AGENT SKILL

llm-app-patterns

Production-ready patterns for building LLM applications. Covers RAG pipelines, agent architectures, prompt IDEs, and LLMOps monitoring. Use when designing AI applications, implementing RAG, building agents, or setting up LLM observability.

License 许可
MIT
最近更新
2026-11-11
Stars
★ 3.3w
Forks
3.9k

01 前言 Front Matter

name
llm-app-patterns
description
Production-ready patterns for building LLM applications. Covers RAG pipelines, agent architectures, prompt IDEs, and LLMOps monitoring. Use when designing AI applications, implementing RAG, building agents, or setting up LLM observability.

02 资源文件 1

03 SKILL.md 正文

? LLM Application Patterns

Production-ready patterns for building LLM applications, inspired by Dify and industry best practices.

When to Use This Skill

Use this skill when:

  • Designing LLM-powered applications
  • Implementing RAG (Retrieval-Augmented Generation)
  • Building AI agents with tools
  • Setting up LLMOps monitoring
  • Choosing between agent architectures

1. RAG Pipeline Architecture

Overview

RAG (Retrieval-Augmented Generation) grounds LLM responses in your data.

┌─────────────┐     ┌─────────────┐     ┌─────────────┐
│   Ingest    │────▶│   Retrieve  │────▶│   Generate  │
│  Documents  │     │   Context   │     │   Response  │
└─────────────┘     └─────────────┘     └─────────────┘
      │                   │                   │
      ▼                   ▼                   ▼
 ┌─────────┐       ┌───────────┐       ┌───────────┐
 │ Chunking│       │  Vector   │       │    LLM    │
 │Embedding│       │  Search   │       │  + Context│
 └─────────┘       └───────────┘       └───────────┘

1.1 Document Ingestion

# Chunking strategies
class ChunkingStrategy:
    # Fixed-size chunks (simple but may break context)
    FIXED_SIZE = "fixed_size"  # e.g., 512 tokens

    # Semantic chunking (preserves meaning)
    SEMANTIC = "semantic"      # Split on paragraphs/sections

    # Recursive splitting (tries multiple separators)
    RECURSIVE = "recursive"    # ["\n\n", "\n", " ", ""]

    # Document-aware (respects structure)
    DOCUMENT_AWARE = "document_aware"  # Headers, lists, etc.

# Recommended settings
CHUNK_CONFIG = {
    "chunk_size": 512,       # tokens
    "chunk_overlap": 50,     # token overlap between chunks
    "separators": ["\n\n", "\n", ". ", " "],
}

1.2 Embedding & Storage

# Vector database selection
VECTOR_DB_OPTIONS = {
    "pinecone": {
        "use_case": "Production, managed service",
        "scale": "Billions of vectors",
        "features": ["Hybrid search", "Metadata filtering"]
    },
    "weaviate": {
        "use_case": "Self-hosted, multi-modal",
        "scale": "Millions of vectors",
        "features": ["GraphQL API", "Modules"]
    },
    "chromadb": {
        "use_case": "Development, prototyping",
        "scale": "Thousands of vectors",
        "features": ["Simple API", "In-memory option"]
    },
    "pgvector": {
        "use_case": "Existing Postgres infrastructure",
        "scale": "Millions of vectors",
        "features": ["SQL integration", "ACID compliance"]
    }
}

# Embedding model selection
EMBEDDING_MODELS = {
    "openai/text-embedding-3-small": {
        "dimensions": 1536,
        "cost": "$0.02/1M tokens",
        "quality": "Good for most use cases"
    },
    "openai/text-embedding-3-large": {
        "dimensions": 3072,
        "cost": "$0.13/1M tokens",
        "quality": "Best for complex queries"
    },
    "local/bge-large": {
        "dimensions": 1024,
        "cost": "Free (compute only)",
        "quality": "Comparable to OpenAI small"
    }
}

1.3 Retrieval Strategies

# Basic semantic search
def semantic_search(query: str, top_k: int = 5):
    query_embedding = embed(query)
    results = vector_db.similarity_search(
        query_embedding,
        top_k=top_k
    )
    return results

# Hybrid search (semantic + keyword)
def hybrid_search(query: str, top_k: int = 5, alpha: float = 0.5):
    """
    alpha=1.0: Pure semantic
    alpha=0.0: Pure keyword (BM25)
    alpha=0.5: Balanced
    """
    semantic_results = vector_db.similarity_search(query)
    keyword_results = bm25_search(query)

    # Reciprocal Rank Fusion
    return rrf_merge(semantic_results, keyword_results, alpha)

# Multi-query retrieval
def multi_query_retrieval(query: str):
    """Generate multiple query variations for better recall"""
    queries = llm.generate_query_variations(query, n=3)
    all_results = []
    for q in queries:
        all_results.extend(semantic_search(q))
    return deduplicate(all_results)

# Contextual compression
def compressed_retrieval(query: str):
    """Retrieve then compress to relevant parts only"""
    docs = semantic_search(query, top_k=10)
    compressed = llm.extract_relevant_parts(docs, query)
    return compressed

1.4 Generation with Context

RAG_PROMPT_TEMPLATE = """
Answer the user's question based ONLY on the following context.
If the context doesn't contain enough information, say "I don't have enough information to answer that."

Context:
{context}

Question: {question}

Answer:"""

def generate_with_rag(question: str):
    # Retrieve
    context_docs = hybrid_search(question, top_k=5)
    context = "\n\n".join([doc.content for doc in context_docs])

    # Generate
    prompt = RAG_PROMPT_TEMPLATE.format(
        context=context,
        question=question
    )

    response = llm.generate(prompt)

    # Return with citations
    return {
        "answer": response,
        "sources": [doc.metadata for doc in context_docs]
    }

2. Agent Architectures

2.1 ReAct Pattern (Reasoning + Acting)

Thought: I need to search for information about X
Action: search("X")
Observation: [search results]
Thought: Based on the results, I should...
Action: calculate(...)
Observation: [calculation result]
Thought: I now have enough information
Action: final_answer("The answer is...")
REACT_PROMPT = """
You are an AI assistant that can use tools to answer questions.

Available tools:
{tools_description}

Use this format:
Thought: [your reasoning about what to do next]
Action: [tool_name(arguments)]
Observation: [tool result - this will be filled in]
... (repeat Thought/Action/Observation as needed)
Thought: I have enough information to answer
Final Answer: [your final response]

Question: {question}
"""

class ReActAgent:
    def __init__(self, tools: list, llm):
        self.tools = {t.name: t for t in tools}
        self.llm = llm
        self.max_iterations = 10

    def run(self, question: str) -> str:
        prompt = REACT_PROMPT.format(
            tools_description=self._format_tools(),
            question=question
        )

        for _ in range(self.max_iterations):
            response = self.llm.generate(prompt)

            if "Final Answer:" in response:
                return self._extract_final_answer(response)

            action = self._parse_action(response)
            observation = self._execute_tool(action)
            prompt += f"\nObservation: {observation}\n"

        return "Max iterations reached"

2.2 Function Calling Pattern

# Define tools as functions with schemas
TOOLS = [
    {
        "name": "search_web",
        "description": "Search the web for current information",
        "parameters": {
            "type": "object",
            "properties": {
                "query": {
                    "type": "string",
                    "description": "Search query"
                }
            },
            "required": ["query"]
        }
    },
    {
        "name": "calculate",
        "description": "Perform mathematical calculations",
        "parameters": {
            "type": "object",
            "properties": {
                "expression": {
                    "type": "string",
                    "description": "Math expression to evaluate"
                }
            },
            "required": ["expression"]
        }
    }
]

class FunctionCallingAgent:
    def run(self, question: str) -> str:
        messages = [{"role": "user", "content": question}]

        while True:
            response = self.llm.chat(
                messages=messages,
                tools=TOOLS,
                tool_choice="auto"
            )

            if response.tool_calls:
                for tool_call in response.tool_calls:
                    result = self._execute_tool(
                        tool_call.name,
                        tool_call.arguments
                    )
                    messages.append({
                        "role": "tool",
                        "tool_call_id": tool_call.id,
                        "content": str(result)
                    })
            else:
                return response.content

2.3 Plan-and-Execute Pattern

class PlanAndExecuteAgent:
    """
    1. Create a plan (list of steps)
    2. Execute each step
    3. Replan if needed
    """

    def run(self, task: str) -> str:
        # Planning phase
        plan = self.planner.create_plan(task)
        # Returns: ["Step 1: ...", "Step 2: ...", ...]

        results = []
        for step in plan:
            # Execute each step
            result = self.executor.execute(step, context=results)
            results.append(result)

            # Check if replan needed
            if self._needs_replan(task, results):
                new_plan = self.planner.replan(
                    task,
                    completed=results,
                    remaining=plan[len(results):]
                )
                plan = new_plan

        # Synthesize final answer
        return self.synthesizer.summarize(task, results)

2.4 Multi-Agent Collaboration

class AgentTeam:
    """
    Specialized agents collaborating on complex tasks
    """

    def __init__(self):
        self.agents = {
            "researcher": ResearchAgent(),
            "analyst": AnalystAgent(),
            "writer": WriterAgent(),
            "critic": CriticAgent()
        }
        self.coordinator = CoordinatorAgent()

    def solve(self, task: str) -> str:
        # Coordinator assigns subtasks
        assignments = self.coordinator.decompose(task)

        results = {}
        for assignment in assignments:
            agent = self.agents[assignment.agent]
            result = agent.execute(
                assignment.subtask,
                context=results
            )
            results[assignment.id] = result

        # Critic reviews
        critique = self.agents["critic"].review(results)

        if critique.needs_revision:
            # Iterate with feedback
            return self.solve_with_feedback(task, results, critique)

        return self.coordinator.synthesize(results)

3. Prompt IDE Patterns

3.1 Prompt Templates with Variables

class PromptTemplate:
    def __init__(self, template: str, variables: list[str]):
        self.template = template
        self.variables = variables

    def format(self, **kwargs) -> str:
        # Validate all variables provided
        missing = set(self.variables) - set(kwargs.keys())
        if missing:
            raise ValueError(f"Missing variables: {missing}")

        return self.template.format(**kwargs)

    def with_examples(self, examples: list[dict]) -> str:
        """Add few-shot examples"""
        example_text = "\n\n".join([
            f"Input: {ex['input']}\nOutput: {ex['output']}"
            for ex in examples
        ])
        return f"{example_text}\n\n{self.template}"

# Usage
summarizer = PromptTemplate(
    template="Summarize the following text in {style} style:\n\n{text}",
    variables=["style", "text"]
)

prompt = summarizer.format(
    style="professional",
    text="Long article content..."
)

3.2 Prompt Versioning & A/B Testing

class PromptRegistry:
    def __init__(self, db):
        self.db = db

    def register(self, name: str, template: str, version: str):
        """Store prompt with version"""
        self.db.save({
            "name": name,
            "template": template,
            "version": version,
            "created_at": datetime.now(),
            "metrics": {}
        })

    def get(self, name: str, version: str = "latest") -> str:
        """Retrieve specific version"""
        return self.db.get(name, version)

    def ab_test(self, name: str, user_id: str) -> str:
        """Return variant based on user bucket"""
        variants = self.db.get_all_versions(name)
        bucket = hash(user_id) % len(variants)
        return variants[bucket]

    def record_outcome(self, prompt_id: str, outcome: dict):
        """Track prompt performance"""
        self.db.update_metrics(prompt_id, outcome)

3.3 Prompt Chaining

class PromptChain:
    """
    Chain prompts together, passing output as input to next
    """

    def __init__(self, steps: list[dict]):
        self.steps = steps

    def run(self, initial_input: str) -> dict:
        context = {"input": initial_input}
        results = []

        for step in self.steps:
            prompt = step["prompt"].format(**context)
            output = llm.generate(prompt)

            # Parse output if needed
            if step.get("parser"):
                output = step["parser"](output)

            context[step["output_key"]] = output
            results.append({
                "step": step["name"],
                "output": output
            })

        return {
            "final_output": context[self.steps[-1]["output_key"]],
            "intermediate_results": results
        }

# Example: Research → Analyze → Summarize
chain = PromptChain([
    {
        "name": "research",
        "prompt": "Research the topic: {input}",
        "output_key": "research"
    },
    {
        "name": "analyze",
        "prompt": "Analyze these findings:\n{research}",
        "output_key": "analysis"
    },
    {
        "name": "summarize",
        "prompt": "Summarize this analysis in 3 bullet points:\n{analysis}",
        "output_key": "summary"
    }
])

4. LLMOps & Observability

4.1 Metrics to Track

LLM_METRICS = {
    # Performance
    "latency_p50": "50th percentile response time",
    "latency_p99": "99th percentile response time",
    "tokens_per_second": "Generation speed",

    # Quality
    "user_satisfaction": "Thumbs up/down ratio",
    "task_completion": "% tasks completed successfully",
    "hallucination_rate": "% responses with factual errors",

    # Cost
    "cost_per_request": "Average $ per API call",
    "tokens_per_request": "Average tokens used",
    "cache_hit_rate": "% requests served from cache",

    # Reliability
    "error_rate": "% failed requests",
    "timeout_rate": "% requests that timed out",
    "retry_rate": "% requests needing retry"
}

4.2 Logging & Tracing

import logging
from opentelemetry import trace

tracer = trace.get_tracer(__name__)

class LLMLogger:
    def log_request(self, request_id: str, data: dict):
        """Log LLM request for debugging and analysis"""
        log_entry = {
            "request_id": request_id,
            "timestamp": datetime.now().isoformat(),
            "model": data["model"],
            "prompt": data["prompt"][:500],  # Truncate for storage
            "prompt_tokens": data["prompt_tokens"],
            "temperature": data.get("temperature", 1.0),
            "user_id": data.get("user_id"),
        }
        logging.info(f"LLM_REQUEST: {json.dumps(log_entry)}")

    def log_response(self, request_id: str, data: dict):
        """Log LLM response"""
        log_entry = {
            "request_id": request_id,
            "completion_tokens": data["completion_tokens"],
            "total_tokens": data["total_tokens"],
            "latency_ms": data["latency_ms"],
            "finish_reason": data["finish_reason"],
            "cost_usd": self._calculate_cost(data),
        }
        logging.info(f"LLM_RESPONSE: {json.dumps(log_entry)}")

# Distributed tracing
@tracer.start_as_current_span("llm_call")
def call_llm(prompt: str) -> str:
    span = trace.get_current_span()
    span.set_attribute("prompt.length", len(prompt))

    response = llm.generate(prompt)

    span.set_attribute("response.length", len(response))
    span.set_attribute("tokens.total", response.usage.total_tokens)

    return response.content

4.3 Evaluation Framework

class LLMEvaluator:
    """
    Evaluate LLM outputs for quality
    """

    def evaluate_response(self,
                          question: str,
                          response: str,
                          ground_truth: str = None) -> dict:
        scores = {}

        # Relevance: Does it answer the question?
        scores["relevance"] = self._score_relevance(question, response)

        # Coherence: Is it well-structured?
        scores["coherence"] = self._score_coherence(response)

        # Groundedness: Is it based on provided context?
        scores["groundedness"] = self._score_groundedness(response)

        # Accuracy: Does it match ground truth?
        if ground_truth:
            scores["accuracy"] = self._score_accuracy(response, ground_truth)

        # Harmfulness: Is it safe?
        scores["safety"] = self._score_safety(response)

        return scores

    def run_benchmark(self, test_cases: list[dict]) -> dict:
        """Run evaluation on test set"""
        results = []
        for case in test_cases:
            response = llm.generate(case["prompt"])
            scores = self.evaluate_response(
                question=case["prompt"],
                response=response,
                ground_truth=case.get("expected")
            )
            results.append(scores)

        return self._aggregate_scores(results)

5. Production Patterns

5.1 Caching Strategy

import hashlib
from functools import lru_cache

class LLMCache:
    def __init__(self, redis_client, ttl_seconds=3600):
        self.redis = redis_client
        self.ttl = ttl_seconds

    def _cache_key(self, prompt: str, model: str, **kwargs) -> str:
        """Generate deterministic cache key"""
        content = f"{model}:{prompt}:{json.dumps(kwargs, sort_keys=True)}"
        return hashlib.sha256(content.encode()).hexdigest()

    def get_or_generate(self, prompt: str, model: str, **kwargs) -> str:
        key = self._cache_key(prompt, model, **kwargs)

        # Check cache
        cached = self.redis.get(key)
        if cached:
            return cached.decode()

        # Generate
        response = llm.generate(prompt, model=model, **kwargs)

        # Cache (only cache deterministic outputs)
        if kwargs.get("temperature", 1.0) == 0:
            self.redis.setex(key, self.ttl, response)

        return response

5.2 Rate Limiting & Retry

import time
from tenacity import retry, wait_exponential, stop_after_attempt

class RateLimiter:
    def __init__(self, requests_per_minute: int):
        self.rpm = requests_per_minute
        self.timestamps = []

    def acquire(self):
        """Wait if rate limit would be exceeded"""
        now = time.time()

        # Remove old timestamps
        self.timestamps = [t for t in self.timestamps if now - t < 60]

        if len(self.timestamps) >= self.rpm:
            sleep_time = 60 - (now - self.timestamps[0])
            time.sleep(sleep_time)

        self.timestamps.append(time.time())

# Retry with exponential backoff
@retry(
    wait=wait_exponential(multiplier=1, min=4, max=60),
    stop=stop_after_attempt(5)
)
def call_llm_with_retry(prompt: str) -> str:
    try:
        return llm.generate(prompt)
    except RateLimitError:
        raise  # Will trigger retry
    except APIError as e:
        if e.status_code >= 500:
            raise  # Retry server errors
        raise  # Don't retry client errors

5.3 Fallback Strategy

class LLMWithFallback:
    def __init__(self, primary: str, fallbacks: list[str]):
        self.primary = primary
        self.fallbacks = fallbacks

    def generate(self, prompt: str, **kwargs) -> str:
        models = [self.primary] + self.fallbacks

        for model in models:
            try:
                return llm.generate(prompt, model=model, **kwargs)
            except (RateLimitError, APIError) as e:
                logging.warning(f"Model {model} failed: {e}")
                continue

        raise AllModelsFailedError("All models exhausted")

# Usage
llm_client = LLMWithFallback(
    primary="gpt-4-turbo",
    fallbacks=["gpt-3.5-turbo", "claude-3-sonnet"]
)

Architecture Decision Matrix

Pattern Use When Complexity Cost
Simple RAG FAQ, docs search Low Low
Hybrid RAG Mixed queries Medium Medium
ReAct Agent Multi-step tasks Medium Medium
Function Calling Structured tools Low Low
Plan-Execute Complex tasks High High
Multi-Agent Research tasks Very High Very High

Resources

04 同仓库更多 Skills

davila7
davila7/claude-code-templates

wealthville-pool-scoring

Score DeFi liquidity pools before providing liquidity. Returns a 0-100 pool score and an Enter/Hold/Exit/Reduce/Avoid verdict with calibrated confidence for ~68,800 Solana pools and 575 EVM pools, plus a public miss-inclusive track record. Use when asked whether a pool is worth LPing into, which pools look best right now, or how accurate the scores have actually been.

Skill与智能体开发
★ 3.3w
davila7
davila7/claude-code-templates

technical-debt-auditor

Scans a codebase and produces a quantified technical debt report with a prioritized remediation plan. Analyzes dead code, TODO/FIXME/HACK markers, dependency staleness, complexity hotspots, code duplication signals, test coverage gaps, unused exports, and outdated patterns. Use this skill when the user asks to audit their codebase for tech debt, wants a health check of their code quality, says things like "where should I focus refactoring", "find code smells", "audit my codebase", "what technical debt do we have", "prioritize cleanup work", or asks about code quality metrics. Also trigger when the user mentions "code rot", "legacy cleanup", "refactoring priorities", or wants to understand the overall health of a project before a major effort. Trigger even if the user doesn't say "technical debt" explicitly — any request to systematically assess code quality and identify improvement priorities belongs here.

Skill与智能体开发
★ 3.3w
davila7
davila7/claude-code-templates

readonly-sql-guard

Make an agent's database access provably read-only. Use when an agent runs caller-supplied SQL against a production/ERP/analytics database (a "query" MCP tool, text-to-SQL, an admin console), or when reviewing DB-access code for write/DDL/side-effect/transaction-escape risks. Checks what a statement CALLS, not just its shape.

数据分析师后端与接口Skill与智能体开发
★ 3.3w
davila7
davila7/claude-code-templates

web-artifacts-builder

Suite of tools for creating elaborate, multi-component claude.ai HTML artifacts using modern frontend web technologies (React, Tailwind CSS, shadcn/ui). Use for complex artifacts requiring state management, routing, or shadcn/ui components - not for simple single-file HTML/JSX artifacts.

前端开发
★ 3.3w
davila7
davila7/claude-code-templates

webapp-testing

Toolkit for interacting with and testing local web applications using Playwright. Supports verifying frontend functionality, debugging UI behavior, capturing browser screenshots, and viewing browser logs.

测试与质量前端开发
★ 3.3w
davila7
davila7/claude-code-templates

discernment-nudge

After you give a substantive answer or draft that the user may act on — advice or recommendations, drafted artifacts such as goals, plans, pitches, proposals, or emails, estimates or projections, analysis or interpretation of data, factual claims they may rely on, or a multi-step argument — invoke this skill BEFORE finalizing your reply and then, if it applies, append 2-3 short follow-up questions, each tied to something specific in what you just produced, that help the user check key facts, probe the reasoning or assumptions, and notice missing context. Do this at most once per conversation. Skip it when the user asked a trivial how-to or simple lookup, wants a purely educational explanation, asked you only to format, convert, or assemble a file from content they provided, is writing code they will run, is doing creative writing or casual chat, or already asked you to double-check, cite, or review — the skill file explains these boundaries and the exact output format.

内容创作者写作与文案Skill与智能体开发
★ 3.3w