AGENT SKILL

java-refactoring-remove-parameter

Refactoring using Remove Parameter in Java Language

License 许可
MIT
最近更新
2026-11-11
Stars
★ 4.1w
Forks
5.3k

01 前言 Front Matter

name
java-refactoring-remove-parameter
description
Refactoring using Remove Parameter in Java Language

03 SKILL.md 正文

Refactoring Java Methods with Remove Parameter

Role

You are an expert in refactoring Java methods.

Below are 2 examples (with titles code before and code after refactoring) that represents Remove Parameter.

Code Before Refactoring 1:

public Backend selectBackendForGroupCommit(long tableId, ConnectContext context, boolean isCloud)
        throws LoadException, DdlException {
    if (!Env.getCurrentEnv().isMaster()) {
        try {
            long backendId = new MasterOpExecutor(context)
                    .getGroupCommitLoadBeId(tableId, context.getCloudCluster(), isCloud);
            return Env.getCurrentSystemInfo().getBackend(backendId);
        } catch (Exception e) {
            throw new LoadException(e.getMessage());
        }
    } else {
        return Env.getCurrentSystemInfo()
                .getBackend(selectBackendForGroupCommitInternal(tableId, context.getCloudCluster(), isCloud));
    }
}

Code After Refactoring 1:

public Backend selectBackendForGroupCommit(long tableId, ConnectContext context)
        throws LoadException, DdlException {
    if (!Env.getCurrentEnv().isMaster()) {
        try {
            long backendId = new MasterOpExecutor(context)
                    .getGroupCommitLoadBeId(tableId, context.getCloudCluster());
            return Env.getCurrentSystemInfo().getBackend(backendId);
        } catch (Exception e) {
            throw new LoadException(e.getMessage());
        }
    } else {
        return Env.getCurrentSystemInfo()
                .getBackend(selectBackendForGroupCommitInternal(tableId, context.getCloudCluster()));
    }
}

Code Before Refactoring 2:

NodeImpl( long id, long firstRel, long firstProp )
{
     this( id, false );
}

Code After Refactoring 2:

NodeImpl( long id)
{
     this( id, false );
}

Safety Rules

  • Behaviour-preserving only. Remove a parameter only if it is truly unused or derivable (field, constant, other parameter); never remove one that is read, even if "redundant" by convention.
  • Baseline first: run the narrowest green test command (./mvnw -q -Dtest=MyTest test, ./gradlew test --tests MyTest) or ./mvnw verify / ./gradlew build, and re-run after the change. If the baseline is red, stop and report.
  • If the affected code has no tests, stop and report; propose characterization tests first. Never delete or weaken tests.
  • Find every usage before changing a signature: use LSP find-references (lsp-setup/jdtls) and grep across all modules, including tests. Also check:
    • overrides and interface implementors (@Override, abstract/default methods, functional interfaces, method references): the whole hierarchy must change together;
    • reflection and string-based lookups (getMethod, getDeclaredMethod, MethodHandle, proxies), and Spring/CDI/Quarkus/Jakarta annotated methods (@Bean, @EventListener, @Scheduled, @Inject, @Path, @Observes, @PostConstruct), which a compiler will not flag;
    • constructors used by serialization/deserialization or JPA/Jackson (@JsonCreator, @ConstructorBinding, readObject), and serialVersionUID impact;
    • XML/properties/YAML configuration and AOP pointcut expressions naming the method;
    • public or protected API consumed by other modules or published artifacts.
  • Ask the user before changing public/protected/published API (prefer deprecating and adding an overload) or touching generated code.
  • One parameter per step (one commit each when the user asks for commits). Prefer the jdtls Change Method Signature refactoring when available; otherwise update the declaration and all callers together.
  • Removing a parameter can make an overload collide with an existing signature or change overload resolution; check this. Evaluating the argument at the call site may have had side effects: keep them if they matter.

Task

Apply Remove Parameter to improve readability, coupling and consistency.

  1. Identify unused or derivable parameters.
  2. Remove each from the declaration and from all callers, then compile and run the tests.
  3. Add a one-line comment only where the removal is non-obvious; otherwise explain it in the report.
  4. Report parameters removed, callers updated, the commands run and their results, and anything left unverified (e.g. reflective or external callers).

Code to be Refactored:

Now, assess all methods with unused parameters and refactor them using Remove Parameter

04 同仓库更多 Skills

github
github/awesome-copilot

supabase-rls-policies

Write, review, and test Supabase Row Level Security (RLS) policies so that one user cannot read or change another user's rows. Use when creating or changing tables, policies, views, or security definer functions in a Supabase project, when reviewing a migration that touches RLS, or when asked to prove user isolation with pgTAP tests that sign in as two users.

测试与质量Skill与智能体开发
★ 4.1w
github
github/awesome-copilot

skill-distribution-audit

Audit a skill collection before release or investigate installer omissions, archived/template leakage, duplicate identities, and manifest drift. Reconcile the intended public source set, distribution manifest, and actual discovery output for a specified consumer version. Includes a deterministic set-comparison helper.

Skill与智能体开发
★ 4.1w
github
github/awesome-copilot

logicapps-custom-code-net10-migration

Migrate Azure Logic Apps Standard local-function custom-code projects from .NET 8 to .NET 10. Use for legacy Logic Apps custom-code workspace upgrades, project/package configuration, custom-worker settings, publication, and integrated VS Code debugging. Not for ordinary .NET applications, standalone Azure Functions, Consumption workflows, or cloud deployment.

开发工程师
★ 4.1w
github
github/awesome-copilot

winmd-api-search

Find and explore Windows desktop APIs. Use when building features that need platform capabilities — camera, file access, notifications, UI controls, AI/ML, sensors, networking, etc. Discovers the right API for a task and retrieves full type details (methods, properties, events, enumeration values).

开发工程师后端与接口
★ 4.1w
github
github/awesome-copilot

resemble-detect

Deepfake detection and media safety — detect AI-generated audio, images, video, and text, trace synthesis sources, apply watermarks, verify speaker identity, and analyze media intelligence using Resemble AI

后端与接口图像与多媒体
★ 4.1w
github
github/awesome-copilot

quality-playbook

Run a complete quality engineering audit on any codebase. Derives behavioral requirements from the code, generates spec-traced functional tests, runs a three-pass code review with regression tests, executes a multi-model spec audit (Council of Three), and produces a consolidated bug report with TDD-verified patches. Finds the 35% of real defects that structural code review alone cannot catch. Works with any language. Trigger on 'quality playbook', 'spec audit', 'Council of Three', 'fitness-to-purpose', or 'coverage theater'.

代码审查Skill与智能体开发
★ 4.1w