AGENT SKILL

pov-line-generator

Use this skill when the user asks for a point of view, punchy line, positioning sentence, provocative statement, headline angle, opinion line, or concise strategic stance.

License 许可
MIT
最近更新
2026-11-13
Stars
★ 105
Forks
120

01 前言 Front Matter

name
pov-line-generator
description
Use this skill when the user asks for a point of view, punchy line, positioning sentence, provocative statement, headline angle, opinion line, or concise strategic stance.

02 资源文件 2

03 SKILL.md 正文

POV Line Generator

Use this skill to generate concise, distinctive point-of-view lines that help a user frame an argument, post, slide, campaign, or talk.

What makes a good POV line

A strong POV line should:

  • Take a clear stance.
  • Be specific enough to be meaningful.
  • Avoid generic trend commentary.
  • Create useful tension without becoming clickbait.
  • Be easy to reuse as a post opener, slide headline, talk premise, campaign angle, or executive summary line.

Inputs to look for

  • Topic or theme.
  • Audience.
  • Desired stance or tension.
  • Channel: LinkedIn, slide, keynote, blog, proposal, campaign, workshop.
  • Tone: practical, provocative, premium, accessible, technical, executive, conversational.
  • Words to include or avoid.

Workflow

  1. Identify the underlying argument, not just the topic.
  2. Look for a tension: common belief vs better belief, adoption vs transformation, activity vs value, tooling vs operating model, speed vs control, scale vs quality.
  3. Generate one recommended line first.
  4. Provide alternatives grouped by style.
  5. Keep each line concise and useful.
  6. Do not invent evidence or claims.

Output format

## Recommended POV line

[One strong line]

## Alternatives

### More direct
- [Line]
- [Line]

### More provocative
- [Line]
- [Line]

### More executive
- [Line]
- [Line]

## Why the recommended line works

[One short explanation]

References

This skill includes supporting reference material. Read the relevant reference file when the task needs additional structure, rubric detail, examples, or checklist support.

  • references/pov-patterns.md - use this when additional structure, examples, or checks are useful for the task.

Quality checklist

Before responding, check:

  • The line has a clear point of view.
  • It is not interchangeable with any other topic.
  • It avoids empty hype.
  • It can plausibly open a post, slide, talk, or section.
  • The alternatives are meaningfully different, not minor rewrites.

04 同仓库更多 Skills

microsoft
microsoft/cat-agent-skills

stakeholder-and-decision-map

Mines customer interactions to identify stakeholders, infer their likely roles and engagement, map the decision process, and highlight who or what may be missing. Use when asked to "map a deal's buying group", identify influential or missing stakeholders, "assess who has gone quiet", or "explain how the customer will decide". Do not use for phased engagement plans, contact sequences, choosing or drafting outreach to the single next contact, seller or team performance reviews, or contacting, scheduling, or changing records.

★ 105
microsoft
microsoft/cat-agent-skills

sales-progress-update

Creates or refreshes a sales progress update for a manager or team about work done, deal movement, pending outcomes, supported forecast position, and help needed. Use when asked to "create my weekly sales update", "refresh my sales progress deck", "report my forecast position", "where do I stand against my quarter forecast", or "catch my manager up on committed deals". Do NOT use for non-sales project updates, a since-date deal change digest, momentum or blocker analysis, meeting prep, or outreach drafting.

★ 105
microsoft
microsoft/cat-agent-skills

submission-assemble

Put the checked CSR or 510(k) sections together in template order with a reviewer-facing open-items register, as a draft package for human sign-off. Use when the user asks "assemble the CSR draft", "put the module together for review", "build the review package with the open items on top", "compile the 510(k) sections in order" or "package this up for the submission lead". Do NOT use for assembling an unchecked draft - use consistency-check instead. Do NOT use for loading protocol, SAP or TLF sources - use source-ingest instead. Do NOT use for compiling general documents or slide decks - use the built-in docx or pptx skill instead. Do NOT use for filing or submitting to a regulator - use the sponsor's validated gateway, operated by a human, instead. Guardrail: draft for human approval only (L1); status is draft_clean or draft_open_items, never submitted.

行政与办公人员文档处理演示文稿
★ 105
microsoft
microsoft/cat-agent-skills

source-ingest

Pull every number, date and population definition out of a study's protocol, SAP, TLF tables, investigator brochure and prior approved text into one cited fact map, keyed per config/field-dictionary.json, before any CSR or 510(k) section is written. Use when the user asks "here's the locked TLF set and SAP, set up the CSR", "load the protocol and tables before we start drafting", "what figures do we have from the database lock?", "pull the disposition counts out of Table 14.1.1" or "ingest the IB for the 510(k)". Do NOT use for drafting or assembling submission sections - use section-draft or submission-assemble instead. Do NOT use for reconciling a patient's medications - use the discharge-care-transition plugin instead. Guardrail: reads and cites sources only; never estimates, rounds or invents a fact.

★ 105
microsoft
microsoft/cat-agent-skills

section-plan

Work out which sections a CSR or 510(k) requires, from the templates in config, check each one against the cited fact map, and name what is missing before a word is drafted. Use when the user asks "what do we still need before we can draft the CSR?", "which sections are ready to start?", "what's blocking the performance data section?", "do we have everything for the synopsis?" or "map our tables to the E3 structure". Do NOT use for writing section language - use section-draft instead. Do NOT use for cross-checking a finished draft - use consistency-check instead. Do NOT use for outlining general Word documents or business reports - use the built-in docx skill instead. Only structures with a template in config are supported. Guardrail: plans only; never marks a section ready on a missing fact and never invents a structure.

文档处理
★ 105
microsoft
microsoft/cat-agent-skills

section-draft

Write or revise the language for one planned CSR or 510(k) section - synopsis, efficacy, safety, discussion, device description - using only figures already in the cited fact map, each with its TLF or SAP citation. Use when the user asks "draft the Synopsis from our locked tables", "write up safety from Table 14.3.1", "give me a first pass at the discussion", "draft the device description for the 510(k)" or "tighten the wording of the Discussion section". Do NOT use for supplying a number not already in source_facts - use source-ingest instead. Do NOT use for verifying a draft's figures - use consistency-check instead. Do NOT use for appeal letters, clinical notes or discharge summaries - use the matching HLS plugin instead. Guardrail: drafts for human approval only (L1); never asserts an unsourced number or harmonises two figures.

★ 105