c4-architecture
Generate architecture documentation using C4 model Mermaid diagrams. Use when asked to create architecture diagrams, document system architecture, visualize software structure, create C4 diagrams, or generate context/container/component/deployment diagrams. Triggers include "architecture diagram", "C4 diagram", "system context", "container diagram", "component diagram", "deployment diagram", "document architecture", "visualize architecture".
- License 许可
- MIT
- 最近更新
- 2026-11-11
- Stars
- ★ 3.3w
- Forks
- 3.9k
01 前言 Front Matter
- name
- c4-architecture
- description
- Generate architecture documentation using C4 model Mermaid diagrams. Use when asked to create architecture diagrams, document system architecture, visualize software structure, create C4 diagrams, or generate context/container/component/deployment diagrams. Triggers include "architecture diagram", "C4 diagram", "system context", "container diagram", "component diagram", "deployment diagram", "document architecture", "visualize architecture".
02 资源文件 6
- 参考文档agents/openai.yaml102 B
- 参考文档README.md6.9 KB
- 参考文档references/advanced-patterns.md17.9 KB
- 参考文档references/c4-syntax.md14.2 KB
- 参考文档references/common-mistakes.md12.1 KB
- 参考文档SKILL-MECHANICS.md2.6 KB
03 SKILL.md 正文
C4 Architecture Documentation
Generate software architecture documentation using C4 model diagrams in Mermaid syntax.
Workflow
- Understand scope - Determine which C4 level(s) are needed based on audience
- Analyze codebase - Explore the system to identify components, containers, and relationships
- Generate diagrams - Create Mermaid C4 diagrams at appropriate abstraction levels
- Document - Write diagrams to markdown files with explanatory context
C4 Diagram Levels
Select the appropriate level based on the documentation need:
| Level | Diagram Type | Audience | Shows | When to Create |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | C4Context | Everyone | System + external actors | Always (required) |
| 2 | C4Container | Technical | Apps, databases, services | Always (required) |
| 3 | C4Component | Developers | Internal components | Only if adds value |
| 4 | C4Deployment | DevOps | Infrastructure nodes | For production systems |
| - | C4Dynamic | Technical | Request flows (numbered) | For complex workflows |
Key Insight: "Context + Container diagrams are sufficient for most software development teams." Only create Component/Code diagrams when they genuinely add value.
Quick Start Examples
System Context (Level 1)
C4Context
title System Context - Workout Tracker
Person(user, "User", "Tracks workouts and exercises")
System(app, "Workout Tracker", "Vue PWA for tracking strength and CrossFit workouts")
System_Ext(browser, "Web Browser", "Stores data in IndexedDB")
Rel(user, app, "Uses")
Rel(app, browser, "Persists data to", "IndexedDB")
Container Diagram (Level 2)
C4Container
title Container Diagram - Workout Tracker
Person(user, "User", "Tracks workouts")
Container_Boundary(app, "Workout Tracker PWA") {
Container(spa, "SPA", "Vue 3, TypeScript", "Single-page application")
Container(pinia, "State Management", "Pinia", "Manages application state")
ContainerDb(indexeddb, "IndexedDB", "Dexie", "Local workout storage")
}
Rel(user, spa, "Uses")
Rel(spa, pinia, "Reads/writes state")
Rel(pinia, indexeddb, "Persists", "Dexie ORM")
Component Diagram (Level 3)
C4Component
title Component Diagram - Workout Feature
Container(views, "Views", "Vue Router pages")
Container_Boundary(workout, "Workout Feature") {
Component(useWorkout, "useWorkout", "Composable", "Workout execution state")
Component(useTimer, "useTimer", "Composable", "Timer state machine")
Component(workoutRepo, "WorkoutRepository", "Dexie", "Workout persistence")
}
Rel(views, useWorkout, "Uses")
Rel(useWorkout, useTimer, "Controls")
Rel(useWorkout, workoutRepo, "Saves to")
Dynamic Diagram (Request Flow)
C4Dynamic
title Dynamic Diagram - User Sign In Flow
ContainerDb(db, "Database", "PostgreSQL", "User credentials")
Container(spa, "Single-Page App", "React", "Banking UI")
Container_Boundary(api, "API Application") {
Component(signIn, "Sign In Controller", "Express", "Auth endpoint")
Component(security, "Security Service", "JWT", "Validates credentials")
}
Rel(spa, signIn, "1. Submit credentials", "JSON/HTTPS")
Rel(signIn, security, "2. Validate")
Rel(security, db, "3. Query user", "SQL")
UpdateRelStyle(spa, signIn, $textColor="blue", $offsetY="-30")
Deployment Diagram
C4Deployment
title Deployment Diagram - Production
Deployment_Node(browser, "Customer Browser", "Chrome/Firefox") {
Container(spa, "SPA", "React", "Web application")
}
Deployment_Node(aws, "AWS Cloud", "us-east-1") {
Deployment_Node(ecs, "ECS Cluster", "Fargate") {
Container(api, "API Service", "Node.js", "REST API")
}
Deployment_Node(rds, "RDS", "db.r5.large") {
ContainerDb(db, "Database", "PostgreSQL", "Application data")
}
}
Rel(spa, api, "API calls", "HTTPS")
Rel(api, db, "Reads/writes", "JDBC")
Element Syntax
People and Systems
Person(alias, "Label", "Description")
Person_Ext(alias, "Label", "Description") # External person
System(alias, "Label", "Description")
System_Ext(alias, "Label", "Description") # External system
SystemDb(alias, "Label", "Description") # Database system
SystemQueue(alias, "Label", "Description") # Queue system
Containers
Container(alias, "Label", "Technology", "Description")
Container_Ext(alias, "Label", "Technology", "Description")
ContainerDb(alias, "Label", "Technology", "Description")
ContainerQueue(alias, "Label", "Technology", "Description")
Components
Component(alias, "Label", "Technology", "Description")
Component_Ext(alias, "Label", "Technology", "Description")
ComponentDb(alias, "Label", "Technology", "Description")
Boundaries
Enterprise_Boundary(alias, "Label") { ... }
System_Boundary(alias, "Label") { ... }
Container_Boundary(alias, "Label") { ... }
Boundary(alias, "Label", "type") { ... }
Relationships
Rel(from, to, "Label")
Rel(from, to, "Label", "Technology")
BiRel(from, to, "Label") # Bidirectional
Rel_U(from, to, "Label") # Upward
Rel_D(from, to, "Label") # Downward
Rel_L(from, to, "Label") # Leftward
Rel_R(from, to, "Label") # Rightward
Deployment Nodes
Deployment_Node(alias, "Label", "Type", "Description") { ... }
Node(alias, "Label", "Type", "Description") { ... } # Shorthand
Styling and Layout
Layout Configuration
UpdateLayoutConfig($c4ShapeInRow="3", $c4BoundaryInRow="1")
$c4ShapeInRow- Number of shapes per row (default: 4)$c4BoundaryInRow- Number of boundaries per row (default: 2)
Element Styling
UpdateElementStyle(alias, $fontColor="red", $bgColor="grey", $borderColor="red")
Relationship Styling
UpdateRelStyle(from, to, $textColor="blue", $lineColor="blue", $offsetX="5", $offsetY="-10")
Use $offsetX and $offsetY to fix overlapping relationship labels.
Best Practices
Essential Rules
- Every element must have: Name, Type, Technology (where applicable), and Description
- Use unidirectional arrows only - Bidirectional arrows create ambiguity
- Label arrows with action verbs - "Sends email using", "Reads from", not just "uses"
- Include technology labels - "JSON/HTTPS", "JDBC", "gRPC"
- Stay under 20 elements per diagram - Split complex systems into multiple diagrams
Clarity Guidelines
- Start at Level 1 - Context diagrams help frame the system scope
- One diagram per file - Keep diagrams focused on a single abstraction level
- Meaningful aliases - Use descriptive aliases (e.g.,
orderServicenots1) - Concise descriptions - Keep descriptions under 50 characters when possible
- Always include a title - "System Context diagram for [System Name]"
What to Avoid
See references/common-mistakes.md for detailed anti-patterns:
- Confusing containers (deployable) vs components (non-deployable)
- Modeling shared libraries as containers
- Showing message brokers as single containers instead of individual topics
- Adding undefined abstraction levels like "subcomponents"
- Removing type labels to "simplify" diagrams
Microservices Guidelines
Single Team Ownership
Model each microservice as a container (or container group):
C4Container
title Microservices - Single Team
System_Boundary(platform, "E-commerce Platform") {
Container(orderApi, "Order Service", "Spring Boot", "Order processing")
ContainerDb(orderDb, "Order DB", "PostgreSQL", "Order data")
Container(inventoryApi, "Inventory Service", "Node.js", "Stock management")
ContainerDb(inventoryDb, "Inventory DB", "MongoDB", "Stock data")
}
Multi-Team Ownership
Promote microservices to software systems when owned by separate teams:
C4Context
title Microservices - Multi-Team
Person(customer, "Customer", "Places orders")
System(orderSystem, "Order System", "Team Alpha")
System(inventorySystem, "Inventory System", "Team Beta")
System(paymentSystem, "Payment System", "Team Gamma")
Rel(customer, orderSystem, "Places orders")
Rel(orderSystem, inventorySystem, "Checks stock")
Rel(orderSystem, paymentSystem, "Processes payment")
Event-Driven Architecture
Show individual topics/queues as containers, NOT a single "Kafka" box:
C4Container
title Event-Driven Architecture
Container(orderService, "Order Service", "Java", "Creates orders")
Container(stockService, "Stock Service", "Java", "Manages inventory")
ContainerQueue(orderTopic, "order.created", "Kafka", "Order events")
ContainerQueue(stockTopic, "stock.reserved", "Kafka", "Stock events")
Rel(orderService, orderTopic, "Publishes to")
Rel(stockService, orderTopic, "Subscribes to")
Rel(stockService, stockTopic, "Publishes to")
Rel(orderService, stockTopic, "Subscribes to")
Output Location
Write architecture documentation to docs/architecture/ with naming convention:
c4-context.md- System context diagramc4-containers.md- Container diagramc4-components-{feature}.md- Component diagrams per featurec4-deployment.md- Deployment diagramc4-dynamic-{flow}.md- Dynamic diagrams for specific flows
Audience-Appropriate Detail
| Audience | Recommended Diagrams |
|---|---|
| Executives | System Context only |
| Product Managers | Context + Container |
| Architects | Context + Container + key Components |
| Developers | All levels as needed |
| DevOps | Container + Deployment |
References
- references/c4-syntax.md - Complete Mermaid C4 syntax
- references/common-mistakes.md - Anti-patterns to avoid
- references/advanced-patterns.md - Microservices, event-driven, deployment
04 同仓库更多 Skills
wealthville-pool-scoring
Score DeFi liquidity pools before providing liquidity. Returns a 0-100 pool score and an Enter/Hold/Exit/Reduce/Avoid verdict with calibrated confidence for ~68,800 Solana pools and 575 EVM pools, plus a public miss-inclusive track record. Use when asked whether a pool is worth LPing into, which pools look best right now, or how accurate the scores have actually been.
technical-debt-auditor
Scans a codebase and produces a quantified technical debt report with a prioritized remediation plan. Analyzes dead code, TODO/FIXME/HACK markers, dependency staleness, complexity hotspots, code duplication signals, test coverage gaps, unused exports, and outdated patterns. Use this skill when the user asks to audit their codebase for tech debt, wants a health check of their code quality, says things like "where should I focus refactoring", "find code smells", "audit my codebase", "what technical debt do we have", "prioritize cleanup work", or asks about code quality metrics. Also trigger when the user mentions "code rot", "legacy cleanup", "refactoring priorities", or wants to understand the overall health of a project before a major effort. Trigger even if the user doesn't say "technical debt" explicitly — any request to systematically assess code quality and identify improvement priorities belongs here.
readonly-sql-guard
Make an agent's database access provably read-only. Use when an agent runs caller-supplied SQL against a production/ERP/analytics database (a "query" MCP tool, text-to-SQL, an admin console), or when reviewing DB-access code for write/DDL/side-effect/transaction-escape risks. Checks what a statement CALLS, not just its shape.
web-artifacts-builder
Suite of tools for creating elaborate, multi-component claude.ai HTML artifacts using modern frontend web technologies (React, Tailwind CSS, shadcn/ui). Use for complex artifacts requiring state management, routing, or shadcn/ui components - not for simple single-file HTML/JSX artifacts.
webapp-testing
Toolkit for interacting with and testing local web applications using Playwright. Supports verifying frontend functionality, debugging UI behavior, capturing browser screenshots, and viewing browser logs.
discernment-nudge
After you give a substantive answer or draft that the user may act on — advice or recommendations, drafted artifacts such as goals, plans, pitches, proposals, or emails, estimates or projections, analysis or interpretation of data, factual claims they may rely on, or a multi-step argument — invoke this skill BEFORE finalizing your reply and then, if it applies, append 2-3 short follow-up questions, each tied to something specific in what you just produced, that help the user check key facts, probe the reasoning or assumptions, and notice missing context. Do this at most once per conversation. Skip it when the user asked a trivial how-to or simple lookup, wants a purely educational explanation, asked you only to format, convert, or assemble a file from content they provided, is writing code they will run, is doing creative writing or casual chat, or already asked you to double-check, cite, or review — the skill file explains these boundaries and the exact output format.