csharp-xunit
Get best practices for XUnit unit testing, including data-driven tests
- License 许可
- MIT
- 最近更新
- 2026-11-11
- Stars
- ★ 4.1w
- Forks
- 5.3k
01 前言 Front Matter
- name
- csharp-xunit
- description
- Get best practices for XUnit unit testing, including data-driven tests
02 资源文件 2
- 参考文档agents/openai.yaml166 B
- 参考文档HTML-REPORT.md6.5 KB
03 SKILL.md 正文
XUnit Best Practices
Your goal is to help me write effective unit tests with XUnit, covering both standard and data-driven testing approaches.
Project Setup
- Use a separate test project with naming convention
[ProjectName].Tests - Reference Microsoft.NET.Test.Sdk, xunit, and xunit.runner.visualstudio packages
- Create test classes that match the classes being tested (e.g.,
CalculatorTestsforCalculator) - Use .NET SDK test commands:
dotnet testfor running tests
Test Structure
- No test class attributes required (unlike MSTest/NUnit)
- Use fact-based tests with
[Fact]attribute for simple tests - Follow the Arrange-Act-Assert (AAA) pattern
- Name tests using the pattern
MethodName_Scenario_ExpectedBehavior - Use constructor for setup and
IDisposable.Dispose()for teardown - Use
IClassFixture<T>for shared context between tests in a class - Use
ICollectionFixture<T>for shared context between multiple test classes
Standard Tests
- Keep tests focused on a single behavior
- Avoid testing multiple behaviors in one test method
- Use clear assertions that express intent
- Include only the assertions needed to verify the test case
- Make tests independent and idempotent (can run in any order)
- Avoid test interdependencies
Data-Driven Tests
- Use
[Theory]combined with data source attributes - Use
[InlineData]for inline test data - Use
[MemberData]for method-based test data - Use
[ClassData]for class-based test data - Create custom data attributes by implementing
DataAttribute - Use meaningful parameter names in data-driven tests
Assertions
- Use
Assert.Equalfor value equality - Use
Assert.Samefor reference equality - Use
Assert.True/Assert.Falsefor boolean conditions - Use
Assert.Contains/Assert.DoesNotContainfor collections - Use
Assert.Matches/Assert.DoesNotMatchfor regex pattern matching - Use
Assert.Throws<T>orawait Assert.ThrowsAsync<T>to test exceptions - Use fluent assertions library for more readable assertions
Mocking and Isolation
- Consider using Moq or NSubstitute alongside XUnit
- Mock dependencies to isolate units under test
- Use interfaces to facilitate mocking
- Consider using a DI container for complex test setups
Test Organization
- Group tests by feature or component
- Use
[Trait("Category", "CategoryName")]for categorization - Use collection fixtures to group tests with shared dependencies
- Consider output helpers (
ITestOutputHelper) for test diagnostics - Skip tests conditionally with
Skip = "reason"in fact/theory attributes
04 同仓库更多 Skills
supabase-rls-policies
Write, review, and test Supabase Row Level Security (RLS) policies so that one user cannot read or change another user's rows. Use when creating or changing tables, policies, views, or security definer functions in a Supabase project, when reviewing a migration that touches RLS, or when asked to prove user isolation with pgTAP tests that sign in as two users.
skill-distribution-audit
Audit a skill collection before release or investigate installer omissions, archived/template leakage, duplicate identities, and manifest drift. Reconcile the intended public source set, distribution manifest, and actual discovery output for a specified consumer version. Includes a deterministic set-comparison helper.
logicapps-custom-code-net10-migration
Migrate Azure Logic Apps Standard local-function custom-code projects from .NET 8 to .NET 10. Use for legacy Logic Apps custom-code workspace upgrades, project/package configuration, custom-worker settings, publication, and integrated VS Code debugging. Not for ordinary .NET applications, standalone Azure Functions, Consumption workflows, or cloud deployment.
winmd-api-search
Find and explore Windows desktop APIs. Use when building features that need platform capabilities — camera, file access, notifications, UI controls, AI/ML, sensors, networking, etc. Discovers the right API for a task and retrieves full type details (methods, properties, events, enumeration values).
resemble-detect
Deepfake detection and media safety — detect AI-generated audio, images, video, and text, trace synthesis sources, apply watermarks, verify speaker identity, and analyze media intelligence using Resemble AI
quality-playbook
Run a complete quality engineering audit on any codebase. Derives behavioral requirements from the code, generates spec-traced functional tests, runs a three-pass code review with regression tests, executes a multi-model spec audit (Council of Three), and produces a consolidated bug report with TDD-verified patches. Finds the 35% of real defects that structural code review alone cannot catch. Works with any language. Trigger on 'quality playbook', 'spec audit', 'Council of Three', 'fitness-to-purpose', or 'coverage theater'.