analyzing-linux-kernel-rootkits
Detect kernel-level rootkits in Linux memory dumps using Volatility3 linux plugins (check_syscall, lsmod, hidden_modules), rkhunter system scanning, and /proc vs /sys discrepancy analysis to identify hooked syscalls, hidden kernel modules, and tampered system structures.
- License 许可
- Apache-2.0
- 最近更新
- 2026-08-31
- Stars
- ★ 3.6w
- Forks
- 4.4k
01 前言 Front Matter
- name
- analyzing-linux-kernel-rootkits
- tags
- [ "rootkit", "linux", "kernel", "volatility3", "memory-forensics", "malware-analysis", "rkhunter", "forensics" ]
- author
- mahipal
- domain
- cybersecurity
- license
- Apache-2.0
- version
- 1.0
- nist_csf
- [ "RS.AN-03", "DE.AE-02", "RS.MA-01" ]
- subdomain
- digital-forensics
- description
- Detect kernel-level rootkits in Linux memory dumps using Volatility3 linux plugins (check_syscall, lsmod, hidden_modules), rkhunter system scanning, and /proc vs /sys discrepancy analysis to identify hooked syscalls, hidden kernel modules, and tampered system structures.
- mitre_attack
- [ "T1014", "T1547.006", "T1564.001" ]
02 资源文件 3
- 许可证LICENSE11.0 KB
- 参考文档references/api-reference.md2.5 KB
- 脚本scripts/agent.py6.9 KB
03 SKILL.md 正文
Analyzing Linux Kernel Rootkits
Overview
Linux kernel rootkits operate at ring 0, modifying kernel data structures to hide processes, files, network connections, and kernel modules from userspace tools. Detection requires either memory forensics (analyzing physical memory dumps with Volatility3) or cross-view analysis (comparing /proc, /sys, and kernel data structures for inconsistencies). This skill covers using Volatility3 Linux plugins to detect syscall table hooks, hidden kernel modules, and modified function pointers, supplemented by live system scanning with rkhunter and chkrootkit.
When to Use
- When investigating security incidents that require analyzing linux kernel rootkits
- When building detection rules or threat hunting queries for this domain
- When SOC analysts need structured procedures for this analysis type
- When validating security monitoring coverage for related attack techniques
Prerequisites
- Volatility3 installed (pip install volatility3)
- Linux memory dump (acquired via LiME, AVML, or /proc/kcore)
- Volatility3 Linux symbol table (ISF) matching the target kernel version
- rkhunter and chkrootkit for live system scanning
- Reference known-good kernel image for comparison
Steps
Step 1: Acquire Memory Dump
Capture Linux physical memory using LiME kernel module or AVML for cloud instances.
Step 2: Analyze with Volatility3
Run linux.check_syscall, linux.lsmod, linux.hidden_modules, and linux.check_idt plugins to detect rootkit artifacts.
Step 3: Cross-View Analysis
Compare module lists from /proc/modules, lsmod, and /sys/module to identify modules hidden from one view but present in another.
Step 4: Live System Scanning
Run rkhunter and chkrootkit to detect known rootkit signatures, suspicious files, and modified system binaries.
Expected Output
JSON report containing detected syscall hooks, hidden kernel modules, modified IDT entries, suspicious /proc discrepancies, and rkhunter findings.
Example Output
$ sudo python3 rootkit_analyzer.py --memory /evidence/linux-mem.lime --profile Ubuntu2204
Linux Kernel Rootkit Analysis Report
=====================================
Memory Image: /evidence/linux-mem.lime
Kernel Version: 5.15.0-91-generic (Ubuntu 22.04 LTS)
Analysis Time: 2024-01-18 09:15:32 UTC
[+] Scanning syscall table for hooks...
Syscall Table Base: 0xffffffff82200300
Total syscalls checked: 449
HOOKED SYSCALLS DETECTED:
┌─────────┬──────────────────┬──────────────────────┬──────────────────────┐
│ NR │ Syscall │ Expected Address │ Current Address │
├─────────┼──────────────────┼──────────────────────┼──────────────────────┤
│ 0 │ sys_read │ 0xffffffff8139a0e0 │ 0xffffffffc0a12000 │
│ 2 │ sys_open │ 0xffffffff8139b340 │ 0xffffffffc0a12180 │
│ 78 │ sys_getdents64 │ 0xffffffff813f5210 │ 0xffffffffc0a12300 │
│ 62 │ sys_kill │ 0xffffffff8110c4a0 │ 0xffffffffc0a12480 │
└─────────┴──────────────────┴──────────────────────┴──────────────────────┘
WARNING: 4 syscall hooks detected - rootkit behavior confirmed
[+] Checking for hidden kernel modules...
Loaded modules (lsmod): 147
Modules in kobject list: 149
HIDDEN MODULES:
- "netfilter_helper" at 0xffffffffc0a10000 (size: 12288)
- "kworker_sched" at 0xffffffffc0a14000 (size: 8192)
[+] Scanning /proc for discrepancies...
Processes in task_struct list: 234
Processes visible in /proc: 231
HIDDEN PROCESSES:
- PID 31337 cmd: "[kworker/0:3]" (disguised as kernel thread)
- PID 31442 cmd: "rsyslogd" (fake, real rsyslogd is PID 892)
- PID 31500 cmd: "" (unnamed process)
[+] Checking IDT entries...
IDT entries scanned: 256
Modified entries: 0 (clean)
[+] Running rkhunter scan...
Checking for known rootkits: 68 variants checked
Diamorphine rootkit: WARNING - signatures match
System binary checks:
/usr/bin/ps: MODIFIED (SHA-256 mismatch)
/usr/bin/netstat: MODIFIED (SHA-256 mismatch)
/usr/bin/ls: MODIFIED (SHA-256 mismatch)
/usr/sbin/ss: OK
[+] Network analysis...
Hidden connections (not in /proc/net/tcp):
ESTABLISHED 0.0.0.0:0 -> 198.51.100.47:4443 (PID 31337)
ESTABLISHED 0.0.0.0:0 -> 198.51.100.47:8080 (PID 31442)
Summary:
Rootkit Type: Loadable Kernel Module (LKM)
Probable Family: Diamorphine variant
Syscall Hooks: 4 (read, open, getdents64, kill)
Hidden Modules: 2
Hidden Processes: 3
Hidden Connections: 2 (C2: 198.51.100.47)
Modified Binaries: 3 (/usr/bin/ps, netstat, ls)
Risk Level: CRITICAL
04 同仓库更多 Skills
verifying-build-provenance-with-slsa-sigstore
Verifies artifact signatures and SLSA provenance using Sigstore's cosign (verify, verify-attestation, verify-blob-attestation) and slsa-verifier (verify-artifact), enforcing keyless OIDC builder identity and source repo against SLSA Build levels. Use in CI/CD before deploying artifacts, when consuming third-party attestations, establishing a SLSA Build L3 pipeline, or confirming provenance during incident response or admission control.
validating-tpm-measured-boot-attestation
Verifies TPM 2.0 measured-boot integrity and remote attestation with tpm2-tools -- reading PCRs (tpm2_pcrread), replaying the boot event log, generating and checking signed quotes (tpm2_quote/tpm2_checkquote), and sealing secrets to a PCR policy. Use to confirm a system booted trusted firmware/kernel for Zero Trust device posture, detect boot-chain tampering via PCR drift, or build a golden-value baseline for fleet attestation.
validating-backup-integrity-for-recovery
Validates backup integrity through cryptographic hash verification, automated restore testing, corruption detection, and recoverability checks to confirm backups are reliable for disaster recovery and ransomware response. Use before relying on backups for recovery, when building post-backup validation pipelines, auditing backup infrastructure for compliance, or checking immutable/air-gapped backups for silent corruption or tampering.
triaging-windows-with-kape
Runs KAPE (Kroll Artifact Parser and Extractor) to collect targeted forensic artifacts (registry hives, $MFT, event logs, prefetch, browser data) via Targets and parse them with Modules wrapping Eric Zimmerman's EZ Tools (PECmd, MFTECmd, RECmd). Use during early incident containment/triage when full disk imaging is impractical but a defensible, parseable Windows artifact set is needed quickly, including at-scale remote collection.
triaging-vulnerabilities-with-ssvc-framework
Triages and prioritizes vulnerabilities with CISA's Stakeholder-Specific Vulnerability Categorization (SSVC) decision tree, weighing exploitation status (via the CISA KEV catalog and FIRST EPSS API), technical impact, automatability, and mission prevalence to output Track/Track*/Attend/Act decisions. Use when prioritizing vulnerability scan results (OpenVAS, Nessus, Qualys) for remediation planning beyond raw CVSS scores.
triaging-security-incident
Performs initial triage of security incidents using the NIST SP 800-61r3 and SANS PICERL frameworks, classifying incident type, assigning priority by business impact, and routing to the appropriate response team. Use when a SIEM/EDR alert needs human classification, concurrent alerts must be prioritized, or a user report or threat-intel IOC match requires initial incident categorization.