AGENT SKILL

cto-advisor

Technical leadership guidance for engineering teams, architecture decisions, and technology strategy. Includes tech debt analyzer, team scaling calculator, engineering metrics frameworks, technology evaluation tools, and ADR templates. Use when assessing technical debt, scaling engineering teams, evaluating technologies, making architecture decisions, establishing engineering metrics, or when user mentions CTO, tech debt, technical debt, team scaling, architecture decisions, technology evaluation, engineering metrics, DORA metrics, or technology strategy.

License 许可
MIT
最近更新
2026-11-12
Stars
★ 3.3w
Forks
3.9k

01 前言 Front Matter

name
cto-advisor
license
MIT
metadata
{ "author": "Alireza Rezvani", "domain": "cto-leadership", "updated": 1760918400000, "version": "1.0.0", "category": "c-level", "frameworks": "DORA-metrics, architecture-decision-records, engineering-metrics", "tech-stack": "engineering-management, team-organization", "python-tools": "tech_debt_analyzer.py, team_scaling_calculator.py" }
description
Technical leadership guidance for engineering teams, architecture decisions, and technology strategy. Includes tech debt analyzer, team scaling calculator, engineering metrics frameworks, technology evaluation tools, and ADR templates. Use when assessing technical debt, scaling engineering teams, evaluating technologies, making architecture decisions, establishing engineering metrics, or when user mentions CTO, tech debt, technical debt, team scaling, architecture decisions, technology evaluation, engineering metrics, DORA metrics, or technology strategy.

02 资源文件 5

03 SKILL.md 正文

CTO Advisor

Strategic frameworks and tools for technology leadership, team scaling, and engineering excellence.

Keywords

CTO, chief technology officer, technical leadership, tech debt, technical debt, engineering team, team scaling, architecture decisions, technology evaluation, engineering metrics, DORA metrics, ADR, architecture decision records, technology strategy, engineering leadership, engineering organization, team structure, hiring plan, technical strategy, vendor evaluation, technology selection

Quick Start

For Technical Debt Assessment

python scripts/tech_debt_analyzer.py

Analyzes system architecture and provides prioritized debt reduction plan.

For Team Scaling Planning

python scripts/team_scaling_calculator.py

Calculates optimal hiring plan and team structure for growth.

For Architecture Decisions

Review references/architecture_decision_records.md for ADR templates and examples.

For Technology Evaluation

Use framework in references/technology_evaluation_framework.md for vendor selection.

For Engineering Metrics

Implement KPIs from references/engineering_metrics.md for team performance tracking.

Core Responsibilities

1. Technology Strategy

Vision & Roadmap

  • Define 3-5 year technology vision
  • Create quarterly roadmaps
  • Align with business strategy
  • Communicate to stakeholders

Innovation Management

  • Allocate 20% time for innovation
  • Run hackathons quarterly
  • Evaluate emerging technologies
  • Build proof of concepts

Technical Debt Strategy

# Assess current debt
python scripts/tech_debt_analyzer.py

# Allocate capacity
- Critical debt: 40% capacity
- High debt: 25% capacity  
- Medium debt: 15% capacity
- Low debt: Ongoing maintenance

2. Team Leadership

Scaling Engineering

# Calculate scaling needs
python scripts/team_scaling_calculator.py

# Key ratios to maintain:
- Manager:Engineer = 1:8
- Senior:Mid:Junior = 3:4:2
- Product:Engineering = 1:10
- QA:Engineering = 1.5:10

Performance Management

  • Set clear OKRs quarterly
  • Conduct 1:1s weekly
  • Review performance quarterly
  • Provide growth opportunities

Culture Building

  • Define engineering values
  • Establish coding standards
  • Create learning programs
  • Foster collaboration

3. Architecture Governance

Decision Making

Use ADR template from references/architecture_decision_records.md:

  1. Document context and problem
  2. List all options considered
  3. Record decision and rationale
  4. Track consequences

Technology Standards

  • Language choices
  • Framework selection
  • Database standards
  • Security requirements
  • API design guidelines

System Design Review

  • Weekly architecture reviews
  • Design documentation standards
  • Prototype requirements
  • Performance criteria

4. Vendor Management

Evaluation Process

Follow framework in references/technology_evaluation_framework.md:

  1. Gather requirements (Week 1)
  2. Market research (Week 1-2)
  3. Deep evaluation (Week 2-4)
  4. Decision and documentation (Week 4)

Vendor Relationships

  • Quarterly business reviews
  • SLA monitoring
  • Cost optimization
  • Strategic partnerships

5. Engineering Excellence

Metrics Implementation

From references/engineering_metrics.md:

DORA Metrics (Deploy to production targets):

  • Deployment Frequency: >1/day
  • Lead Time: <1 day
  • MTTR: <1 hour
  • Change Failure Rate: <15%

Quality Metrics:

  • Test Coverage: >80%
  • Code Review: 100%
  • Technical Debt: <10%

Team Health:

  • Sprint Velocity: ±10% variance
  • Unplanned Work: <20%
  • On-call Incidents: <5/week

Weekly Cadence

Monday

  • Leadership team sync
  • Review metrics dashboard
  • Address escalations

Tuesday

  • Architecture review
  • Technical interviews
  • 1:1s with directs

Wednesday

  • Cross-functional meetings
  • Vendor meetings
  • Strategy work

Thursday

  • Team all-hands (monthly)
  • Sprint reviews (bi-weekly)
  • Technical deep dives

Friday

  • Strategic planning
  • Innovation time
  • Week recap and planning

Quarterly Planning

Q1 Focus: Foundation

  • Annual planning
  • Budget allocation
  • Team goal setting
  • Technology assessment

Q2 Focus: Execution

  • Major initiatives launch
  • Mid-year hiring push
  • Performance reviews
  • Architecture evolution

Q3 Focus: Innovation

  • Hackathon
  • Technology exploration
  • Team development
  • Process optimization

Q4 Focus: Planning

  • Next year strategy
  • Budget planning
  • Promotion cycles
  • Debt reduction sprint

Crisis Management

Incident Response

  1. Immediate (0-15 min):

    • Assess severity
    • Activate incident team
    • Begin communication
  2. Short-term (15-60 min):

    • Implement fixes
    • Update stakeholders
    • Monitor systems
  3. Resolution (1-24 hours):

    • Verify fix
    • Document timeline
    • Customer communication
  4. Post-mortem (48-72 hours):

    • Root cause analysis
    • Action items
    • Process improvements

Types of Crises

Security Breach

  • Isolate affected systems
  • Engage security team
  • Legal/compliance notification
  • Customer communication plan

Major Outage

  • All-hands response
  • Status page updates
  • Executive briefings
  • Customer outreach

Data Loss

  • Stop writes immediately
  • Assess recovery options
  • Begin restoration
  • Impact analysis

Stakeholder Management

Board/Executive Reporting

Monthly:

  • KPI dashboard
  • Risk register
  • Major initiatives status

Quarterly:

  • Technology strategy update
  • Team growth and health
  • Innovation highlights
  • Budget review

Cross-functional Partners

Product Team

  • Weekly roadmap sync
  • Sprint planning participation
  • Technical feasibility reviews
  • Feature estimation

Sales/Marketing

  • Technical sales support
  • Product capability briefings
  • Customer reference calls
  • Competitive analysis

Finance

  • Budget management
  • Cost optimization
  • Vendor negotiations
  • Capex planning

Strategic Initiatives

Digital Transformation

  1. Assess current state
  2. Define target architecture
  3. Create migration plan
  4. Execute in phases
  5. Measure and adjust

Cloud Migration

  1. Application assessment
  2. Migration strategy (7Rs)
  3. Pilot applications
  4. Full migration
  5. Optimization

Platform Engineering

  1. Define platform vision
  2. Build core services
  3. Create self-service tools
  4. Enable team adoption
  5. Measure efficiency

AI/ML Integration

  1. Identify use cases
  2. Build data infrastructure
  3. Develop models
  4. Deploy and monitor
  5. Scale adoption

Communication Templates

Technology Strategy Presentation

1. Executive Summary (1 slide)
2. Current State Assessment (2 slides)
3. Vision & Strategy (2 slides)
4. Roadmap & Milestones (3 slides)
5. Investment Required (1 slide)
6. Risks & Mitigation (1 slide)
7. Success Metrics (1 slide)

Team All-hands

1. Wins & Recognition (5 min)
2. Metrics Review (5 min)
3. Strategic Updates (10 min)
4. Demo/Deep Dive (15 min)
5. Q&A (10 min)

Board Update Email

Subject: Engineering Update - [Month]

Highlights:
• [Major achievement]
• [Key metric improvement]
• [Strategic progress]

Challenges:
• [Issue and mitigation]

Next Month:
• [Priority 1]
• [Priority 2]

Detailed metrics attached.

Tools & Resources

Essential Tools

  • Architecture: Draw.io, Lucidchart, C4 Model
  • Metrics: DataDog, Grafana, LinearB
  • Planning: Jira, Confluence, Notion
  • Communication: Slack, Zoom, Loom
  • Development: GitHub, GitLab, Bitbucket

Key Resources

  • Books:

    • "The Manager's Path" - Camille Fournier
    • "Accelerate" - Nicole Forsgren
    • "Team Topologies" - Skelton & Pais
  • Frameworks:

    • DORA metrics
    • SPACE framework
    • Team Topologies
  • Communities:

    • CTO Craft
    • Engineering Leadership Slack
    • LeadDev community

Success Indicators

✅ Technical Excellence

  • System uptime >99.9%
  • Deploy multiple times daily
  • Technical debt <10% capacity
  • Security incidents = 0

✅ Team Success

  • Team satisfaction >8/10
  • Attrition <10%
  • Filled positions >90%
  • Diversity improving

✅ Business Impact

  • Features on-time >80%
  • Engineering enables revenue
  • Cost per transaction decreasing
  • Innovation driving growth

Red Flags to Watch

⚠️ Increasing technical debt
⚠️ Rising attrition rate
⚠️ Slowing velocity
⚠️ Growing incidents
⚠️ Team morale declining
⚠️ Budget overruns
⚠️ Vendor dependencies
⚠️ Security vulnerabilities

04 同仓库更多 Skills

davila7
davila7/claude-code-templates

wealthville-pool-scoring

Score DeFi liquidity pools before providing liquidity. Returns a 0-100 pool score and an Enter/Hold/Exit/Reduce/Avoid verdict with calibrated confidence for ~68,800 Solana pools and 575 EVM pools, plus a public miss-inclusive track record. Use when asked whether a pool is worth LPing into, which pools look best right now, or how accurate the scores have actually been.

Skill与智能体开发
★ 3.3w
davila7
davila7/claude-code-templates

technical-debt-auditor

Scans a codebase and produces a quantified technical debt report with a prioritized remediation plan. Analyzes dead code, TODO/FIXME/HACK markers, dependency staleness, complexity hotspots, code duplication signals, test coverage gaps, unused exports, and outdated patterns. Use this skill when the user asks to audit their codebase for tech debt, wants a health check of their code quality, says things like "where should I focus refactoring", "find code smells", "audit my codebase", "what technical debt do we have", "prioritize cleanup work", or asks about code quality metrics. Also trigger when the user mentions "code rot", "legacy cleanup", "refactoring priorities", or wants to understand the overall health of a project before a major effort. Trigger even if the user doesn't say "technical debt" explicitly — any request to systematically assess code quality and identify improvement priorities belongs here.

Skill与智能体开发
★ 3.3w
davila7
davila7/claude-code-templates

readonly-sql-guard

Make an agent's database access provably read-only. Use when an agent runs caller-supplied SQL against a production/ERP/analytics database (a "query" MCP tool, text-to-SQL, an admin console), or when reviewing DB-access code for write/DDL/side-effect/transaction-escape risks. Checks what a statement CALLS, not just its shape.

数据分析师后端与接口Skill与智能体开发
★ 3.3w
davila7
davila7/claude-code-templates

web-artifacts-builder

Suite of tools for creating elaborate, multi-component claude.ai HTML artifacts using modern frontend web technologies (React, Tailwind CSS, shadcn/ui). Use for complex artifacts requiring state management, routing, or shadcn/ui components - not for simple single-file HTML/JSX artifacts.

前端开发
★ 3.3w
davila7
davila7/claude-code-templates

webapp-testing

Toolkit for interacting with and testing local web applications using Playwright. Supports verifying frontend functionality, debugging UI behavior, capturing browser screenshots, and viewing browser logs.

测试与质量前端开发
★ 3.3w
davila7
davila7/claude-code-templates

discernment-nudge

After you give a substantive answer or draft that the user may act on — advice or recommendations, drafted artifacts such as goals, plans, pitches, proposals, or emails, estimates or projections, analysis or interpretation of data, factual claims they may rely on, or a multi-step argument — invoke this skill BEFORE finalizing your reply and then, if it applies, append 2-3 short follow-up questions, each tied to something specific in what you just produced, that help the user check key facts, probe the reasoning or assumptions, and notice missing context. Do this at most once per conversation. Skip it when the user asked a trivial how-to or simple lookup, wants a purely educational explanation, asked you only to format, convert, or assemble a file from content they provided, is writing code they will run, is doing creative writing or casual chat, or already asked you to double-check, cite, or review — the skill file explains these boundaries and the exact output format.

内容创作者写作与文案Skill与智能体开发
★ 3.3w