AGENT SKILL

professional-communication

Guide technical communication for software developers. Covers email structure, team messaging etiquette, meeting agendas, and adapting messages for technical vs non-technical audiences. Use when drafting professional messages, preparing meeting communications, or improving written communication.

使用场景邮件与沟通
License 许可
MIT
最近更新
2026-11-12
Stars
★ 3.3w
Forks
3.9k

01 前言 Front Matter

name
professional-communication
description
Guide technical communication for software developers. Covers email structure, team messaging etiquette, meeting agendas, and adapting messages for technical vs non-technical audiences. Use when drafting professional messages, preparing meeting communications, or improving written communication.
allowed-tools
Read, Glob, Grep

02 资源文件 5

03 SKILL.md 正文

Professional Communication

Overview

This skill provides frameworks and guidance for effective professional communication in software development contexts. Whether you're writing an email to stakeholders, crafting a team chat message, or preparing meeting agendas, these principles help you communicate clearly and build professional credibility.

Core principle: Effective communication isn't about proving how much you know - it's about ensuring your message is received and understood.

When to Use This Skill

Use this skill when:

  • Writing emails to teammates, managers, or stakeholders
  • Crafting team chat messages or async communications
  • Preparing meeting agendas or summaries
  • Translating technical concepts for non-technical audiences
  • Structuring status updates or reports
  • Improving clarity of written communication

Keywords: email, chat, teams, slack, discord, message, writing, communication, meeting, agenda, status update, report

Core Frameworks

The What-Why-How Structure

Use this universal framework to organize any professional message:

Component Purpose Example
What State the topic/request clearly "We need to delay the release by one week"
Why Explain the reasoning "Critical bug found in payment processing"
How Outline next steps/action items "QA will retest by Thursday; I'll update stakeholders Friday"

Apply to: Emails, status updates, meeting talking points, technical explanations

Three Golden Rules for Written Communication

  1. Start with a clear subject/purpose - Recipients should immediately grasp what your message is about
  2. Use bullets, headlines, and scannable formatting - Nobody wants a wall of text
  3. Key messages first - Busy people appreciate efficiency; state your main point upfront

Audience Calibration

Before communicating, ask yourself:

  1. Who are you writing to? (Technical peers, managers, stakeholders, customers)
  2. What level of detail do they need? (High-level overview vs implementation details)
  3. What's the value for them? (How does this affect their work/decisions?)

Email Best Practices

Subject Line Formula

Instead of Try
"Project updates" "Project X: Status Update and Next Steps"
"Question" "Quick question: API rate limiting approach"
"FYI" "FYI: Deployment scheduled for Tuesday 3pm"

Email Structure Template

**Subject:** [Project/Topic]: [Specific Purpose]

Hi [Name],

[1-2 sentences stating the key point or request upfront]

**Context/Background:**
- [Bullet point 1]
- [Bullet point 2]

**What I need from you:**
- [Specific action or decision needed]
- [Timeline if applicable]

[Optional: Brief next steps or follow-up plan]

Best,
[Your name]

Common Email Types

Type Key Elements
Status Update Progress summary, blockers, next steps, timeline
Request Clear ask, context, deadline, why it matters
Escalation Issue summary, impact, attempted solutions, needed decision
FYI/Announcement What changed, who's affected, any required action

For templates: See references/email-templates.md

Team Messaging Etiquette

Note: Examples use Slack terminology, but these principles apply equally to Microsoft Teams, Discord, or any team messaging platform.

When to Use Chat vs Email

Use Chat Use Email
Quick questions with short answers Detailed documentation needing records
Real-time coordination Formal communications to stakeholders
Informal team discussions Messages requiring careful review
Time-sensitive updates Complex explanations with multiple parts

Team Messaging Best Practices

  1. Use threads - Keep main channels scannable; follow-ups go in threads
  2. @mention thoughtfully - Don't notify people unnecessarily
  3. Channel organization - Right channel for right topic
  4. Be direct - "Can you review my PR?" beats "Hey, are you busy?"
  5. Async-friendly - Write messages that don't require immediate response

The "No Hello" Principle

Instead of:

You: Hi
You: Are you there?
You: Can I ask you something?
[waiting...]

Try:

You: Hi Sarah - quick question about the deployment script.
     Getting a permission error on line 42. Have you seen this before?
     Here's the error: [paste error]

Technical vs Non-Technical Communication

When to Be Technical vs Accessible

Audience Approach
Engineering peers Technical details, code examples, architecture specifics
Technical managers Balance of detail and high-level impact
Non-technical stakeholders Business impact, analogies, outcomes over implementation
Customers Plain language, what it means for them, avoid jargon

Three Strategies for Simplification

  1. Start with the big picture before details - People process "why" before "how"
  2. Simplify without losing accuracy - Use analogies; replace jargon with plain language
  3. Know when to switch - Read the room; adjust based on questions and engagement

Jargon Translation Examples

Technical Plain Language
"Microservices architecture" "Our system is split into smaller, independent pieces that can scale separately"
"Asynchronous message processing" "Tasks are queued and processed in the background"
"CI/CD pipeline" "Automated process that tests and deploys our code"
"Database migration" "Updating how our data is organized and stored"

For more examples: See references/jargon-simplification.md

Writing Clarity Principles

Active Voice Over Passive Voice

Active voice is clearer, more direct, and conveys authority:

Passive (avoid) Active (prefer)
"A bug was identified by the team" "The team identified a bug"
"The feature will be implemented" "We will implement the feature"
"Errors were found during testing" "Testing revealed errors"

Eliminate Filler Words

Instead of Use
"At this point in time" "Now"
"In the event that" "If"
"Due to the fact that" "Because"
"In order to" "To"
"I just wanted to check if" "Can you"

The "So What?" Test

After writing, ask: "So what? Why does this matter to the reader?"

If you can't answer clearly, restructure your message to lead with the value/impact.

Meeting Communication

Before: Agenda Best Practices

Every meeting invite should include:

  1. Clear objective - What will be accomplished?
  2. Agenda items - Topics to cover with time estimates
  3. Preparation required - What should attendees bring/review?
  4. Expected outcome - Decision needed? Information sharing? Brainstorm?

During: Facilitation Tips

  • Time-box discussions - "Let's spend 5 minutes on this, then move on"
  • Capture action items live - Who does what by when
  • Parking lot - Note off-topic items for later

After: Summary Format

**Meeting: [Topic] - [Date]**

**Attendees:** [Names]

**Key Decisions:**
- [Decision 1]
- [Decision 2]

**Action Items:**
- [ ] [Person]: [Task] - Due [Date]
- [ ] [Person]: [Task] - Due [Date]

**Next Steps:**
- [Follow-up meeting if needed]
- [Documents to share]

For structures by meeting type: See references/meeting-structures.md

Quick Reference: Communication Checklist

Before sending any professional communication:

  • [ ] Clear purpose - Can the recipient understand intent in 5 seconds?
  • [ ] Right audience - Is this the appropriate person/channel?
  • [ ] Key message first - Is the main point upfront?
  • [ ] Scannable - Are there bullets, headers, short paragraphs?
  • [ ] Action clear - Does the recipient know what (if anything) they need to do?
  • [ ] Jargon check - Will the audience understand all terminology?
  • [ ] Tone appropriate - Is it professional but not cold?
  • [ ] Proofread - Any typos or unclear phrasing?

Additional Tools

  • references/email-templates.md - Ready-to-use email templates by type
  • references/meeting-structures.md - Structures for standups, retros, reviews
  • references/jargon-simplification.md - Technical-to-plain-language translations

Companion Skills

  • feedback-mastery - For difficult conversations and feedback delivery
  • /draft-email - Generate emails using these frameworks

Last Updated: 2025-12-22

Version History

  • v1.0.0 (2025-12-26): Initial release

04 同仓库更多 Skills

davila7
davila7/claude-code-templates

wealthville-pool-scoring

Score DeFi liquidity pools before providing liquidity. Returns a 0-100 pool score and an Enter/Hold/Exit/Reduce/Avoid verdict with calibrated confidence for ~68,800 Solana pools and 575 EVM pools, plus a public miss-inclusive track record. Use when asked whether a pool is worth LPing into, which pools look best right now, or how accurate the scores have actually been.

Skill与智能体开发
★ 3.3w
davila7
davila7/claude-code-templates

technical-debt-auditor

Scans a codebase and produces a quantified technical debt report with a prioritized remediation plan. Analyzes dead code, TODO/FIXME/HACK markers, dependency staleness, complexity hotspots, code duplication signals, test coverage gaps, unused exports, and outdated patterns. Use this skill when the user asks to audit their codebase for tech debt, wants a health check of their code quality, says things like "where should I focus refactoring", "find code smells", "audit my codebase", "what technical debt do we have", "prioritize cleanup work", or asks about code quality metrics. Also trigger when the user mentions "code rot", "legacy cleanup", "refactoring priorities", or wants to understand the overall health of a project before a major effort. Trigger even if the user doesn't say "technical debt" explicitly — any request to systematically assess code quality and identify improvement priorities belongs here.

Skill与智能体开发
★ 3.3w
davila7
davila7/claude-code-templates

readonly-sql-guard

Make an agent's database access provably read-only. Use when an agent runs caller-supplied SQL against a production/ERP/analytics database (a "query" MCP tool, text-to-SQL, an admin console), or when reviewing DB-access code for write/DDL/side-effect/transaction-escape risks. Checks what a statement CALLS, not just its shape.

数据分析师后端与接口Skill与智能体开发
★ 3.3w
davila7
davila7/claude-code-templates

web-artifacts-builder

Suite of tools for creating elaborate, multi-component claude.ai HTML artifacts using modern frontend web technologies (React, Tailwind CSS, shadcn/ui). Use for complex artifacts requiring state management, routing, or shadcn/ui components - not for simple single-file HTML/JSX artifacts.

前端开发
★ 3.3w
davila7
davila7/claude-code-templates

webapp-testing

Toolkit for interacting with and testing local web applications using Playwright. Supports verifying frontend functionality, debugging UI behavior, capturing browser screenshots, and viewing browser logs.

测试与质量前端开发
★ 3.3w
davila7
davila7/claude-code-templates

discernment-nudge

After you give a substantive answer or draft that the user may act on — advice or recommendations, drafted artifacts such as goals, plans, pitches, proposals, or emails, estimates or projections, analysis or interpretation of data, factual claims they may rely on, or a multi-step argument — invoke this skill BEFORE finalizing your reply and then, if it applies, append 2-3 short follow-up questions, each tied to something specific in what you just produced, that help the user check key facts, probe the reasoning or assumptions, and notice missing context. Do this at most once per conversation. Skip it when the user asked a trivial how-to or simple lookup, wants a purely educational explanation, asked you only to format, convert, or assemble a file from content they provided, is writing code they will run, is doing creative writing or casual chat, or already asked you to double-check, cite, or review — the skill file explains these boundaries and the exact output format.

内容创作者写作与文案Skill与智能体开发
★ 3.3w