tax-impact

<!-- bic:source=blank -->

Illustrative tax impact

Retrieve the paired synthetic records and controls. Present the fixed illustrative calculation and unresolved professional-review questions, not tax advice. Use the requested fictional record or the configured PORT-5001 default; never reuse its figures for another record or invent missing inputs.

PORT-5001 quantity bindings

The VTI example has these distinct scopes:

• Entire VTI position value: $4,357,500.
• Entire VTI position cost basis: $3,800,000. This is neither the portfolio's aggregate basis nor the basis allocated to the reduction.
• Reduction candidate: $622,500.
• Exact reduction fraction: $622,500 / $4,357,500 = 1/7.
• Proportional gain: ($4,357,500 - $3,800,000) multiplied by 1/7 = $79,642.857..., displayed as $79,643.
• Applied illustrative rate: 20.0% long-term capital gains + 3.8% NIIT = 23.8%.
• Illustrative Tax Estimate: unrounded proportional gain multiplied by 23.8% = $18,955.

The numerical example includes NIIT. Whether either assumption legally applies to an actual client remains unknown pending qualified review; that uncertainty does not change which rates the fixed example used.

The other packaged references are short-term capital gains 37.0%, ordinary income 37.0%, and qualified dividends 20.0%. They are not additional rates applied to this VTI example.

Response shape

Return only:

1. Portfolio ID, VTI reduction-candidate scope and source citation.
2. The five packaged rate assumptions, clearly identifying the two components of the 23.8% illustrative rate.
3. A field/value table with explicit whole-position versus reduction scopes, exact reduction fraction, proportional gain, applied illustrative rate and Illustrative Tax Estimate. Label the arithmetic as illustrative/derived. Use 1/7 in the gain calculation and the unrounded proportional gain in the tax calculation; round only displayed results, not intermediate calculation inputs.
4. The required review block below, reproduced without elaboration. Rendering and list markers may vary, but do not add examples or explanations.
5. The exact footer below.

Required review block

These are required human reviews, not completed approvals:

• Tax lots and holding periods: a qualified tax professional must validate them.
• Account type and rate applicability, including NIIT: a qualified tax professional must validate them.
• Client suitability: a licensed financial advisor must review it.
• Actual eligibility and tax outcomes remain unknown.

Do not expand this block into account-category examples, eligibility criteria, statutory tests, tax-treatment explanations or benefit mechanisms. Use provided holding-period labels only; do not add a statutory day/year test. Do not append strategy recommendations, personal intake or additional systems. If strategy themes are explicitly requested separately, only the packaged themes may be presented as qualified-review questions, without elaborating their benefits.

End every substantive answer with exactly:

Synthetic portfolio evidence only; not investment, tax, legal, retirement, or financial advice. No order or transaction occurred. Licensed human review required.

Locked example

Persona: Paraplanner

Prompt: What tax assumptions should the advisor validate for the rebalance candidate?

Expected synthetic evidence: Illustrative Tax Estimate, VTI.