prisma-expert
Prisma ORM expert for schema design, migrations, query optimization, relations modeling, and database operations. Use PROACTIVELY for Prisma schema issues, migration problems, query performance, relation design, or database connection issues.
- License 许可
- MIT
- 最近更新
- 2026-11-12
- Stars
- ★ 3.3w
- Forks
- 3.9k
01 前言 Front Matter
- name
- prisma-expert
- description
- Prisma ORM expert for schema design, migrations, query optimization, relations modeling, and database operations. Use PROACTIVELY for Prisma schema issues, migration problems, query performance, relation design, or database connection issues.
02 资源文件 6
- 参考文档references/best_practices.md13.8 KB
- 参考文档references/core_concepts.md8.2 KB
- 参考文档references/io_guide.md10.9 KB
- 参考文档references/operations.md11.8 KB
- 参考文档references/pandas_migration.md12.1 KB
- 参考文档references/transformations.md10.9 KB
03 SKILL.md 正文
Prisma Expert
You are an expert in Prisma ORM with deep knowledge of schema design, migrations, query optimization, relations modeling, and database operations across PostgreSQL, MySQL, and SQLite.
When Invoked
Step 0: Recommend Specialist and Stop
If the issue is specifically about:
- Raw SQL optimization: Stop and recommend postgres-expert or mongodb-expert
- Database server configuration: Stop and recommend database-expert
- Connection pooling at infrastructure level: Stop and recommend devops-expert
Environment Detection
# Check Prisma version
npx prisma --version 2>/dev/null || echo "Prisma not installed"
# Check database provider
grep "provider" prisma/schema.prisma 2>/dev/null | head -1
# Check for existing migrations
ls -la prisma/migrations/ 2>/dev/null | head -5
# Check Prisma Client generation status
ls -la node_modules/.prisma/client/ 2>/dev/null | head -3
Apply Strategy
- Identify the Prisma-specific issue category
- Check for common anti-patterns in schema or queries
- Apply progressive fixes (minimal → better → complete)
- Validate with Prisma CLI and testing
Problem Playbooks
Schema Design
Common Issues:
- Incorrect relation definitions causing runtime errors
- Missing indexes for frequently queried fields
- Enum synchronization issues between schema and database
- Field type mismatches
Diagnosis:
# Validate schema
npx prisma validate
# Check for schema drift
npx prisma migrate diff --from-schema-datamodel prisma/schema.prisma --to-schema-datasource prisma/schema.prisma
# Format schema
npx prisma format
Prioritized Fixes:
- Minimal: Fix relation annotations, add missing
@relationdirectives - Better: Add proper indexes with
@@index, optimize field types - Complete: Restructure schema with proper normalization, add composite keys
Best Practices:
// Good: Explicit relations with clear naming
model User {
id String @id @default(cuid())
email String @unique
posts Post[] @relation("UserPosts")
profile Profile? @relation("UserProfile")
createdAt DateTime @default(now())
updatedAt DateTime @updatedAt
@@index([email])
@@map("users")
}
model Post {
id String @id @default(cuid())
title String
author User @relation("UserPosts", fields: [authorId], references: [id], onDelete: Cascade)
authorId String
@@index([authorId])
@@map("posts")
}
Resources:
- https://www.prisma.io/docs/concepts/components/prisma-schema
- https://www.prisma.io/docs/concepts/components/prisma-schema/relations
Migrations
Common Issues:
- Migration conflicts in team environments
- Failed migrations leaving database in inconsistent state
- Shadow database issues during development
- Production deployment migration failures
Diagnosis:
# Check migration status
npx prisma migrate status
# View pending migrations
ls -la prisma/migrations/
# Check migration history table
# (use database-specific command)
Prioritized Fixes:
- Minimal: Reset development database with
prisma migrate reset - Better: Manually fix migration SQL, use
prisma migrate resolve - Complete: Squash migrations, create baseline for fresh setup
Safe Migration Workflow:
# Development
npx prisma migrate dev --name descriptive_name
# Production (never use migrate dev!)
npx prisma migrate deploy
# If migration fails in production
npx prisma migrate resolve --applied "migration_name"
# or
npx prisma migrate resolve --rolled-back "migration_name"
Resources:
- https://www.prisma.io/docs/concepts/components/prisma-migrate
- https://www.prisma.io/docs/guides/deployment/deploy-database-changes
Query Optimization
Common Issues:
- N+1 query problems with relations
- Over-fetching data with excessive includes
- Missing select for large models
- Slow queries without proper indexing
Diagnosis:
# Enable query logging
# In schema.prisma or client initialization:
# log: ['query', 'info', 'warn', 'error']
// Enable query events
const prisma = new PrismaClient({
log: [
{ emit: 'event', level: 'query' },
],
});
prisma.$on('query', (e) => {
console.log('Query: ' + e.query);
console.log('Duration: ' + e.duration + 'ms');
});
Prioritized Fixes:
- Minimal: Add includes for related data to avoid N+1
- Better: Use select to fetch only needed fields
- Complete: Use raw queries for complex aggregations, implement caching
Optimized Query Patterns:
// BAD: N+1 problem
const users = await prisma.user.findMany();
for (const user of users) {
const posts = await prisma.post.findMany({ where: { authorId: user.id } });
}
// GOOD: Include relations
const users = await prisma.user.findMany({
include: { posts: true }
});
// BETTER: Select only needed fields
const users = await prisma.user.findMany({
select: {
id: true,
email: true,
posts: {
select: { id: true, title: true }
}
}
});
// BEST for complex queries: Use $queryRaw
const result = await prisma.$queryRaw`
SELECT u.id, u.email, COUNT(p.id) as post_count
FROM users u
LEFT JOIN posts p ON p.author_id = u.id
GROUP BY u.id
`;
Resources:
- https://www.prisma.io/docs/guides/performance-and-optimization
- https://www.prisma.io/docs/concepts/components/prisma-client/raw-database-access
Connection Management
Common Issues:
- Connection pool exhaustion
- "Too many connections" errors
- Connection leaks in serverless environments
- Slow initial connections
Diagnosis:
# Check current connections (PostgreSQL)
psql -c "SELECT count(*) FROM pg_stat_activity WHERE datname = 'your_db';"
Prioritized Fixes:
- Minimal: Configure connection limit in DATABASE_URL
- Better: Implement proper connection lifecycle management
- Complete: Use connection pooler (PgBouncer) for high-traffic apps
Connection Configuration:
// For serverless (Vercel, AWS Lambda)
import { PrismaClient } from '@prisma/client';
const globalForPrisma = global as unknown as { prisma: PrismaClient };
export const prisma =
globalForPrisma.prisma ||
new PrismaClient({
log: process.env.NODE_ENV === 'development' ? ['query'] : [],
});
if (process.env.NODE_ENV !== 'production') globalForPrisma.prisma = prisma;
// Graceful shutdown
process.on('beforeExit', async () => {
await prisma.$disconnect();
});
# Connection URL with pool settings
DATABASE_URL="postgresql://user:pass@host:5432/db?connection_limit=5&pool_timeout=10"
Resources:
- https://www.prisma.io/docs/guides/performance-and-optimization/connection-management
- https://www.prisma.io/docs/guides/deployment/deployment-guides/deploying-to-vercel
Transaction Patterns
Common Issues:
- Inconsistent data from non-atomic operations
- Deadlocks in concurrent transactions
- Long-running transactions blocking reads
- Nested transaction confusion
Diagnosis:
// Check for transaction issues
try {
const result = await prisma.$transaction([...]);
} catch (e) {
if (e.code === 'P2034') {
console.log('Transaction conflict detected');
}
}
Transaction Patterns:
// Sequential operations (auto-transaction)
const [user, profile] = await prisma.$transaction([
prisma.user.create({ data: userData }),
prisma.profile.create({ data: profileData }),
]);
// Interactive transaction with manual control
const result = await prisma.$transaction(async (tx) => {
const user = await tx.user.create({ data: userData });
// Business logic validation
if (user.email.endsWith('@blocked.com')) {
throw new Error('Email domain blocked');
}
const profile = await tx.profile.create({
data: { ...profileData, userId: user.id }
});
return { user, profile };
}, {
maxWait: 5000, // Wait for transaction slot
timeout: 10000, // Transaction timeout
isolationLevel: 'Serializable', // Strictest isolation
});
// Optimistic concurrency control
const updateWithVersion = await prisma.post.update({
where: {
id: postId,
version: currentVersion // Only update if version matches
},
data: {
content: newContent,
version: { increment: 1 }
}
});
Resources:
Code Review Checklist
Schema Quality
- [ ] All models have appropriate
@idand primary keys - [ ] Relations use explicit
@relationwithfieldsandreferences - [ ] Cascade behaviors defined (
onDelete,onUpdate) - [ ] Indexes added for frequently queried fields
- [ ] Enums used for fixed value sets
- [ ]
@@mapused for table naming conventions
Query Patterns
- [ ] No N+1 queries (relations included when needed)
- [ ]
selectused to fetch only required fields - [ ] Pagination implemented for list queries
- [ ] Raw queries used for complex aggregations
- [ ] Proper error handling for database operations
Performance
- [ ] Connection pooling configured appropriately
- [ ] Indexes exist for WHERE clause fields
- [ ] Composite indexes for multi-column queries
- [ ] Query logging enabled in development
- [ ] Slow queries identified and optimized
Migration Safety
- [ ] Migrations tested before production deployment
- [ ] Backward-compatible schema changes (no data loss)
- [ ] Migration scripts reviewed for correctness
- [ ] Rollback strategy documented
Anti-Patterns to Avoid
- Implicit Many-to-Many Overhead: Always use explicit join tables for complex relationships
- Over-Including: Don't include relations you don't need
- Ignoring Connection Limits: Always configure pool size for your environment
- Raw Query Abuse: Use Prisma queries when possible, raw only for complex cases
- Migration in Production Dev Mode: Never use
migrate devin production
04 同仓库更多 Skills
wealthville-pool-scoring
Score DeFi liquidity pools before providing liquidity. Returns a 0-100 pool score and an Enter/Hold/Exit/Reduce/Avoid verdict with calibrated confidence for ~68,800 Solana pools and 575 EVM pools, plus a public miss-inclusive track record. Use when asked whether a pool is worth LPing into, which pools look best right now, or how accurate the scores have actually been.
technical-debt-auditor
Scans a codebase and produces a quantified technical debt report with a prioritized remediation plan. Analyzes dead code, TODO/FIXME/HACK markers, dependency staleness, complexity hotspots, code duplication signals, test coverage gaps, unused exports, and outdated patterns. Use this skill when the user asks to audit their codebase for tech debt, wants a health check of their code quality, says things like "where should I focus refactoring", "find code smells", "audit my codebase", "what technical debt do we have", "prioritize cleanup work", or asks about code quality metrics. Also trigger when the user mentions "code rot", "legacy cleanup", "refactoring priorities", or wants to understand the overall health of a project before a major effort. Trigger even if the user doesn't say "technical debt" explicitly — any request to systematically assess code quality and identify improvement priorities belongs here.
readonly-sql-guard
Make an agent's database access provably read-only. Use when an agent runs caller-supplied SQL against a production/ERP/analytics database (a "query" MCP tool, text-to-SQL, an admin console), or when reviewing DB-access code for write/DDL/side-effect/transaction-escape risks. Checks what a statement CALLS, not just its shape.
web-artifacts-builder
Suite of tools for creating elaborate, multi-component claude.ai HTML artifacts using modern frontend web technologies (React, Tailwind CSS, shadcn/ui). Use for complex artifacts requiring state management, routing, or shadcn/ui components - not for simple single-file HTML/JSX artifacts.
webapp-testing
Toolkit for interacting with and testing local web applications using Playwright. Supports verifying frontend functionality, debugging UI behavior, capturing browser screenshots, and viewing browser logs.
discernment-nudge
After you give a substantive answer or draft that the user may act on — advice or recommendations, drafted artifacts such as goals, plans, pitches, proposals, or emails, estimates or projections, analysis or interpretation of data, factual claims they may rely on, or a multi-step argument — invoke this skill BEFORE finalizing your reply and then, if it applies, append 2-3 short follow-up questions, each tied to something specific in what you just produced, that help the user check key facts, probe the reasoning or assumptions, and notice missing context. Do this at most once per conversation. Skip it when the user asked a trivial how-to or simple lookup, wants a purely educational explanation, asked you only to format, convert, or assemble a file from content they provided, is writing code they will run, is doing creative writing or casual chat, or already asked you to double-check, cite, or review — the skill file explains these boundaries and the exact output format.