seoagent
Persistent SEO workflow for Claude Code — run a technical SEO audit, build a hub-and-spoke keyword strategy, write page-type-aware content briefs, and draft SEO-optimized articles, persisting every artifact to a .seoagent/ workspace so the work compounds across sessions. Use when auditing a site's technical SEO, planning a keyword/content strategy, writing content briefs, drafting SEO articles with structured data, or resuming SEO work started in a previous session.
- License 许可
- MIT
- 最近更新
- 2026-11-11
- Stars
- ★ 3.3w
- Forks
- 3.9k
01 前言 Front Matter
- name
- seoagent
- description
- Persistent SEO workflow for Claude Code — run a technical SEO audit, build a hub-and-spoke keyword strategy, write page-type-aware content briefs, and draft SEO-optimized articles, persisting every artifact to a .seoagent/ workspace so the work compounds across sessions. Use when auditing a site's technical SEO, planning a keyword/content strategy, writing content briefs, drafting SEO articles with structured data, or resuming SEO work started in a previous session.
03 SKILL.md 正文
SEOAgent
A persistent, repo-local SEO workflow. Unlike one-off SEO prompts that lose their context the moment the conversation ends, every artifact here is written to a .seoagent/ directory in the repo — so audits, strategy, briefs, and drafts accumulate across sessions instead of resetting each time.
When to Use This Skill
Use this skill when the user wants to:
- Run a technical SEO audit of a site (meta tags, headings, internal links, schema, Core Web Vitals readiness, AI-search optimization)
- Build a keyword strategy with topic clusters and an internal-linking structure
- Write a content brief for a specific page or article
- Draft an SEO-optimized article with full metadata and JSON-LD
- Resume SEO work — read back prior audit findings, strategy, or the roadmap
Workspace Model
All work persists to .seoagent/ so it survives across sessions:
.seoagent/
project.md # domain, site type
context.md # business context, tone, banned topics
audit/latest.md # findings as [ ] / [x] checkboxes, tagged by severity
strategy/clusters/ # hub-and-spoke topic clusters
briefs/{slug}.md # page-type-aware briefs
content/{slug}.md # drafts with SEO frontmatter + JSON-LD
roadmap.md # prioritized next steps
changelog.md # history of SEO work
Always read existing .seoagent/ files before acting, and write results back so the next session can build on them.
Workflow (5 phases)
1. Technical audit
Fetch the site's key pages and check each against the list below. Save findings to .seoagent/audit/latest.md as [ ] checkboxes the user can flip to [x] when fixed, each tagged critical | high | medium | low.
Critical / high
- [ ] Indexability: no accidental
noindex, no blocked paths in robots.txt, canonical present and self-referential - [ ] Title tag: present, unique, 50–60 chars, primary keyword near the front
- [ ] Meta description: present, unique, 140–160 chars, compelling
- [ ] One
<h1>per page, descriptive; logicalh2/h3hierarchy - [ ] Internal links: no orphan pages; descriptive anchor text
- [ ] Structured data: appropriate JSON-LD (Organization/Article/Product/FAQ) present and valid
Medium / low
- [ ] Image
alttext on content images - [ ] OpenGraph + Twitter card tags for social sharing
- [ ] Core Web Vitals readiness (LCP image preloaded, no layout shift, reasonable JS)
- [ ] Clean, keyword-relevant URL slugs
- [ ] XML sitemap present and submitted; HTTPS enforced
2. Keyword strategy (hub-and-spoke)
Research the niche, then build topic clusters where each cluster has roles:
- PILLAR — broad, high-value hub page
- SUB_PILLAR — focused subtopics linking up to the pillar
- LONG_TAIL — specific questions/niche queries linking up to sub-pillars
Internal links funnel authority up toward pillars. Save clusters to .seoagent/strategy/clusters/{slug}.md with the article table + link graph.
3. Content briefs (page-type-aware)
Different page types need different structures. Pick the protocol by type:
- landing — conversion-focused, Product/Service JSON-LD
- pillar — comprehensive overview, links to all sub-pillars
- sub_pillar — focused subtopic depth
- long_tail — direct answer to a specific query, FAQPage JSON-LD
- programmatic — templated pages from a data set
Each brief gets a URL pattern, section outline (H2/H3), internal-link plan, JSON-LD plan, and a word-count target. Save to .seoagent/briefs/{slug}.md.
4. Draft articles
Write from the brief with complete SEO frontmatter:
meta_title,meta_description,canonical- OpenGraph + Twitter fields
- JSON-LD:
Article, plusFAQPage/HowTowhere the content warrants it - An image plan (hero + inline) with alt text
Save to .seoagent/content/{slug}.md.
5. Monitor
Re-audit periodically, update .seoagent/roadmap.md with the next highest-leverage actions, and append what changed to .seoagent/changelog.md.
Answer-engine optimization (AEO/GEO)
Beyond classic SEO, structure content so AI assistants (ChatGPT, Claude, Perplexity, Google AI Overviews) can cite it: lead with a direct answer, use clear headings as questions, include comparison tables and concrete stats, and add FAQ/HowTo structured data. This makes pages citable in AI-generated answers, not just rankable.
Running the full agent
This skill captures the SEOAgent methodology. The full agent ships as a CLI that scaffolds the .seoagent/ workspace, installs an expanded reference library (per-page-type protocols, a JSON-LD library, an audit-check catalog), and adds an optional cloud loop:
# npm
npm install -g @seoagent-official/seoagent && seoagent init
# or the plugin marketplace (Claude Code or Codex)
/plugin marketplace add Baxter-Inc/seoagent-npm
Free and local by default (uses your agent's own tools; data stays in your repo). Optional cloud adds real keyword data, Google Search Console, and CMS publishing. MIT licensed — https://github.com/Baxter-Inc/seoagent-npm
04 同仓库更多 Skills
wealthville-pool-scoring
Score DeFi liquidity pools before providing liquidity. Returns a 0-100 pool score and an Enter/Hold/Exit/Reduce/Avoid verdict with calibrated confidence for ~68,800 Solana pools and 575 EVM pools, plus a public miss-inclusive track record. Use when asked whether a pool is worth LPing into, which pools look best right now, or how accurate the scores have actually been.
technical-debt-auditor
Scans a codebase and produces a quantified technical debt report with a prioritized remediation plan. Analyzes dead code, TODO/FIXME/HACK markers, dependency staleness, complexity hotspots, code duplication signals, test coverage gaps, unused exports, and outdated patterns. Use this skill when the user asks to audit their codebase for tech debt, wants a health check of their code quality, says things like "where should I focus refactoring", "find code smells", "audit my codebase", "what technical debt do we have", "prioritize cleanup work", or asks about code quality metrics. Also trigger when the user mentions "code rot", "legacy cleanup", "refactoring priorities", or wants to understand the overall health of a project before a major effort. Trigger even if the user doesn't say "technical debt" explicitly — any request to systematically assess code quality and identify improvement priorities belongs here.
readonly-sql-guard
Make an agent's database access provably read-only. Use when an agent runs caller-supplied SQL against a production/ERP/analytics database (a "query" MCP tool, text-to-SQL, an admin console), or when reviewing DB-access code for write/DDL/side-effect/transaction-escape risks. Checks what a statement CALLS, not just its shape.
web-artifacts-builder
Suite of tools for creating elaborate, multi-component claude.ai HTML artifacts using modern frontend web technologies (React, Tailwind CSS, shadcn/ui). Use for complex artifacts requiring state management, routing, or shadcn/ui components - not for simple single-file HTML/JSX artifacts.
webapp-testing
Toolkit for interacting with and testing local web applications using Playwright. Supports verifying frontend functionality, debugging UI behavior, capturing browser screenshots, and viewing browser logs.
discernment-nudge
After you give a substantive answer or draft that the user may act on — advice or recommendations, drafted artifacts such as goals, plans, pitches, proposals, or emails, estimates or projections, analysis or interpretation of data, factual claims they may rely on, or a multi-step argument — invoke this skill BEFORE finalizing your reply and then, if it applies, append 2-3 short follow-up questions, each tied to something specific in what you just produced, that help the user check key facts, probe the reasoning or assumptions, and notice missing context. Do this at most once per conversation. Skip it when the user asked a trivial how-to or simple lookup, wants a purely educational explanation, asked you only to format, convert, or assemble a file from content they provided, is writing code they will run, is doing creative writing or casual chat, or already asked you to double-check, cite, or review — the skill file explains these boundaries and the exact output format.