[{"data":1,"prerenderedAt":-1},["ShallowReactive",2],{"skill:01M6AE4JZS5CSFPD0VG9R65A1R":3,"skill-same:01M6AE4JZS5CSFPD0VG9R65A1R":62},{"skillNo":4,"name":5,"nameZh":6,"description":7,"descriptionZh":6,"repositoryFullName":8,"ownerLogin":9,"ownerAvatarUrl":10,"ownerAccountNo":11,"ownerDisplayName":12,"repositoryNo":13,"starsCount":14,"licenseSpdxId":15,"licenseFileUrl":6,"sourceHtmlUrl":16,"categories":17,"keywords":18,"publishedAt":33,"linkOnly":34,"markdownContent":35,"markdownBody":36,"frontMatter":37,"refName":38,"commitSha":39,"skillDirectory":40,"forksCount":41,"repositoryHtmlUrl":42,"repositoryHomepageUrl":43,"ownerHtmlUrl":44,"ownerBlogUrl":45,"ownerDescription":46,"updatedAt":47,"install":48,"resources":61},"01M6AE4JZS5CSFPD0VG9R65A1R","offer-comparison-analyzer",null,"Compare multiple job offers side-by-side with total compensation analysis. Use when the user has multiple offers and wants to compare salary, equity, benefits, or total comp.","davila7\u002Fclaude-code-templates","davila7","https:\u002F\u002Favatars.githubusercontent.com\u002Fu\u002F6216945?v=4","01M6ADEWWFPS191NFM0Y1EX1JH","Daniel Avila","01M6ADJHGM78PHQRD3XZTFDVKK",33332,"MIT","https:\u002F\u002Fgithub.com\u002Fdavila7\u002Fclaude-code-templates\u002Fblob\u002Fmain\u002Fcli-tool\u002Fcomponents\u002Fskills\u002Fcareer\u002Foffer-comparison-analyzer\u002FSKILL.md",[],[19,20,21,22,23,24,25,26,27,28,29,30,31,32],"offer comparison analyzer","comparison","analyzer","analysis","offers","user","use","compare","comp","equity","with","benefits","when","compensation","2026-11-10 10:12:30",false,"---\nname: offer-comparison-analyzer\ndescription: Compare multiple job offers side-by-side with total compensation analysis. Use when the user has multiple offers and wants to compare salary, equity, benefits, or total comp.\n---\n\n# Offer Comparison Analyzer\n\n## When to Use This Skill\n\nUse this skill when the user:\n- Has multiple job offers to compare\n- Needs to evaluate total compensation\n- Wants to make a data-driven job decision\n- Is weighing different opportunities\n- Mentions: \"compare offers\", \"multiple offers\", \"which job\", \"offer comparison\", \"deciding between jobs\"\n\n## Core Capabilities\n\n- Compare total compensation across offers\n- Evaluate non-monetary factors\n- Create weighted decision frameworks\n- Calculate true offer value\n- Identify hidden costs and benefits\n- Guide the decision-making process\n\n## The Comparison Challenge\n\n**The Problem:** \nComparing offers is hard because:\n- Different compensation structures\n- Non-monetary factors matter\n- Hidden benefits and costs\n- Emotional factors cloud judgment\n- Information asymmetry\n\n**The Solution:**\nSystematic comparison framework that considers:\n- Total compensation (not just salary)\n- Career growth potential\n- Work-life factors\n- Risk assessment\n- Personal values alignment\n\n## Total Compensation Calculator\n\n### Components to Include\n\n**Cash Compensation:**\n- Base salary\n- Signing bonus (one-time)\n- Annual bonus (target %)\n- Commission (for sales roles)\n- Relocation assistance\n\n**Equity Compensation:**\n- Stock options (value = current price - strike price)\n- RSUs (value = current price × shares)\n- Vesting schedule\n- Refresh grant expectations\n\n**Benefits Value:**\n- Health insurance (employer contribution)\n- 401(k) match\n- HSA\u002FFSA contributions\n- Life\u002Fdisability insurance\n- Other insurance benefits\n\n**Perks Value:**\n- Vacation days (can assign $ value)\n- Remote work (saves commute costs)\n- Professional development budget\n- Equipment\u002Foffice stipend\n- Meals, gym, etc.\n\n### Calculation Template\n\n```\nOFFER A - TOTAL COMPENSATION\n\nCASH\nBase Salary:                    $150,000\nSigning Bonus (year 1 only):     $25,000\nTarget Bonus (15%):              $22,500\n--------------------------------\nCash Compensation:              $197,500 (year 1)\n                               $172,500 (ongoing)\n\nEQUITY\nRSU Grant: $200,000 over 4 years\nAnnual Value:                    $50,000\n--------------------------------\nEquity Compensation:             $50,000\u002Fyear\n\nBENEFITS\n401(k) Match (4%):               $6,000\nHealth Insurance:                $15,000 (employer portion)\nHSA Contribution:                 $1,000\n--------------------------------\nBenefits Value:                  $22,000\u002Fyear\n\nPERKS\nVacation: 20 days (vs 10 standard)\n  Extra 10 days × ~$575\u002Fday:      $5,750 value\nRemote Work Savings:              $3,000 (commute, lunch)\nProfessional Dev:                 $2,000 budget\n--------------------------------\nPerks Value:                     $10,750\u002Fyear\n\nTOTAL YEAR 1:        $280,250\nTOTAL ONGOING:       $255,250\u002Fyear\n```\n\n## Side-by-Side Comparison Template\n\n```markdown\n# OFFER COMPARISON\n\n|                          | Company A | Company B | Notes |\n|--------------------------|-----------|-----------|-------|\n| **CASH**                 |           |           |       |\n| Base Salary              | $150,000  | $160,000  | B +$10K |\n| Signing Bonus            | $25,000   | $10,000   | A +$15K |\n| Target Bonus             | 15%       | 10%       | A +$6.5K |\n| **Cash Total (Yr 1)**    | $197,500  | $186,000  | A +$11.5K |\n|                          |           |           |       |\n| **EQUITY**               |           |           |       |\n| Grant Value (4yr)        | $200,000  | $300,000  | B +$100K |\n| Annual Equity            | $50,000   | $75,000   | B +$25K |\n|                          |           |           |       |\n| **BENEFITS**             |           |           |       |\n| 401(k) Match             | 4%        | 6%        | B +$3.2K |\n| Health Insurance         | Good      | Premium   | B better |\n| PTO                      | 20 days   | Unlimited | Varies |\n|                          |           |           |       |\n| **TOTAL COMP (Yr 1)**    | $280,250  | $285,000  | B +$4.7K |\n| **TOTAL COMP (Ongoing)** | $255,250  | $275,000  | B +$19.7K |\n```\n\n## Non-Monetary Factor Framework\n\n### Career Growth (Weight: High)\n\n**Questions to Consider:**\n- Which role offers more learning?\n- Which company\u002Fbrand helps future job search?\n- Which has better promotion track?\n- Which offers more scope\u002Fresponsibility?\n- Which manager will develop you more?\n\n**Scoring:**\n```\nCompany A: Growth Score\n- Learning opportunity: 8\u002F10\n- Brand\u002Fresume value: 7\u002F10\n- Promotion potential: 6\u002F10\n- Scope: 8\u002F10\nAverage: 7.25\u002F10\n\nCompany B: Growth Score\n- Learning opportunity: 7\u002F10\n- Brand\u002Fresume value: 9\u002F10\n- Promotion potential: 8\u002F10\n- Scope: 7\u002F10\nAverage: 7.75\u002F10\n```\n\n### Work-Life Balance (Weight: Personal)\n\n**Factors:**\n- Expected hours\n- Remote\u002Fhybrid flexibility\n- Vacation usage culture\n- On-call requirements\n- Travel requirements\n- Commute time\n\n### Team & Culture (Weight: High)\n\n**Factors:**\n- Manager quality (crucial!)\n- Team health\u002Fdynamics\n- Company culture fit\n- DEI considerations\n- Company stability\u002Fgrowth\n- Values alignment\n\n### Risk Assessment (Weight: Medium)\n\n**Startup vs. Established:**\n- Funding runway\n- Market position\n- Company trajectory\n- Equity risk (could be worth $0)\n\n**Questions:**\n- What happens if company struggles?\n- How stable is this role?\n- What's the severance policy?\n\n## Weighted Decision Matrix\n\n### Step 1: Define Your Priorities\n\n```\nFactor                  Weight\n------------------------------------\nTotal Compensation       25%\nCareer Growth            25%\nWork-Life Balance        20%\nTeam & Culture           20%\nLocation\u002FCommute         10%\n------------------------------------\nTotal:                   100%\n```\n\n### Step 2: Score Each Factor\n\n```\n                    Company A   Company B\nFactor              Score (1-10)\n------------------------------------\nCompensation        7           8\nCareer Growth       7           8\nWork-Life           8           6\nTeam & Culture      9           7\nLocation            8           5\n```\n\n### Step 3: Calculate Weighted Score\n\n```\nCompany A:\n(7 × 0.25) + (7 × 0.25) + (8 × 0.20) + (9 × 0.20) + (8 × 0.10)\n= 1.75 + 1.75 + 1.60 + 1.80 + 0.80\n= 7.70\n\nCompany B:\n(8 × 0.25) + (8 × 0.25) + (6 × 0.20) + (7 × 0.20) + (5 × 0.10)\n= 2.00 + 2.00 + 1.20 + 1.40 + 0.50\n= 7.10\n\nResult: Company A scores higher (7.70 vs 7.10)\n```\n\n## Red Flags to Watch\n\n### In the Offer\n\n- ❌ Vague bonus language (\"up to 20%\")\n- ❌ Equity with no liquidity path\n- ❌ High base but no equity (at startup)\n- ❌ Cliff longer than 1 year\n- ❌ Vesting acceleration absent\n- ❌ Non-compete restrictions\n- ❌ Verbal promises not in writing\n\n### About the Company\n\n- ❌ High turnover (check LinkedIn)\n- ❌ Recent layoffs or reorgs\n- ❌ Manager seems checked out\n- ❌ Glassdoor patterns in bad reviews\n- ❌ Funding concerns\n- ❌ Unclear path to profitability\n\n### About the Role\n\n- ❌ Vague responsibilities\n- ❌ Role seems to change during interviews\n- ❌ Red flags in why position is open\n- ❌ No growth path discussed\n- ❌ Unrealistic expectations set\n\n## Questions to Ask Yourself\n\n### The Gut Check\n- Which offer excites me more?\n- Which would I regret not taking?\n- Which aligns with my 5-year goals?\n- Which would I brag about to friends?\n\n### The Monday Morning Test\n- Which job do I want to wake up for?\n- Which team do I want to work with?\n- Which problems do I want to solve?\n\n### The Learning Test\n- Where will I grow more?\n- Which skills will I develop?\n- Which looks better on my resume in 3 years?\n\n### The Risk Test\n- What's the downside of each?\n- Which failure would I regret more?\n- What's my backup plan for each?\n\n## Output Format\n\nWhen comparing offers:\n\n```markdown\n# JOB OFFER COMPARISON\n\n## Offers Being Compared\n- **Offer A:** [Role] at [Company]\n- **Offer B:** [Role] at [Company]\n\n## Total Compensation Comparison\n\n| Component | Offer A | Offer B | Difference |\n|-----------|---------|---------|------------|\n| Base | $X | $X | |\n| Bonus | $X | $X | |\n| Equity (annual) | $X | $X | |\n| Benefits | $X | $X | |\n| **Year 1 Total** | $X | $X | |\n| **Ongoing Total** | $X | $X | |\n\n## Non-Monetary Comparison\n\n| Factor | Offer A | Offer B | Notes |\n|--------|---------|---------|-------|\n| Career Growth | X\u002F10 | X\u002F10 | |\n| Work-Life | X\u002F10 | X\u002F10 | |\n| Team\u002FCulture | X\u002F10 | X\u002F10 | |\n| Risk Level | X\u002F10 | X\u002F10 | |\n\n## Weighted Analysis\n\nUsing your priorities:\n- Offer A Score: X.XX\n- Offer B Score: X.XX\n\n## Key Differences\n1. [Key difference 1]\n2. [Key difference 2]\n3. [Key difference 3]\n\n## Recommendation\n\nBased on your stated priorities of [X, Y, Z], **Offer [A\u002FB]** appears to be the stronger choice because:\n- [Reason 1]\n- [Reason 2]\n- [Reason 3]\n\n## Things to Clarify Before Deciding\n- [ ] [Question for Company A]\n- [ ] [Question for Company B]\n\n## Negotiation Opportunities\n- [Opportunity 1]\n- [Opportunity 2]\n```\n\n## Comparison Checklist\n\n- ✅ Calculated total comp (not just base)\n- ✅ Included equity with realistic valuation\n- ✅ Factored in benefits value\n- ✅ Considered tax implications\n- ✅ Weighted non-monetary factors\n- ✅ Assessed career growth potential\n- ✅ Evaluated team and manager quality\n- ✅ Checked company stability\u002Frisk\n- ✅ Aligned with personal priorities\n- ✅ Gut-checked the decision\n","# Offer Comparison Analyzer\n\n## When to Use This Skill\n\nUse this skill when the user:\n- Has multiple job offers to compare\n- Needs to evaluate total compensation\n- Wants to make a data-driven job decision\n- Is weighing different opportunities\n- Mentions: \"compare offers\", \"multiple offers\", \"which job\", \"offer comparison\", \"deciding between jobs\"\n\n## Core Capabilities\n\n- Compare total compensation across offers\n- Evaluate non-monetary factors\n- Create weighted decision frameworks\n- Calculate true offer value\n- Identify hidden costs and benefits\n- Guide the decision-making process\n\n## The Comparison Challenge\n\n**The Problem:** \nComparing offers is hard because:\n- Different compensation structures\n- Non-monetary factors matter\n- Hidden benefits and costs\n- Emotional factors cloud judgment\n- Information asymmetry\n\n**The Solution:**\nSystematic comparison framework that considers:\n- Total compensation (not just salary)\n- Career growth potential\n- Work-life factors\n- Risk assessment\n- Personal values alignment\n\n## Total Compensation Calculator\n\n### Components to Include\n\n**Cash Compensation:**\n- Base salary\n- Signing bonus (one-time)\n- Annual bonus (target %)\n- Commission (for sales roles)\n- Relocation assistance\n\n**Equity Compensation:**\n- Stock options (value = current price - strike price)\n- RSUs (value = current price × shares)\n- Vesting schedule\n- Refresh grant expectations\n\n**Benefits Value:**\n- Health insurance (employer contribution)\n- 401(k) match\n- HSA\u002FFSA contributions\n- Life\u002Fdisability insurance\n- Other insurance benefits\n\n**Perks Value:**\n- Vacation days (can assign $ value)\n- Remote work (saves commute costs)\n- Professional development budget\n- Equipment\u002Foffice stipend\n- Meals, gym, etc.\n\n### Calculation Template\n\n```\nOFFER A - TOTAL COMPENSATION\n\nCASH\nBase Salary:                    $150,000\nSigning Bonus (year 1 only):     $25,000\nTarget Bonus (15%):              $22,500\n--------------------------------\nCash Compensation:              $197,500 (year 1)\n                               $172,500 (ongoing)\n\nEQUITY\nRSU Grant: $200,000 over 4 years\nAnnual Value:                    $50,000\n--------------------------------\nEquity Compensation:             $50,000\u002Fyear\n\nBENEFITS\n401(k) Match (4%):               $6,000\nHealth Insurance:                $15,000 (employer portion)\nHSA Contribution:                 $1,000\n--------------------------------\nBenefits Value:                  $22,000\u002Fyear\n\nPERKS\nVacation: 20 days (vs 10 standard)\n  Extra 10 days × ~$575\u002Fday:      $5,750 value\nRemote Work Savings:              $3,000 (commute, lunch)\nProfessional Dev:                 $2,000 budget\n--------------------------------\nPerks Value:                     $10,750\u002Fyear\n\nTOTAL YEAR 1:        $280,250\nTOTAL ONGOING:       $255,250\u002Fyear\n```\n\n## Side-by-Side Comparison Template\n\n```markdown\n# OFFER COMPARISON\n\n|                          | Company A | Company B | Notes |\n|--------------------------|-----------|-----------|-------|\n| **CASH**                 |           |           |       |\n| Base Salary              | $150,000  | $160,000  | B +$10K |\n| Signing Bonus            | $25,000   | $10,000   | A +$15K |\n| Target Bonus             | 15%       | 10%       | A +$6.5K |\n| **Cash Total (Yr 1)**    | $197,500  | $186,000  | A +$11.5K |\n|                          |           |           |       |\n| **EQUITY**               |           |           |       |\n| Grant Value (4yr)        | $200,000  | $300,000  | B +$100K |\n| Annual Equity            | $50,000   | $75,000   | B +$25K |\n|                          |           |           |       |\n| **BENEFITS**             |           |           |       |\n| 401(k) Match             | 4%        | 6%        | B +$3.2K |\n| Health Insurance         | Good      | Premium   | B better |\n| PTO                      | 20 days   | Unlimited | Varies |\n|                          |           |           |       |\n| **TOTAL COMP (Yr 1)**    | $280,250  | $285,000  | B +$4.7K |\n| **TOTAL COMP (Ongoing)** | $255,250  | $275,000  | B +$19.7K |\n```\n\n## Non-Monetary Factor Framework\n\n### Career Growth (Weight: High)\n\n**Questions to Consider:**\n- Which role offers more learning?\n- Which company\u002Fbrand helps future job search?\n- Which has better promotion track?\n- Which offers more scope\u002Fresponsibility?\n- Which manager will develop you more?\n\n**Scoring:**\n```\nCompany A: Growth Score\n- Learning opportunity: 8\u002F10\n- Brand\u002Fresume value: 7\u002F10\n- Promotion potential: 6\u002F10\n- Scope: 8\u002F10\nAverage: 7.25\u002F10\n\nCompany B: Growth Score\n- Learning opportunity: 7\u002F10\n- Brand\u002Fresume value: 9\u002F10\n- Promotion potential: 8\u002F10\n- Scope: 7\u002F10\nAverage: 7.75\u002F10\n```\n\n### Work-Life Balance (Weight: Personal)\n\n**Factors:**\n- Expected hours\n- Remote\u002Fhybrid flexibility\n- Vacation usage culture\n- On-call requirements\n- Travel requirements\n- Commute time\n\n### Team & Culture (Weight: High)\n\n**Factors:**\n- Manager quality (crucial!)\n- Team health\u002Fdynamics\n- Company culture fit\n- DEI considerations\n- Company stability\u002Fgrowth\n- Values alignment\n\n### Risk Assessment (Weight: Medium)\n\n**Startup vs. Established:**\n- Funding runway\n- Market position\n- Company trajectory\n- Equity risk (could be worth $0)\n\n**Questions:**\n- What happens if company struggles?\n- How stable is this role?\n- What's the severance policy?\n\n## Weighted Decision Matrix\n\n### Step 1: Define Your Priorities\n\n```\nFactor                  Weight\n------------------------------------\nTotal Compensation       25%\nCareer Growth            25%\nWork-Life Balance        20%\nTeam & Culture           20%\nLocation\u002FCommute         10%\n------------------------------------\nTotal:                   100%\n```\n\n### Step 2: Score Each Factor\n\n```\n                    Company A   Company B\nFactor              Score (1-10)\n------------------------------------\nCompensation        7           8\nCareer Growth       7           8\nWork-Life           8           6\nTeam & Culture      9           7\nLocation            8           5\n```\n\n### Step 3: Calculate Weighted Score\n\n```\nCompany A:\n(7 × 0.25) + (7 × 0.25) + (8 × 0.20) + (9 × 0.20) + (8 × 0.10)\n= 1.75 + 1.75 + 1.60 + 1.80 + 0.80\n= 7.70\n\nCompany B:\n(8 × 0.25) + (8 × 0.25) + (6 × 0.20) + (7 × 0.20) + (5 × 0.10)\n= 2.00 + 2.00 + 1.20 + 1.40 + 0.50\n= 7.10\n\nResult: Company A scores higher (7.70 vs 7.10)\n```\n\n## Red Flags to Watch\n\n### In the Offer\n\n- ❌ Vague bonus language (\"up to 20%\")\n- ❌ Equity with no liquidity path\n- ❌ High base but no equity (at startup)\n- ❌ Cliff longer than 1 year\n- ❌ Vesting acceleration absent\n- ❌ Non-compete restrictions\n- ❌ Verbal promises not in writing\n\n### About the Company\n\n- ❌ High turnover (check LinkedIn)\n- ❌ Recent layoffs or reorgs\n- ❌ Manager seems checked out\n- ❌ Glassdoor patterns in bad reviews\n- ❌ Funding concerns\n- ❌ Unclear path to profitability\n\n### About the Role\n\n- ❌ Vague responsibilities\n- ❌ Role seems to change during interviews\n- ❌ Red flags in why position is open\n- ❌ No growth path discussed\n- ❌ Unrealistic expectations set\n\n## Questions to Ask Yourself\n\n### The Gut Check\n- Which offer excites me more?\n- Which would I regret not taking?\n- Which aligns with my 5-year goals?\n- Which would I brag about to friends?\n\n### The Monday Morning Test\n- Which job do I want to wake up for?\n- Which team do I want to work with?\n- Which problems do I want to solve?\n\n### The Learning Test\n- Where will I grow more?\n- Which skills will I develop?\n- Which looks better on my resume in 3 years?\n\n### The Risk Test\n- What's the downside of each?\n- Which failure would I regret more?\n- What's my backup plan for each?\n\n## Output Format\n\nWhen comparing offers:\n\n```markdown\n# JOB OFFER COMPARISON\n\n## Offers Being Compared\n- **Offer A:** [Role] at [Company]\n- **Offer B:** [Role] at [Company]\n\n## Total Compensation Comparison\n\n| Component | Offer A | Offer B | Difference |\n|-----------|---------|---------|------------|\n| Base | $X | $X | |\n| Bonus | $X | $X | |\n| Equity (annual) | $X | $X | |\n| Benefits | $X | $X | |\n| **Year 1 Total** | $X | $X | |\n| **Ongoing Total** | $X | $X | |\n\n## Non-Monetary Comparison\n\n| Factor | Offer A | Offer B | Notes |\n|--------|---------|---------|-------|\n| Career Growth | X\u002F10 | X\u002F10 | |\n| Work-Life | X\u002F10 | X\u002F10 | |\n| Team\u002FCulture | X\u002F10 | X\u002F10 | |\n| Risk Level | X\u002F10 | X\u002F10 | |\n\n## Weighted Analysis\n\nUsing your priorities:\n- Offer A Score: X.XX\n- Offer B Score: X.XX\n\n## Key Differences\n1. [Key difference 1]\n2. [Key difference 2]\n3. [Key difference 3]\n\n## Recommendation\n\nBased on your stated priorities of [X, Y, Z], **Offer [A\u002FB]** appears to be the stronger choice because:\n- [Reason 1]\n- [Reason 2]\n- [Reason 3]\n\n## Things to Clarify Before Deciding\n- [ ] [Question for Company A]\n- [ ] [Question for Company B]\n\n## Negotiation Opportunities\n- [Opportunity 1]\n- [Opportunity 2]\n```\n\n## Comparison Checklist\n\n- ✅ Calculated total comp (not just base)\n- ✅ Included equity with realistic valuation\n- ✅ Factored in benefits value\n- ✅ Considered tax implications\n- ✅ Weighted non-monetary factors\n- ✅ Assessed career growth potential\n- ✅ Evaluated team and manager quality\n- ✅ Checked company stability\u002Frisk\n- ✅ Aligned with personal priorities\n- ✅ Gut-checked the decision\n",{"name":5,"description":7},"main","2b749c82b5d11fac39d9a6e021ce3f5b8a541bd1","cli-tool\u002Fcomponents\u002Fskills\u002Fcareer\u002Foffer-comparison-analyzer",3911,"https:\u002F\u002Fgithub.com\u002Fdavila7\u002Fclaude-code-templates","https:\u002F\u002Faitmpl.com","https:\u002F\u002Fgithub.com\u002Fdavila7","https:\u002F\u002Fdanielavila.me","Building AI dev tools with LLMs","2026-11-11 21:38:31",{"source":8,"skillName":5,"commands":49,"prompt":59,"zipAvailable":60},[50,53,56],{"tool":51,"command":52},"npx","npx skills add davila7\u002Fclaude-code-templates --skill offer-comparison-analyzer",{"tool":54,"command":55},"bunx","bunx skills add davila7\u002Fclaude-code-templates --skill offer-comparison-analyzer",{"tool":57,"command":58},"pnpm","pnpm dlx skills add davila7\u002Fclaude-code-templates --skill offer-comparison-analyzer","安装技能，技能地址：https:\u002F\u002Fgithub.com\u002Fdavila7\u002Fclaude-code-templates\u002Fblob\u002Fmain\u002Fcli-tool\u002Fcomponents\u002Fskills\u002Fcareer\u002Foffer-comparison-analyzer\u002FSKILL.md",true,[],[63,92,119,152,187,211],{"skillNo":64,"name":65,"nameZh":6,"description":66,"descriptionZh":6,"repositoryFullName":8,"ownerLogin":9,"ownerAvatarUrl":10,"ownerAccountNo":11,"ownerDisplayName":12,"repositoryNo":13,"starsCount":14,"licenseSpdxId":15,"licenseFileUrl":6,"sourceHtmlUrl":67,"categories":68,"keywords":74,"publishedAt":33},"01M70NHBTQ8BV0A2SCAZXEPHCX","wealthville-pool-scoring","Score DeFi liquidity pools before providing liquidity. Returns a 0-100 pool score and an Enter\u002FHold\u002FExit\u002FReduce\u002FAvoid verdict with calibrated confidence for ~68,800 Solana pools and 575 EVM pools, plus a public miss-inclusive track record. Use when asked whether a pool is worth LPing into, which pools look best right now, or how accurate the scores have actually been.","https:\u002F\u002Fgithub.com\u002Fdavila7\u002Fclaude-code-templates\u002Fblob\u002Fmain\u002Fcli-tool\u002Fcomponents\u002Fskills\u002Fweb-data\u002Fwealthville-pool-scoring\u002FSKILL.md",[69],{"categoryNo":70,"categoryName":71,"taxonomyType":72,"taxonomyTypeDesc":73},"01JBSEEDCAT000000000000023","Skill与智能体开发","SCENARIO","使用场景",[75,76,77,78,79,80,81,82,25,31,83,29,84,85,86,87,88,89,90,91],"scoring","pool","wealthville pool scoring","liquidity","which","for","exit","now","reduce","record","track","verdict","evm","solana","how","public","look",{"skillNo":93,"name":94,"nameZh":6,"description":95,"descriptionZh":6,"repositoryFullName":8,"ownerLogin":9,"ownerAvatarUrl":10,"ownerAccountNo":11,"ownerDisplayName":12,"repositoryNo":13,"starsCount":14,"licenseSpdxId":15,"licenseFileUrl":6,"sourceHtmlUrl":96,"categories":97,"keywords":99,"publishedAt":33},"01M70MB6VR8ERJ4EM8D5KHBMEV","technical-debt-auditor","Scans a codebase and produces a quantified technical debt report with a prioritized remediation plan. Analyzes dead code, TODO\u002FFIXME\u002FHACK markers, dependency staleness, complexity hotspots, code duplication signals, test coverage gaps, unused exports, and outdated patterns. Use this skill when the user asks to audit their codebase for tech debt, wants a health check of their code quality, says things like \"where should I focus refactoring\", \"find code smells\", \"audit my codebase\", \"what technical debt do we have\", \"prioritize cleanup work\", or asks about code quality metrics. Also trigger when the user mentions \"code rot\", \"legacy cleanup\", \"refactoring priorities\", or wants to understand the overall health of a project before a major effort. Trigger even if the user doesn't say \"technical debt\" explicitly — any request to systematically assess code quality and identify improvement priorities belongs here.","https:\u002F\u002Fgithub.com\u002Fdavila7\u002Fclaude-code-templates\u002Fblob\u002Fmain\u002Fcli-tool\u002Fcomponents\u002Fskills\u002Fdevelopment\u002Ftechnical-debt-auditor\u002FSKILL.md",[98],{"categoryNo":70,"categoryName":71,"taxonomyType":72,"taxonomyTypeDesc":73},[100,101,102,103,104,105,106,107,108,109,110,31,111,112,113,114,115,116,117,118],"technical debt","debt","technical","technical debt auditor","auditor","coverage","complexity","markers","project","cleanup","unused","code","todo","work","plan","focus","signals","audit","dependency",{"skillNo":120,"name":121,"nameZh":6,"description":122,"descriptionZh":6,"repositoryFullName":8,"ownerLogin":9,"ownerAvatarUrl":10,"ownerAccountNo":11,"ownerDisplayName":12,"repositoryNo":13,"starsCount":14,"licenseSpdxId":15,"licenseFileUrl":6,"sourceHtmlUrl":123,"categories":124,"keywords":134,"publishedAt":33},"01M70KPYH9QNHCNME5GJQGE22K","readonly-sql-guard","Make an agent's database access provably read-only. Use when an agent runs caller-supplied SQL against a production\u002FERP\u002Fanalytics database (a \"query\" MCP tool, text-to-SQL, an admin console), or when reviewing DB-access code for write\u002FDDL\u002Fside-effect\u002Ftransaction-escape risks. Checks what a statement CALLS, not just its shape.","https:\u002F\u002Fgithub.com\u002Fdavila7\u002Fclaude-code-templates\u002Fblob\u002Fmain\u002Fcli-tool\u002Fcomponents\u002Fskills\u002Fdatabase\u002Freadonly-sql-guard\u002FSKILL.md",[125,128,129],{"categoryNo":126,"categoryName":127,"taxonomyType":72,"taxonomyTypeDesc":73},"01JBSEEDCAT000000000000010","后端与接口",{"categoryNo":70,"categoryName":71,"taxonomyType":72,"taxonomyTypeDesc":73},{"categoryNo":130,"categoryName":131,"taxonomyType":132,"taxonomyTypeDesc":133},"01JBSEEDCAT000000000000033","数据分析师","PROFESSION","适用职业",[135,136,137,138,139,140,141,80,142,143,144,145,146,147,148,25,149,150,31,151],"readonly","guard","sql guard","sql","readonly sql guard","erp","effect","read-only","db","just","tool","calls","only","MCP","access","database","query",{"skillNo":153,"name":154,"nameZh":6,"description":155,"descriptionZh":6,"repositoryFullName":8,"ownerLogin":9,"ownerAvatarUrl":10,"ownerAccountNo":11,"ownerDisplayName":12,"repositoryNo":13,"starsCount":14,"licenseSpdxId":156,"licenseFileUrl":157,"sourceHtmlUrl":158,"categories":159,"keywords":163,"publishedAt":33},"01M6AFY6F7CC2BBZP1QD6VTNVC","web-artifacts-builder","Suite of tools for creating elaborate, multi-component claude.ai HTML artifacts using modern frontend web technologies (React, Tailwind CSS, shadcn\u002Fui). Use for complex artifacts requiring state management, routing, or shadcn\u002Fui components - not for simple single-file HTML\u002FJSX artifacts.","Apache-2.0","https:\u002F\u002Fgithub.com\u002Fdavila7\u002Fclaude-code-templates\u002Fblob\u002Fmain\u002Fcli-tool\u002Fcomponents\u002Fskills\u002Futilities\u002Fweb-artifacts-builder\u002FLICENSE.txt","https:\u002F\u002Fgithub.com\u002Fdavila7\u002Fclaude-code-templates\u002Fblob\u002Fmain\u002Fcli-tool\u002Fcomponents\u002Fskills\u002Futilities\u002Fweb-artifacts-builder\u002FSKILL.md",[160],{"categoryNo":161,"categoryName":162,"taxonomyType":72,"taxonomyTypeDesc":73},"01JBSEEDCAT000000000000009","前端开发",[164,165,166,167,168,169,170,171,172,173,174,175,176,177,178,179,180,181,182,183,184,185,80,186],"artifacts builder","web","web artifacts builder","artifacts","builder","state","routing","state management","component","css","frontend","ui","Tools","file","components","shadcn","react","Tailwind","suite","jsx","html","single-file","ui components",{"skillNo":188,"name":189,"nameZh":6,"description":190,"descriptionZh":6,"repositoryFullName":8,"ownerLogin":9,"ownerAvatarUrl":10,"ownerAccountNo":11,"ownerDisplayName":12,"repositoryNo":13,"starsCount":14,"licenseSpdxId":156,"licenseFileUrl":191,"sourceHtmlUrl":192,"categories":193,"keywords":198,"publishedAt":33},"01M6AFWF33SFV9Z3SF4PEEE4BF","webapp-testing","Toolkit for interacting with and testing local web applications using Playwright. Supports verifying frontend functionality, debugging UI behavior, capturing browser screenshots, and viewing browser logs.","https:\u002F\u002Fgithub.com\u002Fdavila7\u002Fclaude-code-templates\u002Fblob\u002Fmain\u002Fcli-tool\u002Fcomponents\u002Fskills\u002Fsecurity\u002Fwebapp-testing\u002FLICENSE.txt","https:\u002F\u002Fgithub.com\u002Fdavila7\u002Fclaude-code-templates\u002Fblob\u002Fmain\u002Fcli-tool\u002Fcomponents\u002Fskills\u002Fsecurity\u002Fwebapp-testing\u002FSKILL.md",[194,197],{"categoryNo":195,"categoryName":196,"taxonomyType":72,"taxonomyTypeDesc":73},"01JBSEEDCAT000000000000008","测试与质量",{"categoryNo":161,"categoryName":162,"taxonomyType":72,"taxonomyTypeDesc":73},[199,200,201,202,203,165,204,174,175,205,206,207,208,80,209,29,210],"webapp testing","testing","webapp","browser","playwright","applications","debugging","toolkit","logs","screenshots","local","behavior",{"skillNo":212,"name":213,"nameZh":6,"description":214,"descriptionZh":6,"repositoryFullName":8,"ownerLogin":9,"ownerAvatarUrl":10,"ownerAccountNo":11,"ownerDisplayName":12,"repositoryNo":13,"starsCount":14,"licenseSpdxId":156,"licenseFileUrl":215,"sourceHtmlUrl":216,"categories":217,"keywords":225,"publishedAt":33},"01M6AF67Q67JJJ5V51JR2P52KA","discernment-nudge","After you give a substantive answer or draft that the user may act on — advice or recommendations, drafted artifacts such as goals, plans, pitches, proposals, or emails, estimates or projections, analysis or interpretation of data, factual claims they may rely on, or a multi-step argument — invoke this skill BEFORE finalizing your reply and then, if it applies, append 2-3 short follow-up questions, each tied to something specific in what you just produced, that help the user check key facts, probe the reasoning or assumptions, and notice missing context. Do this at most once per conversation. Skip it when the user asked a trivial how-to or simple lookup, wants a purely educational explanation, asked you only to format, convert, or assemble a file from content they provided, is writing code they will run, is doing creative writing or casual chat, or already asked you to double-check, cite, or review — the skill file explains these boundaries and the exact output format.","https:\u002F\u002Fgithub.com\u002Fdavila7\u002Fclaude-code-templates\u002Fblob\u002Fmain\u002Fcli-tool\u002Fcomponents\u002Fskills\u002Fproductivity\u002Fdiscernment-nudge\u002FLICENSE.txt","https:\u002F\u002Fgithub.com\u002Fdavila7\u002Fclaude-code-templates\u002Fblob\u002Fmain\u002Fcli-tool\u002Fcomponents\u002Fskills\u002Fproductivity\u002Fdiscernment-nudge\u002FSKILL.md",[218,221,222],{"categoryNo":219,"categoryName":220,"taxonomyType":72,"taxonomyTypeDesc":73},"01JBSEEDCAT000000000000018","写作与文案",{"categoryNo":70,"categoryName":71,"taxonomyType":72,"taxonomyTypeDesc":73},{"categoryNo":223,"categoryName":224,"taxonomyType":132,"taxonomyTypeDesc":133},"01JBSEEDCAT000000000000036","内容创作者",[226,227,228,229,230,231,232,233,167,234,177,111,235,236,237,238,239,147,240,31,241,22,242,243,244,89,245],"discernment nudge","nudge","interpretation","help","run","reasoning","data","writing","lookup","content","review","conversation","short","up","invoke","you","claims","argument","assemble","recommendations"]