github-workflow-automation
Automate GitHub workflows with AI assistance. Includes PR reviews, issue triage, CI/CD integration, and Git operations. Use when automating GitHub workflows, setting up PR review automation, creating GitHub Actions, or triaging issues.
- License 许可
- MIT
- 最近更新
- 2026-11-12
- Stars
- ★ 3.3w
- Forks
- 3.9k
01 前言 Front Matter
- name
- github-workflow-automation
- description
- Automate GitHub workflows with AI assistance. Includes PR reviews, issue triage, CI/CD integration, and Git operations. Use when automating GitHub workflows, setting up PR review automation, creating GitHub Actions, or triaging issues.
03 SKILL.md 正文
? GitHub Workflow Automation
Patterns for automating GitHub workflows with AI assistance, inspired by Gemini CLI and modern DevOps practices.
When to Use This Skill
Use this skill when:
- Automating PR reviews with AI
- Setting up issue triage automation
- Creating GitHub Actions workflows
- Integrating AI into CI/CD pipelines
- Automating Git operations (rebases, cherry-picks)
1. Automated PR Review
1.1 PR Review Action
# .github/workflows/ai-review.yml
name: AI Code Review
on:
pull_request:
types: [opened, synchronize]
jobs:
review:
runs-on: ubuntu-latest
permissions:
contents: read
pull-requests: write
steps:
- uses: actions/checkout@v4
with:
fetch-depth: 0
- name: Get changed files
id: changed
run: |
files=$(git diff --name-only origin/${{ github.base_ref }}...HEAD)
echo "files<<EOF" >> $GITHUB_OUTPUT
echo "$files" >> $GITHUB_OUTPUT
echo "EOF" >> $GITHUB_OUTPUT
- name: Get diff
id: diff
run: |
diff=$(git diff origin/${{ github.base_ref }}...HEAD)
echo "diff<<EOF" >> $GITHUB_OUTPUT
echo "$diff" >> $GITHUB_OUTPUT
echo "EOF" >> $GITHUB_OUTPUT
- name: AI Review
uses: actions/github-script@v7
with:
script: |
const { Anthropic } = require('@anthropic-ai/sdk');
const client = new Anthropic({ apiKey: process.env.ANTHROPIC_API_KEY });
const response = await client.messages.create({
model: "claude-sonnet-4-6",
max_tokens: 4096,
messages: [{
role: "user",
content: `Review this PR diff and provide feedback:
Changed files: ${{ steps.changed.outputs.files }}
Diff:
${{ steps.diff.outputs.diff }}
Provide:
1. Summary of changes
2. Potential issues or bugs
3. Suggestions for improvement
4. Security concerns if any
Format as GitHub markdown.`
}]
});
await github.rest.pulls.createReview({
owner: context.repo.owner,
repo: context.repo.repo,
pull_number: context.issue.number,
body: response.content[0].text,
event: 'COMMENT'
});
env:
ANTHROPIC_API_KEY: ${{ secrets.ANTHROPIC_API_KEY }}
1.2 Review Comment Patterns
# AI Review Structure
## ? Summary
Brief description of what this PR does.
## ✅ What looks good
- Well-structured code
- Good test coverage
- Clear naming conventions
## ⚠️ Potential Issues
1. **Line 42**: Possible null pointer exception
```javascript
// Current
user.profile.name;
// Suggested
user?.profile?.name ?? "Unknown";
```
- Line 78: Consider error handling
// Add try-catch or .catch()
? Suggestions
- Consider extracting the validation logic into a separate function
- Add JSDoc comments for public methods
? Security Notes
- No sensitive data exposure detected
- API key handling looks correct
### 1.3 Focused Reviews
```yaml
# Review only specific file types
- name: Filter code files
run: |
files=$(git diff --name-only origin/${{ github.base_ref }}...HEAD | \
grep -E '\.(ts|tsx|js|jsx|py|go)$' || true)
echo "code_files=$files" >> $GITHUB_OUTPUT
# Review with context
- name: AI Review with context
run: |
# Include relevant context files
context=""
for file in ${{ steps.changed.outputs.files }}; do
if [[ -f "$file" ]]; then
context+="=== $file ===\n$(cat $file)\n\n"
fi
done
# Send to AI with full file context
2. Issue Triage Automation
2.1 Auto-label Issues
# .github/workflows/issue-triage.yml
name: Issue Triage
on:
issues:
types: [opened]
jobs:
triage:
runs-on: ubuntu-latest
permissions:
issues: write
steps:
- name: Analyze issue
uses: actions/github-script@v7
with:
script: |
const issue = context.payload.issue;
// Call AI to analyze
const analysis = await analyzeIssue(issue.title, issue.body);
// Apply labels
const labels = [];
if (analysis.type === 'bug') {
labels.push('bug');
if (analysis.severity === 'high') labels.push('priority: high');
} else if (analysis.type === 'feature') {
labels.push('enhancement');
} else if (analysis.type === 'question') {
labels.push('question');
}
if (analysis.area) {
labels.push(`area: ${analysis.area}`);
}
await github.rest.issues.addLabels({
owner: context.repo.owner,
repo: context.repo.repo,
issue_number: issue.number,
labels: labels
});
// Add initial response
if (analysis.type === 'bug' && !analysis.hasReproSteps) {
await github.rest.issues.createComment({
owner: context.repo.owner,
repo: context.repo.repo,
issue_number: issue.number,
body: `Thanks for reporting this issue!
To help us investigate, could you please provide:
- Steps to reproduce the issue
- Expected behavior
- Actual behavior
- Environment (OS, version, etc.)
This will help us resolve your issue faster. ?`
});
}
2.2 Issue Analysis Prompt
const TRIAGE_PROMPT = `
Analyze this GitHub issue and classify it:
Title: {title}
Body: {body}
Return JSON with:
{
"type": "bug" | "feature" | "question" | "docs" | "other",
"severity": "low" | "medium" | "high" | "critical",
"area": "frontend" | "backend" | "api" | "docs" | "ci" | "other",
"summary": "one-line summary",
"hasReproSteps": boolean,
"isFirstContribution": boolean,
"suggestedLabels": ["label1", "label2"],
"suggestedAssignees": ["username"] // based on area expertise
}
`;
2.3 Stale Issue Management
# .github/workflows/stale.yml
name: Manage Stale Issues
on:
schedule:
- cron: "0 0 * * *" # Daily
jobs:
stale:
runs-on: ubuntu-latest
steps:
- uses: actions/stale@v9
with:
stale-issue-message: |
This issue has been automatically marked as stale because it has not had
recent activity. It will be closed in 14 days if no further activity occurs.
If this issue is still relevant:
- Add a comment with an update
- Remove the `stale` label
Thank you for your contributions! ?
stale-pr-message: |
This PR has been automatically marked as stale. Please update it or it
will be closed in 14 days.
days-before-stale: 60
days-before-close: 14
stale-issue-label: "stale"
stale-pr-label: "stale"
exempt-issue-labels: "pinned,security,in-progress"
exempt-pr-labels: "pinned,security"
3. CI/CD Integration
3.1 Smart Test Selection
# .github/workflows/smart-tests.yml
name: Smart Test Selection
on:
pull_request:
jobs:
analyze:
runs-on: ubuntu-latest
outputs:
test_suites: ${{ steps.analyze.outputs.suites }}
steps:
- uses: actions/checkout@v4
with:
fetch-depth: 0
- name: Analyze changes
id: analyze
run: |
# Get changed files
changed=$(git diff --name-only origin/${{ github.base_ref }}...HEAD)
# Determine which test suites to run
suites="[]"
if echo "$changed" | grep -q "^src/api/"; then
suites=$(echo $suites | jq '. + ["api"]')
fi
if echo "$changed" | grep -q "^src/frontend/"; then
suites=$(echo $suites | jq '. + ["frontend"]')
fi
if echo "$changed" | grep -q "^src/database/"; then
suites=$(echo $suites | jq '. + ["database", "api"]')
fi
# If nothing specific, run all
if [ "$suites" = "[]" ]; then
suites='["all"]'
fi
echo "suites=$suites" >> $GITHUB_OUTPUT
test:
needs: analyze
runs-on: ubuntu-latest
strategy:
matrix:
suite: ${{ fromJson(needs.analyze.outputs.test_suites) }}
steps:
- uses: actions/checkout@v4
- name: Run tests
run: |
if [ "${{ matrix.suite }}" = "all" ]; then
npm test
else
npm test -- --suite ${{ matrix.suite }}
fi
3.2 Deployment with AI Validation
# .github/workflows/deploy.yml
name: Deploy with AI Validation
on:
push:
branches: [main]
jobs:
validate:
runs-on: ubuntu-latest
steps:
- uses: actions/checkout@v4
- name: Get deployment changes
id: changes
run: |
# Get commits since last deployment
last_deploy=$(git describe --tags --abbrev=0 2>/dev/null || echo "")
if [ -n "$last_deploy" ]; then
changes=$(git log --oneline $last_deploy..HEAD)
else
changes=$(git log --oneline -10)
fi
echo "changes<<EOF" >> $GITHUB_OUTPUT
echo "$changes" >> $GITHUB_OUTPUT
echo "EOF" >> $GITHUB_OUTPUT
- name: AI Risk Assessment
id: assess
uses: actions/github-script@v7
with:
script: |
// Analyze changes for deployment risk
const prompt = `
Analyze these changes for deployment risk:
${process.env.CHANGES}
Return JSON:
{
"riskLevel": "low" | "medium" | "high",
"concerns": ["concern1", "concern2"],
"recommendations": ["rec1", "rec2"],
"requiresManualApproval": boolean
}
`;
// Call AI and parse response
const analysis = await callAI(prompt);
if (analysis.riskLevel === 'high') {
core.setFailed('High-risk deployment detected. Manual review required.');
}
return analysis;
env:
CHANGES: ${{ steps.changes.outputs.changes }}
deploy:
needs: validate
runs-on: ubuntu-latest
environment: production
steps:
- name: Deploy
run: |
echo "Deploying to production..."
# Deployment commands here
3.3 Rollback Automation
# .github/workflows/rollback.yml
name: Automated Rollback
on:
workflow_dispatch:
inputs:
reason:
description: "Reason for rollback"
required: true
jobs:
rollback:
runs-on: ubuntu-latest
steps:
- uses: actions/checkout@v4
with:
fetch-depth: 0
- name: Find last stable version
id: stable
run: |
# Find last successful deployment
stable=$(git tag -l 'v*' --sort=-version:refname | head -1)
echo "version=$stable" >> $GITHUB_OUTPUT
- name: Rollback
run: |
git checkout ${{ steps.stable.outputs.version }}
# Deploy stable version
npm run deploy
- name: Notify team
uses: slackapi/slack-github-action@v1
with:
payload: |
{
"text": "? Production rolled back to ${{ steps.stable.outputs.version }}",
"blocks": [
{
"type": "section",
"text": {
"type": "mrkdwn",
"text": "*Rollback executed*\n• Version: `${{ steps.stable.outputs.version }}`\n• Reason: ${{ inputs.reason }}\n• Triggered by: ${{ github.actor }}"
}
}
]
}
4. Git Operations
4.1 Automated Rebasing
# .github/workflows/auto-rebase.yml
name: Auto Rebase
on:
issue_comment:
types: [created]
jobs:
rebase:
if: github.event.issue.pull_request && contains(github.event.comment.body, '/rebase')
runs-on: ubuntu-latest
steps:
- uses: actions/checkout@v4
with:
fetch-depth: 0
token: ${{ secrets.GITHUB_TOKEN }}
- name: Setup Git
run: |
git config user.name "github-actions[bot]"
git config user.email "github-actions[bot]@users.noreply.github.com"
- name: Rebase PR
run: |
# Fetch PR branch
gh pr checkout ${{ github.event.issue.number }}
# Rebase onto main
git fetch origin main
git rebase origin/main
# Force push
git push --force-with-lease
env:
GH_TOKEN: ${{ secrets.GITHUB_TOKEN }}
- name: Comment result
uses: actions/github-script@v7
with:
script: |
github.rest.issues.createComment({
owner: context.repo.owner,
repo: context.repo.repo,
issue_number: context.issue.number,
body: '✅ Successfully rebased onto main!'
})
4.2 Smart Cherry-Pick
// AI-assisted cherry-pick that handles conflicts
async function smartCherryPick(commitHash: string, targetBranch: string) {
// Get commit info
const commitInfo = await exec(`git show ${commitHash} --stat`);
// Check for potential conflicts
const targetDiff = await exec(
`git diff ${targetBranch}...HEAD -- ${affectedFiles}`
);
// AI analysis
const analysis = await ai.analyze(`
I need to cherry-pick this commit to ${targetBranch}:
${commitInfo}
Current state of affected files on ${targetBranch}:
${targetDiff}
Will there be conflicts? If so, suggest resolution strategy.
`);
if (analysis.willConflict) {
// Create branch for manual resolution
await exec(
`git checkout -b cherry-pick-${commitHash.slice(0, 7)} ${targetBranch}`
);
const result = await exec(`git cherry-pick ${commitHash}`, {
allowFail: true,
});
if (result.failed) {
// AI-assisted conflict resolution
const conflicts = await getConflicts();
for (const conflict of conflicts) {
const resolution = await ai.resolveConflict(conflict);
await applyResolution(conflict.file, resolution);
}
}
} else {
await exec(`git checkout ${targetBranch}`);
await exec(`git cherry-pick ${commitHash}`);
}
}
4.3 Branch Cleanup
# .github/workflows/branch-cleanup.yml
name: Branch Cleanup
on:
schedule:
- cron: '0 0 * * 0' # Weekly
workflow_dispatch:
jobs:
cleanup:
runs-on: ubuntu-latest
steps:
- uses: actions/checkout@v4
with:
fetch-depth: 0
- name: Find stale branches
id: stale
run: |
# Branches not updated in 30 days
stale=$(git for-each-ref --sort=-committerdate refs/remotes/origin \
--format='%(refname:short) %(committerdate:relative)' | \
grep -E '[3-9][0-9]+ days|[0-9]+ months|[0-9]+ years' | \
grep -v 'origin/main\|origin/develop' | \
cut -d' ' -f1 | sed 's|origin/||')
echo "branches<<EOF" >> $GITHUB_OUTPUT
echo "$stale" >> $GITHUB_OUTPUT
echo "EOF" >> $GITHUB_OUTPUT
- name: Create cleanup PR
if: steps.stale.outputs.branches != ''
uses: actions/github-script@v7
with:
script: |
const branches = `${{ steps.stale.outputs.branches }}`.split('\n').filter(Boolean);
const body = `## ? Stale Branch Cleanup
The following branches haven't been updated in over 30 days:
${branches.map(b => `- \`${b}\``).join('\n')}
### Actions:
- [ ] Review each branch
- [ ] Delete branches that are no longer needed
- Comment \`/keep branch-name\` to preserve specific branches
`;
await github.rest.issues.create({
owner: context.repo.owner,
repo: context.repo.repo,
title: 'Stale Branch Cleanup',
body: body,
labels: ['housekeeping']
});
5. On-Demand Assistance
5.1 @mention Bot
# .github/workflows/mention-bot.yml
name: AI Mention Bot
on:
issue_comment:
types: [created]
pull_request_review_comment:
types: [created]
jobs:
respond:
if: contains(github.event.comment.body, '@ai-helper')
runs-on: ubuntu-latest
steps:
- uses: actions/checkout@v4
- name: Extract question
id: question
run: |
# Extract text after @ai-helper
question=$(echo "${{ github.event.comment.body }}" | sed 's/.*@ai-helper//')
echo "question=$question" >> $GITHUB_OUTPUT
- name: Get context
id: context
run: |
if [ "${{ github.event.issue.pull_request }}" != "" ]; then
# It's a PR - get diff
gh pr diff ${{ github.event.issue.number }} > context.txt
else
# It's an issue - get description
gh issue view ${{ github.event.issue.number }} --json body -q .body > context.txt
fi
echo "context=$(cat context.txt)" >> $GITHUB_OUTPUT
env:
GH_TOKEN: ${{ secrets.GITHUB_TOKEN }}
- name: AI Response
uses: actions/github-script@v7
with:
script: |
const response = await ai.chat(`
Context: ${process.env.CONTEXT}
Question: ${process.env.QUESTION}
Provide a helpful, specific answer. Include code examples if relevant.
`);
await github.rest.issues.createComment({
owner: context.repo.owner,
repo: context.repo.repo,
issue_number: context.issue.number,
body: response
});
env:
CONTEXT: ${{ steps.context.outputs.context }}
QUESTION: ${{ steps.question.outputs.question }}
5.2 Command Patterns
## Available Commands
| Command | Description |
| :------------------- | :-------------------------- |
| `@ai-helper explain` | Explain the code in this PR |
| `@ai-helper review` | Request AI code review |
| `@ai-helper fix` | Suggest fixes for issues |
| `@ai-helper test` | Generate test cases |
| `@ai-helper docs` | Generate documentation |
| `/rebase` | Rebase PR onto main |
| `/update` | Update PR branch from main |
| `/approve` | Mark as approved by bot |
| `/label bug` | Add 'bug' label |
| `/assign @user` | Assign to user |
6. Repository Configuration
6.1 CODEOWNERS
# .github/CODEOWNERS
# Global owners
* @org/core-team
# Frontend
/src/frontend/ @org/frontend-team
*.tsx @org/frontend-team
*.css @org/frontend-team
# Backend
/src/api/ @org/backend-team
/src/database/ @org/backend-team
# Infrastructure
/.github/ @org/devops-team
/terraform/ @org/devops-team
Dockerfile @org/devops-team
# Docs
/docs/ @org/docs-team
*.md @org/docs-team
# Security-sensitive
/src/auth/ @org/security-team
/src/crypto/ @org/security-team
6.2 Branch Protection
# Set up via GitHub API
- name: Configure branch protection
uses: actions/github-script@v7
with:
script: |
await github.rest.repos.updateBranchProtection({
owner: context.repo.owner,
repo: context.repo.repo,
branch: 'main',
required_status_checks: {
strict: true,
contexts: ['test', 'lint', 'ai-review']
},
enforce_admins: true,
required_pull_request_reviews: {
required_approving_review_count: 1,
require_code_owner_reviews: true,
dismiss_stale_reviews: true
},
restrictions: null,
required_linear_history: true,
allow_force_pushes: false,
allow_deletions: false
});
Best Practices
Security
- [ ] Store API keys in GitHub Secrets
- [ ] Use minimal permissions in workflows
- [ ] Validate all inputs
- [ ] Don't expose sensitive data in logs
Performance
- [ ] Cache dependencies
- [ ] Use matrix builds for parallel testing
- [ ] Skip unnecessary jobs with path filters
- [ ] Use self-hosted runners for heavy workloads
Reliability
- [ ] Add timeouts to jobs
- [ ] Handle rate limits gracefully
- [ ] Implement retry logic
- [ ] Have rollback procedures
Resources
04 同仓库更多 Skills
wealthville-pool-scoring
Score DeFi liquidity pools before providing liquidity. Returns a 0-100 pool score and an Enter/Hold/Exit/Reduce/Avoid verdict with calibrated confidence for ~68,800 Solana pools and 575 EVM pools, plus a public miss-inclusive track record. Use when asked whether a pool is worth LPing into, which pools look best right now, or how accurate the scores have actually been.
technical-debt-auditor
Scans a codebase and produces a quantified technical debt report with a prioritized remediation plan. Analyzes dead code, TODO/FIXME/HACK markers, dependency staleness, complexity hotspots, code duplication signals, test coverage gaps, unused exports, and outdated patterns. Use this skill when the user asks to audit their codebase for tech debt, wants a health check of their code quality, says things like "where should I focus refactoring", "find code smells", "audit my codebase", "what technical debt do we have", "prioritize cleanup work", or asks about code quality metrics. Also trigger when the user mentions "code rot", "legacy cleanup", "refactoring priorities", or wants to understand the overall health of a project before a major effort. Trigger even if the user doesn't say "technical debt" explicitly — any request to systematically assess code quality and identify improvement priorities belongs here.
readonly-sql-guard
Make an agent's database access provably read-only. Use when an agent runs caller-supplied SQL against a production/ERP/analytics database (a "query" MCP tool, text-to-SQL, an admin console), or when reviewing DB-access code for write/DDL/side-effect/transaction-escape risks. Checks what a statement CALLS, not just its shape.
web-artifacts-builder
Suite of tools for creating elaborate, multi-component claude.ai HTML artifacts using modern frontend web technologies (React, Tailwind CSS, shadcn/ui). Use for complex artifacts requiring state management, routing, or shadcn/ui components - not for simple single-file HTML/JSX artifacts.
webapp-testing
Toolkit for interacting with and testing local web applications using Playwright. Supports verifying frontend functionality, debugging UI behavior, capturing browser screenshots, and viewing browser logs.
discernment-nudge
After you give a substantive answer or draft that the user may act on — advice or recommendations, drafted artifacts such as goals, plans, pitches, proposals, or emails, estimates or projections, analysis or interpretation of data, factual claims they may rely on, or a multi-step argument — invoke this skill BEFORE finalizing your reply and then, if it applies, append 2-3 short follow-up questions, each tied to something specific in what you just produced, that help the user check key facts, probe the reasoning or assumptions, and notice missing context. Do this at most once per conversation. Skip it when the user asked a trivial how-to or simple lookup, wants a purely educational explanation, asked you only to format, convert, or assemble a file from content they provided, is writing code they will run, is doing creative writing or casual chat, or already asked you to double-check, cite, or review — the skill file explains these boundaries and the exact output format.