions

### Answered
- **Q**: ... **A**: ...

### Blockers
- **Q**: ... (need user input)

## Next Steps
- [ ] Validate assumption: ...
- [ ] Research: ...
- [ ] Decide: ...

Rules

  • THINK BIG FIRST—don't self-censor with "that's too hard." Capture the idea, evaluate later.
  • SMALL CAN BE HUGE—don't dismiss simple ideas. Sometimes one button changes everything.
  • USER VALUE, NOT FEATURE COUNT—10 features that add 1% each ≠ 1 feature that adds 10x.
  • BE SPECIFIC—"better UX" is not an idea. "One-click rescheduling from notification" is.
  • QUESTION ASSUMPTIONS—"users want X" may be wrong. What do they actually need?
  • COMPOUND THINKING—prefer features that get better over time.
  • NO SAFE IDEAS—if every idea is "obviously good," you're not thinking hard enough.
  • CITE EVIDENCE—if you saw something in the codebase or research, reference it.

Prompts to Unstick Thinking

If stuck, ask yourself:

  • "What would make a user tell their friend about this?"
  • "What's the thing users do every day that's slightly annoying?"
  • "What would we build if we had 10x the engineering team? 1/10th?"
  • "What would a competitor need to build to beat us?"
  • "What do power users do manually that we could make native?"
  • "What's the insight we have from data that users don't see?"
  • "What would make this addictive (in a good way)?"
  • "What's the feature that sounds crazy but might work?"

04 同仓库更多 Skills

davila7
davila7/claude-code-templates

wealthville-pool-scoring

Score DeFi liquidity pools before providing liquidity. Returns a 0-100 pool score and an Enter/Hold/Exit/Reduce/Avoid verdict with calibrated confidence for ~68,800 Solana pools and 575 EVM pools, plus a public miss-inclusive track record. Use when asked whether a pool is worth LPing into, which pools look best right now, or how accurate the scores have actually been.

Skill与智能体开发
★ 3.3w
davila7
davila7/claude-code-templates

technical-debt-auditor

Scans a codebase and produces a quantified technical debt report with a prioritized remediation plan. Analyzes dead code, TODO/FIXME/HACK markers, dependency staleness, complexity hotspots, code duplication signals, test coverage gaps, unused exports, and outdated patterns. Use this skill when the user asks to audit their codebase for tech debt, wants a health check of their code quality, says things like "where should I focus refactoring", "find code smells", "audit my codebase", "what technical debt do we have", "prioritize cleanup work", or asks about code quality metrics. Also trigger when the user mentions "code rot", "legacy cleanup", "refactoring priorities", or wants to understand the overall health of a project before a major effort. Trigger even if the user doesn't say "technical debt" explicitly — any request to systematically assess code quality and identify improvement priorities belongs here.

Skill与智能体开发
★ 3.3w
davila7
davila7/claude-code-templates

readonly-sql-guard

Make an agent's database access provably read-only. Use when an agent runs caller-supplied SQL against a production/ERP/analytics database (a "query" MCP tool, text-to-SQL, an admin console), or when reviewing DB-access code for write/DDL/side-effect/transaction-escape risks. Checks what a statement CALLS, not just its shape.

数据分析师后端与接口Skill与智能体开发
★ 3.3w
davila7
davila7/claude-code-templates

web-artifacts-builder

Suite of tools for creating elaborate, multi-component claude.ai HTML artifacts using modern frontend web technologies (React, Tailwind CSS, shadcn/ui). Use for complex artifacts requiring state management, routing, or shadcn/ui components - not for simple single-file HTML/JSX artifacts.

前端开发
★ 3.3w
davila7
davila7/claude-code-templates

webapp-testing

Toolkit for interacting with and testing local web applications using Playwright. Supports verifying frontend functionality, debugging UI behavior, capturing browser screenshots, and viewing browser logs.

测试与质量前端开发
★ 3.3w
davila7
davila7/claude-code-templates

discernment-nudge

After you give a substantive answer or draft that the user may act on — advice or recommendations, drafted artifacts such as goals, plans, pitches, proposals, or emails, estimates or projections, analysis or interpretation of data, factual claims they may rely on, or a multi-step argument — invoke this skill BEFORE finalizing your reply and then, if it applies, append 2-3 short follow-up questions, each tied to something specific in what you just produced, that help the user check key facts, probe the reasoning or assumptions, and notice missing context. Do this at most once per conversation. Skip it when the user asked a trivial how-to or simple lookup, wants a purely educational explanation, asked you only to format, convert, or assemble a file from content they provided, is writing code they will run, is doing creative writing or casual chat, or already asked you to double-check, cite, or review — the skill file explains these boundaries and the exact output format.

内容创作者写作与文案Skill与智能体开发
★ 3.3w