deadline-prep
Generate a structured demo outline from your session's change log and git history. Reads .claude/critical_log_changes.csv and git log to produce presentation-ready talking points for end-of-day demos, standups, or delivery deadlines.
- License 许可
- MIT
- 最近更新
- 2026-11-11
- Stars
- ★ 3.3w
- Forks
- 3.9k
01 前言 Front Matter
- name
- deadline-prep
- description
- Generate a structured demo outline from your session's change log and git history. Reads .claude/critical_log_changes.csv and git log to produce presentation-ready talking points for end-of-day demos, standups, or delivery deadlines.
03 SKILL.md 正文
Deadline Prep
Generate a structured demo outline from your work session. Combines the change log CSV (from the change-logger hook) with git history to create presentation-ready talking points.
Workflow
Step 1: Gather data sources
Change log (primary source if available):
- Read
.claude/critical_log_changes.csvif it exists - Parse columns: timestamp, tool, file_path, action, details
- Group by: files created, files modified, commands executed
Git history (always available):
git log --oneline --since="today 00:00"
git diff --stat HEAD~10 2>/dev/null || git diff --stat
If the CSV doesn't exist, fall back to git-only mode and note this in the output.
Step 2: Analyze and categorize changes
Group all changes into categories:
| Category | Signals |
|---|---|
| Features shipped | New files, new routes, new components, feat commits |
| Bug fixes | Modified files with fix commits, error handling changes |
| Refactors | Renamed files, structural changes, refactor commits |
| Config/Setup | package.json, tsconfig, CI/CD, Docker changes |
| Tests | Test files created or modified |
| Documentation | README, docs, comments |
Step 3: Generate the demo outline
Create a structured markdown document:
# Demo Outline — [Date]
## What I Shipped
- **[Feature/Fix name]**: One sentence explaining what it does and why it matters
- **[Feature/Fix name]**: One sentence explaining what it does and why it matters
- **[Feature/Fix name]**: One sentence explaining what it does and why it matters
## Architecture Decisions
- **[Decision]**: Why I chose this approach over alternatives
- **[Decision]**: Tradeoff I made and the reasoning
## What I Would Do Next
1. **[Priority 1]**: Why this is the most important next step
2. **[Priority 2]**: What this would unlock
3. **[Priority 3]**: Nice-to-have improvement
## Session Metrics
- Files changed: X
- Lines: +Y / -Z
- Commits: N
- Key files: `path/to/important/file.ts`, `path/to/other.ts`
- Time window: HH:MM - HH:MM
Step 4: Save and present
Save the outline to .claude/demo-outline.md.
Print the full outline to the terminal so the user can review it immediately.
Tips
- Run this 30 minutes before your deadline to have time to review and add personal context
- The "Architecture Decisions" section is what reviewers care about most — add context about tradeoffs
- "What I Would Do Next" shows you think beyond the immediate task
- Edit the generated outline to add your own voice and any context the log missed
- Works best with the
change-loggerhook installed, but functions with git history alone
04 同仓库更多 Skills
wealthville-pool-scoring
Score DeFi liquidity pools before providing liquidity. Returns a 0-100 pool score and an Enter/Hold/Exit/Reduce/Avoid verdict with calibrated confidence for ~68,800 Solana pools and 575 EVM pools, plus a public miss-inclusive track record. Use when asked whether a pool is worth LPing into, which pools look best right now, or how accurate the scores have actually been.
technical-debt-auditor
Scans a codebase and produces a quantified technical debt report with a prioritized remediation plan. Analyzes dead code, TODO/FIXME/HACK markers, dependency staleness, complexity hotspots, code duplication signals, test coverage gaps, unused exports, and outdated patterns. Use this skill when the user asks to audit their codebase for tech debt, wants a health check of their code quality, says things like "where should I focus refactoring", "find code smells", "audit my codebase", "what technical debt do we have", "prioritize cleanup work", or asks about code quality metrics. Also trigger when the user mentions "code rot", "legacy cleanup", "refactoring priorities", or wants to understand the overall health of a project before a major effort. Trigger even if the user doesn't say "technical debt" explicitly — any request to systematically assess code quality and identify improvement priorities belongs here.
readonly-sql-guard
Make an agent's database access provably read-only. Use when an agent runs caller-supplied SQL against a production/ERP/analytics database (a "query" MCP tool, text-to-SQL, an admin console), or when reviewing DB-access code for write/DDL/side-effect/transaction-escape risks. Checks what a statement CALLS, not just its shape.
web-artifacts-builder
Suite of tools for creating elaborate, multi-component claude.ai HTML artifacts using modern frontend web technologies (React, Tailwind CSS, shadcn/ui). Use for complex artifacts requiring state management, routing, or shadcn/ui components - not for simple single-file HTML/JSX artifacts.
webapp-testing
Toolkit for interacting with and testing local web applications using Playwright. Supports verifying frontend functionality, debugging UI behavior, capturing browser screenshots, and viewing browser logs.
discernment-nudge
After you give a substantive answer or draft that the user may act on — advice or recommendations, drafted artifacts such as goals, plans, pitches, proposals, or emails, estimates or projections, analysis or interpretation of data, factual claims they may rely on, or a multi-step argument — invoke this skill BEFORE finalizing your reply and then, if it applies, append 2-3 short follow-up questions, each tied to something specific in what you just produced, that help the user check key facts, probe the reasoning or assumptions, and notice missing context. Do this at most once per conversation. Skip it when the user asked a trivial how-to or simple lookup, wants a purely educational explanation, asked you only to format, convert, or assemble a file from content they provided, is writing code they will run, is doing creative writing or casual chat, or already asked you to double-check, cite, or review — the skill file explains these boundaries and the exact output format.