AGENT SKILL

prompt-engineering-instructor

Extract structured data from LLM responses with Pydantic validation, retry failed extractions automatically, parse complex JSON with type safety, and stream partial results with Instructor - battle-tested structured output library

License 许可
MIT
最近更新
2026-11-12
Stars
★ 3.3w
Forks
3.9k

01 前言 Front Matter

name
prompt-engineering-instructor
license
MIT
metadata
{ "tags": [ "Prompt Engineering", "Instructor", "Structured Output", "Pydantic", "Data Extraction", "JSON Parsing", "Type Safety", "Validation", "Streaming", "OpenAI", "Anthropic" ], "author": "Orchestra Research", "version": "1.0.0", "dependencies": [ "instructor", "pydantic", "openai", "anthropic" ] }
description
Extract structured data from LLM responses with Pydantic validation, retry failed extractions automatically, parse complex JSON with type safety, and stream partial results with Instructor - battle-tested structured output library

02 资源文件 8

03 SKILL.md 正文

Instructor: Structured LLM Outputs

When to Use This Skill

Use Instructor when you need to:

  • Extract structured data from LLM responses reliably
  • Validate outputs against Pydantic schemas automatically
  • Retry failed extractions with automatic error handling
  • Parse complex JSON with type safety and validation
  • Stream partial results for real-time processing
  • Support multiple LLM providers with consistent API

GitHub Stars: 15,000+ | Battle-tested: 100,000+ developers

Installation

# Base installation
pip install instructor

# With specific providers
pip install "instructor[anthropic]"  # Anthropic Claude
pip install "instructor[openai]"     # OpenAI
pip install "instructor[all]"        # All providers

Quick Start

Basic Example: Extract User Data

import instructor
from pydantic import BaseModel
from anthropic import Anthropic

# Define output structure
class User(BaseModel):
    name: str
    age: int
    email: str

# Create instructor client
client = instructor.from_anthropic(Anthropic())

# Extract structured data
user = client.messages.create(
    model="claude-sonnet-4-5-20250929",
    max_tokens=1024,
    messages=[{
        "role": "user",
        "content": "John Doe is 30 years old. His email is john@example.com"
    }],
    response_model=User
)

print(user.name)   # "John Doe"
print(user.age)    # 30
print(user.email)  # "john@example.com"

With OpenAI

from openai import OpenAI

client = instructor.from_openai(OpenAI())

user = client.chat.completions.create(
    model="gpt-4o-mini",
    response_model=User,
    messages=[{"role": "user", "content": "Extract: Alice, 25, alice@email.com"}]
)

Core Concepts

1. Response Models (Pydantic)

Response models define the structure and validation rules for LLM outputs.

Basic Model

from pydantic import BaseModel, Field

class Article(BaseModel):
    title: str = Field(description="Article title")
    author: str = Field(description="Author name")
    word_count: int = Field(description="Number of words", gt=0)
    tags: list[str] = Field(description="List of relevant tags")

article = client.messages.create(
    model="claude-sonnet-4-5-20250929",
    max_tokens=1024,
    messages=[{
        "role": "user",
        "content": "Analyze this article: [article text]"
    }],
    response_model=Article
)

Benefits:

  • Type safety with Python type hints
  • Automatic validation (word_count > 0)
  • Self-documenting with Field descriptions
  • IDE autocomplete support

Nested Models

class Address(BaseModel):
    street: str
    city: str
    country: str

class Person(BaseModel):
    name: str
    age: int
    address: Address  # Nested model

person = client.messages.create(
    model="claude-sonnet-4-5-20250929",
    max_tokens=1024,
    messages=[{
        "role": "user",
        "content": "John lives at 123 Main St, Boston, USA"
    }],
    response_model=Person
)

print(person.address.city)  # "Boston"

Optional Fields

from typing import Optional

class Product(BaseModel):
    name: str
    price: float
    discount: Optional[float] = None  # Optional
    description: str = Field(default="No description")  # Default value

# LLM doesn't need to provide discount or description

Enums for Constraints

from enum import Enum

class Sentiment(str, Enum):
    POSITIVE = "positive"
    NEGATIVE = "negative"
    NEUTRAL = "neutral"

class Review(BaseModel):
    text: str
    sentiment: Sentiment  # Only these 3 values allowed

review = client.messages.create(
    model="claude-sonnet-4-5-20250929",
    max_tokens=1024,
    messages=[{
        "role": "user",
        "content": "This product is amazing!"
    }],
    response_model=Review
)

print(review.sentiment)  # Sentiment.POSITIVE

2. Validation

Pydantic validates LLM outputs automatically. If validation fails, Instructor retries.

Built-in Validators

from pydantic import Field, EmailStr, HttpUrl

class Contact(BaseModel):
    name: str = Field(min_length=2, max_length=100)
    age: int = Field(ge=0, le=120)  # 0 <= age <= 120
    email: EmailStr  # Validates email format
    website: HttpUrl  # Validates URL format

# If LLM provides invalid data, Instructor retries automatically

Custom Validators

from pydantic import field_validator

class Event(BaseModel):
    name: str
    date: str
    attendees: int

    @field_validator('date')
    def validate_date(cls, v):
        """Ensure date is in YYYY-MM-DD format."""
        import re
        if not re.match(r'\d{4}-\d{2}-\d{2}', v):
            raise ValueError('Date must be YYYY-MM-DD format')
        return v

    @field_validator('attendees')
    def validate_attendees(cls, v):
        """Ensure positive attendees."""
        if v < 1:
            raise ValueError('Must have at least 1 attendee')
        return v

Model-Level Validation

from pydantic import model_validator

class DateRange(BaseModel):
    start_date: str
    end_date: str

    @model_validator(mode='after')
    def check_dates(self):
        """Ensure end_date is after start_date."""
        from datetime import datetime
        start = datetime.strptime(self.start_date, '%Y-%m-%d')
        end = datetime.strptime(self.end_date, '%Y-%m-%d')

        if end < start:
            raise ValueError('end_date must be after start_date')
        return self

3. Automatic Retrying

Instructor retries automatically when validation fails, providing error feedback to the LLM.

# Retries up to 3 times if validation fails
user = client.messages.create(
    model="claude-sonnet-4-5-20250929",
    max_tokens=1024,
    messages=[{
        "role": "user",
        "content": "Extract user from: John, age unknown"
    }],
    response_model=User,
    max_retries=3  # Default is 3
)

# If age can't be extracted, Instructor tells the LLM:
# "Validation error: age - field required"
# LLM tries again with better extraction

How it works:

  1. LLM generates output
  2. Pydantic validates
  3. If invalid: Error message sent back to LLM
  4. LLM tries again with error feedback
  5. Repeats up to max_retries

4. Streaming

Stream partial results for real-time processing.

Streaming Partial Objects

from instructor import Partial

class Story(BaseModel):
    title: str
    content: str
    tags: list[str]

# Stream partial updates as LLM generates
for partial_story in client.messages.create_partial(
    model="claude-sonnet-4-5-20250929",
    max_tokens=1024,
    messages=[{
        "role": "user",
        "content": "Write a short sci-fi story"
    }],
    response_model=Story
):
    print(f"Title: {partial_story.title}")
    print(f"Content so far: {partial_story.content[:100]}...")
    # Update UI in real-time

Streaming Iterables

class Task(BaseModel):
    title: str
    priority: str

# Stream list items as they're generated
tasks = client.messages.create_iterable(
    model="claude-sonnet-4-5-20250929",
    max_tokens=1024,
    messages=[{
        "role": "user",
        "content": "Generate 10 project tasks"
    }],
    response_model=Task
)

for task in tasks:
    print(f"- {task.title} ({task.priority})")
    # Process each task as it arrives

Provider Configuration

Anthropic Claude

import instructor
from anthropic import Anthropic

client = instructor.from_anthropic(
    Anthropic(api_key="your-api-key")
)

# Use with Claude models
response = client.messages.create(
    model="claude-sonnet-4-5-20250929",
    max_tokens=1024,
    messages=[...],
    response_model=YourModel
)

OpenAI

from openai import OpenAI

client = instructor.from_openai(
    OpenAI(api_key="your-api-key")
)

response = client.chat.completions.create(
    model="gpt-4o-mini",
    response_model=YourModel,
    messages=[...]
)

Local Models (Ollama)

from openai import OpenAI

# Point to local Ollama server
client = instructor.from_openai(
    OpenAI(
        base_url="http://localhost:11434/v1",
        api_key="ollama"  # Required but ignored
    ),
    mode=instructor.Mode.JSON
)

response = client.chat.completions.create(
    model="llama3.1",
    response_model=YourModel,
    messages=[...]
)

Common Patterns

Pattern 1: Data Extraction from Text

class CompanyInfo(BaseModel):
    name: str
    founded_year: int
    industry: str
    employees: int
    headquarters: str

text = """
Tesla, Inc. was founded in 2003. It operates in the automotive and energy
industry with approximately 140,000 employees. The company is headquartered
in Austin, Texas.
"""

company = client.messages.create(
    model="claude-sonnet-4-5-20250929",
    max_tokens=1024,
    messages=[{
        "role": "user",
        "content": f"Extract company information from: {text}"
    }],
    response_model=CompanyInfo
)

Pattern 2: Classification

class Category(str, Enum):
    TECHNOLOGY = "technology"
    FINANCE = "finance"
    HEALTHCARE = "healthcare"
    EDUCATION = "education"
    OTHER = "other"

class ArticleClassification(BaseModel):
    category: Category
    confidence: float = Field(ge=0.0, le=1.0)
    keywords: list[str]

classification = client.messages.create(
    model="claude-sonnet-4-5-20250929",
    max_tokens=1024,
    messages=[{
        "role": "user",
        "content": "Classify this article: [article text]"
    }],
    response_model=ArticleClassification
)

Pattern 3: Multi-Entity Extraction

class Person(BaseModel):
    name: str
    role: str

class Organization(BaseModel):
    name: str
    industry: str

class Entities(BaseModel):
    people: list[Person]
    organizations: list[Organization]
    locations: list[str]

text = "Tim Cook, CEO of Apple, announced at the event in Cupertino..."

entities = client.messages.create(
    model="claude-sonnet-4-5-20250929",
    max_tokens=1024,
    messages=[{
        "role": "user",
        "content": f"Extract all entities from: {text}"
    }],
    response_model=Entities
)

for person in entities.people:
    print(f"{person.name} - {person.role}")

Pattern 4: Structured Analysis

class SentimentAnalysis(BaseModel):
    overall_sentiment: Sentiment
    positive_aspects: list[str]
    negative_aspects: list[str]
    suggestions: list[str]
    score: float = Field(ge=-1.0, le=1.0)

review = "The product works well but setup was confusing..."

analysis = client.messages.create(
    model="claude-sonnet-4-5-20250929",
    max_tokens=1024,
    messages=[{
        "role": "user",
        "content": f"Analyze this review: {review}"
    }],
    response_model=SentimentAnalysis
)

Pattern 5: Batch Processing

def extract_person(text: str) -> Person:
    return client.messages.create(
        model="claude-sonnet-4-5-20250929",
        max_tokens=1024,
        messages=[{
            "role": "user",
            "content": f"Extract person from: {text}"
        }],
        response_model=Person
    )

texts = [
    "John Doe is a 30-year-old engineer",
    "Jane Smith, 25, works in marketing",
    "Bob Johnson, age 40, software developer"
]

people = [extract_person(text) for text in texts]

Advanced Features

Union Types

from typing import Union

class TextContent(BaseModel):
    type: str = "text"
    content: str

class ImageContent(BaseModel):
    type: str = "image"
    url: HttpUrl
    caption: str

class Post(BaseModel):
    title: str
    content: Union[TextContent, ImageContent]  # Either type

# LLM chooses appropriate type based on content

Dynamic Models

from pydantic import create_model

# Create model at runtime
DynamicUser = create_model(
    'User',
    name=(str, ...),
    age=(int, Field(ge=0)),
    email=(EmailStr, ...)
)

user = client.messages.create(
    model="claude-sonnet-4-5-20250929",
    max_tokens=1024,
    messages=[...],
    response_model=DynamicUser
)

Custom Modes

# For providers without native structured outputs
client = instructor.from_anthropic(
    Anthropic(),
    mode=instructor.Mode.JSON  # JSON mode
)

# Available modes:
# - Mode.ANTHROPIC_TOOLS (recommended for Claude)
# - Mode.JSON (fallback)
# - Mode.TOOLS (OpenAI tools)

Context Management

# Single-use client
with instructor.from_anthropic(Anthropic()) as client:
    result = client.messages.create(
        model="claude-sonnet-4-5-20250929",
        max_tokens=1024,
        messages=[...],
        response_model=YourModel
    )
    # Client closed automatically

Error Handling

Handling Validation Errors

from pydantic import ValidationError

try:
    user = client.messages.create(
        model="claude-sonnet-4-5-20250929",
        max_tokens=1024,
        messages=[...],
        response_model=User,
        max_retries=3
    )
except ValidationError as e:
    print(f"Failed after retries: {e}")
    # Handle gracefully

except Exception as e:
    print(f"API error: {e}")

Custom Error Messages

class ValidatedUser(BaseModel):
    name: str = Field(description="Full name, 2-100 characters")
    age: int = Field(description="Age between 0 and 120", ge=0, le=120)
    email: EmailStr = Field(description="Valid email address")

    class Config:
        # Custom error messages
        json_schema_extra = {
            "examples": [
                {
                    "name": "John Doe",
                    "age": 30,
                    "email": "john@example.com"
                }
            ]
        }

Best Practices

1. Clear Field Descriptions

# ❌ Bad: Vague
class Product(BaseModel):
    name: str
    price: float

# ✅ Good: Descriptive
class Product(BaseModel):
    name: str = Field(description="Product name from the text")
    price: float = Field(description="Price in USD, without currency symbol")

2. Use Appropriate Validation

# ✅ Good: Constrain values
class Rating(BaseModel):
    score: int = Field(ge=1, le=5, description="Rating from 1 to 5 stars")
    review: str = Field(min_length=10, description="Review text, at least 10 chars")

3. Provide Examples in Prompts

messages = [{
    "role": "user",
    "content": """Extract person info from: "John, 30, engineer"

Example format:
{
  "name": "John Doe",
  "age": 30,
  "occupation": "engineer"
}"""
}]

4. Use Enums for Fixed Categories

# ✅ Good: Enum ensures valid values
class Status(str, Enum):
    PENDING = "pending"
    APPROVED = "approved"
    REJECTED = "rejected"

class Application(BaseModel):
    status: Status  # LLM must choose from enum

5. Handle Missing Data Gracefully

class PartialData(BaseModel):
    required_field: str
    optional_field: Optional[str] = None
    default_field: str = "default_value"

# LLM only needs to provide required_field

Comparison to Alternatives

Feature Instructor Manual JSON LangChain DSPy
Type Safety ✅ Yes ❌ No ⚠️ Partial ✅ Yes
Auto Validation ✅ Yes ❌ No ❌ No ⚠️ Limited
Auto Retry ✅ Yes ❌ No ❌ No ✅ Yes
Streaming ✅ Yes ❌ No ✅ Yes ❌ No
Multi-Provider ✅ Yes ⚠️ Manual ✅ Yes ✅ Yes
Learning Curve Low Low Medium High

When to choose Instructor:

  • Need structured, validated outputs
  • Want type safety and IDE support
  • Require automatic retries
  • Building data extraction systems

When to choose alternatives:

  • DSPy: Need prompt optimization
  • LangChain: Building complex chains
  • Manual: Simple, one-off extractions

Resources

See Also

  • references/validation.md - Advanced validation patterns
  • references/providers.md - Provider-specific configuration
  • references/examples.md - Real-world use cases

04 同仓库更多 Skills

davila7
davila7/claude-code-templates

wealthville-pool-scoring

Score DeFi liquidity pools before providing liquidity. Returns a 0-100 pool score and an Enter/Hold/Exit/Reduce/Avoid verdict with calibrated confidence for ~68,800 Solana pools and 575 EVM pools, plus a public miss-inclusive track record. Use when asked whether a pool is worth LPing into, which pools look best right now, or how accurate the scores have actually been.

Skill与智能体开发
★ 3.3w
davila7
davila7/claude-code-templates

technical-debt-auditor

Scans a codebase and produces a quantified technical debt report with a prioritized remediation plan. Analyzes dead code, TODO/FIXME/HACK markers, dependency staleness, complexity hotspots, code duplication signals, test coverage gaps, unused exports, and outdated patterns. Use this skill when the user asks to audit their codebase for tech debt, wants a health check of their code quality, says things like "where should I focus refactoring", "find code smells", "audit my codebase", "what technical debt do we have", "prioritize cleanup work", or asks about code quality metrics. Also trigger when the user mentions "code rot", "legacy cleanup", "refactoring priorities", or wants to understand the overall health of a project before a major effort. Trigger even if the user doesn't say "technical debt" explicitly — any request to systematically assess code quality and identify improvement priorities belongs here.

Skill与智能体开发
★ 3.3w
davila7
davila7/claude-code-templates

readonly-sql-guard

Make an agent's database access provably read-only. Use when an agent runs caller-supplied SQL against a production/ERP/analytics database (a "query" MCP tool, text-to-SQL, an admin console), or when reviewing DB-access code for write/DDL/side-effect/transaction-escape risks. Checks what a statement CALLS, not just its shape.

数据分析师后端与接口Skill与智能体开发
★ 3.3w
davila7
davila7/claude-code-templates

web-artifacts-builder

Suite of tools for creating elaborate, multi-component claude.ai HTML artifacts using modern frontend web technologies (React, Tailwind CSS, shadcn/ui). Use for complex artifacts requiring state management, routing, or shadcn/ui components - not for simple single-file HTML/JSX artifacts.

前端开发
★ 3.3w
davila7
davila7/claude-code-templates

webapp-testing

Toolkit for interacting with and testing local web applications using Playwright. Supports verifying frontend functionality, debugging UI behavior, capturing browser screenshots, and viewing browser logs.

测试与质量前端开发
★ 3.3w
davila7
davila7/claude-code-templates

discernment-nudge

After you give a substantive answer or draft that the user may act on — advice or recommendations, drafted artifacts such as goals, plans, pitches, proposals, or emails, estimates or projections, analysis or interpretation of data, factual claims they may rely on, or a multi-step argument — invoke this skill BEFORE finalizing your reply and then, if it applies, append 2-3 short follow-up questions, each tied to something specific in what you just produced, that help the user check key facts, probe the reasoning or assumptions, and notice missing context. Do this at most once per conversation. Skip it when the user asked a trivial how-to or simple lookup, wants a purely educational explanation, asked you only to format, convert, or assemble a file from content they provided, is writing code they will run, is doing creative writing or casual chat, or already asked you to double-check, cite, or review — the skill file explains these boundaries and the exact output format.

内容创作者写作与文案Skill与智能体开发
★ 3.3w