AGENT SKILL

analyze-test-run

Analyze a GitHub Actions integration test run and produce a skill invocation report with failure root-cause issues. TRIGGERS: analyze test run, skill invocation rate, test run report, compare test runs, skill invocation summary, test failure analysis, run report, test results, action run report

License 许可
MIT
最近更新
2026-11-13
Stars
★ 264
Forks
225

01 前言 Front Matter

name
analyze-test-run
license
MIT
metadata
{ "author": "Microsoft", "version": "1.0.6" }
description
Analyze a GitHub Actions integration test run and produce a skill invocation report with failure root-cause issues. TRIGGERS: analyze test run, skill invocation rate, test run report, compare test runs, skill invocation summary, test failure analysis, run report, test results, action run report

02 资源文件 2

03 SKILL.md 正文

Analyze Test Run

Downloads artifacts from a GitHub Actions integration test run, generates a summarized skill invocation report, and files GitHub issues for each test failure with root-cause analysis.

When to Use

  • Summarize results of a GitHub Actions integration test run
  • Calculate skill invocation rates for the skill under test
  • For azure-deploy tests: track the full deployment chain (azure-prepare → azure-validate → azure-deploy)
  • Compare skill invocation across two runs
  • File issues for test failures with root-cause context

Input

Parameter Required Description
Run ID or URL Yes GitHub Actions run ID (e.g. 22373768875) or full URL
Comparison Run No Second run ID/URL for side-by-side comparison

MCP Tools

All tools use owner: "microsoft" and repo: "GitHub-Copilot-for-Azure" as fixed parameters. method selects the operation within the tool.

Tool method Key Parameter Purpose
actions_get get_workflow_run resource_id: run ID Fetch run status and metadata
actions_list list_workflow_run_artifacts resource_id: run ID List all artifacts for a run
actions_get download_workflow_run_artifact resource_id: artifact ID Get a temporary download URL for an artifact ZIP
get_job_logs — run_id + failed_only: true Retrieve job logs when artifact content is inaccessible
search_issues — query: search string Find existing open issues before creating new ones
create_issue — title, body, labels, assignees File a new GitHub issue for a test failure

Workflow

Phase 1 — Download & Parse

  1. Extract the numeric run ID from the input (strip URL prefix if needed)

  2. Fetch run metadata using the MCP actions_get tool:

    actions_get({ method: "get_workflow_run", owner: "microsoft", repo: "GitHub-Copilot-for-Azure", resource_id: "<run-id>" })
    
  3. List artifacts using the MCP actions_list tool, then download each relevant artifact:

    // List artifacts
    actions_list({ method: "list_workflow_run_artifacts", owner: "microsoft", repo: "GitHub-Copilot-for-Azure", resource_id: "<run-id>" })
    // Download individual artifacts by ID
    actions_get({ method: "download_workflow_run_artifact", owner: "microsoft", repo: "GitHub-Copilot-for-Azure", resource_id: "<artifact-id>" })
    

    The download returns a temporary URL. Fetch the ZIP archive from that URL and extract it locally. If the environment restricts outbound HTTP (e.g. AWF sandbox), record in the analysis report that artifact content was unavailable and fall back to job logs via the get_job_logs MCP tool.

  4. Locate these files in the downloaded artifacts:

    • junit.xml — test pass/fail/skip/error results
    • *-SKILL-REPORT.md — generated skill report with per-test details
    • agent-metadata-*.md files — raw agent session logs per test

    ⚠️ Note: If artifact ZIP files cannot be downloaded due to network restrictions, or if downloaded files cannot be extracted, use the get_job_logs MCP tool to identify test failures and produce a best-effort analysis from whatever data is accessible.

Phase 2 — Build Summary Report

Produce a markdown report with four sections. See report-format.md for the exact template.

Section 1 — Test Results Overview

Parse junit.xml to build:

Metric Value
Total tests count from <testsuites tests=…>
Executed total − skipped
Skipped count of <skipped/> elements
Passed executed − failures − errors
Failed count of <failure> elements
Test Pass Rate passed / executed as %

Include a per-test table with name, duration (from time attribute, convert seconds to Xm Ys), and Pass/Fail result.

Section 2 — Skill Invocation Rate

Read the SKILL-REPORT.md "Per-Test Case Results" sections. For each executed test determine whether the skill under test was invoked.

The skills to track depend on which integration test suite the run belongs to:

azure-deploy integration tests — track the full deployment chain:

Skill How to detect
azure-prepare Mentioned as invoked in the narrative or agent-metadata
azure-validate Mentioned as invoked in the narrative or agent-metadata
azure-deploy Mentioned as invoked in the narrative or agent-metadata

Build a per-test invocation matrix (Yes/No for each skill) and compute rates:

Skill Invocation Rate
azure-deploy X% (n/total)
azure-prepare X% (n/total)
azure-validate X% (n/total)
Full skill chain (P→V→D) X% (n/total)

The azure-deploy integration tests exercise the full deployment workflow where the agent is expected to invoke azure-prepare, azure-validate, and azure-deploy in sequence. This three-skill chain tracking is specific to azure-deploy tests only.

All other integration tests — track only the skill under test:

Skill Invocation Rate
{skill-under-test} X% (n/total)

For non-deploy tests (e.g. azure-prepare, azure-ai, azure-kusto), only track whether the primary skill under test was invoked. Do not include azure-prepare/azure-validate/azure-deploy chain columns.

Section 3 — Report Confidence & Pass Rate

Extract from SKILL-REPORT.md:

  • Skill Invocation Success Rate (from the report's statistics section)
  • Overall Test Pass Rate (from the report's statistics section)
  • Average Confidence (from the report's statistics section)

Section 4 — Comparison (only when a second run is provided)

Repeat Phase 1–3 for the second run, then produce a side-by-side delta table. See report-format.md § Comparison.

Phase 3 — File Issues for Failures

For every test with a <failure> element in junit.xml:

  1. Read the failure message and file:line from the XML
  2. Read the actual line of code from the test file at that location
  3. Read the agent-metadata-*.md for that test from the artifacts
  4. Read the corresponding section in the SKILL-REPORT.md for context on what the agent did
  5. Determine root cause category:
    • Skill not invoked — agent bypassed skills and used manual commands
    • Deployment failure — infrastructure or RBAC error during deployment
    • Timeout — test exceeded time limit
    • Assertion mismatch — expected files/links not found
    • Quota exhaustion — Azure region quota prevented deployment
  6. Search for existing open issue before creating a new one using the search_issues MCP tool:
    search_issues({
      owner: "microsoft", repo: "GitHub-Copilot-for-Azure",
      query: "Integration test failure: {skill} in:title is:open"
    })
    
    Match criteria: an open issue whose title and body describe a similar problem. If a match is found, skip issue creation for this failure and note the existing issue number(s) in the summary report.
  7. If no existing issue was found, create a GitHub issue using the create_issue MCP tool, assign the label with the name of the skill, and assign it to the code owners listed in .github/CODEOWNERS file based on which skill it is for:
create_issue({
  owner: "microsoft", repo: "GitHub-Copilot-for-Azure",
  title: "Integration test failure: <skill> – <keywords> [<root-cause-category>]",
  labels: ["bug", "integration-test", "test-failure", "<skill>"],
  body: "<body>",
  assignees: ["<codeowners>"]
})

Title format: Integration test failure: {skill} – {keywords} [{root-cause-category}]

  • {keywords}: 2-4 words from the test name — app type (function app, static web app) + IaC type (Terraform, Bicep) + trigger if relevant
  • {root-cause-category}: one of the categories from step 5 in brackets

Issue body template — see issue-template.md.

⚠️ Note: Do NOT include the Error Details (JUnit XML) or Agent Metadata sections in the issue body. Keep issues concise with the diagnosis, prompt context, skill report context, and environment sections only. ⚠️ Note: Do NOT create issues for skill invocation test failures.

For azure-deploy integration tests, include an "azure-deploy Skill Invocation" section showing whether azure-deploy was invoked (Yes/No), with a note that the full chain is azure-prepare → azure-validate → azure-deploy. For all other integration tests, include a "{skill} Skill Invocation" section showing only whether the primary skill under test was invoked.

Error Handling

Error Cause Fix
no artifacts found Run has no uploadable reports Verify the run completed the "Export report" step
HTTP 404 on actions_get Invalid run ID or no access Check the run ID and ensure the MCP token has repo access
rate limit exceeded Too many GitHub API calls Wait and retry; reduce concurrent MCP tool calls
Artifact ZIP download blocked AWF sandbox restricts outbound HTTP to blob storage Use get_job_logs MCP tool to get failure details from job logs; produce best-effort analysis from metadata

References

04 同仓库更多 Skills

microsoft
microsoft/GitHub-Copilot-for-Azure

azure-advisor-cost-optimization

Analyze Azure Advisor Cost/IdleResources findings and prevalidate deletion safety, including Service Groups. WHEN: "find unused Azure resources", "what resources am I paying for but no longer using", "idle-resource savings", "historical idle-resource savings", "are these idle resources safe to delete". Generic Cost, other subcategories, and cross-category requests use azure-advisor.

★ 264
microsoft
microsoft/GitHub-Copilot-for-Azure

foundry-iq

Foundry IQ knowledge bases. WHEN: make local or Blob documents searchable; create/diagnose KBs; triage unsupported connectors or multi-source KB creation/reconfiguration (even with classic-search terms); connect existing KB to agents (including multi-source KBs); create/reuse a Search service; retrieve from an existing knowledge base with citations; no brand words needed. Read its procedure before query/target questions. NOT: other KB providers, repository-file search, classic Azure AI Search index/query/app work with no Foundry IQ KB or connector request, generic agent creation.

Skill与智能体开发
★ 264
microsoft
microsoft/GitHub-Copilot-for-Azure

python-appservice-deploy

Deploy Python (Flask/Django/FastAPI) code to Azure App Service Linux. WHEN: "Flask App Service", "Django App Service", "FastAPI App Service", "deploy Python to App Service". DO NOT USE FOR: Container Apps, Functions, non-Python, Terraform/Bicep/IaC, full infra — use azure-prepare.

运维与部署
★ 264
microsoft
microsoft/GitHub-Copilot-for-Azure

preset

Intelligently deploys Azure OpenAI models to optimal regions by analyzing capacity across all available regions. Automatically checks current region first and shows alternatives if needed. USE FOR: quick deployment, optimal region, best region, automatic region selection, fast setup, multi-region capacity check, high availability deployment, deploy to best location. DO NOT USE FOR: custom SKU selection (use customize), specific version selection (use customize), custom capacity configuration (use customize), PTU deployments (use customize).

运维与部署Skill与智能体开发
★ 264
microsoft
microsoft/GitHub-Copilot-for-Azure

customize

Interactive guided deployment flow for Azure OpenAI models with full customization control. Step-by-step selection of model version, SKU (GlobalStandard/Standard/ProvisionedManaged), capacity, RAI policy (content filter), and advanced options (dynamic quota, priority processing, spillover). USE FOR: custom deployment, customize model deployment, choose version, select SKU, set capacity, configure content filter, RAI policy, deployment options, detailed deployment, advanced deployment, PTU deployment, provisioned throughput. DO NOT USE FOR: quick deployment to optimal region (use preset).

Skill与智能体开发
★ 264
microsoft
microsoft/GitHub-Copilot-for-Azure

capacity

Discovers available Azure OpenAI model capacity across regions and projects. Analyzes quota limits, compares availability, and recommends optimal deployment locations based on capacity requirements. USE FOR: find capacity, check quota, where can I deploy, capacity discovery, best region for capacity, multi-project capacity search, quota analysis, model availability, region comparison, check TPM availability. DO NOT USE FOR: actual deployment (hand off to preset or customize after discovery), quota increase requests (direct user to Azure Portal), listing existing deployments.

★ 264